Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,007 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Abnormal placentation in which the placenta implants in the lower segment of the uterus (the zone of dilation) and may cover part or all of the opening of the cervix. It is often associated with serious antepartum bleeding and premature labor.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Placenta Praevia.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Obstetric Labor Complications; Placenta Diseases
Related concepts
- Placenta
- Uterus
- Cervix Uteri
- Premature Labor
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 3,675 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Placenta Previa” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 755 of them (20.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,749 records.
Reviews account for 265 records (7.2%) and meta-analyses for 57. Randomized controlled trials number 26 (0.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 1,749 |
| 2000-2009 | 344 |
| 2010-2019 | 827 |
| 2020 onward | 755 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 265 | 7.2% |
| Meta-analyses | 57 | 1.6% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 26 | 0.7% |
Method: PubMed query "Placenta Previa"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.
Reading the evidence in kidney, urology and women's health
Kidney, urinary and reproductive health research uses lab markers (such as creatinine), imaging, symptom scores and registry data on pregnancy and birth. Findings about pregnancy are especially sensitive to who was studied and when in pregnancy exposure occurred. Nothing on this page is advice about treatment, fertility or pregnancy; speak to a qualified clinician. Check the population, the outcome measured and whether the study accounted for other health differences between groups.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impact of aging on obstetric outcomes: defining advanced maternal age in Barcelona | 2019 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 71 | cc by PMID 31547808 · DOI · PMC6757376 |
| Association of Placenta Previa With Severe Maternal Morbidity Among Patients With Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder | 2022 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 34 | cc by PMID 35994286 · DOI · PMC9396360 |
| Adverse effects of endometriosis on pregnancy: a case-control study | 2019 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 30 | cc by PMID 31640604 · DOI · PMC6805464 |
| Intraoperative Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Evaluation for Placenta Accreta Spectrum in Placenta Previa: A Retrospective Observational Study | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1 | cc by PMID 42244252 · DOI · PMC13238295 |
Impact of aging on obstetric outcomes: defining advanced maternal age in Barcelona [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundWomen of advanced maternal age (AMA) are a growing population, with higher obstetric risks.
- Closing excerpt
- Age ≥ 40 years was associated to relevant increased risks and reveals to be an adequate cut-off to define AMA in our population.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (208 words)
BackgroundWomen of advanced maternal age (AMA) are a growing population, with higher obstetric risks. The Mediterranean population has specific characteristics different from other areas. Thus, the objective of this study was to establish a cut-off to define AMA in a selected mediterranean population coming from a tertiary referral private/mutual health hospital in Barcelona.MethodsRetrospective cohort of euploid singleton pregnancies delivered from January 2007 to June 2017. Main maternal outcomes were: gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, placenta previa, c-section and prolonged hospitalization (≥ 7 days). Main adverse perinatal outcomes were: stillbirth, prematurity, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, low birth weight, need of admission at a neonatal intensive care unit and perinatal mortality. Adjustment for confounding factors (smoking, previous comorbilities, parity, assisted reproductive techniques (ART) and obesity) was performed.ResultsA total of 25054 pregnancies were included. Mean maternal age was 34.7 ± 4.2 years, with 2807 patients in the group of age between 40 and 44 years (11.2%) and 280 patients ≥45 years (1.1%). Women at AMA had higher incidence of previous comorbilities (compared to the reference group of women ConclusionsMaternal age is an independent risk factor for adverse obstetric outcomes. Age ≥ 40 years was associated to relevant increased risks and reveals to be an adequate cut-off to define AMA in our population.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31547808 · DOI · PMC6757376
Association of Placenta Previa With Severe Maternal Morbidity Among Patients With Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ImportancePlacenta previa is widely acknowledged as a risk factor for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders, which are severe maternal complications; however, data are limited regarding whether placenta previa is associated with a higher risk of worse maternal outcomes among patients with PAS disorders.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings suggest that interventions to alleviate maternal and surgical morbidities are especially needed for patients with placenta previa-complicated PAS disorders.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (318 words)
ImportancePlacenta previa is widely acknowledged as a risk factor for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders, which are severe maternal complications; however, data are limited regarding whether placenta previa is associated with a higher risk of worse maternal outcomes among patients with PAS disorders.ObjectiveTo examine the association between placenta previa and the risk of severe maternal morbidities (SMMs) and higher resource use among patients with PAS disorders.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study extracted records of 3793 patients with PAS diagnosis and delivery indicators between October 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, from the US National Inpatient Sample database.ExposuresPlacenta previa.Main outcomes and measuresData on 21 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined SMMs and 25 study-defined surgical morbidities associated with PAS were extracted. Six surgical procedures (cystoscopy, intra-arterial balloon occlusion, cesarean delivery, hysterectomy, cystectomy, and oophorectomy), hospital length of stay, and inpatient costs were compared. Multivariable Poisson regression models built in the generalized estimating equation framework were used.ResultsAmong 3793 patients with PAS (median [IQR] age at admission, 33 [29-37] years), 621 women (16.4%) were Black, 765 (20.2%) were Hispanic, 1779 (46.9%) were White, 441 (11.6%) were of other races and/or ethnicities (47 [1.2%] were American Indian, 220 [5.8%] were Asian or Pacific Islander, and 174 [4.6%] were of multiple or other races and/or ethnicities), and 187 (4.9%) were of unknown race and ethnicity. A total of 1323 patients (34.9%) had placenta previa and 2470 patients (65.1%) did not; of those with placenta previa, 405 patients (30.6%) had invasive PAS. Patients with vs without placenta previa had a significantly higher rate and risk of any SMM (935 women [70.7%] vs 1087 women [44.0%]; P Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, placenta previa was associated with an increased risk of maternal and surgical morbidities and higher resource use among women with PAS. These findings suggest that interventions to alleviate maternal and surgical morbidities are especially needed for patients with placenta previa-complicated PAS disorders.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35994286 · DOI · PMC9396360
Adverse effects of endometriosis on pregnancy: a case-control study [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundEndometriosis is a common disease occurring in 1-2% of all women of reproductive age.
- Closing excerpt
- However, clinicians should be alert to this potential increased risk and manage these patients accordingly.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (233 words)
BackgroundEndometriosis is a common disease occurring in 1-2% of all women of reproductive age. Although there is increasing evidence on the association between endometriosis and adverse perinatal outcomes, little is known about the effect of pre-pregnancy treatments for endometriosis on subsequent perinatal outcomes. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with endometriosis and to investigate whether pre-pregnancy surgical treatment would affect these outcomes.MethodsThis case-control study included 2769 patients who gave birth at Nagoya University Hospital located in Japan between 2010 and 2017. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the endometriosis group (n = 80) and the control group (n = 2689). The endometriosis group was further divided into two groups: patients with a history of surgical treatment such as cystectomy for ovarian endometriosis, ablation or excision of endometriotic implants, or adhesiolysis (surgical treatment group, n = 49) and those treated with only medications or without any treatment (non-surgical treatment group, n = 31).ResultsIn the univariate analysis, placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage were significantly increased in the endometriosis group compared to the control group (12.5% vs. 4.1%, p ConclusionWomen who have had surgical treatment for their endometriosis appear to have a higher risk for placenta previa. This may be due to the more severe stage of endometriosis often found in these patients. However, clinicians should be alert to this potential increased risk and manage these patients accordingly.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31640604 · DOI · PMC6805464
Intraoperative Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Evaluation for Placenta Accreta Spectrum in Placenta Previa: A Retrospective Observational Study [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- AimTo assess the utility of intraoperative transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) in evaluating the duration of blood flow in cervical hypervascularity as a real time diagnostic marker for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in placenta previa.
- Closing excerpt
- A flow duration of < 7 min may help rule out PAS, while ≥ 14 min may suggest its presence and guide safer intraoperative management.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (248 words)
AimTo assess the utility of intraoperative transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) in evaluating the duration of blood flow in cervical hypervascularity as a real time diagnostic marker for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in placenta previa.MethodsThis single-center historical cohort study included patients with placenta previa with intraoperative TVUS. The primary outcome was blood flow persistence time, defined as the interval from fetal delivery to disappearance of low-velocity (≤ 2.0 cm/s) color Doppler signals in cervical hypervascularity. Two obstetricians independently reviewed surgical video recordings. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of flow persistence time for predicting PAS. The AUC was calculated to assess discrimination. Optimal cutoffs were based on sensitivity and specificity. Independent predictors of PAS were identified by multivariate regression.ResultsPAS was diagnosed in 20 cases (38.5%). Flow persistence time was significantly longer in PAS cases (20.20 ± 14.31 min) than in non-PAS cases (5.69 ± 2.46 min). A cut-off of 7 min achieved 100% sensitivity and 72% specificity (AUC = 0.94), reliably excluding PAS when flow ceased within this period. A threshold of ≥ 14 min yielded 100% positive predictive value for PAS and 96% specificity for predicting hysterectomy. Flow duration remained an independent predictor in multivariable analysis (AUC = 0.95).ConclusionsIntraoperative assessment of cervical hypervascularity blood flow duration using TVUS may serve as a supportive indicator when PAS is suspected. A flow duration of < 7 min may help rule out PAS, while ≥ 14 min may suggest its presence and guide safer intraoperative management.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42244252 · DOI · PMC13238295
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa [5]
- Research article Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management: Green-top Guideline No. 27a [6]
- Research article Abnormal Placentation: Placenta Previa, Vasa Previa, and Placenta Accreta [7]
- Research article Effects of smoking during pregnancy. Five meta-analyses [8]
- Research article Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [9]
- Research article The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis [10]
References
- Claramonte Nieto M, Meler Barrabes E, Garcia Martínez S, Gutiérrez Prat M, Serra Zantop B. Impact of aging on obstetric outcomes: defining advanced maternal age in Barcelona. . 2019. PMID 31547808 · DOI · PMC6757376
- Han X, Guo Z, Yang X, Yang H, Ma J. Association of Placenta Previa With Severe Maternal Morbidity Among Patients With Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder. . 2022. PMID 35994286 · DOI · PMC9396360
- Miura M, Ushida T, Imai K, Wang J, Moriyama Y, Nakano-Kobayashi T, et al.. Adverse effects of endometriosis on pregnancy: a case-control study. . 2019. PMID 31640604 · DOI · PMC6805464
- Mitoma T, Sakata S, Suemori A, Ooba H, Hayata K, Maki J. Intraoperative Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Evaluation for Placenta Accreta Spectrum in Placenta Previa: A Retrospective Observational Study. . 2026. PMID 42244252 · DOI · PMC13238295
- Oyelese Y, Smulian JC. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID 16582134 · DOI
- Jauniaux E, Alfirevic Z, Bhide AG, Belfort MA, Burton GJ, Collins SL, et al.. Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management: Green-top Guideline No. 27a. BJOG. 2019. PMID 30260097 · DOI
- Silver RM. Abnormal Placentation: Placenta Previa, Vasa Previa, and Placenta Accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID 26244528 · DOI
- Castles A, Adams EK, Melvin CL, Kelsch C, Boulton ML. Effects of smoking during pregnancy. Five meta-analyses. Am J Prev Med. 1999. PMID 10198660 · DOI
- Jauniaux E, Bhide A. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID 28268196 · DOI
- Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997. PMID 9396896 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.