Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Breech Presentation
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Breech Presentation

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 6 min read

A malpresentation of the fetus at near term or during obstetric labor with the fetal cephalic pole in the fundus of the uterus.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,256 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A malpresentation of the fetus at near term or during obstetric labor with the fetal cephalic pole in the fundus of the uterus. There are three types of breech: the complete breech with flexed hips and knees; the incomplete breech with one or both hips partially or fully extended; the frank breech with flexed hips and extended knees.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Presentation, Breech; Fetal Presentation, Breech; Breech Fetal Presentation; Presentation, Breech Fetal; Labor Presentation, Breech; Breech Labor Presentation; Presentation, Breech Labor; Frank Breech Presentation.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Obstetric Labor Complications; Labor Presentation

Related concepts

  • Fetus
  • Obstetric Labor
  • Uterus

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 3,515 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Breech Presentation” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 402 of them (11.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,683 records.

Reviews account for 314 records (8.9%) and meta-analyses for 53. Randomized controlled trials number 111 (3.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,683 records; 2000-2009: 716 records; 2010-2019: 714 records; 2020 onward: 402 records1,683through 19997162000-20097142010-20194022020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,683
2000-2009716
2010-2019714
2020 onward402
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 8.9 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.2 percentReviews8.9% (314)Meta-analyses1.5% (53)Randomized controlled trials3.2% (111)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 3,515 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3148.9%
Meta-analyses531.5%
Randomized controlled trials1113.2%

Method: PubMed query "Breech Presentation"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
A descriptive analysis of the indications for caesarean section in mainland China
Liu Y, Li G, Chen Y, Wang X, Ruan Y, Zou L, et al.
2014Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
55cc by
PMID 25495550 · DOI · PMC4269966
Screening for breech presentation using universal late-pregnancy ultrasonography: A prospective cohort study and cost effectiveness analysis
Wastlund D, Moraitis AA, Dacey A, Sovio U, Wilson ECF, Smith GCS
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
35cc by
PMID 30990808 · DOI · PMC6467368
Practical insight into upright breech birth from birth videos: A structured analysis
Reitter A, Halliday A, Walker S
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
27cc by
PMID 31960492 · DOI · PMC7318698
Association between breech presentation in twins and developmental dysplasia of the hip
Jung B, Hollfelder J, Zur Strassen V, Bodelle B, Schulz M
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42446713 · DOI · PMC13525056

A descriptive analysis of the indications for caesarean section in mainland China [1]

Research article Liu Y, Li G, Chen Y, Wang X, Ruan Y, Zou L, et al. · · 2014 · cited 55 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundIn recent decades we have observed a remarkable increase in the rate of caesarean section (CS) in both developed and developing countries, especially in China.
Closing excerpt
Appropriate policies and guidelines should be considered to accomplish the goal.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (259 words)

BackgroundIn recent decades we have observed a remarkable increase in the rate of caesarean section (CS) in both developed and developing countries, especially in China. However, the real reasons for this phenomenon are uncertain. Notably, the number of women requesting elective CS without accepted valid medical indication has also increased, generating a nationwide debate because several studies have shown that this may be the underlying cause of the increase in CS rates observed recently. Therefore, we carried out a multicentre, large-sample, cross-sectional study to describe the CS rate and indications for CS in mainland China during 2011.MethodsThis was a multicentre, large-sample, cross-sectional study of women who delivered infants in 39 hospitals in 14 provinces in China during 2011. We selected 111, 315 deliveries that occurred during 2011, excluding miscarriages or termination of pregnancy before 28 gestational weeks.ResultsThe overall rate of CS in mainland China was 54.90%. The most common indication for CS was caesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR; 28.43%), followed by cephalo-pelvic disproportion (14.08%), fetal distress (12.46%), previous CS (10.25%), malpresentation and breech presentation (6.56%), macrosomia (6.10%) and other indications (22.12%). CDMR accounted for 15.53% of all the deliveries and 28.43% of all CS deliveries in mainland China.ConclusionsCDMR appears to be a considerable driver behind the increasing CS rate in mainland China. The relaxation of China's "one-child policy" may translate into a greater number of CS because of previous CS delivery. To decrease the CS rate, we should first decrease the rate of CS on maternal request. Appropriate policies and guidelines should be considered to accomplish the goal.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25495550 · DOI · PMC4269966

Screening for breech presentation using universal late-pregnancy ultrasonography: A prospective cohort study and cost effectiveness analysis [2]

Research article Wastlund D, Moraitis AA, Dacey A, Sovio U, Wilson ECF, Smith GCS · · 2019 · cited 35 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundDespite the relative ease with which breech presentation can be identified through ultrasound screening, the assessment of foetal presentation at term is often based on clinical examination only.
Closing excerpt
80 per woman.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (455 words)

BackgroundDespite the relative ease with which breech presentation can be identified through ultrasound screening, the assessment of foetal presentation at term is often based on clinical examination only. Due to limitations in this approach, many women present in labour with an undiagnosed breech presentation, with increased risk of foetal morbidity and mortality. This study sought to determine the cost effectiveness of universal ultrasound scanning for breech presentation near term (36 weeks of gestational age [wkGA]) in nulliparous women.Methods and findingsThe Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study was a prospective cohort study between January 14, 2008 and July 31, 2012, including 3,879 nulliparous women who attended for a research screening ultrasound examination at 36 wkGA. Foetal presentation was assessed and compared for the groups with and without a clinically indicated ultrasound. Where breech presentation was detected, an external cephalic version (ECV) was routinely offered. If the ECV was unsuccessful or not performed, the women were offered either planned cesarean section at 39 weeks or attempted vaginal breech delivery. To compare the likelihood of different mode of deliveries and associated long-term health outcomes for universal ultrasound to current practice, a probabilistic economic simulation model was constructed. Parameter values were obtained from the POP study, and costs were mainly obtained from the English National Health Service (NHS). One hundred seventy-nine out of 3,879 women (4.6%) were diagnosed with breech presentation at 36 weeks. For most women (96), there had been no prior suspicion of noncephalic presentation. ECV was attempted for 84 (46.9%) women and was successful in 12 (success rate: 14.3%). Overall, 19 of the 179 women delivered vaginally (10.6%), 110 delivered by elective cesarean section (ELCS) (61.5%) and 50 delivered by emergency cesarean section (EMCS) (27.9%). There were no women with undiagnosed breech presentation in labour in the entire cohort. On average, 40 scans were needed per detection of a previously undiagnosed breech presentation. The economic analysis indicated that, compared to current practice, universal late-pregnancy ultrasound would identify around 14,826 otherwise undiagnosed breech presentations across England annually. It would also reduce EMCS and vaginal breech deliveries by 0.7 and 1.0 percentage points, respectively: around 4,196 and 6,061 deliveries across England annually. Universal ultrasound would also prevent 7.89 neonatal mortalities annually. The strategy would be cost effective if foetal presentation could be assessed for £19.80 or less per woman. Limitations to this study included that foetal presentation was revealed to all women and that the health economic analysis may be altered by parity.ConclusionsAccording to our estimates, universal late pregnancy ultrasound in nulliparous women (1) would virtually eliminate undiagnosed breech presentation, (2) would be expected to reduce foetal mortality in breech presentation, and (3) would be cost effective if foetal presentation could be assessed for less than £19.80 per woman.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30990808 · DOI · PMC6467368

Practical insight into upright breech birth from birth videos: A structured analysis [3]

Research article Reitter A, Halliday A, Walker S · · 2020 · cited 27 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundWe aimed to identify common features of upright vaginal breech births with good outcomes to refine a physiological approach to teaching breech birth.
Closing excerpt
We introduce a physiological breech algorithm as an initial timekeeping framework for teaching, research, and practice.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (260 words)

BackgroundWe aimed to identify common features of upright vaginal breech births with good outcomes to refine a physiological approach to teaching breech birth.MethodsWe performed a structured analysis of 42 videos of successful upright breech births (eg, kneeling, hand/knees), facilitated by obstetricians (n = 34) and midwives (n = 8) in nine different countries. Precise timings and relevant clinical details were recorded on an Excel spreadsheet. Each video was analyzed twice by at least two members of the research team. Time-to-event intervals, frequencies of interventions, and descriptive statistics were calculated using SPSS.ResultsA completely spontaneous (labor mechanisms and maternal effort only) birth occurred in 14/42 (33%) cases. The median time between the birth of the fetal pelvis and the head in all births was 1:52 (IQR 1:05,2:46; min:sec). Lack of spontaneous rotation to a sacro-anterior position by the time the fetus had emerged to the nipple line was strongly associated with fetal arm entrapment. The following maneuvers were used: shoulder press to flex the aftercoming head in midpelvis or outlet (n = 24), sweeping down arm/s (n = 12), buttock lift to assist shoulder press (n = 6), modified Mauriceau (n = 6), rotational maneuvers to release an entrapped arm (n = 6), elevate and rotate fetal head to assist engagement (n = 2), and conversion into supine maternal position (n = 2).ConclusionsMost upright breech births occur within 3 minutes of the birth of the fetal pelvis. Upright breech birth attendants use variations of traditional maneuvers. We introduce a physiological breech algorithm as an initial timekeeping framework for teaching, research, and practice.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31960492 · DOI · PMC7318698

Association between breech presentation in twins and developmental dysplasia of the hip [4]

Research article Jung B, Hollfelder J, Zur Strassen V, Bodelle B, Schulz M · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundBreech presentation is considered one of the main risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in singleton pregnancies; however, data regarding twins are limited.
Closing excerpt
Level III evidence.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (282 words)

BackgroundBreech presentation is considered one of the main risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in singleton pregnancies; however, data regarding twins are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether breech presentation in twins is associated with abnormal hip ultrasound findings and to assess the influence of delivery mode, sex and gestational age.MethodsObstetric and ultrasound data from twin births at Frankfurt University Hospital between 2010 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 130 twins in whom at least 1 infant with breech presentation and both infants underwent hip ultrasound according to Graf's technique within the first 14 days after birth were included. Twins were divided into breech-breech, breech-vertex and breech-transverse groups. Hip findings were categorized as normal (Graf type Ia/Ib) or abnormal/immature (Graf type IIa or higher). Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact testing.ResultsNo infant demonstrated manifest DDH (Graf type IIc or higher). Overall, 5.4% of infants showed physiologically immature or abnormal hip ultrasound findings classified as Graf type IIa. No significant association was found between breech presentation and abnormal hip findings; however, abnormal findings were more common in the breech-transverse group compared to the breech-breech group (p = 0.037). Infants delivered via cesarean section demonstrated a higher rate of abnormal findings than vaginally delivered infants (p = 0.041).ConclusionIn this cohort, breech presentation in twins was not associated with an increased rate of abnormal hip ultrasound findings. The combination of breech and transverse presentation may represent a higher risk constellation. Due to the retrospective design and lack of a singleton control group, conclusions regarding a modifying effect of twin pregnancy on the occurrence of DDH cannot be drawn.Level of evidenceRetrospective cohort study. Level III evidence.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42446713 · DOI · PMC13525056

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery [5]
    · Obstet Gynecol · 2014 · cited 454 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery [6]
    ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice · Obstet Gynecol · 2006 · cited 131 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery [7]
    Kotaska A · BMJ · 2004 · cited 107 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis [8]
    Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, Mol BW, van der Post JA · Obstet Gynecol · 2008 · cited 100 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies [9]
    Berhan Y, Haileamlak A · BJOG · 2016 · cited 87 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Breech delivery at term: a critical review of the literature [10]
    Cheng M, Hannah M · Obstet Gynecol · 1993 · cited 81 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Liu Y, Li G, Chen Y, Wang X, Ruan Y, Zou L, et al.. A descriptive analysis of the indications for caesarean section in mainland China. . 2014. PMID 25495550 · DOI · PMC4269966
  2. Wastlund D, Moraitis AA, Dacey A, Sovio U, Wilson ECF, Smith GCS. Screening for breech presentation using universal late-pregnancy ultrasonography: A prospective cohort study and cost effectiveness analysis. . 2019. PMID 30990808 · DOI · PMC6467368
  3. Reitter A, Halliday A, Walker S. Practical insight into upright breech birth from birth videos: A structured analysis. . 2020. PMID 31960492 · DOI · PMC7318698
  4. Jung B, Hollfelder J, Zur Strassen V, Bodelle B, Schulz M. Association between breech presentation in twins and developmental dysplasia of the hip. . 2026. PMID 42446713 · DOI · PMC13525056
  5. . Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID 24553167 · DOI
  6. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID 16816088 · DOI
  7. Kotaska A. Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery. BMJ. 2004. PMID 15514356 · DOI · PMC524566
  8. Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, Mol BW, van der Post JA. External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID 18978117 · DOI
  9. Berhan Y, Haileamlak A. The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies. BJOG. 2016. PMID 26234485 · DOI
  10. Cheng M, Hannah M. Breech delivery at term: a critical review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID 8377990 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Cervical RipeningAnatomy and Physiology
  • Live BirthAnatomy and Physiology
  • PlacentationAnatomy and Physiology
  • Acrosome ReactionAnatomy and Physiology
  • AnovulationAnatomy and Physiology
  • CoitusAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

3,515
PubMed records on this heading
11%
published since 2020
314
review articles
111
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Cervical RipeningAnatomy and Physiology
  • Live BirthAnatomy and Physiology
  • PlacentationAnatomy and Physiology
  • Acrosome ReactionAnatomy and Physiology
  • AnovulationAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support