Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,093 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The statistical manipulation of hierarchically and non-hierarchically nested data. It includes clustered data, such as a sample of subjects within a group of schools. Prevalent in the social, behavioral sciences, and biomedical sciences, both linear and nonlinear regression models are applied.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Analyses, Multilevel; Analysis, Multilevel; Multilevel Analyses.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Statistics as Topic
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 3,794 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Multilevel Analysis” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,809 of them (47.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 1,974 records.
Reviews account for 102 records (2.7%) and meta-analyses for 57. Randomized controlled trials number 109 (2.9%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 0 |
| 2000-2009 | 98 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,974 |
| 2020 onward | 1,809 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 102 | 2.7% |
| Meta-analyses | 57 | 1.5% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 109 | 2.9% |
Method: PubMed query "Multilevel Analysis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in public health and nutrition
Population and nutrition studies mostly observe what people eat, breathe or are exposed to and then look for links with health, which shows association and not proof of cause. Self-reported diet is imprecise, people who eat or live differently also differ in other ways, and effects measured across a population may not apply to one person. Check the study design, how exposure was measured, what else was accounted for and the size of the effect, not only whether it was statistically significant.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Sample size determination for mediation analysis of longitudinal data [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundSample size planning for longitudinal data is crucial when designing mediation studies because sufficient statistical power is not only required in grant applications and peer-reviewed publications, but is essential to reliable research results.
- Closing excerpt
- A R package has been developed for the product method of sample size determination in mediation longitudinal study design.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (279 words)
BackgroundSample size planning for longitudinal data is crucial when designing mediation studies because sufficient statistical power is not only required in grant applications and peer-reviewed publications, but is essential to reliable research results. However, sample size determination is not straightforward for mediation analysis of longitudinal design.MethodsTo facilitate planning the sample size for longitudinal mediation studies with a multilevel mediation model, this article provides the sample size required to achieve 80% power by simulations under various sizes of the mediation effect, within-subject correlations and numbers of repeated measures. The sample size calculation is based on three commonly used mediation tests: Sobel's method, distribution of product method and the bootstrap method.ResultsAmong the three methods of testing the mediation effects, Sobel's method required the largest sample size to achieve 80% power. Bootstrapping and the distribution of the product method performed similarly and were more powerful than Sobel's method, as reflected by the relatively smaller sample sizes. For all three methods, the sample size required to achieve 80% power depended on the value of the ICC (i.e., within-subject correlation). A larger value of ICC typically required a larger sample size to achieve 80% power. Simulation results also illustrated the advantage of the longitudinal study design. The sample size tables for most encountered scenarios in practice have also been published for convenient use.ConclusionsExtensive simulations study showed that the distribution of the product method and bootstrapping method have superior performance to the Sobel's method, but the product method was recommended to use in practice in terms of less computation time load compared to the bootstrapping method. A R package has been developed for the product method of sample size determination in mediation longitudinal study design.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29580203 · DOI · PMC5870539
Individual- and community-level determinants of child immunization in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A multilevel analysis [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Understanding modifiable determinants of full immunization of children provide a valuable contribution to immunization programs and help reduce disease, disability, and death.
- Closing excerpt
- The study underlines the importance of promoting immunization programs tailored to the poor and women with little education.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (379 words)
Understanding modifiable determinants of full immunization of children provide a valuable contribution to immunization programs and help reduce disease, disability, and death. This study is aimed to assess the individual and community-level determinants of full immunization coverage among children in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This study used data from the Demographic and Health Survey 2013-14 from the Democratic Republic of Congo. Data regarding total 3,366 children between 12 and 23 months of age were used in this study. Children who were immunized with one dose of BCG, three doses of polio, three doses of DPT, and a dose of measles vaccine was considered fully immunized. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the prevalence and distribution of full immunization coverage. Two-level multilevel logistic regression analysis, with individual-level (level 1) characteristics nested within community-level (level 2) characteristics, was used to assess the individual- and community-level determinants of full immunization coverage. This study found that about 45.3% [95%CI: 42.02, 48.52] of children aged 12-23 months were fully immunized in the DRC. The results confirmed immunization coverage varied and ranged between 5.8% in Mongala province to 70.6% in Nord-Kivu province. Results from multilevel analysis revealed that, four Antenatal Care (ANC) visits [AOR: 1.64; 95%CI: 1.23, 2.18], institutional delivery [AOR: 2.37; 95%CI: 1.52, 3.72], and Postnatal Care (PNC) service utilization [AOR: 1.43; 95%CI: 1.04, 1.95] were statistically significantly associated with the full immunization coverage. Similarly, children of mothers with secondary or higher education [AOR: 1.32; 95%CI: 1.00, 1.81] and from the richest wealth quintile [AOR: 1.96; 95%CI: 1.18, 3.27] had significantly higher odds of being fully immunized compared to their counterparts whose mothers were relatively poorer and less educated. Among the community-level characteristics, residents of the community with a higher rate of institutional delivery [AOR: 2.36; 95%CI: 1.59, 3.51] were found to be positively associated with the full immunization coverage. Also, the random effect result found about 35% of the variation in immunization coverage among the communities was attributed to community-level factors.The Democratic Republic of Congo has a noteworthy gap in full immunization coverage. Modifiable factors-particularly health service utilization including four ANC visits, institutional delivery, and postnatal visits-had a strong positive effect on full immunization coverage. The study underlines the importance of promoting immunization programs tailored to the poor and women with little education.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30138459 · DOI · PMC6107214
Prevalence and associated factors of delayed first antenatal care booking among reproductive age women in Ethiopia; a multilevel analysis of EDHS 2016 data [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundEarly or timely initiation of antenatal care and regular visits based on the schedule have a tremendous effect on both maternal and fetal health.
- Closing excerpt
- Therefore, taking special attention for these high-risk groups could decrease delayed first ANC booking and this intern decreases maternal and fetal health problems by identifying and intervene early.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (347 words)
BackgroundEarly or timely initiation of antenatal care and regular visits based on the schedule have a tremendous effect on both maternal and fetal health. Despite the paramount benefits of early initiation of ANC within the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, women still do not have adequate and equal access to high-quality early antenatal care.ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence and factors associated with delayed first ANC booking in Ethiopia.MethodA secondary data analysis was conducted using the 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health survey data. All reproductive age women who gave birth in the five years preceding the survey and who had ANC visit for their last child were included in this study. The total weighted sample size analyzed was 4,741. Due to the hierarchical nature of the EDHS data, Multi-level logistic regression model was used to identify the individual and community level factors associated with delayed first ANC booking.ResultIn this study, the prevalence of delayed first ANC booking was 67.31% [95% CI: 65.96% to 68.63%]. Women with secondary and higher education [Adjusted Odd Ratio (AOR) = 0.78; 95%CI: 0.61, 0.99] and [AOR = 0.61; 95%CI: 0.44, 0.83] respectively had lower odds of delayed first ANC booking. But woman who were multiparous and grand multiparous [AOR = 1.21; 95%CI: 1.01, 1.45] and [AOR = 1.50; 95%CI: 1.16, 1.93] respectively, women with the last pregnancy wanted no more [AOR = 1.52; 95%CI: 1.10, 2.09], a woman who was living in the rural area [AOR = 1.66; 95%CI: 1.25, 2.21], and a woman who was living in large central regions and small peripheral regions [AOR = 2.76; 95%CI: 2.20, 3.47] and [AOR = 2.70; 95%CI: 2.12, 3.45] respectively had higher odds of delayed first ANC booking.ConclusionDespite the documented benefits of early antenatal care initiation, late ANC booking is still predominant in Ethiopia as highlighted by this study. Maternal education, parity, wanted the last child, residence and region were significantly associated with delayed first ANC booking. Therefore, taking special attention for these high-risk groups could decrease delayed first ANC booking and this intern decreases maternal and fetal health problems by identifying and intervene early.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32628700 · DOI · PMC7337309
Robust Bayesian multilevel meta-analysis: Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of dependent effect sizes [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Meta-analyses often include multiple dependent effect sizes, yet current methods typically neglect the resulting within-study dependencies or fail to address model uncertainty and publication bias adequately.
- Closing excerpt
- The approach is implemented in the RoBMA R package and JASP.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (88 words)
Meta-analyses often include multiple dependent effect sizes, yet current methods typically neglect the resulting within-study dependencies or fail to address model uncertainty and publication bias adequately. We extend robust Bayesian meta-analysis (RoBMA) to a multilevel framework, simultaneously handling within-study dependencies, model uncertainty, heterogeneity, moderators, and publication bias. Specifically, the three-level RoBMA integrates approximate Bayesian selection models with PET-PEESE adjustments within a hierarchical Bayesian setting. We illustrate the methodology through empirical examples and demonstrate its performance via simulations. The approach is implemented in the RoBMA R package and JASP.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42120801 · DOI · PMC13167900
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article A practical guide to multilevel modeling [5]
- Research article Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling [6]
- Research article Fixed effects models versus mixed effects models for clustered data: Reviewing the approaches, disentangling the differences, and making recommendations [7]
- Research article Multilevel multiple imputation: A review and evaluation of joint modeling and chained equations imputation [8]
- Research article The application of meta-analytic (multi-level) models with multiple random effects: A systematic review [9]
- Research article Multilevel factorial experiments for developing behavioral interventions: power, sample size, and resource considerations [10]
References
- Pan H, Liu S, Miao D, Yuan Y. Sample size determination for mediation analysis of longitudinal data. . 2018. PMID 29580203 · DOI · PMC5870539
- Acharya P, Kismul H, Mapatano MA, Hatløy A. Individual- and community-level determinants of child immunization in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A multilevel analysis. . 2018. PMID 30138459 · DOI · PMC6107214
- Teshale AB, Tesema GA. Prevalence and associated factors of delayed first antenatal care booking among reproductive age women in Ethiopia; a multilevel analysis of EDHS 2016 data. . 2020. PMID 32628700 · DOI · PMC7337309
- Bartoš F, Maier M, Wagenmakers EJ. Robust Bayesian multilevel meta-analysis: Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of dependent effect sizes. . 2026. PMID 42120801 · DOI · PMC13167900
- Peugh JL. A practical guide to multilevel modeling. J Sch Psychol. 2010. PMID 20006989 · DOI
- Mathieu JE, Aguinis H, Culpepper SA, Chen G. Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. J Appl Psychol. 2012. PMID 22582726 · DOI
- McNeish D, Kelley K. Fixed effects models versus mixed effects models for clustered data: Reviewing the approaches, disentangling the differences, and making recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2019. PMID 29863377 · DOI
- Enders CK, Mistler SA, Keller BT. Multilevel multiple imputation: A review and evaluation of joint modeling and chained equations imputation. Psychol Methods. 2016. PMID 26690775 · DOI
- Fernández-Castilla B, Jamshidi L, Declercq L, Beretvas SN, Onghena P, Van den Noortgate W. The application of meta-analytic (multi-level) models with multiple random effects: A systematic review. Behav Res Methods. 2020. PMID 32162276 · DOI
- Dziak JJ, Nahum-Shani I, Collins LM. Multilevel factorial experiments for developing behavioral interventions: power, sample size, and resource considerations. Psychol Methods. 2012. PMID 22309956 · DOI · PMC3351535
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.