Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Clinical Research›Multivariate Analysis
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Multivariate Analysis

Clinical Research · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

A set of techniques used when variation in several variables are studied simultaneously.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (742 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A set of techniques used when variation in several variables are studied simultaneously. In statistics, multivariate analysis is interpreted as any analytic method that allows simultaneous study of two or more dependent variables.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Analysis, Multivariate; Multivariate Analyses.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Analysis of Variance
Narrower topics
Canonical Correlation Analysis; Multidimensional Scaling Analysis

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 135,165 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Multivariate Analysis” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 9,381 of them (6.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 71,186 records.

Reviews account for 2,065 records (1.5%) and meta-analyses for 601. Randomized controlled trials number 5,059 (3.7%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 15,891 records; 2000-2009: 38,707 records; 2010-2019: 71,186 records; 2020 onward: 9,381 records15,891through 199938,7072000-200971,1862010-20199,3812020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199915,891
2000-200938,707
2010-201971,186
2020 onward9,381
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 1.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.7 percentReviews1.5% (2,065)Meta-analyses0.4% (601)Randomized controlled trials3.7% (5,059)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 135,165 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2,0651.5%
Meta-analyses6010.4%
Randomized controlled trials5,0593.7%

Method: PubMed query "Multivariate Analysis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in clinical research

Research methods determine how much a result can be trusted. Randomized trials guard against confounding, systematic reviews and meta-analyses combine many studies, and observational designs are valuable but can show only association. Reporting standards, trial registration and pre-specified outcomes reduce bias. When reading about a method, ask what problem it is designed to solve and which problems it does not solve.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations
Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F
2010Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2,976cc by
PMID 20950446 · DOI · PMC2973851
Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies
Mallick H, Rahnavard A, McIver LJ, Ma S, Zhang Y, Nguyen LH, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2,286cc0
PMID 34784344 · DOI · PMC8714082
Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology
Ramette A
2007Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1,118cc by
PMID 17892477 · DOI · PMC2121141
Analysis of multi-condition single-cell data with latent embedding multivariate regression
Ahlmann-Eltze C, Huber W
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
17cc by
PMID 39753773 · DOI · PMC11906359

Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations [1]

Research article Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F · · 2010 · cited 2,976 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundThe dramatic progress in sequencing technologies offers unprecedented prospects for deciphering the organization of natural populations in space and time.
Closing excerpt
Our approach is also faster than Bayesian clustering algorithms by several orders of magnitude, and may be applicable to a wider range of datasets.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (274 words)

BackgroundThe dramatic progress in sequencing technologies offers unprecedented prospects for deciphering the organization of natural populations in space and time. However, the size of the datasets generated also poses some daunting challenges. In particular, Bayesian clustering algorithms based on pre-defined population genetics models such as the STRUCTURE or BAPS software may not be able to cope with this unprecedented amount of data. Thus, there is a need for less computer-intensive approaches. Multivariate analyses seem particularly appealing as they are specifically devoted to extracting information from large datasets. Unfortunately, currently available multivariate methods still lack some essential features needed to study the genetic structure of natural populations.ResultsWe introduce the Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC), a multivariate method designed to identify and describe clusters of genetically related individuals. When group priors are lacking, DAPC uses sequential K-means and model selection to infer genetic clusters. Our approach allows extracting rich information from genetic data, providing assignment of individuals to groups, a visual assessment of between-population differentiation, and contribution of individual alleles to population structuring. We evaluate the performance of our method using simulated data, which were also analyzed using STRUCTURE as a benchmark. Additionally, we illustrate the method by analyzing microsatellite polymorphism in worldwide human populations and hemagglutinin gene sequence variation in seasonal influenza.ConclusionsAnalysis of simulated data revealed that our approach performs generally better than STRUCTURE at characterizing population subdivision. The tools implemented in DAPC for the identification of clusters and graphical representation of between-group structures allow to unravel complex population structures. Our approach is also faster than Bayesian clustering algorithms by several orders of magnitude, and may be applicable to a wider range of datasets.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 20950446 · DOI · PMC2973851

Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies [2]

Research article Mallick H, Rahnavard A, McIver LJ, Ma S, Zhang Y, Nguyen LH, et al. · · 2021 · cited 2,286 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
It is challenging to associate features such as human health outcomes, diet, environmental conditions, or other metadata to microbial community measurements, due in part to their quantitative properties.
Closing excerpt
We also applied MaAsLin 2 to a microbial multi-omics dataset from the Integrative Human Microbiome (HMP2) project which, in addition to reproducing established results, revealed a unique, integrated landscape of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) across multiple time points and omics profiles.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (223 words)

It is challenging to associate features such as human health outcomes, diet, environmental conditions, or other metadata to microbial community measurements, due in part to their quantitative properties. Microbiome multi-omics are typically noisy, sparse (zero-inflated), high-dimensional, extremely non-normal, and often in the form of count or compositional measurements. Here we introduce an optimized combination of novel and established methodology to assess multivariable association of microbial community features with complex metadata in population-scale observational studies. Our approach, MaAsLin 2 (Microbiome Multivariable Associations with Linear Models), uses generalized linear and mixed models to accommodate a wide variety of modern epidemiological studies, including cross-sectional and longitudinal designs, as well as a variety of data types (e.g., counts and relative abundances) with or without covariates and repeated measurements. To construct this method, we conducted a large-scale evaluation of a broad range of scenarios under which straightforward identification of meta-omics associations can be challenging. These simulation studies reveal that MaAsLin 2's linear model preserves statistical power in the presence of repeated measures and multiple covariates, while accounting for the nuances of meta-omics features and controlling false discovery. We also applied MaAsLin 2 to a microbial multi-omics dataset from the Integrative Human Microbiome (HMP2) project which, in addition to reproducing established results, revealed a unique, integrated landscape of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) across multiple time points and omics profiles.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc0 licence; © the authors. PMID 34784344 · DOI · PMC8714082

Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology [3]

Review article Ramette A · · 2007 · cited 1,118 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Environmental microbiology is undergoing a dramatic revolution due to the increasing accumulation of biological information and contextual environmental parameters.
Closing excerpt
Because such tools aim at reducing data set complexity, at identifying major patterns and putative causal factors, they will certainly find many applications in microbial ecology.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (118 words)

Environmental microbiology is undergoing a dramatic revolution due to the increasing accumulation of biological information and contextual environmental parameters. This will not only enable a better identification of diversity patterns, but will also shed more light on the associated environmental conditions, spatial locations, and seasonal fluctuations, which could explain such patterns. Complex ecological questions may now be addressed using multivariate statistical analyses, which represent a vast potential of techniques that are still underexploited. Here, well-established exploratory and hypothesis-driven approaches are reviewed, so as to foster their addition to the microbial ecologist toolbox. Because such tools aim at reducing data set complexity, at identifying major patterns and putative causal factors, they will certainly find many applications in microbial ecology.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 17892477 · DOI · PMC2121141

Analysis of multi-condition single-cell data with latent embedding multivariate regression [4]

Research article Ahlmann-Eltze C, Huber W · · 2025 · cited 17 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Identifying gene expression differences in heterogeneous tissues across conditions is a fundamental biological task, enabled by multi-condition single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq).
Closing excerpt
We apply LEMUR to cancer, zebrafish development and spatial gradients in Alzheimer's disease, demonstrating its broad applicability.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (127 words)

Identifying gene expression differences in heterogeneous tissues across conditions is a fundamental biological task, enabled by multi-condition single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Current data analysis approaches divide the constituent cells into clusters meant to represent cell types, but such discrete categorization tends to be an unsatisfactory model of the underlying biology. Here, we introduce latent embedding multivariate regression (LEMUR), a model that operates without, or before, commitment to discrete categorization. LEMUR (1) integrates data from different conditions, (2) predicts each cell's gene expression changes as a function of the conditions and its position in latent space and (3) for each gene, identifies a compact neighborhood of cells with consistent differential expression. We apply LEMUR to cancer, zebrafish development and spatial gradients in Alzheimer's disease, demonstrating its broad applicability.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39753773 · DOI · PMC11906359

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: The Framingham Study risk score functions [5]
    Sullivan LM, Massaro JM, D'Agostino RB · Stat Med · 2004 · cited 1,379 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression [6]
    van Houwelingen HC, Arends LR, Stijnen T · Stat Med · 2002 · cited 1,130 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The risk of determining risk with multivariable models [7]
    Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR · Ann Intern Med · 1993 · cited 801 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Combining estimates of interest in prognostic modelling studies after multiple imputation: current practice and guidelines [8]
    Marshall A, Altman DG, Holder RL, Royston P · BMC Med Res Methodol · 2009 · cited 702 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Decoding Dynamic Brain Patterns from Evoked Responses: A Tutorial on Multivariate Pattern Analysis Applied to Time Series Neuroimaging Data [9]
    Grootswagers T, Wardle SG, Carlson TA · J Cogn Neurosci · 2017 · cited 613 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals [10]
    Pereda E, Quiroga RQ, Bhattacharya J · Prog Neurobiol · 2005 · cited 595 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F. Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. . 2010. PMID 20950446 · DOI · PMC2973851
  2. Mallick H, Rahnavard A, McIver LJ, Ma S, Zhang Y, Nguyen LH, et al.. Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies. . 2021. PMID 34784344 · DOI · PMC8714082
  3. Ramette A. Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology. . 2007. PMID 17892477 · DOI · PMC2121141
  4. Ahlmann-Eltze C, Huber W. Analysis of multi-condition single-cell data with latent embedding multivariate regression. . 2025. PMID 39753773 · DOI · PMC11906359
  5. Sullivan LM, Massaro JM, D'Agostino RB. Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: The Framingham Study risk score functions. Stat Med. 2004. PMID 15122742 · DOI
  6. van Houwelingen HC, Arends LR, Stijnen T. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat Med. 2002. PMID 11836738 · DOI
  7. Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. The risk of determining risk with multivariable models. Ann Intern Med. 1993. PMID 8417638 · DOI
  8. Marshall A, Altman DG, Holder RL, Royston P. Combining estimates of interest in prognostic modelling studies after multiple imputation: current practice and guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009. PMID 19638200 · DOI · PMC2727536
  9. Grootswagers T, Wardle SG, Carlson TA. Decoding Dynamic Brain Patterns from Evoked Responses: A Tutorial on Multivariate Pattern Analysis Applied to Time Series Neuroimaging Data. J Cogn Neurosci. 2017. PMID 27779910 · DOI
  10. Pereda E, Quiroga RQ, Bhattacharya J. Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals. Prog Neurobiol. 2005. PMID 16289760 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Discriminant AnalysisClinical Research
  • Survival AnalysisClinical Research
  • Cluster AnalysisClinical Research
  • Spatial AnalysisClinical Research
  • ROC CurveClinical Research
  • Mediation AnalysisClinical Research

All 98 articles in Clinical Research →

At a glance

135,165
PubMed records on this heading
7%
published since 2020
2,065
review articles
5,059
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Discriminant AnalysisClinical Research
  • Survival AnalysisClinical Research
  • Cluster AnalysisClinical Research
  • Spatial AnalysisClinical Research
  • ROC CurveClinical Research

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support