Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Clinical Research›Life Tables
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Life Tables

Clinical Research · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

Summarizing techniques used to describe the pattern of mortality and survival in populations.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (946 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Summarizing techniques used to describe the pattern of mortality and survival in populations. These methods can be applied to the study not only of death, but also of any defined endpoint such as the onset of disease or the occurrence of disease complications.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Life Table; Tables, Life; Life Table Analysis; Analyses, Life Table; Analysis, Life Table; Life Table Analyses; Life Table Estimates; Estimate, Life Table.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Life Expectancy; Actuarial Analysis

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 6,742 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Life Tables” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 304 of them (4.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 3,466 records.

Reviews account for 451 records (6.7%) and meta-analyses for 31. Randomized controlled trials number 487 (7.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 3,466 records; 2000-2009: 2,191 records; 2010-2019: 781 records; 2020 onward: 304 records3,466through 19992,1912000-20097812010-20193042020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19993,466
2000-20092,191
2010-2019781
2020 onward304
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 6.7 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 7.2 percentReviews6.7% (451)Meta-analyses0.5% (31)Randomized controlled trials7.2% (487)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 6,742 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4516.7%
Meta-analyses310.5%
Randomized controlled trials4877.2%

Method: PubMed query "Life Tables"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in clinical research

Research methods determine how much a result can be trusted. Randomized trials guard against confounding, systematic reviews and meta-analyses combine many studies, and observational designs are valuable but can show only association. Reporting standards, trial registration and pre-specified outcomes reduce bias. When reading about a method, ask what problem it is designed to solve and which problems it does not solve.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Use and Misuse of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Thresholds in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Trends in Cost-per-DALY Studies
Leech AA, Kim DD, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
136cc by
PMID 30005746 · DOI · PMC6041503
Integrating temperature-dependent life table data into a matrix projection model for Drosophila suzukii population estimation
Wiman NG, Walton VM, Dalton DT, Anfora G, Burrack HJ, Chiu JC, et al.
2014Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
83cc by
PMID 25192013 · DOI · PMC4156384
Indirect estimation of the prevalence of spinal muscular atrophy Type I, II, and III in the United States
Lally C, Jones C, Farwell W, Reyna SP, Cook SF, Flanders WD
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
63cc by
PMID 29183396 · DOI · PMC5704427
Use of mortality tables by level of deprivation in the study of social inequalities in cancer survival
Wilson S, Merville O, Dejardin O, Gardy J, Rollet Q, Jooste V, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 39912859 · DOI · PMC12018625

Use and Misuse of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Thresholds in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Trends in Cost-per-DALY Studies [1]

Research article Leech AA, Kim DD, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ · · 2018 · cited 136 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectivesTo determine what thresholds are most often cited in the cost-effectiveness literature for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), given various recommendations proposed and used in the literature to date, and thereafter to assess whether studies appropriately justified their use of threshold values.
Closing excerpt
Rather than rely on commonly used, generic economic thresholds, we encourage authors to use context-specific thresholds that reflect local preferences.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (191 words)

ObjectivesTo determine what thresholds are most often cited in the cost-effectiveness literature for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), given various recommendations proposed and used in the literature to date, and thereafter to assess whether studies appropriately justified their use of threshold values.MethodsWe reviewed the contents of the Tufts Medical Center Global Health Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, a repository of all English language cost-per-disability-adjusted life-year averted studies indexed in PubMed. Our review included all catalogued cost-per-disability-adjusted life-year studies published from 2000 through 2015. We restricted attention to studies that investigated interventions in LMICs.ResultsOur analysis identified 381 studies (80%) focused on LMICs. Of these studies, 250 (66%) cited the World Health Organization's 1 to 3 times gross domestic product per capita threshold. A full-text review of 60 (24%) of these articles (randomly selected) revealed that none justified use of this threshold in the particular country or countries studied beyond citing (generic) guideline documents.ConclusionsCost-effectiveness analysis can help inform health care spending, but its value depends on incorporating assumptions that are valid for the applicable setting. Rather than rely on commonly used, generic economic thresholds, we encourage authors to use context-specific thresholds that reflect local preferences.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30005746 · DOI · PMC6041503

Integrating temperature-dependent life table data into a matrix projection model for Drosophila suzukii population estimation [2]

Research article Wiman NG, Walton VM, Dalton DT, Anfora G, Burrack HJ, Chiu JC, et al. · · 2014 · cited 83 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Temperature-dependent fecundity and survival data was integrated into a matrix population model to describe relative Drosophila suzukii Matsumura (Diptera: Drosophilidae) population increase and age structure based on environmental conditions.
Closing excerpt
suzukii populations.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (244 words)

Temperature-dependent fecundity and survival data was integrated into a matrix population model to describe relative Drosophila suzukii Matsumura (Diptera: Drosophilidae) population increase and age structure based on environmental conditions. This novel modification of the classic Leslie matrix population model is presented as a way to examine how insect populations interact with the environment, and has application as a predictor of population density. For D. suzukii, we examined model implications for pest pressure on crops. As case studies, we examined model predictions in three small fruit production regions in the United States (US) and one in Italy. These production regions have distinctly different climates. In general, patterns of adult D. suzukii trap activity broadly mimicked seasonal population levels predicted by the model using only temperature data. Age structure of estimated populations suggest that trap and fruit infestation data are of limited value and are insufficient for model validation. Thus, we suggest alternative experiments for validation. The model is advantageous in that it provides stage-specific population estimation, which can potentially guide management strategies and provide unique opportunities to simulate stage-specific management effects such as insecticide applications or the effect of biological control on a specific life-stage. The two factors that drive initiation of the model are suitable temperatures (biofix) and availability of a suitable host medium (fruit). Although there are many factors affecting population dynamics of D. suzukii in the field, temperature-dependent survival and reproduction are believed to be the main drivers for D. suzukii populations.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25192013 · DOI · PMC4156384

Indirect estimation of the prevalence of spinal muscular atrophy Type I, II, and III in the United States [3]

Research article Lally C, Jones C, Farwell W, Reyna SP, Cook SF, Flanders WD · · 2017 · cited 63 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a progressive, devastating disease and a leading inherited cause of infant mortality.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsIn the absence of a survey or other means to directly estimate prevalence in the US population, estimates can be calculated indirectly using a life table.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (259 words)

BackgroundSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a progressive, devastating disease and a leading inherited cause of infant mortality. The limited population-based literature is confined to small regional studies. Estimates of prevalence are needed to characterize the burden of SMA and to understand trends in prevalence by disease type as new treatments become available. The reported estimates of SMA genotype prevalence at birth consistently range from 8.5-10.3 per 100,000 live births, with a mid-range estimate of 9.4 per 100,000. Among infants born with an SMA genotype, it is reported that ~58% will develop SMA Type I, 29% will develop Type II, and 13% will develop Type III, respectively.ResultsUsing evidence from peer-reviewed literature for SMA birth prevalence, age at symptom onset, and SMA type-specific survival, and incorporating United States vital statistics, we constructed life tables to estimate prevalence for SMA Types I, II, and III in the United States. We estimated the number of prevalent cases in the US to be 8526, 9429, and 10,333 based on a birth prevalence of 8.5, 9.4, and 10.3, respectively (the lower, midpoint, and upper ends of the reported range). Assuming the midpoint of 9.4 and US-reported survival, the type-specific population prevalence estimates were 1610 for SMA Type I, 3944 for SMA Type II, and 3875 for SMA Type III. Evidence-based estimates of the number of people living with SMA in the United States in the published literature were previously unavailable.ConclusionsIn the absence of a survey or other means to directly estimate prevalence in the US population, estimates can be calculated indirectly using a life table.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29183396 · DOI · PMC5704427

Use of mortality tables by level of deprivation in the study of social inequalities in cancer survival [4]

Research article Wilson S, Merville O, Dejardin O, Gardy J, Rollet Q, Jooste V, et al. · · 2025 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundPrevious studies have reported lower net survival probabilities for socioeconomically deprived patients, using non-deprivation specific lifetables.
Closing excerpt
Development of such deprivation-specific lifetables for future years is crucial to understand mechanisms of social inequalities and work towards reducing the social burden.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (252 words)

BackgroundPrevious studies have reported lower net survival probabilities for socioeconomically deprived patients, using non-deprivation specific lifetables. Not accounting for the social gradient in background mortality could potentially overestimate the effect of deprivation on net survival. The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of taking into account the social gradient of expected mortality in the general population on the study of the social gradient of survival of people with cancer.MethodsFrench cancer registry data was analyzed, with 190,902 incident cases of nineteen cancer sites between 2013 and 2015. Deprivation was measured using the European deprivation index (EDI). Net survival was estimated thanks to additive models with French lifetables stratified on deprivation level with the EDI, using the non-parametric Pohar-perme method and flexible excess hazard modelling with multidimensional penalized splines, firstly with non-specific lifetables then with the deprivation specific-lifetables.ResultsA significant effect of EDI on excess mortality hazard (EMH) remained when using the deprivation-specific lifetables for colorectal, lung cancer and melanoma in both sexes, and esophagus, bladder, head and neck and liver cancer for men, and breast, cervix and uterine cancer for women. The only site where the effect of EDI on EMH was no longer significant when using deprivation-specific lifetables was prostate cancer.ConclusionsThe use of deprivation-specific lifetables confirms the existence of a social gradient in cancer survival, indicating that these inequalities do not result from inequalities in background mortality. Development of such deprivation-specific lifetables for future years is crucial to understand mechanisms of social inequalities and work towards reducing the social burden.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39912859 · DOI · PMC12018625

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes: a life-course perspective [5]
    Lu MC, Halfon N · Matern Child Health J · 2003 · cited 704 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A systematic review to calculate background miscarriage rates using life table analysis [6]
    Ammon Avalos L, Galindo C, Li DK · Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol · 2012 · cited 210 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Life years lost among patients with a given disease [7]
    Andersen PK · Stat Med · 2017 · cited 54 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Life table (survival) analysis to generate cumulative pregnancy rates in assisted reproduction: are we overestimating our success rates? [8]
    Daya S · Hum Reprod · 2005 · cited 47 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Before senescence: the evolutionary demography of ontogenesis [9]
    Levitis DA · Proc Biol Sci · 2011 · cited 41 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Diabetic angiopathy in children [10]
    Danne T, Kordonouri O, Hövener G, Weber B · Diabet Med · 1997 · cited 36 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Leech AA, Kim DD, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ. Use and Misuse of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Thresholds in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Trends in Cost-per-DALY Studies. . 2018. PMID 30005746 · DOI · PMC6041503
  2. Wiman NG, Walton VM, Dalton DT, Anfora G, Burrack HJ, Chiu JC, et al.. Integrating temperature-dependent life table data into a matrix projection model for Drosophila suzukii population estimation. . 2014. PMID 25192013 · DOI · PMC4156384
  3. Lally C, Jones C, Farwell W, Reyna SP, Cook SF, Flanders WD. Indirect estimation of the prevalence of spinal muscular atrophy Type I, II, and III in the United States. . 2017. PMID 29183396 · DOI · PMC5704427
  4. Wilson S, Merville O, Dejardin O, Gardy J, Rollet Q, Jooste V, et al.. Use of mortality tables by level of deprivation in the study of social inequalities in cancer survival. . 2025. PMID 39912859 · DOI · PMC12018625
  5. Lu MC, Halfon N. Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes: a life-course perspective. Matern Child Health J. 2003. PMID 12710797 · DOI
  6. Ammon Avalos L, Galindo C, Li DK. A systematic review to calculate background miscarriage rates using life table analysis. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012. PMID 22511535 · DOI
  7. Andersen PK. Life years lost among patients with a given disease. Stat Med. 2017. PMID 28585255 · DOI
  8. Daya S. Life table (survival) analysis to generate cumulative pregnancy rates in assisted reproduction: are we overestimating our success rates?. Hum Reprod. 2005. PMID 15790603 · DOI
  9. Levitis DA. Before senescence: the evolutionary demography of ontogenesis. Proc Biol Sci. 2011. PMID 21123273 · DOI · PMC3049054
  10. Danne T, Kordonouri O, Hövener G, Weber B. Diabetic angiopathy in children. Diabet Med. 1997. PMID 9455928 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Quality-Adjusted Life YearsClinical Research
  • Life ExpectancyClinical Research
  • Disability-Adjusted Life YearsClinical Research
  • Basic Reproduction NumberClinical Research
  • Birth RateClinical Research
  • Cause of DeathClinical Research

All 98 articles in Clinical Research →

At a glance

6,742
PubMed records on this heading
5%
published since 2020
451
review articles
487
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Quality-Adjusted Life YearsClinical Research
  • Life ExpectancyClinical Research
  • Disability-Adjusted Life YearsClinical Research
  • Basic Reproduction NumberClinical Research
  • Birth RateClinical Research

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support