Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,029 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Combustion or burning in which substances combine chemically with oxygen typically giving out bright light, heat, and smoke.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Fire.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Environment
- Narrower topics
- Fire Extinguishing Systems; Open Waste Burning; Spontaneous Combustion; Wildfires
- See also
- Burns, Inhalation; Smoke Inhalation Injury
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 13,545 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Fires” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 3,772 of them (27.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 4,033 records.
Reviews account for 812 records (6.0%) and meta-analyses for 49. Randomized controlled trials number 86 (0.6%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 3,196 |
| 2000-2009 | 2,544 |
| 2010-2019 | 4,033 |
| 2020 onward | 3,772 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 812 | 6.0% |
| Meta-analyses | 49 | 0.4% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 86 | 0.6% |
Method: PubMed query "Fires"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in public health and nutrition
Population and nutrition studies mostly observe what people eat, breathe or are exposed to and then look for links with health, which shows association and not proof of cause. Self-reported diet is imprecise, people who eat or live differently also differ in other ways, and effects measured across a population may not apply to one person. Check the study design, how exposure was measured, what else was accounted for and the size of the effect, not only whether it was statistically significant.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health and Social Support in the Aftermath of the Maui Wildfires | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 11 | cc by PMID 40768146 · DOI · PMC12329611 |
| Global, regional and national burden of injuries caused by fire, heat, and hot substances from 1990 to 2021 | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 9 | cc by PMID 40392861 · DOI · PMC12091820 |
| Unprecedentedly high global forest disturbance due to fire in 2023 and 2024 | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 7 | cc by PMID 40690667 · DOI · PMC12318170 |
| Pyrodiversity of boreal lake islands begets biodiversity of beetles, plants, and birds | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 2 | cc by PMID 41912353 · DOI · PMC13035461 |
Health and Social Support in the Aftermath of the Maui Wildfires [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ImportanceClimate-driven wildfires are increasing in frequency and severity, but their association with midterm and long-term health trajectories during the course of recovery remain poorly characterized, particularly in underserved populations.
- Closing excerpt
- As climate-driven disasters intensify, proactive strategies to monitor and mitigate their long-term health effects will be essential to protect vulnerable populations and enhance resilience.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (408 words)
ImportanceClimate-driven wildfires are increasing in frequency and severity, but their association with midterm and long-term health trajectories during the course of recovery remain poorly characterized, particularly in underserved populations.ObjectiveTo assess the midterm health outcomes of wildfire exposure, including respiratory and mental health, and evaluate the interaction of social support with these health burdens.Design, setting, and participantsThe Maui Wildfire Exposure Study (MauiWES) is a community-based, cohort study that enrolled 1174 adults in 2024, 6 to 14 months after the 2023 Maui wildfires. Participants completed exposure assessments, spirometry, biomonitoring, and validated mental health evaluations. Data were accrued from January 26 to September 30, 2024.ExposureLiving or working in or near areas affected by the August 2023 Maui wildfires.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcomes included lung function (forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration [FEV1] and forced vital capacity [FVC]), blood pressure, depressive symptoms (10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), anxiety (7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale), and days affected by health issues. Social support was assessed using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support.ResultsAmong 1174 participants (median age, 47 [IQR, 36-59] years; 684 [59.1%] female; 108 [9.3%] Asian; 239 [20.5%] Filipino; 203 [17.4%] Hispanic or Latino; 238 [20.4%] Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander; 343 [29.4%] White), 150 of 670 (22.4%) exhibited FEV1 of less than 80% predicted, 725 of 1152 (62.9%) had high blood pressure (>130/80 mm Hg), and 554 of 1110 (49.9%) reported depressive symptoms. Participants residing within the fire perimeter had significantly lower lung function compared with those outside (FEV1 β, -5.97 [95% CI, -10.81 to -1.14] percentage points predicted). Acute wildfire exposure was associated with an increase in days affected by health issues (β, 20.03 [95% CI, 8.87-31.18] days) and elevated depressive symptoms (β, 9.43 [95% CI, 0.61-18.25] points). Higher social support was associated with fewer days affected by health issues (β, -5.08 [95% CI, -8.50 to -1.65] days) but did not mitigate low lung function.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of adults affected by the Maui wildfires, substantial midterm cardiopulmonary and psychological health burdens were observed. Higher social support was associated with improved mental health outcomes but did not appear to buffer physiological outcomes such as reduced lung function. These findings highlight the need for disaster response models that integrate clinical surveillance, targeted mental health interventions, and culturally anchored community-based support. As climate-driven disasters intensify, proactive strategies to monitor and mitigate their long-term health effects will be essential to protect vulnerable populations and enhance resilience.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40768146 · DOI · PMC12329611
Global, regional and national burden of injuries caused by fire, heat, and hot substances from 1990 to 2021 [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundBurn injuries, which are caused by fire, heat, and hot substances, are considered a chronic condition due to their long-term effects on the health of affected individuals.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionsDespite the observed and projected decline in global ASR of burn, the burden of burn remains a significant concern that should not be underestimated.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (168 words)
BackgroundBurn injuries, which are caused by fire, heat, and hot substances, are considered a chronic condition due to their long-term effects on the health of affected individuals. Moreover, burn injuries constitute a significant public health issue that cannot be overlooked within the global healthcare system.Materials and methodsThis study comprehensively analyzed the burden of burn injuries, focusing on variations by Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) levels and Global Burden of Disease (GBD) regions, sex-based disparities, Frontier analysis, and future trend forecasting using the Bayesian Age-Period-Cohort (BAPC) model.ResultsCompared to 1990, the global burden of burn injuries decreased in most regions worldwide in 2021. The majority of regions showed a negative Estimated Annual Percentage Change (EAPC), indicating a continuous decline in Age-Standardized Rate (ASR) annually. And the ASR decreased with the increasing SDI. Moreover, the forecasted trend from 2021 to 2030, indicates a continued decline with a well-fitted projection model.ConclusionsDespite the observed and projected decline in global ASR of burn, the burden of burn remains a significant concern that should not be underestimated.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40392861 · DOI · PMC12091820
Unprecedentedly high global forest disturbance due to fire in 2023 and 2024 [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Global forests provide key ecosystem services, from climate regulation to biodiversity habitat, but are under increasing pressure from the combined impacts of climate and land use change.
- Closing excerpt
- Protecting these remaining unfragmented high conservation value forests from this threat poses a daunting and as yet undeveloped policy and capacity challenge.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (225 words)
Global forests provide key ecosystem services, from climate regulation to biodiversity habitat, but are under increasing pressure from the combined impacts of climate and land use change. Here, we show that forest disturbance due to fire is growing globally, with the most dramatic increases in intact forest landscapes, highlighting an existential threat to remaining high biomass, high biodiversity forests. The global annual area of forest disturbance due to fire for 2023 and 2024 was highest since the beginning of monitoring in 2001. Compared to 2002-2022 average annual forest disturbance due to fire, the 2023-2024 average was 2.2 times higher globally and 3 times higher in the Tropics. More than ¼ of all 2024 forest disturbance from fire occurred in tropical forests. We found a statistically significant increasing trend of forest disturbance due to fire from 2002 to 2024 in all climate domains except Subtropical. High forest, low deforestation tropical countries were not exempt, with Guyana and the Republic of the Congo experiencing record forest disturbance due to fire. Our results agree with recently estimated increases in global forest fire emissions and active fire detections. The unprecedented scale of fires in the world's most remote forests is a potential harbinger of ecosystem tipping points. Protecting these remaining unfragmented high conservation value forests from this threat poses a daunting and as yet undeveloped policy and capacity challenge.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40690667 · DOI · PMC12318170
Pyrodiversity of boreal lake islands begets biodiversity of beetles, plants, and birds [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Global fire regimes are changing, raising concerns about the ability of fire-prone ecosystems to maintain biodiversity.
- Closing excerpt
- Our findings emphasize the importance of maintaining pyrodiversity in boreal landscapes to combat biodiversity loss in the age of "megafires" and suggest leveraging the fire refugia effects of large lakes within the region to conserve vital components of temporal pyrodiversity such as old-growth forests.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (228 words)
Global fire regimes are changing, raising concerns about the ability of fire-prone ecosystems to maintain biodiversity. We tested whether the pyrodiversity-biodiversity hypothesis (i.e., variation in postfire characteristics promotes biodiversity) or alternative hypotheses better explain patterns of biodiversity in a true island system. Using fixed-area sampling plots in a chronosequence of 42 boreal lake islands spanning gradients in island area (1-350.4 ha), isolation (0.1-7.9 km from mainland), and fire history (1-231+ year since fire), we tested whether alpha and beta diversity of beetles, plants, and birds increased with spatial (within-island variation in burn severity) and temporal (variation in time since fire among islands) pyrodiversity, respectively. Species richness of plants and birds increased with spatial pyrodiversity indicating that habitat heterogeneity from localized variation in burn severity supported more species in some groups. Beta diversity of all taxa increased with temporal pyrodiversity, highlighting the importance of conserving age-class variation within the boreal patch mosaic. In contrast, the habitat amount hypothesis and island biogeography theory were weak predictors of species richness across all taxa, and island area and isolation did not consistently affect beta diversity among the islands. Our findings emphasize the importance of maintaining pyrodiversity in boreal landscapes to combat biodiversity loss in the age of "megafires" and suggest leveraging the fire refugia effects of large lakes within the region to conserve vital components of temporal pyrodiversity such as old-growth forests.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41912353 · DOI · PMC13035461
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Critical Review of Health Impacts of Wildfire Smoke Exposure [5]
- Research article Wildland fire smoke and human health [6]
- Research article Ecological thresholds at the savanna-forest boundary: how plant traits, resources and fire govern the distribution of tropical biomes [7]
- Research article Cancer risk among firefighters: a review and meta-analysis of 32 studies [8]
- Research article Wildfire smoke exposure and human health: Significant gaps in research for a growing public health issue [9]
- Research article Global climate change and mental health [10]
References
- Juarez R, Phankitnirundorn K, Ozorio Dutra SV, Bond-Smith D, Lee AG, Maunakea AK. Health and Social Support in the Aftermath of the Maui Wildfires. . 2025. PMID 40768146 · DOI · PMC12329611
- Huang S, Lin HZ, Wei X. Global, regional and national burden of injuries caused by fire, heat, and hot substances from 1990 to 2021. . 2025. PMID 40392861 · DOI · PMC12091820
- Potapov P, Tyukavina A, Turubanova S, Hansen MC, Giglio L, Hernandez-Serna A, et al.. Unprecedentedly high global forest disturbance due to fire in 2023 and 2024. . 2025. PMID 40690667 · DOI · PMC12318170
- Bell AJ, Paterson SMA, Van Wilgenburg SL, Laroque CP, Wardle DA, Phillips ID. Pyrodiversity of boreal lake islands begets biodiversity of beetles, plants, and birds. . 2026. PMID 41912353 · DOI · PMC13035461
- Reid CE, Brauer M, Johnston FH, Jerrett M, Balmes JR, Elliott CT. Critical Review of Health Impacts of Wildfire Smoke Exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2016. PMID 27082891 · DOI · PMC5010409
- Cascio WE. Wildland fire smoke and human health. Sci Total Environ. 2018. PMID 29272827 · DOI · PMC6697173
- Hoffmann WA, Geiger EL, Gotsch SG, Rossatto DR, Silva LC, Lau OL, et al.. Ecological thresholds at the savanna-forest boundary: how plant traits, resources and fire govern the distribution of tropical biomes. Ecol Lett. 2012. PMID 22554474 · DOI
- LeMasters GK, Genaidy AM, Succop P, Deddens J, Sobeih T, Barriera-Viruet H, et al.. Cancer risk among firefighters: a review and meta-analysis of 32 studies. J Occup Environ Med. 2006. PMID 17099456 · DOI
- Black C, Tesfaigzi Y, Bassein JA, Miller LA. Wildfire smoke exposure and human health: Significant gaps in research for a growing public health issue. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017. PMID 28892756 · DOI · PMC5628149
- Palinkas LA, Wong M. Global climate change and mental health. Curr Opin Psychol. 2020. PMID 31349129 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.