Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Kidney, Urology and Women's Health›Urethral Stricture

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Urethral Stricture

Kidney, Urology and Women's Health · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

Narrowing of any part of the urethra.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,053 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Narrowing of any part of the urethra. It is characterized by decreased urinary stream and often other obstructive voiding symptoms.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Strictures, Urethral; Stricture, Urethral; Urethral Strictures; Urethral Stenosis; Stenoses, Urethral; Stenosis, Urethral; Urethral Stenoses; Anterior Urethral Stricture.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Urethral Obstruction

Related concepts

  • Urethra

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 6,095 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Urethral Stricture” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 1,089 of them (17.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,803 records.

Reviews account for 556 records (9.1%) and meta-analyses for 66. Randomized controlled trials number 132 (2.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,803 records; 2000-2009: 797 records; 2010-2019: 1,406 records; 2020 onward: 1,089 records2,803through 19997972000-20091,4062010-20191,0892020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,803
2000-2009797
2010-20191,406
2020 onward1,089
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 9.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 2.2 percentReviews9.1% (556)Meta-analyses1.1% (66)Randomized controlled trials2.2% (132)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 6,095 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews5569.1%
Meta-analyses661.1%
Randomized controlled trials1322.2%

Method: PubMed query "Urethral Stricture"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.

Reading the evidence in kidney, urology and women's health

Kidney, urinary and reproductive health research uses lab markers (such as creatinine), imaging, symptom scores and registry data on pregnancy and birth. Findings about pregnancy are especially sensitive to who was studied and when in pregnancy exposure occurred. Nothing on this page is advice about treatment, fertility or pregnancy; speak to a qualified clinician. Check the population, the outcome measured and whether the study accounted for other health differences between groups.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Clinical practice guideline for transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia (2021 Edition)
Zeng XT, Jin YH, Liu TZ, Chen FM, Ding DG, Fu M, et al.
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
41cc by
PMID 35361280 · DOI · PMC8974007
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine in Pediatric Urology: Urethral and Urinary Bladder Reconstruction
Casarin M, Morlacco A, Dal Moro F
2022Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
31cc by
PMID 35742803 · DOI · PMC9224288
Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review
Xiong S, Wang J, Zhu W, Yang K, Ding G, Li X, et al.
2020Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
27cc by
PMID 32775430 · DOI · PMC7407031
Mendelian Randomization Reveals Genetic Associations Between Immune Traits and Urethral Stricture
Guo Q, Guo JC, Zheng ZL, Yang K, Wang JQ, Li CY, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 41769046 · DOI · PMC12949340

Clinical practice guideline for transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia (2021 Edition) [1]

Research article Zeng XT, Jin YH, Liu TZ, Chen FM, Ding DG, Fu M, et al. · · 2022 · cited 41 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is highly prevalent among older men, impacting on their quality of life, sexual function, and genitourinary health, and has become an important global burden of disease.
Closing excerpt
We hope these recommendations can help support healthcare workers caring for patients having TUPKP for the treatment of BPH.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (453 words)

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is highly prevalent among older men, impacting on their quality of life, sexual function, and genitourinary health, and has become an important global burden of disease. Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate (TUPKP) is one of the foremost surgical procedures for the treatment of BPH. It has become well established in clinical practice with good efficacy and safety. In 2018, we issued the guideline "2018 Standard Edition". However much new direct evidence has now emerged and this may change some of previous recommendations. The time is ripe to develop new evidence-based guidelines, so we formed a working group of clinical experts and methodologists. The steering group members posed 31 questions relevant to the management of TUPKP for BPH covering the following areas: questions relevant to the perioperative period (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) of TUPKP in the treatment of BPH, postoperative complications and the level of surgeons' surgical skill. We searched the literature for direct evidence on the management of TUPKP for BPH, and assessed its certainty generated recommendations using the grade criteria by the European Association of Urology. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of an ungraded consensus-based statement. Finally, we issued 36 statements. Among them, 23 carried strong recommendations, and 13 carried weak recommendations for the stated procedure. They covered questions relevant to the aforementioned three areas. The preoperative period for TUPKP in the treatment of BPH included indications and contraindications for TUPKP, precautions for preoperative preparation in patients with renal impairment and urinary tract infection due to urinary retention, and preoperative prophylactic use of antibiotics. Questions relevant to the intraoperative period incorporated surgical operation techniques and prevention and management of bladder explosion. The application to different populations incorporating the efficacy and safety of TUPKP in the treatment of normal volume (< 80 ml) and large-volume (≥ 80 ml) BPH compared with transurethral urethral resection prostate, transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate and open prostatectomy; the efficacy and safety of TUPKP in high-risk populations and among people taking anticoagulant (antithrombotic) drugs. Questions relevant to the postoperative period incorporated the time and speed of flushing, the time indwelling catheters are needed, principles of postoperative therapeutic use of antibiotics, follow-up time and follow-up content. Questions related to complications incorporated types of complications and their incidence, postoperative leukocyturia, the treatment measures for the perforation and extravasation of the capsule, transurethral resection syndrome, postoperative bleeding, urinary catheter blockage, bladder spasm, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence, urethral stricture, rectal injury during surgery, postoperative erectile dysfunction and retrograde ejaculation. Final questions were related to surgeons' skills when performing TUPKP for the treatment of BPH. We hope these recommendations can help support healthcare workers caring for patients having TUPKP for the treatment of BPH.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35361280 · DOI · PMC8974007

Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine in Pediatric Urology: Urethral and Urinary Bladder Reconstruction [2]

Review article Casarin M, Morlacco A, Dal Moro F · · 2022 · cited 31 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
In the case of pediatric urology there are several congenital conditions, such as hypospadias and neurogenic bladder, which affect, respectively, the urethra and the urinary bladder.
Closing excerpt
Moreover, the main critical features needed for urinary tissue engineering have been highlighted and specifically focused on for pediatric application.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (197 words)

In the case of pediatric urology there are several congenital conditions, such as hypospadias and neurogenic bladder, which affect, respectively, the urethra and the urinary bladder. In fact, the gold standard consists of a urethroplasty procedure in the case of urethral malformations and enterocystoplasty in the case of urinary bladder disorders. However, both surgical procedures are associated with severe complications, such as fistulas, urethral strictures, and dehiscence of the repair or recurrence of chordee in the case of urethroplasty, and metabolic disturbances, stone formation, urine leakage, and chronic infections in the case of enterocystoplasty. With the aim of overcoming the issue related to the lack of sufficient and appropriate autologous tissue, increasing attention has been focused on tissue engineering. In this review, both the urethral and the urinary bladder reconstruction strategies were summarized, focusing on pediatric applications and evaluating all the biomaterials tested in both animal models and patients. Particular attention was paid to the capability for tissue regeneration in dependence on the eventual presence of seeded cell and growth factor combinations in several types of scaffolds. Moreover, the main critical features needed for urinary tissue engineering have been highlighted and specifically focused on for pediatric application.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35742803 · DOI · PMC9224288

Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review [3]

Review article Xiong S, Wang J, Zhu W, Yang K, Ding G, Li X, et al. · · 2020 · cited 27 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Ureteroplasty using onlay grafts or flaps emerged as an innovative procedure for the management of proximal and midureteral strictures.
Closing excerpt
Tissue engineering-based ureteroplasty through the implantation of patched scaffolds, such as the small intestine submucosa, with or without cell seeding, has induced successful ureteral regeneration structurally close to that of the native ureter and has resulted in good functional outcomes in animal models.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (229 words)

Ureteroplasty using onlay grafts or flaps emerged as an innovative procedure for the management of proximal and midureteral strictures. Autologous grafts or flaps used commonly in ureteroplasty include the oral mucosae, bladder mucosae, ileal mucosae, and appendiceal mucosae. Oral mucosa grafts, especially buccal mucosa grafts (BMGs), have gained wide acceptance as a graft choice for ureteroplasty. The reported length of BMG ureteroplasty ranged from 1.5 to 11 cm with success rates of 71.4%-100%. However, several studies have demonstrated that ureteroplasty using lingual mucosa grafts yields better recipient site outcomes and fewer donor site complications than that using BMGs. In addition, there is no essential difference in the efficacy and complication rates of BMG ureteroplasty using an anterior approach or a posterior approach. Intestinal graft or flap ureteroplasty was also reported. And the reported length of ileal or appendiceal flap ureteroplasty ranged from 1 to 8 cm with success rates of 75%-100%. Moreover, the bladder mucosa, renal pelvis wall, and penile/preputial skin have also been reported to be used for ureteroplasty and have achieved satisfactory outcomes, but each graft or flap has unique advantages and potential problems. Tissue engineering-based ureteroplasty through the implantation of patched scaffolds, such as the small intestine submucosa, with or without cell seeding, has induced successful ureteral regeneration structurally close to that of the native ureter and has resulted in good functional outcomes in animal models.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32775430 · DOI · PMC7407031

Mendelian Randomization Reveals Genetic Associations Between Immune Traits and Urethral Stricture [4]

Research article Guo Q, Guo JC, Zheng ZL, Yang K, Wang JQ, Li CY, et al. · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundThere is currently little research on the association between immune traits and urethral stricture, and the diversity of immune cell subtypes leads to an unclear association with urethral stricture.
Closing excerpt
This may guide the management and treatment of urethral stricture in the future.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (174 words)

BackgroundThere is currently little research on the association between immune traits and urethral stricture, and the diversity of immune cell subtypes leads to an unclear association with urethral stricture. This study investigated the relationship between immune cells and urethral stricture using the Mendelian randomization (MR) technique.MethodsWe assessed the causative relationships between urethral stricture (N = 341,285) and 731 immunological characteristics (N = 3757). The main technique was the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach, which was supplemented by MR-Egger and weighted median (WM). The robustness of MR results was assessed using sensitivity analyses, primarily the Egger intercept, Cochran's Q test, MR-PRESSO, and leave-one-out test.ResultsOur findings revealed that 37 immune phenotypes have suggestive causal relationships with urethral stricture, including 13 subtypes of B cells, four classical dendritic cells, three myeloid cells, five monocytes, four TBNK, five Treg cells, and three maturation stages of T cells. Sensitivity analyses revealed neither heterogeneity nor pleiotropy.ConclusionsOur findings supported a potential causal relationship between immune cells and urethral stricture. This may guide the management and treatment of urethral stricture in the future.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41769046 · DOI · PMC12949340

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: pressure-flow studies of voiding, urethral resistance, and urethral obstruction. International Continence Society Subcommittee on Standardization of Terminology of Pressure-Flow Studies [5]
    Griffiths D, Höfner K, van Mastrigt R, Rollema HJ, Spångberg A, Gleason D · Neurourol Urodyn · 1997 · cited 282 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Urethral strictures [6]
    Mundy AR, Andrich DE · BJU Int · 2011 · cited 252 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Male Urethral Stricture: American Urological Association Guideline [7]
    Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott S, Gonzalez CM, Kodama R, Peterson AC, et al. · J Urol · 2017 · cited 249 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Male urethral strictures and their management [8]
    Hampson LA, McAninch JW, Breyer BN · Nat Rev Urol · 2014 · cited 135 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Urethral Stricture Disease Guideline Amendment (2023) [9]
    Wessells H, Morey A, Souter L, Rahimi L, Vanni A · J Urol · 2023 · cited 100 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Current controversies in anterior urethral stricture repair: free-graft versus pedicled skin-flap reconstruction [10]
    Wessells H, McAninch JW · World J Urol · 1998 · cited 96 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Zeng XT, Jin YH, Liu TZ, Chen FM, Ding DG, Fu M, et al.. Clinical practice guideline for transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia (2021 Edition). . 2022. PMID 35361280 · DOI · PMC8974007
  2. Casarin M, Morlacco A, Dal Moro F. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine in Pediatric Urology: Urethral and Urinary Bladder Reconstruction. . 2022. PMID 35742803 · DOI · PMC9224288
  3. Xiong S, Wang J, Zhu W, Yang K, Ding G, Li X, et al.. Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review. . 2020. PMID 32775430 · DOI · PMC7407031
  4. Guo Q, Guo JC, Zheng ZL, Yang K, Wang JQ, Li CY, et al.. Mendelian Randomization Reveals Genetic Associations Between Immune Traits and Urethral Stricture. . 2026. PMID 41769046 · DOI · PMC12949340
  5. Griffiths D, Höfner K, van Mastrigt R, Rollema HJ, Spångberg A, Gleason D. Standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: pressure-flow studies of voiding, urethral resistance, and urethral obstruction. International Continence Society Subcommittee on Standardization of Terminology of Pressure-Flow Studies. Neurourol Urodyn. 1997. PMID 9021786 · DOI
  6. Mundy AR, Andrich DE. Urethral strictures. BJU Int. 2011. PMID 21176068 · DOI
  7. Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott S, Gonzalez CM, Kodama R, Peterson AC, et al.. Male Urethral Stricture: American Urological Association Guideline. J Urol. 2017. PMID 27497791 · DOI
  8. Hampson LA, McAninch JW, Breyer BN. Male urethral strictures and their management. Nat Rev Urol. 2014. PMID 24346008 · DOI · PMC4123447
  9. Wessells H, Morey A, Souter L, Rahimi L, Vanni A. Urethral Stricture Disease Guideline Amendment (2023). J Urol. 2023. PMID 37096574 · DOI
  10. Wessells H, McAninch JW. Current controversies in anterior urethral stricture repair: free-graft versus pedicled skin-flap reconstruction. World J Urol. 1998. PMID 9666540 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Urethral ObstructionKidney, Urology and Women's Health
  • UrethritisKidney, Urology and Women's Health
  • Acute Kidney InjuryKidney, Urology and Women's Health
  • AnuriaKidney, Urology and Women's Health
  • Atypical Hemolytic Uremic SyndromeKidney, Urology and Women's Health
  • AzotemiaKidney, Urology and Women's Health

All 73 articles in Kidney, Urology and Women's Health →

At a glance

6,095
PubMed records on this heading
18%
published since 2020
556
review articles
132
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-11-04; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Urethral ObstructionKidney, Urology and Women's Health
  • UrethritisKidney, Urology and Women's Health
  • Acute Kidney InjuryKidney, Urology and Women's Health
  • AnuriaKidney, Urology and Women's Health
  • Atypical Hemolytic Uremic SyndromeKidney, Urology and Women's Health

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support