Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,053 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Narrowing of any part of the urethra. It is characterized by decreased urinary stream and often other obstructive voiding symptoms.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Strictures, Urethral; Stricture, Urethral; Urethral Strictures; Urethral Stenosis; Stenoses, Urethral; Stenosis, Urethral; Urethral Stenoses; Anterior Urethral Stricture.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Urethral Obstruction
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 6,095 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Urethral Stricture” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 1,089 of them (17.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,803 records.
Reviews account for 556 records (9.1%) and meta-analyses for 66. Randomized controlled trials number 132 (2.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 2,803 |
| 2000-2009 | 797 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,406 |
| 2020 onward | 1,089 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 556 | 9.1% |
| Meta-analyses | 66 | 1.1% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 132 | 2.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Urethral Stricture"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.
Reading the evidence in kidney, urology and women's health
Kidney, urinary and reproductive health research uses lab markers (such as creatinine), imaging, symptom scores and registry data on pregnancy and birth. Findings about pregnancy are especially sensitive to who was studied and when in pregnancy exposure occurred. Nothing on this page is advice about treatment, fertility or pregnancy; speak to a qualified clinician. Check the population, the outcome measured and whether the study accounted for other health differences between groups.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical practice guideline for transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia (2021 Edition) | 2022 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 41 | cc by PMID 35361280 · DOI · PMC8974007 |
| Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine in Pediatric Urology: Urethral and Urinary Bladder Reconstruction | 2022 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 31 | cc by PMID 35742803 · DOI · PMC9224288 |
| Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review | 2020 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 27 | cc by PMID 32775430 · DOI · PMC7407031 |
| Mendelian Randomization Reveals Genetic Associations Between Immune Traits and Urethral Stricture | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 41769046 · DOI · PMC12949340 |
Clinical practice guideline for transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia (2021 Edition) [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is highly prevalent among older men, impacting on their quality of life, sexual function, and genitourinary health, and has become an important global burden of disease.
- Closing excerpt
- We hope these recommendations can help support healthcare workers caring for patients having TUPKP for the treatment of BPH.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (453 words)
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is highly prevalent among older men, impacting on their quality of life, sexual function, and genitourinary health, and has become an important global burden of disease. Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate (TUPKP) is one of the foremost surgical procedures for the treatment of BPH. It has become well established in clinical practice with good efficacy and safety. In 2018, we issued the guideline "2018 Standard Edition". However much new direct evidence has now emerged and this may change some of previous recommendations. The time is ripe to develop new evidence-based guidelines, so we formed a working group of clinical experts and methodologists. The steering group members posed 31 questions relevant to the management of TUPKP for BPH covering the following areas: questions relevant to the perioperative period (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) of TUPKP in the treatment of BPH, postoperative complications and the level of surgeons' surgical skill. We searched the literature for direct evidence on the management of TUPKP for BPH, and assessed its certainty generated recommendations using the grade criteria by the European Association of Urology. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of an ungraded consensus-based statement. Finally, we issued 36 statements. Among them, 23 carried strong recommendations, and 13 carried weak recommendations for the stated procedure. They covered questions relevant to the aforementioned three areas. The preoperative period for TUPKP in the treatment of BPH included indications and contraindications for TUPKP, precautions for preoperative preparation in patients with renal impairment and urinary tract infection due to urinary retention, and preoperative prophylactic use of antibiotics. Questions relevant to the intraoperative period incorporated surgical operation techniques and prevention and management of bladder explosion. The application to different populations incorporating the efficacy and safety of TUPKP in the treatment of normal volume (< 80 ml) and large-volume (≥ 80 ml) BPH compared with transurethral urethral resection prostate, transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate and open prostatectomy; the efficacy and safety of TUPKP in high-risk populations and among people taking anticoagulant (antithrombotic) drugs. Questions relevant to the postoperative period incorporated the time and speed of flushing, the time indwelling catheters are needed, principles of postoperative therapeutic use of antibiotics, follow-up time and follow-up content. Questions related to complications incorporated types of complications and their incidence, postoperative leukocyturia, the treatment measures for the perforation and extravasation of the capsule, transurethral resection syndrome, postoperative bleeding, urinary catheter blockage, bladder spasm, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence, urethral stricture, rectal injury during surgery, postoperative erectile dysfunction and retrograde ejaculation. Final questions were related to surgeons' skills when performing TUPKP for the treatment of BPH. We hope these recommendations can help support healthcare workers caring for patients having TUPKP for the treatment of BPH.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35361280 · DOI · PMC8974007
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine in Pediatric Urology: Urethral and Urinary Bladder Reconstruction [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- In the case of pediatric urology there are several congenital conditions, such as hypospadias and neurogenic bladder, which affect, respectively, the urethra and the urinary bladder.
- Closing excerpt
- Moreover, the main critical features needed for urinary tissue engineering have been highlighted and specifically focused on for pediatric application.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (197 words)
In the case of pediatric urology there are several congenital conditions, such as hypospadias and neurogenic bladder, which affect, respectively, the urethra and the urinary bladder. In fact, the gold standard consists of a urethroplasty procedure in the case of urethral malformations and enterocystoplasty in the case of urinary bladder disorders. However, both surgical procedures are associated with severe complications, such as fistulas, urethral strictures, and dehiscence of the repair or recurrence of chordee in the case of urethroplasty, and metabolic disturbances, stone formation, urine leakage, and chronic infections in the case of enterocystoplasty. With the aim of overcoming the issue related to the lack of sufficient and appropriate autologous tissue, increasing attention has been focused on tissue engineering. In this review, both the urethral and the urinary bladder reconstruction strategies were summarized, focusing on pediatric applications and evaluating all the biomaterials tested in both animal models and patients. Particular attention was paid to the capability for tissue regeneration in dependence on the eventual presence of seeded cell and growth factor combinations in several types of scaffolds. Moreover, the main critical features needed for urinary tissue engineering have been highlighted and specifically focused on for pediatric application.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35742803 · DOI · PMC9224288
Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Ureteroplasty using onlay grafts or flaps emerged as an innovative procedure for the management of proximal and midureteral strictures.
- Closing excerpt
- Tissue engineering-based ureteroplasty through the implantation of patched scaffolds, such as the small intestine submucosa, with or without cell seeding, has induced successful ureteral regeneration structurally close to that of the native ureter and has resulted in good functional outcomes in animal models.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (229 words)
Ureteroplasty using onlay grafts or flaps emerged as an innovative procedure for the management of proximal and midureteral strictures. Autologous grafts or flaps used commonly in ureteroplasty include the oral mucosae, bladder mucosae, ileal mucosae, and appendiceal mucosae. Oral mucosa grafts, especially buccal mucosa grafts (BMGs), have gained wide acceptance as a graft choice for ureteroplasty. The reported length of BMG ureteroplasty ranged from 1.5 to 11 cm with success rates of 71.4%-100%. However, several studies have demonstrated that ureteroplasty using lingual mucosa grafts yields better recipient site outcomes and fewer donor site complications than that using BMGs. In addition, there is no essential difference in the efficacy and complication rates of BMG ureteroplasty using an anterior approach or a posterior approach. Intestinal graft or flap ureteroplasty was also reported. And the reported length of ileal or appendiceal flap ureteroplasty ranged from 1 to 8 cm with success rates of 75%-100%. Moreover, the bladder mucosa, renal pelvis wall, and penile/preputial skin have also been reported to be used for ureteroplasty and have achieved satisfactory outcomes, but each graft or flap has unique advantages and potential problems. Tissue engineering-based ureteroplasty through the implantation of patched scaffolds, such as the small intestine submucosa, with or without cell seeding, has induced successful ureteral regeneration structurally close to that of the native ureter and has resulted in good functional outcomes in animal models.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32775430 · DOI · PMC7407031
Mendelian Randomization Reveals Genetic Associations Between Immune Traits and Urethral Stricture [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundThere is currently little research on the association between immune traits and urethral stricture, and the diversity of immune cell subtypes leads to an unclear association with urethral stricture.
- Closing excerpt
- This may guide the management and treatment of urethral stricture in the future.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (174 words)
BackgroundThere is currently little research on the association between immune traits and urethral stricture, and the diversity of immune cell subtypes leads to an unclear association with urethral stricture. This study investigated the relationship between immune cells and urethral stricture using the Mendelian randomization (MR) technique.MethodsWe assessed the causative relationships between urethral stricture (N = 341,285) and 731 immunological characteristics (N = 3757). The main technique was the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach, which was supplemented by MR-Egger and weighted median (WM). The robustness of MR results was assessed using sensitivity analyses, primarily the Egger intercept, Cochran's Q test, MR-PRESSO, and leave-one-out test.ResultsOur findings revealed that 37 immune phenotypes have suggestive causal relationships with urethral stricture, including 13 subtypes of B cells, four classical dendritic cells, three myeloid cells, five monocytes, four TBNK, five Treg cells, and three maturation stages of T cells. Sensitivity analyses revealed neither heterogeneity nor pleiotropy.ConclusionsOur findings supported a potential causal relationship between immune cells and urethral stricture. This may guide the management and treatment of urethral stricture in the future.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41769046 · DOI · PMC12949340
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: pressure-flow studies of voiding, urethral resistance, and urethral obstruction. International Continence Society Subcommittee on Standardization of Terminology of Pressure-Flow Studies [5]
- Research article Urethral strictures [6]
- Research article Male Urethral Stricture: American Urological Association Guideline [7]
- Research article Male urethral strictures and their management [8]
- Research article Urethral Stricture Disease Guideline Amendment (2023) [9]
- Research article Current controversies in anterior urethral stricture repair: free-graft versus pedicled skin-flap reconstruction [10]
References
- Zeng XT, Jin YH, Liu TZ, Chen FM, Ding DG, Fu M, et al.. Clinical practice guideline for transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia (2021 Edition). . 2022. PMID 35361280 · DOI · PMC8974007
- Casarin M, Morlacco A, Dal Moro F. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine in Pediatric Urology: Urethral and Urinary Bladder Reconstruction. . 2022. PMID 35742803 · DOI · PMC9224288
- Xiong S, Wang J, Zhu W, Yang K, Ding G, Li X, et al.. Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review. . 2020. PMID 32775430 · DOI · PMC7407031
- Guo Q, Guo JC, Zheng ZL, Yang K, Wang JQ, Li CY, et al.. Mendelian Randomization Reveals Genetic Associations Between Immune Traits and Urethral Stricture. . 2026. PMID 41769046 · DOI · PMC12949340
- Griffiths D, Höfner K, van Mastrigt R, Rollema HJ, Spångberg A, Gleason D. Standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: pressure-flow studies of voiding, urethral resistance, and urethral obstruction. International Continence Society Subcommittee on Standardization of Terminology of Pressure-Flow Studies. Neurourol Urodyn. 1997. PMID 9021786 · DOI
- Mundy AR, Andrich DE. Urethral strictures. BJU Int. 2011. PMID 21176068 · DOI
- Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott S, Gonzalez CM, Kodama R, Peterson AC, et al.. Male Urethral Stricture: American Urological Association Guideline. J Urol. 2017. PMID 27497791 · DOI
- Hampson LA, McAninch JW, Breyer BN. Male urethral strictures and their management. Nat Rev Urol. 2014. PMID 24346008 · DOI · PMC4123447
- Wessells H, Morey A, Souter L, Rahimi L, Vanni A. Urethral Stricture Disease Guideline Amendment (2023). J Urol. 2023. PMID 37096574 · DOI
- Wessells H, McAninch JW. Current controversies in anterior urethral stricture repair: free-graft versus pedicled skin-flap reconstruction. World J Urol. 1998. PMID 9666540 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.