Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat›Tympanic Membrane Perforation

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Tympanic Membrane Perforation

Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A temporary or persistent opening in the eardrum (tympanic membrane).

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (978 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A temporary or persistent opening in the eardrum (tympanic membrane). Clinical signs depend on the size, location, and associated pathological condition.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Membrane Perforation, Tympanic; Tympanic Membrane Rupture; Membrane Rupture, Tympanic; Rupture, Tympanic Membrane; Eardrum Perforation; Perforation, Eardrum.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Ear Diseases; Wounds and Injuries

Related concepts

  • Tympanic Membrane

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 2,212 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Tympanic Membrane Perforation” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 581 of them (26.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 826 records.

Reviews account for 200 records (9.0%) and meta-analyses for 41. Randomized controlled trials number 133 (6.0%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 283 records; 2000-2009: 522 records; 2010-2019: 826 records; 2020 onward: 581 records283through 19995222000-20098262010-20195812020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999283
2000-2009522
2010-2019826
2020 onward581
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 9.0 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.9 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 6.0 percentReviews9.0% (200)Meta-analyses1.9% (41)Randomized controlled trials6.0% (133)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 2,212 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2009.0%
Meta-analyses411.9%
Randomized controlled trials1336.0%

Method: PubMed query "Tympanic Membrane Perforation"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.

Reading the evidence in eye, ear, nose and throat

Eye, hearing, nose and throat studies rely on specialist tests (visual acuity, eye pressure, audiograms, scopes) and on patient-reported symptoms, which vary between people and with age. Some conditions improve without treatment, so comparison groups matter. Nothing on this page is advice about diagnosis or treatment; sudden loss of sight or hearing needs urgent care from a qualified clinician. Check how the outcome was tested, the age of the people studied and how long they were followed.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty
Hsu YC, Kuo CL, Huang TC
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
44cc by
PMID 29973286 · DOI · PMC6033204
Treatment of tympanic membrane perforation using bacterial cellulose: a randomized controlled trial
Silveira FC, Pinto FC, Caldas Neto Sda S, Leal Mde C, Cesário J, Aguiar JL
2016Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
42cc by
PMID 26631330 · DOI · PMC9449027
Plasminogen initiates and potentiates the healing of acute and chronic tympanic membrane perforations in mice
Shen Y, Guo Y, Wilczynska M, Li J, Hellström S, Ny T
2014Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
26cc by
PMID 24393366 · DOI · PMC3895791
Adjunctive Serum Drops to Paper Patch for Tympanic Membrane Perforation
Yazdani Y, Lee EJ, Tawk K, Abouzari M, Djalilian HR
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 41937679 · DOI · PMC13173778

A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty [1]

Research article Hsu YC, Kuo CL, Huang TC · · 2018 · cited 44 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundThis study compares endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty for the treatment of chronic otitis media (COM) without cholesteatoma.
Closing excerpt
(CGHIRB No: CGH-P105012 ).
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (271 words)

BackgroundThis study compares endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty for the treatment of chronic otitis media (COM) without cholesteatoma.MethodsThis retrospective study included 153 ears (139 patients) treated surgically (endoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty) for COM in the absence of cholesteatoma at our hospital between January 2008 and October 2015. The adoption of transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) or microscopic ear surgery (MES) was divided temporally (before and since 2014). Comparisons between these groups focused on the following: (I) surgical outcomes, including successful tympanic membrane healing and post-operative complications; (II) restoration of hearing; and (III) consumption of medical resources, including the duration of surgery and anesthesia. All patients had a follow-up period of at least 3 months after surgery.ResultsNo statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding surgical outcome or hearing restoration. TEES resulted in the successful healing of 96.2% of ear drums, whereas MES led to successful healing in 92% (p = 0.2826) of cases. The average hearing gains following surgery were 10.27 ± 6.4 and 12.43 ± 7.46 dB in TEES and MES, respectively. The consumption of medical resources in the TEES group was lower than that of the MES group (TEES versus MES) regarding the average operating time (87.8 ± 19.01 min (mins) versus 110.2 ± 17.0 (mins) (p ConclusionsThe results indicate that TEES can achieve surgical outcomes and hearing restoration comparable to those of MES. In addition, TEES appears to be associated with shorter surgical and anesthesia time, which makes it an ideal alternative for the management of COM without cholesteatoma.Trial registrationThis study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cathay General Hospital. (CGHIRB No: CGH-P105012 ).

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29973286 · DOI · PMC6033204

Treatment of tympanic membrane perforation using bacterial cellulose: a randomized controlled trial [2]

Randomized controlled trial Silveira FC, Pinto FC, Caldas Neto Sda S, Leal Mde C, Cesário J, Aguiar JL · · 2016 · cited 42 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
IntroductionPromising treatments for tympanic membrane perforation closure have been studied.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionBacterial cellulose grafts promoted the closure of the tympanic membrane perforations, and were demonstrated to be innovative, effective, safe, minimally invasive, efficacious and to have a very low cost.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (214 words)

IntroductionPromising treatments for tympanic membrane perforation closure have been studied. Therapies derived from tissue engineering probably eliminate the need for conventional surgery. Bacterial cellulose is presented as an alternative that is safe, biocompatible, and has low toxicity.ObjectivesTo investigate the effect on healing of direct application of a bacterial cellulose graft on the tympanic membrane compared to the conventional approach with autologous fascia.MethodsRandomized controlled trial. Forty patients with tympanic membrane perforations secondary to chronic otitis media were included, and were randomly assigned to an experimental group (20), treated with a bacterial cellulose graft (BC) and control group (20), treated with autologous temporal fascia (fascia). We evaluated the surgical time, hospital stay, time of epithelialization and the rate of tympanic perforation closure. Hospital costs were compared. The statistical significance level accepted was established at pResultsThe closure of perforations was similar in both groups. The average operation time in the fascia group was 76.50 min versus 14.06 min bacterial cellulose in the group (p=0.0001). The hospital cost by the Brazilian public health system was R$ 600.00 for the bacterial cellulose group, and R$ 7778.00 for the fascia group (p=0.0001).ConclusionBacterial cellulose grafts promoted the closure of the tympanic membrane perforations, and were demonstrated to be innovative, effective, safe, minimally invasive, efficacious and to have a very low cost.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 26631330 · DOI · PMC9449027

Plasminogen initiates and potentiates the healing of acute and chronic tympanic membrane perforations in mice [3]

Research article Shen Y, Guo Y, Wilczynska M, Li J, Hellström S, Ny T · · 2014 · cited 26 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundMost tympanic membrane (TM) perforations heal spontaneously, but approximately 10-20% remain open as chronic TM perforations.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionOur data suggests that plg is a promising drug candidate for the treatment of chronic TM perforations in humans.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (293 words)

BackgroundMost tympanic membrane (TM) perforations heal spontaneously, but approximately 10-20% remain open as chronic TM perforations. Chronic perforations can lead to an impaired hearing ability and recurrent middle ear infections. Traditionally, these perforations must be surgically closed, which is costly and time consuming. Therefore, there is a need for simpler therapeutic strategies. Previous studies by us have shown that plasminogen (plg) is a potent pro-inflammatory regulator that accelerates cutaneous wound healing in mice. We have also shown that the healing of TM perforations is completely arrested in plg-deficient (plg(-/-)) mice and that these mice develop chronic TM perforations. In the present study, we investigated the therapeutic potential of local plg injection in acute and chronic TM perforation mice models.MethodsPlg(-/-) mice and wild-type mice were subjected to standardized TM perforations followed by local injection of plg into the soft tissue surrounding the TM. TM perforations with chronic characteristics were induced by leaving TM perforations in plg(-/-) mice untreated for 9 days before treatment. The healing process was observed through otomicroscope and finally confirmed by immunostaining. The quality of TM healing was evaluated based on the morphology of the TM.ResultDaily local injections of plg into the soft tissue surrounding the TM restored the ability to heal TM perforations in plg-/- mice in a dose-dependent manner, and potentiated the healing rate and quality in wild-type mice. A single local injection of plg initiated the healing of the chronic-like TM perforations in these mice, resulting in a closed TM with a continuous but rather thick outer keratinocyte layer. However, three plg injections led to a completely healed TM with a thin keratinizing squamous epithelium covering a connective tissue layer.ConclusionOur data suggests that plg is a promising drug candidate for the treatment of chronic TM perforations in humans.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 24393366 · DOI · PMC3895791

Adjunctive Serum Drops to Paper Patch for Tympanic Membrane Perforation [4]

Research article Yazdani Y, Lee EJ, Tawk K, Abouzari M, Djalilian HR · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of autologous serum drops combined with paper patch myringoplasty in enhancing tympanic membrane (TM) perforation closure among patients with prior patch failure.
Closing excerpt
Further studies with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-ups are warranted.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (200 words)

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of autologous serum drops combined with paper patch myringoplasty in enhancing tympanic membrane (TM) perforation closure among patients with prior patch failure.MethodsThis retrospective chart review included 81 patients with chronic TM perforations unresponsive to initial paper patching. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the experimental group received autologous serum drops alongside secondary paper patching, while the control group received patching alone. The primary outcome was TM closure at 8 weeks. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were used to evaluate time-to-closure and the effect of patient variables.ResultsClosure rates were significantly higher in the experimental group (54.5%) compared to the control group (21.6%; P = .002). The addition of serum drops was associated with improved healing outcomes, even in cases unresponsive to initial patching. Perforation size and location influenced closure, with smaller and posterior TM perforations showing higher success. No significant associations were found between healing and age, sex, race, comorbidities, or perforation etiology. No adverse effects from serum drops were reported.ConclusionAutologous serum drops significantly improve TM closure rates when added to paper patch myringoplasty, offering a safe, cost-effective, and non-surgical option for managing chronic perforations. Further studies with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-ups are warranted.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41937679 · DOI · PMC13173778

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Tympanoplasty for Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforation in Children: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [5]
    Hardman J, Muzaffar J, Nankivell P, Coulson C · Otol Neurotol · 2015 · cited 96 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Cartilage tympanoplasty: literature review [6]
    Yung M · J Laryngol Otol · 2008 · cited 74 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Cartilage tympanoplasty [7]
    Dornhoffer JL · Otolaryngol Clin North Am · 2006 · cited 72 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Intratympanic corticosteroids for sudden sensorineural hearing loss [8]
    Plontke SK, Meisner C, Agrawal S, Cayé-Thomasen P, Galbraith K, Mikulec AA, et al. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2022 · cited 69 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Is cartilage better than temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty? Implications for current surgical practice [9]
    Iacovou E, Vlastarakos PV, Papacharalampous G, Kyrodimos E, Nikolopoulos TP · Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol · 2013 · cited 64 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Repair of tympanic membrane perforation using novel adjuvant therapies: a contemporary review of experimental and tissue engineering studies [10]
    Hong P, Bance M, Gratzer PF · Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol · 2013 · cited 55 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Hsu YC, Kuo CL, Huang TC. A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty. . 2018. PMID 29973286 · DOI · PMC6033204
  2. Silveira FC, Pinto FC, Caldas Neto Sda S, Leal Mde C, Cesário J, Aguiar JL. Treatment of tympanic membrane perforation using bacterial cellulose: a randomized controlled trial. . 2016. PMID 26631330 · DOI · PMC9449027
  3. Shen Y, Guo Y, Wilczynska M, Li J, Hellström S, Ny T. Plasminogen initiates and potentiates the healing of acute and chronic tympanic membrane perforations in mice. . 2014. PMID 24393366 · DOI · PMC3895791
  4. Yazdani Y, Lee EJ, Tawk K, Abouzari M, Djalilian HR. Adjunctive Serum Drops to Paper Patch for Tympanic Membrane Perforation. . 2026. PMID 41937679 · DOI · PMC13173778
  5. Hardman J, Muzaffar J, Nankivell P, Coulson C. Tympanoplasty for Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforation in Children: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol. 2015. PMID 25899552 · DOI
  6. Yung M. Cartilage tympanoplasty: literature review. J Laryngol Otol. 2008. PMID 18312709 · DOI
  7. Dornhoffer JL. Cartilage tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2006. PMID 17097439 · DOI
  8. Plontke SK, Meisner C, Agrawal S, Cayé-Thomasen P, Galbraith K, Mikulec AA, et al.. Intratympanic corticosteroids for sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID 35867413 · DOI · PMC9307133
  9. Iacovou E, Vlastarakos PV, Papacharalampous G, Kyrodimos E, Nikolopoulos TP. Is cartilage better than temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty? Implications for current surgical practice. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013. PMID 23321796 · DOI
  10. Hong P, Bance M, Gratzer PF. Repair of tympanic membrane perforation using novel adjuvant therapies: a contemporary review of experimental and tissue engineering studies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013. PMID 23044356 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Tympanic MembraneAnatomy and Physiology
  • Otitis ExternaEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • Ear CanalAnatomy and Physiology
  • Retinal DystrophiesEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • ExocytosisMolecular Biology
  • Membrane FusionMolecular Biology

All 51 articles in Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat →

At a glance

2,212
PubMed records on this heading
26%
published since 2020
200
review articles
133
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-11-04; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Tympanic MembraneAnatomy and Physiology
  • Otitis ExternaEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • Ear CanalAnatomy and Physiology
  • Retinal DystrophiesEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • ExocytosisMolecular Biology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support