Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (808 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The adherence and merging of cell membranes, intracellular membranes, or artificial membranes to each other or to viruses, parasites, or interstitial particles through a variety of chemical and physical processes.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Fusion, Membrane; Fusions, Membrane; Membrane Fusions.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Cell Physiological Phenomena
- See also
- HIV Fusion Inhibitors
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 9,279 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Membrane Fusion” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,110 of them (12.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 3,161 records.
Reviews account for 1,522 records (16.4%) and meta-analyses for 0. Randomized controlled trials number 2 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 2,669 |
| 2000-2009 | 3,161 |
| 2010-2019 | 2,339 |
| 2020 onward | 1,110 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,522 | 16.4% |
| Meta-analyses | 0 | 0.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 2 | 0.0% |
Method: PubMed query "Membrane Fusion"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in molecular biology
Molecular biology establishes mechanisms through controlled experiments, often in simplified systems such as purified proteins, cultured cells or model organisms. Such work can show what is possible in a defined system, but whether a pathway matters in a whole organism or in human disease needs further evidence. Check the experimental system, whether findings were reproduced by independent groups, and whether the authors tested the mechanism directly or inferred it from correlation.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release | 2018 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1,940 | cc by PMID 28733901 · DOI · PMC5756260 |
| Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion | 2020 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1,084 | cc by PMID 32231345 · DOI · PMC7104723 |
| Altered TMPRSS2 usage by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron impacts infectivity and fusogenicity | 2022 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 993 | cc by PMID 35104837 · DOI · PMC8942856 |
| Atg23 prevents aberrant fusion of Atg9 vesicles during delivery to autophagosome formation sites | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1 | cc by PMID 42477132 · DOI · PMC13534743 |
Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Exosomes are nanosized membrane vesicles released by fusion of an organelle of the endocytic pathway, the multivesicular body, with the plasma membrane.
- Closing excerpt
- Finally, methodological aspects related to exosome release studies are discussed.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (165 words)
Exosomes are nanosized membrane vesicles released by fusion of an organelle of the endocytic pathway, the multivesicular body, with the plasma membrane. This process was discovered more than 30 years ago, and during these years, exosomes have gone from being considered as cellular waste disposal to mediate a novel mechanism of cell-to-cell communication. The exponential interest in exosomes experienced during recent years is due to their important roles in health and disease and to their potential clinical application in therapy and diagnosis. However, important aspects of the biology of exosomes remain unknown. To explore the use of exosomes in the clinic, it is essential that the basic molecular mechanisms behind the transport and function of these vesicles are better understood. We have here summarized what is presently known about how exosomes are formed and released by cells. Moreover, other cellular processes related to exosome biogenesis and release, such as autophagy and lysosomal exocytosis are presented. Finally, methodological aspects related to exosome release studies are discussed.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28733901 · DOI · PMC5756260
Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The recent outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan, China has posed a serious threat to global public health.
- Closing excerpt
- Intranasal application of EK1C4 before or after challenge with HCoV-OC43 protected mice from infection, suggesting that EK1C4 could be used for prevention and treatment of infection by the currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 and other emerging SARSr-CoVs.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (260 words)
The recent outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan, China has posed a serious threat to global public health. To develop specific anti-coronavirus therapeutics and prophylactics, the molecular mechanism that underlies viral infection must first be defined. Therefore, we herein established a SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein-mediated cell-cell fusion assay and found that SARS-CoV-2 showed a superior plasma membrane fusion capacity compared to that of SARS-CoV. We solved the X-ray crystal structure of six-helical bundle (6-HB) core of the HR1 and HR2 domains in the SARS-CoV-2 S protein S2 subunit, revealing that several mutated amino acid residues in the HR1 domain may be associated with enhanced interactions with the HR2 domain. We previously developed a pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor, EK1, which targeted the HR1 domain and could inhibit infection by divergent human coronaviruses tested, including SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Here we generated a series of lipopeptides derived from EK1 and found that EK1C4 was the most potent fusion inhibitor against SARS-CoV-2 S protein-mediated membrane fusion and pseudovirus infection with IC50s of 1.3 and 15.8 nM, about 241- and 149-fold more potent than the original EK1 peptide, respectively. EK1C4 was also highly effective against membrane fusion and infection of other human coronavirus pseudoviruses tested, including SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, as well as SARSr-CoVs, and potently inhibited the replication of 5 live human coronaviruses examined, including SARS-CoV-2. Intranasal application of EK1C4 before or after challenge with HCoV-OC43 protected mice from infection, suggesting that EK1C4 could be used for prevention and treatment of infection by the currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 and other emerging SARSr-CoVs.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32231345 · DOI · PMC7104723
Altered TMPRSS2 usage by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron impacts infectivity and fusogenicity [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.
- Closing excerpt
- The less efficient spike cleavage of Omicron at S1/S2 is associated with a shift in cellular tropism away from TMPRSS2-expressing cells, with implications for altered pathogenesis.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (253 words)
The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 variant emerged in 20211 and has multiple mutations in its spike protein2. Here we show that the spike protein of Omicron has a higher affinity for ACE2 compared with Delta, and a marked change in its antigenicity increases Omicron's evasion of therapeutic monoclonal and vaccine-elicited polyclonal neutralizing antibodies after two doses. mRNA vaccination as a third vaccine dose rescues and broadens neutralization. Importantly, the antiviral drugs remdesivir and molnupiravir retain efficacy against Omicron BA.1. Replication was similar for Omicron and Delta virus isolates in human nasal epithelial cultures. However, in lung cells and gut cells, Omicron demonstrated lower replication. Omicron spike protein was less efficiently cleaved compared with Delta. The differences in replication were mapped to the entry efficiency of the virus on the basis of spike-pseudotyped virus assays. The defect in entry of Omicron pseudotyped virus to specific cell types effectively correlated with higher cellular RNA expression of TMPRSS2, and deletion of TMPRSS2 affected Delta entry to a greater extent than Omicron. Furthermore, drug inhibitors targeting specific entry pathways3 demonstrated that the Omicron spike inefficiently uses the cellular protease TMPRSS2, which promotes cell entry through plasma membrane fusion, with greater dependency on cell entry through the endocytic pathway. Consistent with suboptimal S1/S2 cleavage and inability to use TMPRSS2, syncytium formation by the Omicron spike was substantially impaired compared with the Delta spike. The less efficient spike cleavage of Omicron at S1/S2 is associated with a shift in cellular tropism away from TMPRSS2-expressing cells, with implications for altered pathogenesis.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35104837 · DOI · PMC8942856
Atg23 prevents aberrant fusion of Atg9 vesicles during delivery to autophagosome formation sites [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Autophagosome biogenesis depends on the accurate delivery of membrane lipids to the pre-autophagosomal structure.
- Closing excerpt
- Together, these findings reveal an Atg1-dependent phosphorylation switch that regulates Atg9 vesicle dynamics during autophagosome biogenesis.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (130 words)
Autophagosome biogenesis depends on the accurate delivery of membrane lipids to the pre-autophagosomal structure. Golgi/endosome-derived Atg9 vesicles provide the membrane seed for this process, but how they are trafficked through the cytoplasm while avoiding inappropriate fusion remains unclear. Here we show that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the soluble Atg9-interacting protein Atg23 remains associated with Atg9 vesicles after their biogenesis. This association shields Atg9 vesicles from aberrant SNARE-dependent fusion as they diffuse through the cytoplasm en route to the autophagosome formation site. We further show that upon vesicle arrival at the site, Atg9 phosphorylation by the autophagy initiation kinase Atg1 releases Atg23, facilitating recruitment of the downstream factor Atg2, a lipid transfer protein for membrane expansion. Together, these findings reveal an Atg1-dependent phosphorylation switch that regulates Atg9 vesicle dynamics during autophagosome biogenesis.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42477132 · DOI · PMC13534743
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress [5]
- Research article SNAREs--engines for membrane fusion [6]
- Research article Structure, Function, and Evolution of Coronavirus Spike Proteins [7]
- Research article Membrane fusion: grappling with SNARE and SM proteins [8]
- Research article Mitochondrial fusion and fission in cell life and death [9]
- Research article Lysosomes: fusion and function [10]
References
- Hessvik NP, Llorente A. Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. . 2018. PMID 28733901 · DOI · PMC5756260
- Xia S, Liu M, Wang C, Xu W, Lan Q, Feng S, et al.. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion. . 2020. PMID 32231345 · DOI · PMC7104723
- Meng B, Abdullahi A, Ferreira IATM, Goonawardane N, Saito A, Kimura I, et al.. Altered TMPRSS2 usage by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron impacts infectivity and fusogenicity. . 2022. PMID 35104837 · DOI · PMC8942856
- Kimura T, Shima T, Kotani T, Nakatogawa H. Atg23 prevents aberrant fusion of Atg9 vesicles during delivery to autophagosome formation sites. . 2026. PMID 42477132 · DOI · PMC13534743
- Youle RJ, van der Bliek AM. Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress. Science. 2012. PMID 22936770 · DOI · PMC4762028
- Jahn R, Scheller RH. SNAREs--engines for membrane fusion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006. PMID 16912714 · DOI
- Li F. Structure, Function, and Evolution of Coronavirus Spike Proteins. Annu Rev Virol. 2016. PMID 27578435 · DOI · PMC5457962
- Südhof TC, Rothman JE. Membrane fusion: grappling with SNARE and SM proteins. Science. 2009. PMID 19164740 · DOI · PMC3736821
- Westermann B. Mitochondrial fusion and fission in cell life and death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010. PMID 21102612 · DOI
- Luzio JP, Pryor PR, Bright NA. Lysosomes: fusion and function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007. PMID 17637737 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.