Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Psychiatry and Psychology›Self Efficacy

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Self Efficacy

Psychiatry and Psychology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Cognitive mechanism based on expectations or beliefs about one's ability to perform actions necessary to produce a given effect.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (710 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Cognitive mechanism based on expectations or beliefs about one's ability to perform actions necessary to produce a given effect. It is also a theoretical component of behavior change in various therapeutic treatments. (APA, Thesaurus of Psychological Index Terms, 1994)

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Efficacy, Self.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Self Concept

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 30,751 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Self Efficacy” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 10,373 of them (33.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 13,399 records.

Reviews account for 1,724 records (5.6%) and meta-analyses for 310. Randomized controlled trials number 4,181 (13.6%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 7,250 records; 2010-2019: 13,399 records; 2020 onward: 10,373 records0through 19997,2502000-200913,3992010-201910,3732020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-20097,250
2010-201913,399
2020 onward10,373
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.6 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 13.6 percentReviews5.6% (1,724)Meta-analyses1.0% (310)Randomized controlled trials13.6% (4,181)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 30,751 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,7245.6%
Meta-analyses3101.0%
Randomized controlled trials4,18113.6%

Method: PubMed query "Self Efficacy"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in psychiatry and psychology

Research on mental health and behaviour relies on questionnaires, interviews and rating scales rather than physical measurements, so how a condition was defined and measured shapes every result. Many studies are observational or small, placebo responses can be large, and findings in one group or culture may not carry over to another. Nothing on this page is advice about diagnosis or treatment; anyone worried about their mental health should talk to a qualified clinician. Check how outcomes were measured, who took part and how long they were followed.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Self-medication behavior among medical students: the roles of stress, self-efficacy, and health literacy
Basit A, Khan MR, Ud Din AF, Waheed M, Hamid M, Rehman M, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 42021288 · DOI · PMC13238113
Teacher Self-Efficacy and Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Satisfaction with Students, Colleagues, and Parents
Marcedula F, Angelini G, Fiorilli C
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 41752233 · DOI · PMC12940229
Informatics Competency and Technology Self-Efficacy Levels Among Undergraduate Nursing Students: Cross-Sectional Study
Alnomasy N, Alrashedi H, Alsayed S, Pangket P, Alsayed R
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42258796 · DOI · PMC13245837

Self-medication behavior among medical students: the roles of stress, self-efficacy, and health literacy [1]

Research article Basit A, Khan MR, Ud Din AF, Waheed M, Hamid M, Rehman M, et al. · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BACKGROUND: Self-medication, the use of medications without professional consultation, is prevalent among medical students and poses risks such as drug misuse and delayed diagnosis.
Closing excerpt
Targeted interventions should promote safe practices, address gender-specific stressors, and enhance health literacy to mitigate risks.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (243 words)

BACKGROUND: Self-medication, the use of medications without professional consultation, is prevalent among medical students and poses risks such as drug misuse and delayed diagnosis. This study examined the roles of stress, self-efficacy, and health literacy in self-medication behaviours among undergraduate medical students in Pakistan. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from April to May 2025 at Nowshehra Medical College, involving 241 students (158 females and 83 males) selected through a convenience sampling method. A self-modified structured questionnaire was used to assess health literacy (nine items), self-efficacy (six items), stress (ten items), and self-medication behaviour. Data were analyzed using SPSS v30.0, employing t-tests to compare sex differences and binary logistic regression to identify predictors of the outcome. Ethical approval was obtained (Ref. 30/ERB/NMC). RESULTS: No sex differences were found in health literacy (p = 0.630) or self-efficacy (p = 0.156), but females reported higher stress (p 0.05). However, significant predictors included reliance on past experiences (OR = 1.823, p = 0.003) and health-related stress (OR = 1.607, p = 0.007), while safe self-medication practices were protective (OR = 0.679, p = 0.027). The overall model explained 18.5% of the variance (Nagelkerke R² = 0.185) but had low classification accuracy (47.9–49.2%). Visualisations, including bar charts, ROC curves, box plots, and heatmaps, highlighted the stress disparities and predictor strengths. CONCLUSION: Unsupervised medication use and stress drive self-medication among medical students. Targeted interventions should promote safe practices, address gender-specific stressors, and enhance health literacy to mitigate risks.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42021288 · DOI · PMC13238113

Teacher Self-Efficacy and Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Satisfaction with Students, Colleagues, and Parents [2]

Research article Marcedula F, Angelini G, Fiorilli C · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The recent literature has increasingly drawn attention to the role of teachers' personal and relational resources in managing stress and sustaining their well-being.
Closing excerpt
Taken together, these findings underscore how both individual competencies and everyday relational experiences contribute to teachers' well-being, pointing to the value of interventions that strengthen self-efficacy and enhance the quality of relationships within the school context.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (179 words)

The recent literature has increasingly drawn attention to the role of teachers' personal and relational resources in managing stress and sustaining their well-being. In this study, we examined how self-efficacy and satisfaction in key school relationships contribute to teachers' psychological health. A sample of 339 Italian teachers (Mage = 49.7, SD = 9.26; 85.5% female) completed measures assessing their self-efficacy, satisfaction in relationships with students, colleagues, and parents, and their overall well-being. We tested a parallel mediation model to explore whether these three forms of relational satisfaction helped explain the link between self-efficacy and well-being. The analyses indicated that higher self-efficacy was associated with greater satisfaction across all relational domains, as well as with better well-being. Moreover, satisfaction with students, colleagues, and parents each emerged as a significant mediator, while the direct effect of self-efficacy remained significant, suggesting a pattern of partial mediation. Taken together, these findings underscore how both individual competencies and everyday relational experiences contribute to teachers' well-being, pointing to the value of interventions that strengthen self-efficacy and enhance the quality of relationships within the school context.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41752233 · DOI · PMC12940229

Informatics Competency and Technology Self-Efficacy Levels Among Undergraduate Nursing Students: Cross-Sectional Study [3]

Research article Alnomasy N, Alrashedi H, Alsayed S, Pangket P, Alsayed R · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundThe Saudi Arabian health care sector is transforming under Vision 2030 with the goal of digitizing its services.
Closing excerpt
While underpowered, exploratory analyses and self-report data mean that these institution-specific findings should be interpreted cautiously and used primarily to guide future multisite and mixed methods research.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (288 words)

BackgroundThe Saudi Arabian health care sector is transforming under Vision 2030 with the goal of digitizing its services. This necessitates a digitally prepared nursing workforce; however, there is evidence suggesting that nursing students have limited informatics competency and that these skills are minimally covered in their training programs.ObjectiveThis study measured the baseline informatics competency and technology self-efficacy of undergraduate nursing students at the University of Hail, Saudi Arabia.MethodsUsing a descriptive cross-sectional design, data were collected from 243 undergraduate nursing students at the University of Hail through an online survey. The survey measured demographics, informatics competency (Canadian Nurse Informatics Competency Assessment Scale), and digital technology self-efficacy. Data analysis used descriptive statistics, 2-tailed t tests, ANOVA, and hierarchical regression analysis.ResultsStudents reported a moderate level of informatics competency, with a mean Canadian Nurse Informatics Competency Assessment Scale item score of 2.57 (SD 0.84) on a scale from 1 to 4. They also showed moderate to high self-efficacy for digital technology, with a mean item score of 2.7 (SD 0.56) out of 4. Informatics competency scores were substantially higher in students with prior informatics training and frequent electronic health record exposure. In the underpowered exploratory hierarchical regression model, self-efficacy for digital technology showed a small positive association with informatics competency that approached statistical significance; however, the overall model was not statistically significant and explained only a limited proportion of the variance.ConclusionsThis single-site study of undergraduate nursing students at the University of Hail found moderate self-reported informatics competency despite higher digital technology self-efficacy, indicating a need for strengthened informatics education to support the Saudi Vision 2030. While underpowered, exploratory analyses and self-report data mean that these institution-specific findings should be interpreted cautiously and used primarily to guide future multisite and mixed methods research.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42258796 · DOI · PMC13245837

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article The Role of Psychosocial Processes in the Development and Maintenance of Chronic Pain [4]
    Edwards RR, Dworkin RH, Sullivan MD, Turk DC, Wasan AD · J Pain · 2016 · cited 652 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis [5]
    Sheeran P, Maki A, Montanaro E, Avishai-Yitshak A, Bryan A, Klein WM, et al. · Health Psychol · 2016 · cited 606 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Emotion-related self-regulation and its relation to children's maladjustment [6]
    Eisenberg N, Spinrad TL, Eggum ND · Annu Rev Clin Psychol · 2010 · cited 579 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure [7]
    Steel P · Psychol Bull · 2007 · cited 576 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited [8]
    Bandura A, Locke EA · J Appl Psychol · 2003 · cited 424 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article What are the most effective techniques in changing obese individuals' physical activity self-efficacy and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis [9]
    Olander EK, Fletcher H, Williams S, Atkinson L, Turner A, French DP · Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act · 2013 · cited 353 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Basit A, Khan MR, Ud Din AF, Waheed M, Hamid M, Rehman M, et al.. Self-medication behavior among medical students: the roles of stress, self-efficacy, and health literacy. . 2026. PMID 42021288 · DOI · PMC13238113
  2. Marcedula F, Angelini G, Fiorilli C. Teacher Self-Efficacy and Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Satisfaction with Students, Colleagues, and Parents. . 2026. PMID 41752233 · DOI · PMC12940229
  3. Alnomasy N, Alrashedi H, Alsayed S, Pangket P, Alsayed R. Informatics Competency and Technology Self-Efficacy Levels Among Undergraduate Nursing Students: Cross-Sectional Study. . 2026. PMID 42258796 · DOI · PMC13245837
  4. Edwards RR, Dworkin RH, Sullivan MD, Turk DC, Wasan AD. The Role of Psychosocial Processes in the Development and Maintenance of Chronic Pain. J Pain. 2016. PMID 27586832 · DOI · PMC5012303
  5. Sheeran P, Maki A, Montanaro E, Avishai-Yitshak A, Bryan A, Klein WM, et al.. The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2016. PMID 27280365 · DOI
  6. Eisenberg N, Spinrad TL, Eggum ND. Emotion-related self-regulation and its relation to children's maladjustment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010. PMID 20192797 · DOI · PMC3018741
  7. Steel P. The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychol Bull. 2007. PMID 17201571 · DOI
  8. Bandura A, Locke EA. Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. J Appl Psychol. 2003. PMID 12675397 · DOI
  9. Olander EK, Fletcher H, Williams S, Atkinson L, Turner A, French DP. What are the most effective techniques in changing obese individuals' physical activity self-efficacy and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013. PMID 23452345 · DOI · PMC3639155

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • EgoPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Gender IdentityPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Self-ControlPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Self MedicationPharmacology
  • Self ToleranceImmunology
  • HypnosisPsychiatry and Psychology

All 110 articles in Psychiatry and Psychology →

At a glance

30,751
PubMed records on this heading
34%
published since 2020
1,724
review articles
4,181
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • EgoPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Gender IdentityPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Self-ControlPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Self MedicationPharmacology
  • Self ToleranceImmunology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support