Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Psychiatry and Psychology›Respect

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Respect

Psychiatry and Psychology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A feeling of deep admiration for someone or something elicited by their abilities, qualities, or achievements and regard for the feelings, wishes, or rights of others.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (963 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A feeling of deep admiration for someone or something elicited by their abilities, qualities, or achievements and regard for the feelings, wishes, or rights of others.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Dignity; Personal Respect; Respect, Personal.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Attitude

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 1,437 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Respect” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,118 of them (77.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 1,118 records.

Reviews account for 140 records (9.7%) and meta-analyses for 10. Randomized controlled trials number 16 (1.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 0 records; 2010-2019: 353 records; 2020 onward: 1,118 records0through 199902000-20093532010-20191,1182020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-20090
2010-2019353
2020 onward1,118
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 9.7 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.7 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.1 percentReviews9.7% (140)Meta-analyses0.7% (10)Randomized controlled trials1.1% (16)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 1,437 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1409.7%
Meta-analyses100.7%
Randomized controlled trials161.1%

Method: PubMed query "Respect"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in psychiatry and psychology

Research on mental health and behaviour relies on questionnaires, interviews and rating scales rather than physical measurements, so how a condition was defined and measured shapes every result. Many studies are observational or small, placebo responses can be large, and findings in one group or culture may not carry over to another. Nothing on this page is advice about diagnosis or treatment; anyone worried about their mental health should talk to a qualified clinician. Check how outcomes were measured, who took part and how long they were followed.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Respectful care during childbirth in health facilities globally: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Shakibazadeh E, Namadian M, Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Rashidian A, Nogueira Pileggi V, et al.
2018Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
307cc by
PMID 29117644 · DOI · PMC6033006
The meaning of dignity for older adults: A meta-synthesis
Clancy A, Simonsen N, Lind J, Liveng A, Johannessen A
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
68cc by
PMID 32613895 · DOI · PMC8408827
Disrespect and abuse during childbirth in district Gujrat, Pakistan: A quest for respectful maternity care
Azhar Z, Oyebode O, Masud H
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
50cc by
PMID 29995939 · DOI · PMC6040717
Digitizing Dignity: Analyzing Digital Twins Through the Lens of Multidimensional Human Dignity
Barnhart AJ
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 41174931 · DOI · PMC13179012

Respectful care during childbirth in health facilities globally: a qualitative evidence synthesis [1]

Systematic review Shakibazadeh E, Namadian M, Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Rashidian A, Nogueira Pileggi V, et al. · · 2018 · cited 307 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundWhat constitutes respectful maternity care (RMC) operationally in research and programme implementation is often variable.
Closing excerpt
Tweetable abstractUnderstanding respectful maternity care - synthesis of evidence from 67 qualitative studies.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (250 words)

BackgroundWhat constitutes respectful maternity care (RMC) operationally in research and programme implementation is often variable.ObjectivesTo develop a conceptualisation of RMC.Search strategyKey databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Global Health Library, grey literature, and reference lists of relevant studies.Selection criteriaPrimary qualitative studies focusing on care occurring during labour, childbirth, and/or immediately postpartum in health facilities, without any restrictions on locations or publication date.Data collection and analysisA combined inductive and deductive approach was used to synthesise the data; the GRADE CERQual approach was used to assess the level of confidence in review findings.Main resultsSixty-seven studies from 32 countries met our inclusion criteria. Twelve domains of RMC were synthesised: being free from harm and mistreatment; maintaining privacy and confidentiality; preserving women's dignity; prospective provision of information and seeking of informed consent; ensuring continuous access to family and community support; enhancing quality of physical environment and resources; providing equitable maternity care; engaging with effective communication; respecting women's choices that strengthen their capabilities to give birth; availability of competent and motivated human resources; provision of efficient and effective care; and continuity of care. Globally, women's perspectives of what constitutes RMC are quite consistent.ConclusionsThis review presents an evidence-based typology of RMC in health facilities globally, and demonstrates that the concept is broader than a reduction of disrespectful care or mistreatment of women during childbirth. Innovative approaches should be developed and tested to integrate RMC as a routine component of quality maternal and newborn care programmes.Tweetable abstractUnderstanding respectful maternity care - synthesis of evidence from 67 qualitative studies.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29117644 · DOI · PMC6033006

The meaning of dignity for older adults: A meta-synthesis [2]

Research article Clancy A, Simonsen N, Lind J, Liveng A, Johannessen A · · 2021 · cited 68 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Dignified care is a central issue in the nursing care of older adults.
Closing excerpt
Lack of recognition and being socially invisible is a genuine threat to older adults' dignity.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (222 words)

Dignified care is a central issue in the nursing care of older adults. Nurses are expected to treat older adults with dignity, and older adults wish to be treated in a dignified manner. Researchers have recommended investigating the concept of dignity based on specific contexts and population groups. This meta-synthesis study aims to explore the understandings of dignity from the perspective of older adults in the Nordic countries. Synthesising findings from qualitative studies on older adults' experiences of dignity has provided important insight into what can be essential for dignified care in a Nordic context. The importance of visibility and recognition for the experience of dignity is an overarching theme in all the studies. The participants' descriptions mostly implicated an existence dominated by a lack of recognition. The older adults do not feel valued as people or for their contribution to society and strive to tone down their illnesses in an attempt to become more visible and acknowledged as people. Toning down their illnesses and masking their needs can protect their independence. At the same time, becoming less visible can leave them without a voice. The metaphorical phrase protected and exposed by a cloak of invisibility is used to express the authors' overall interpretation of the findings. Lack of recognition and being socially invisible is a genuine threat to older adults' dignity.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32613895 · DOI · PMC8408827

Disrespect and abuse during childbirth in district Gujrat, Pakistan: A quest for respectful maternity care [3]

Research article Azhar Z, Oyebode O, Masud H · · 2018 · cited 50 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundDisrespectful and abusive practices at health facilities during childbirth discourage many women to seek care at facilities.
Closing excerpt
Maternal health policies in Pakistan need to be revised based on the charter of respectful maternity care.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (281 words)

BackgroundDisrespectful and abusive practices at health facilities during childbirth discourage many women to seek care at facilities. This may lead to maternal morbidity and mortalities. Despite severe impacts, such practices remain hidden and are rarely reported in developing countries.ObjectivesThe study was carried out to assess the prevalence and determinants of the disrespect and abuse (D & A) during child birth in rural Gujrat, Pakistan.MethodsA cross sectional household based study was conducted in tehsil Kharian of district Gujrat. Data was collected using an interview based questionnaire from the women who had a live birth within the previous two months (n = 360). The D & A scale was based on standard Maternal and Child Health Integrated Programme indicators. Multiple logistic regression was used to find out the determinants of reported D & A.ResultsAlmost all women experienced D & A (99.7%) during childbirth according to objective assessment "experienced D & A". However, only 27.2% reported subjective experience of D & A "reported D & A". The main determinant of reported D & A was facility based childbirth (OR = 13.49; 10.10-100.16) and lower socio economic strata (OR = 2.89; 1.63-5.11). The risk of reporting D & A was twice in public health facilities as compared to private. Women who had reported D & A were more likely to opt for changing the place of childbirth for next time (OR = 4.37, 95% CI = 2.41-7.90).ConclusionD & A during childbirth is highly prevalent and under-recognized in Pakistan. High prevalence at facilities and particularly at public facilities can be a reason for underutilization of this sector for childbirth. Maternal health policies in Pakistan need to be revised based on the charter of respectful maternity care.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29995939 · DOI · PMC6040717

Digitizing Dignity: Analyzing Digital Twins Through the Lens of Multidimensional Human Dignity [4]

Research article Barnhart AJ · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
In precision medicine, digital twins-virtual models of patients created using personalized data and advanced machine learning-are potentially changing healthcare by predicting health outcomes and guiding medical decisions.
Closing excerpt
Finally, the paper addresses the ethical implications of these findings, emphasizing the moral responsibilities of researchers, developers, and clinicians to treat digital twins as representations of patient dignity, thereby ensuring these technologies advance healthcare without compromising the fundamental respect owed to every individual.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (210 words)

In precision medicine, digital twins-virtual models of patients created using personalized data and advanced machine learning-are potentially changing healthcare by predicting health outcomes and guiding medical decisions. However, their use raises complex ethical questions, particularly concerning their relationship to human dignity. Patients often regard dignity as central to their healthcare experience, and failing to incorporate this principle into the design and application of digital twins risks undermining personal autonomy, misusing sensitive data, eroding patient-provider trust, and creating broader ethical challenges. This paper argues that digital twins are not mere data sets or predictive tools, but symbolic extensions of the dignity of the individuals they represent. Using David Kirchhoffer's multidimensional framework of human dignity, this study examines how digital twins engage with both absolute (inherent) and contingent (socially constructed) dimensions of dignity. The analysis begins by exploring the multidimensional concept of human dignity, followed by a discussion of how digital twins embody these dimensions, illustrated through examples such as digital brain twins, posthumous digital representations, and disability contexts. Finally, the paper addresses the ethical implications of these findings, emphasizing the moral responsibilities of researchers, developers, and clinicians to treat digital twins as representations of patient dignity, thereby ensuring these technologies advance healthcare without compromising the fundamental respect owed to every individual.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41174931 · DOI · PMC13179012

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Transforming intrapartum care: Respectful maternity care [5]
    Bohren MA, Tunçalp Ö, Miller S · Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol · 2020 · cited 113 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article What is the impact on health and wellbeing of interventions that foster respect and social inclusion in community-residing older adults? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies [6]
    Ronzi S, Orton L, Pope D, Valtorta NK, Bruce NG · Syst Rev · 2018 · cited 74 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Brief psychosocial interventions improve quality of life of patients receiving palliative care: A systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
    Warth M, Kessler J, Koehler F, Aguilar-Raab C, Bardenheuer HJ, Ditzen B · Palliat Med · 2019 · cited 54 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Human dignity research in clinical practice - a systematic literature review [8]
    Lindwall L, Lohne V · Scand J Caring Sci · 2021 · cited 44 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Children's Sense of Fairness as Equal Respect [9]
    Engelmann JM, Tomasello M · Trends Cogn Sci · 2019 · cited 42 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article How patients with cancer experience dignity: An integrative review [10]
    Xiao J, Ng MSN, Yan T, Chow KM, Chan CWH · Psychooncology · 2021 · cited 34 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Shakibazadeh E, Namadian M, Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Rashidian A, Nogueira Pileggi V, et al.. Respectful care during childbirth in health facilities globally: a qualitative evidence synthesis. . 2018. PMID 29117644 · DOI · PMC6033006
  2. Clancy A, Simonsen N, Lind J, Liveng A, Johannessen A. The meaning of dignity for older adults: A meta-synthesis. . 2021. PMID 32613895 · DOI · PMC8408827
  3. Azhar Z, Oyebode O, Masud H. Disrespect and abuse during childbirth in district Gujrat, Pakistan: A quest for respectful maternity care. . 2018. PMID 29995939 · DOI · PMC6040717
  4. Barnhart AJ. Digitizing Dignity: Analyzing Digital Twins Through the Lens of Multidimensional Human Dignity. . 2026. PMID 41174931 · DOI · PMC13179012
  5. Bohren MA, Tunçalp Ö, Miller S. Transforming intrapartum care: Respectful maternity care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020. PMID 32245630 · DOI
  6. Ronzi S, Orton L, Pope D, Valtorta NK, Bruce NG. What is the impact on health and wellbeing of interventions that foster respect and social inclusion in community-residing older adults? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Syst Rev. 2018. PMID 29382375 · DOI · PMC5789687
  7. Warth M, Kessler J, Koehler F, Aguilar-Raab C, Bardenheuer HJ, Ditzen B. Brief psychosocial interventions improve quality of life of patients receiving palliative care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Palliat Med. 2019. PMID 30648926 · DOI
  8. Lindwall L, Lohne V. Human dignity research in clinical practice - a systematic literature review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2021. PMID 33104271 · DOI · PMC9290914
  9. Engelmann JM, Tomasello M. Children's Sense of Fairness as Equal Respect. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019. PMID 30952599 · DOI
  10. Xiao J, Ng MSN, Yan T, Chow KM, Chan CWH. How patients with cancer experience dignity: An integrative review. Psychooncology. 2021. PMID 33893677 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Personal Protective EquipmentDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • AchievementPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AffectPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AggressionPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AlcoholismPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Anorexia NervosaPsychiatry and Psychology

All 110 articles in Psychiatry and Psychology →

At a glance

1,437
PubMed records on this heading
78%
published since 2020
140
review articles
16
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Personal Protective EquipmentDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • AchievementPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AffectPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AggressionPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AlcoholismPsychiatry and Psychology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support