Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Public Health and Nutrition›Medical Waste

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Medical Waste

Public Health and Nutrition · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

Blood, mucus, tissue removed at surgery or autopsy, soiled surgical dressings, and other materials requiring special disposal procedures.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (883 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Blood, mucus, tissue removed at surgery or autopsy, soiled surgical dressings, and other materials requiring special disposal procedures.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Waste, Medical; Medical Wastes; Wastes, Medical; Waste, Pathological; Pathological Wastes; Wastes, Pathological; Pathological Waste.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Waste Products
Narrower topics
Dental Waste; Medical Waste Disposal
See also
Blood-Borne Pathogens

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 4,027 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Medical Waste” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 614 of them (15.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,299 records.

Reviews account for 357 records (8.9%) and meta-analyses for 6. Randomized controlled trials number 6 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,299 records; 2000-2009: 1,099 records; 2010-2019: 1,015 records; 2020 onward: 614 records1,299through 19991,0992000-20091,0152010-20196142020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,299
2000-20091,099
2010-20191,015
2020 onward614
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 8.9 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.1 percentReviews8.9% (357)Meta-analyses0.1% (6)Randomized controlled trials0.1% (6)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 4,027 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3578.9%
Meta-analyses60.1%
Randomized controlled trials60.1%

Method: PubMed query "Medical Waste"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in public health and nutrition

Population and nutrition studies mostly observe what people eat, breathe or are exposed to and then look for links with health, which shows association and not proof of cause. Self-reported diet is imprecise, people who eat or live differently also differ in other ways, and effects measured across a population may not apply to one person. Check the study design, how exposure was measured, what else was accounted for and the size of the effect, not only whether it was statistically significant.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Appearance of β-lactam Resistance Genes in Agricultural Soils and Clinical Isolates over the 20th Century
Graham DW, Knapp CW, Christensen BT, McCluskey S, Dolfing J
2016Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
86cc by
PMID 26878889 · DOI · PMC4754643
Green nephrology and eco-dialysis: a position statement by the Italian Society of Nephrology
Piccoli GB, Cupisti A, Aucella F, Regolisti G, Lomonte C, Ferraresi M, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
72cc by
PMID 32297293 · DOI · PMC7381479
Sustainable waste management of medical waste in African developing countries: A narrative review
Chisholm JM, Zamani R, Negm AM, Said N, Abdel Daiem MM, Dibaj M, et al.
2021Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
65cc by
PMID 34218734 · DOI · PMC8488638
Survey of Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria Isolated from Rivers in Japan, Indonesia and Nepal
Osawa K, Nomoto R, Suzuki T, Maeda T, Rai G, Kinoshita S, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 41901770 · DOI · PMC13028957

Appearance of β-lactam Resistance Genes in Agricultural Soils and Clinical Isolates over the 20th Century [1]

Research article Graham DW, Knapp CW, Christensen BT, McCluskey S, Dolfing J · · 2016 · cited 86 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Debate exists about whether agricultural versus medical antibiotic use drives increasing antibiotic resistance (AR) across nature.
Closing excerpt
Conversely, int1 levels have continued to increase in M soils since 1990, implying direct manure application to soils should be scrutinized as part of future stewardship programs.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (197 words)

Debate exists about whether agricultural versus medical antibiotic use drives increasing antibiotic resistance (AR) across nature. Both sectors have been inconsistent at antibiotic stewardship, but it is unclear which sector has most influenced acquired AR on broad scales. Using qPCR and soils archived since 1923 at Askov Experimental Station in Denmark, we quantified four broad-spectrum β-lactam AR genes (ARG; bla(TEM), bla(SHV), bla(OXA) and bla(CTX-M)) and class-1 integron genes (int1) in soils from manured (M) versus inorganic fertilised (IF) fields. "Total" β-lactam ARG levels were significantly higher in M versus IF in soils post-1940 (paired-t test; p < 0.001). However, dominant individual ARGs varied over time; bla(TEM) and bla(SHV) between 1963 and 1974, bla(OXA) slightly later, and bla(CTX-M) since 1988. These dates roughly parallel first reporting of these genes in clinical isolates, suggesting ARGs in animal manure and humans are historically interconnected. Archive data further show when non-therapeutic antibiotic use was banned in Denmark, bla(CTX-M) levels declined in M soils, suggesting accumulated soil ARGs can be reduced by prudent antibiotic stewardship. Conversely, int1 levels have continued to increase in M soils since 1990, implying direct manure application to soils should be scrutinized as part of future stewardship programs.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 26878889 · DOI · PMC4754643

Green nephrology and eco-dialysis: a position statement by the Italian Society of Nephrology [2]

Research article Piccoli GB, Cupisti A, Aucella F, Regolisti G, Lomonte C, Ferraresi M, et al. · · 2020 · cited 72 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
High-technology medicine saves lives and produces waste; this is the case of dialysis.
Closing excerpt
Due to the particular relevance in waste management of dialysis, which produces up to 2 kg of potentially contaminated waste per session and about the same weight of potentially recyclable materials, together with technological waste (dialysis machines), and involves high water and electricity consumption, the position statement mainly focuses on dialysis management, identifying ten first affordable actions: (1) reducing the burden of dialysis (whenever possible adopting an intent to delay strategy, with wide use of incremental schedules); (2) limiting drugs and favouring "natural" medicine focussing on lifestyle and diet; (3) encouraging the reuse of "household" hospital material; (4) recycling paper and glass; (5) recycling non-contaminated plastic; (6) reducing water consumption; (7) reducing energy consumption; (8) introducing environmental-impact criteria in checklists for evaluating dialysis machines and supplies; (9) encouraging well-planned triage of contaminated and non-contaminated materials; (10) demanding planet-friendly approaches in the building of new facilities.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (241 words)

High-technology medicine saves lives and produces waste; this is the case of dialysis. The increasing amounts of waste products can be biologically dangerous in different ways: some represent a direct infectious or toxic danger for other living creatures (potentially contaminated or hazardous waste), while others are harmful for the planet (plastic and non-recycled waste). With the aim of increasing awareness, proposing joint actions and coordinating industrial and social interactions, the Italian Society of Nephrology is presenting this position statement on ways in which the environmental impact of caring for patients with kidney diseases can be reduced. Due to the particular relevance in waste management of dialysis, which produces up to 2 kg of potentially contaminated waste per session and about the same weight of potentially recyclable materials, together with technological waste (dialysis machines), and involves high water and electricity consumption, the position statement mainly focuses on dialysis management, identifying ten first affordable actions: (1) reducing the burden of dialysis (whenever possible adopting an intent to delay strategy, with wide use of incremental schedules); (2) limiting drugs and favouring "natural" medicine focussing on lifestyle and diet; (3) encouraging the reuse of "household" hospital material; (4) recycling paper and glass; (5) recycling non-contaminated plastic; (6) reducing water consumption; (7) reducing energy consumption; (8) introducing environmental-impact criteria in checklists for evaluating dialysis machines and supplies; (9) encouraging well-planned triage of contaminated and non-contaminated materials; (10) demanding planet-friendly approaches in the building of new facilities.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32297293 · DOI · PMC7381479

Sustainable waste management of medical waste in African developing countries: A narrative review [3]

Review article Chisholm JM, Zamani R, Negm AM, Said N, Abdel Daiem MM, Dibaj M, et al. · · 2021 · cited 65 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Africa is the second populous continent, and its population has the fastest growing rate.
Closing excerpt
The findings of this research introduce policies, possible advices and solutions associated with sustainability and medical waste management that can support decision-makers in developing strategies for the sustainability by using the eco-friendly technologies for efficient medical waste treatment and disposal methods and also can serve as a link between the healthcare system, decision-makers, and stakeholders in developing health policies and programmes.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (246 words)

Africa is the second populous continent, and its population has the fastest growing rate. Some African countries are still plagued by poverty, poor sanitary conditions and limited resources, such as clean drinking water, food supply, electricity, and effective waste management systems. Underfunded healthcare systems, poor training and lack of awareness of policies and legislations on handling medical waste have led to increased improper handling of waste within hospitals, healthcare facilities and transportation and storage of medical waste. Some countries, including Ethiopia, Botswana, Nigeria and Algeria, do not have national guidelines in place to adhere to the correct disposal of such wastage. Incineration is often the favoured disposal method due to the rapid diminishment of up to 90% of waste, as well as production of heat for boilers or for energy production. This type of method - if not applying the right technologies - potentially creates hazardous risks of its own, such as harmful emissions and residuals. In this study, the sustainability aspects of medical waste management in Africa were reviewed to present resilient solutions for health and environment protection for the next generation in Africa. The findings of this research introduce policies, possible advices and solutions associated with sustainability and medical waste management that can support decision-makers in developing strategies for the sustainability by using the eco-friendly technologies for efficient medical waste treatment and disposal methods and also can serve as a link between the healthcare system, decision-makers, and stakeholders in developing health policies and programmes.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34218734 · DOI · PMC8488638

Survey of Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria Isolated from Rivers in Japan, Indonesia and Nepal [4]

Research article Osawa K, Nomoto R, Suzuki T, Maeda T, Rai G, Kinoshita S, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The threat of antimicrobial resistance in aquatic environments, particularly riverine systems, is escalating, in part due to effluents discharged from healthcare facilities.
Closing excerpt
In conclusion, these analyses elucidated substantial differences in bacterial community composition and degrees of environmental contamination.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)

The threat of antimicrobial resistance in aquatic environments, particularly riverine systems, is escalating, in part due to effluents discharged from healthcare facilities. This issue has been recognized not only in Japan but also in other Asian countries such as Indonesia and Nepal. Nevertheless, existing research remains limited, prompting an investigation into the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in the upstream and downstream sites of environmental rivers. In 2024, six samples were collected from three rivers in Hyogo Prefecture, Japan; five samples from five river sites in Indonesia; and three samples from downstream sites of rivers in Kathmandu, Nepal. These samples were subjected to selective culture-based Next Generation Sequencing and resistome analyses, based exclusively on the selective culture of bacteria propagated on CHROMagar ESBL plates. In Japan and Indonesia, Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas and Acinetobacter were frequently detected, whereas Klebsiella was overwhelmingly predominant in Nepal. Significant differences in the similarity of bacterial community composition among sampling sites across the three countries were observed (p < 0.001). Notably, Nepal exhibited the highest abundance level of antimicrobial resistance genes among the three countries, largely consisting of β-lactam resistance genes. In conclusion, these analyses elucidated substantial differences in bacterial community composition and degrees of environmental contamination.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41901770 · DOI · PMC13028957

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Drugs in the environment: emission of drugs, diagnostic aids and disinfectants into wastewater by hospitals in relation to other sources--a review [5]
    Kümmerer K · Chemosphere · 2001 · cited 511 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Waste to bioproduct conversion with undefined mixed cultures: the carboxylate platform [6]
    Agler MT, Wrenn BA, Zinder SH, Angenent LT · Trends Biotechnol · 2011 · cited 367 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Disinfection technology of hospital wastes and wastewater: Suggestions for disinfection strategy during coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in China [7]
    Wang J, Shen J, Ye D, Yan X, Zhang Y, Yang W, et al. · Environ Pollut · 2020 · cited 299 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Environmental performance of bio-based and biodegradable plastics: the road ahead [8]
    Lambert S, Wagner M · Chem Soc Rev · 2017 · cited 278 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Is bioaugmentation a feasible strategy for pollutant removal and site remediation? [9]
    El Fantroussi S, Agathos SN · Curr Opin Microbiol · 2005 · cited 254 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Medical waste management - A review [10]
    Windfeld ES, Brooks MS · J Environ Manage · 2015 · cited 199 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Graham DW, Knapp CW, Christensen BT, McCluskey S, Dolfing J. Appearance of β-lactam Resistance Genes in Agricultural Soils and Clinical Isolates over the 20th Century. . 2016. PMID 26878889 · DOI · PMC4754643
  2. Piccoli GB, Cupisti A, Aucella F, Regolisti G, Lomonte C, Ferraresi M, et al.. Green nephrology and eco-dialysis: a position statement by the Italian Society of Nephrology. . 2020. PMID 32297293 · DOI · PMC7381479
  3. Chisholm JM, Zamani R, Negm AM, Said N, Abdel Daiem MM, Dibaj M, et al.. Sustainable waste management of medical waste in African developing countries: A narrative review. . 2021. PMID 34218734 · DOI · PMC8488638
  4. Osawa K, Nomoto R, Suzuki T, Maeda T, Rai G, Kinoshita S, et al.. Survey of Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria Isolated from Rivers in Japan, Indonesia and Nepal. . 2026. PMID 41901770 · DOI · PMC13028957
  5. Kümmerer K. Drugs in the environment: emission of drugs, diagnostic aids and disinfectants into wastewater by hospitals in relation to other sources--a review. Chemosphere. 2001. PMID 11695619 · DOI
  6. Agler MT, Wrenn BA, Zinder SH, Angenent LT. Waste to bioproduct conversion with undefined mixed cultures: the carboxylate platform. Trends Biotechnol. 2011. PMID 21190748 · DOI
  7. Wang J, Shen J, Ye D, Yan X, Zhang Y, Yang W, et al.. Disinfection technology of hospital wastes and wastewater: Suggestions for disinfection strategy during coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in China. Environ Pollut. 2020. PMID 32443202 · DOI · PMC7194566
  8. Lambert S, Wagner M. Environmental performance of bio-based and biodegradable plastics: the road ahead. Chem Soc Rev. 2017. PMID 28932844 · DOI
  9. El Fantroussi S, Agathos SN. Is bioaugmentation a feasible strategy for pollutant removal and site remediation?. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005. PMID 15939349 · DOI
  10. Windfeld ES, Brooks MS. Medical waste management - A review. J Environ Manage. 2015. PMID 26301686 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Hazardous WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Solid WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Radioactive WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Electronic WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Waste ProductsPublic Health and Nutrition
  • Air PollutionPublic Health and Nutrition

All 114 articles in Public Health and Nutrition →

At a glance

4,027
PubMed records on this heading
15%
published since 2020
357
review articles
6
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Hazardous WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Solid WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Radioactive WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Electronic WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Waste ProductsPublic Health and Nutrition

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support