Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Public Health and Nutrition›Electronic Waste

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Electronic Waste

Public Health and Nutrition · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

Discarded electronic devices containing valuable and sometimes hazardous materials such as LEAD, nickel, cadmium, and mercury.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (954 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Discarded electronic devices containing valuable and sometimes hazardous materials such as LEAD, nickel, cadmium, and mercury. (from http://www.epa.gov/osw/conserve/materials/ecycling/faq.htm#impact accessed 4/25/2010)

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Electronic Wastes; Waste, Electronic; Wastes, Electronic; E-Scrap; E-Scraps; E-Waste; E-Wastes; End-of-Life Electronics.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Waste Products

Related concepts

  • Nickel
  • Cadmium
  • Mercury

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 2,191 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Electronic Waste” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,053 of them (48.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 1,173 records.

Reviews account for 226 records (10.3%) and meta-analyses for 3. Randomized controlled trials number 2 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 4 records; 2010-2019: 1,173 records; 2020 onward: 1,053 records0through 199942000-20091,1732010-20191,0532020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-20094
2010-20191,173
2020 onward1,053
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 10.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.1 percentReviews10.3% (226)Meta-analyses0.1% (3)Randomized controlled trials0.1% (2)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 2,191 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews22610.3%
Meta-analyses30.1%
Randomized controlled trials20.1%

Method: PubMed query "Electronic Waste"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in public health and nutrition

Population and nutrition studies mostly observe what people eat, breathe or are exposed to and then look for links with health, which shows association and not proof of cause. Self-reported diet is imprecise, people who eat or live differently also differ in other ways, and effects measured across a population may not apply to one person. Check the study design, how exposure was measured, what else was accounted for and the size of the effect, not only whether it was statistically significant.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
E-Waste and Harm to Vulnerable Populations: A Growing Global Problem
Heacock M, Kelly CB, Asante KA, Birnbaum LS, Bergman ÅL, Bruné MN, et al.
2016Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
137cc0
PMID 26418733 · DOI · PMC4858409
Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: an updated systematic review
Parvez SM, Jahan F, Brune MN, Gorman JF, Rahman MJ, Carpenter D, et al.
2021Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
96cc by
PMID 34895498 · DOI · PMC8674120
Heart Rate, Stress, and Occupational Noise Exposure among Electronic Waste Recycling Workers
Burns KN, Sun K, Fobil JN, Neitzel RL
2016Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
41cc by
PMID 26797626 · DOI · PMC4730531
Fermentation-based oxalic acid production aimed at sustainable critical metal recovery from electronic waste
Erkmen AN, Ulber R, Jüstel T, Altendorfner M
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42776259 · DOI · PMC13601489

E-Waste and Harm to Vulnerable Populations: A Growing Global Problem [1]

Review article Heacock M, Kelly CB, Asante KA, Birnbaum LS, Bergman ÅL, Bruné MN, et al. · · 2016 · cited 137 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundElectronic waste (e-waste) is produced in staggering quantities, estimated globally to be 41.
Closing excerpt
1509699.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (296 words)

BackgroundElectronic waste (e-waste) is produced in staggering quantities, estimated globally to be 41.8 million tonnes in 2014. Informal e-waste recycling is a source of much-needed income in many low- to middle-income countries. However, its handling and disposal in underdeveloped countries is often unsafe and leads to contaminated environments. Rudimentary and uncontrolled processing methods often result in substantial harmful chemical exposures among vulnerable populations, including women and children. E-waste hazards have not yet received the attention they deserve in research and public health agendas.ObjectivesWe provide an overview of the scale and health risks. We review international efforts concerned with environmental hazards, especially affecting children, as a preface to presenting next steps in addressing health issues stemming from the global e-waste problem.DiscussionThe e-waste problem has been building for decades. Increased observation of adverse health effects from e-waste sites calls for protecting human health and the environment from e-waste contamination. Even if e-waste exposure intervention and prevention efforts are implemented, legacy contamination will remain, necessitating increased awareness of e-waste as a major environmental health threat.ConclusionGlobal, national, and local levels efforts must aim to create safe recycling operations that consider broad security issues for people who rely on e-waste processing for survival. Paramount to these efforts is reducing pregnant women and children's e-waste exposures to mitigate harmful health effects. With human environmental health in mind, novel dismantling methods and remediation technologies and intervention practices are needed to protect communities.CitationHeacock M, Kelly CB, Asante KA, Birnbaum LS, Bergman AL, Bruné MN, Buka I, Carpenter DO, Chen A, Huo X, Kamel M, Landrigan PJ, Magalini F, Diaz-Barriga F, Neira M, Omar M, Pascale A, Ruchirawat M, Sly L, Sly PD, Van den Berg M, Suk WA. 2016. E-waste and harm to vulnerable populations: a growing global problem. Environ Health Perspect 124:550-555; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509699.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc0 licence; © the authors. PMID 26418733 · DOI · PMC4858409

Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: an updated systematic review [2]

Systematic review Parvez SM, Jahan F, Brune MN, Gorman JF, Rahman MJ, Carpenter D, et al. · · 2021 · cited 96 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Electronic waste (e-waste) contains numerous chemicals harmful to human and ecological health.
Closing excerpt
Novel cost-effective methods for safe recycling operations need to be employed in e-waste sites to ensure the health and safety of vulnerable populations.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (197 words)

Electronic waste (e-waste) contains numerous chemicals harmful to human and ecological health. To update a 2013 review assessing adverse human health consequences of exposure to e-waste, we systematically reviewed studies reporting effects on humans related to e-waste exposure. We searched EMBASE, PsycNET, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PubMed for articles published between Dec 18, 2012, and Jan 28, 2020, restricting our search to publications in English. Of the 5645 records identified, we included 70 studies that met the preset criteria. People living in e-waste exposed regions had significantly elevated levels of heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants. Children and pregnant women were especially susceptible during the critical periods of exposure that detrimentally affect diverse biological systems and organs. Elevated toxic chemicals negatively impact on neonatal growth indices and hormone level alterations in e-waste exposed populations. We recorded possible connections between chronic exposure to e-waste and DNA lesions, telomere attrition, inhibited vaccine responsiveness, elevated oxidative stress, and altered immune function. The existence of various toxic chemicals in e-waste recycling areas impose plausible adverse health outcomes. Novel cost-effective methods for safe recycling operations need to be employed in e-waste sites to ensure the health and safety of vulnerable populations.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34895498 · DOI · PMC8674120

Heart Rate, Stress, and Occupational Noise Exposure among Electronic Waste Recycling Workers [3]

Research article Burns KN, Sun K, Fobil JN, Neitzel RL · · 2016 · cited 41 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Electronic waste (e-waste) is a growing occupational and environmental health issue around the globe.
Closing excerpt
These findings suggest that occupational and non-occupational noise exposure is associated with elevations in average heart rate, which may in turn predict potential cardiovascular damage.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (239 words)

Electronic waste (e-waste) is a growing occupational and environmental health issue around the globe. E-waste recycling is a green industry of emerging importance, especially in low-and middle-income countries where much of this recycling work is performed, and where many people's livelihoods depend on this work. The occupational health hazards of e-waste recycling have not been adequately explored. We performed a cross-sectional study of noise exposures, heart rate, and perceived stress among e-waste recycling workers at a large e-waste site in Accra, Ghana. We interviewed 57 workers and continuously monitored their individual noise exposures and heart rates for up to 24 h. More than 40% of workers had noise exposures that exceeded recommended occupational (85 dBA) and community (70 dBA) noise exposure limits, and self-reported hearing difficulties were common. Workers also had moderate to high levels of perceived stress as measured via Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale, and reported a variety of symptoms that could indicate cardiovascular disease. Noise exposures were moderately and significantly correlated with heart rate (Spearman's ρ 0.46, p < 0.001). A mixed effects linear regression model indicated that a 1 dB increase in noise exposure was associated with a 0.17 increase in heart rate (p-value = 0.01) even after controlling for work activities, age, smoking, perceived stress, and unfavorable physical working conditions. These findings suggest that occupational and non-occupational noise exposure is associated with elevations in average heart rate, which may in turn predict potential cardiovascular damage.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 26797626 · DOI · PMC4730531

Fermentation-based oxalic acid production aimed at sustainable critical metal recovery from electronic waste [4]

Research article Erkmen AN, Ulber R, Jüstel T, Altendorfner M · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
This study systematically investigates the biogenic production of oxalic acid (OA, H2C2O4) via submerged fermentation to establish a sustainable reagent for critical metal recovery applications.
Closing excerpt
Gluconic acid and phosphate excess hinder selective OA production.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (222 words)

This study systematically investigates the biogenic production of oxalic acid (OA, H2C2O4) via submerged fermentation to establish a sustainable reagent for critical metal recovery applications. Preliminary shake-flask experiments evaluated Aspergillus niger strains (ATCC 1015 and CECT 2807), optimal carbon sources, and the influence of pH adjustment. Despite inherent biological variance across replicates, A. niger ATCC 1015 demonstrated a superior production trajectory, yielding 71.0 ± 27.7 mM OA in 5 days. Intermittent pH adjustment above 4.0 significantly enhanced secretion to 90.4 ± 5.8 mM, while glucose was identified as the optimal carbon source (YP/S ≈ 0.4 g/g). Building upon these preliminary findings, process intensification was conducted in a 10 L stirred-tank bioreactor. Transitioning to a fed-batch strategy with pulsed feeding and continuous pH control effectively contributed to substantially higher OA titers, achieving a peak OA titer of 260.1 ± 4.8 mM over 14 days. Co-production of gluconic acid and acidogenesis inhibition posed a challenge in attaining higher product yields. Collectively, these findings establish a robust, scalable bioprocess for sustainable OA generation, directly supporting its emerging application as a highly selective leaching agent for critical metal recovery from electronic waste streams. KEY POINTS: A.niger strain ATCC1015 was pinpointed as a suitable strain for biogenic OA production Fed-batch with pulsed feeding maximizes OA titer in scale-up. Gluconic acid and phosphate excess hinder selective OA production.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42776259 · DOI · PMC13601489

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: a systematic review [5]
    Grant K, Goldizen FC, Sly PD, Brune MN, Neira M, van den Berg M, et al. · Lancet Glob Health · 2013 · cited 247 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article How are WEEE doing? A global review of the management of electrical and electronic wastes [6]
    Ongondo FO, Williams ID, Cherrett TJ · Waste Manag · 2011 · cited 186 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Recovery of metals and nonmetals from electronic waste by physical and chemical recycling processes [7]
    Kaya M · Waste Manag · 2016 · cited 173 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article E-waste recycling: where does it go from here? [8]
    Zhang K, Schnoor JL, Zeng EY · Environ Sci Technol · 2012 · cited 163 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Chemical hazards associated with treatment of waste electrical and electronic equipment [9]
    Tsydenova O, Bengtsson M · Waste Manag · 2011 · cited 157 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Developmental neurotoxicants in e-waste: an emerging health concern [10]
    Chen A, Dietrich KN, Huo X, Ho SM · Environ Health Perspect · 2011 · cited 157 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Heacock M, Kelly CB, Asante KA, Birnbaum LS, Bergman ÅL, Bruné MN, et al.. E-Waste and Harm to Vulnerable Populations: A Growing Global Problem. . 2016. PMID 26418733 · DOI · PMC4858409
  2. Parvez SM, Jahan F, Brune MN, Gorman JF, Rahman MJ, Carpenter D, et al.. Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: an updated systematic review. . 2021. PMID 34895498 · DOI · PMC8674120
  3. Burns KN, Sun K, Fobil JN, Neitzel RL. Heart Rate, Stress, and Occupational Noise Exposure among Electronic Waste Recycling Workers. . 2016. PMID 26797626 · DOI · PMC4730531
  4. Erkmen AN, Ulber R, Jüstel T, Altendorfner M. Fermentation-based oxalic acid production aimed at sustainable critical metal recovery from electronic waste. . 2026. PMID 42776259 · DOI · PMC13601489
  5. Grant K, Goldizen FC, Sly PD, Brune MN, Neira M, van den Berg M, et al.. Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Health. 2013. PMID 25104600 · DOI
  6. Ongondo FO, Williams ID, Cherrett TJ. How are WEEE doing? A global review of the management of electrical and electronic wastes. Waste Manag. 2011. PMID 21146974 · DOI
  7. Kaya M. Recovery of metals and nonmetals from electronic waste by physical and chemical recycling processes. Waste Manag. 2016. PMID 27543174 · DOI
  8. Zhang K, Schnoor JL, Zeng EY. E-waste recycling: where does it go from here?. Environ Sci Technol. 2012. PMID 22998401 · DOI
  9. Tsydenova O, Bengtsson M. Chemical hazards associated with treatment of waste electrical and electronic equipment. Waste Manag. 2011. PMID 20869229 · DOI
  10. Chen A, Dietrich KN, Huo X, Ho SM. Developmental neurotoxicants in e-waste: an emerging health concern. Environ Health Perspect. 2011. PMID 21081302 · DOI · PMC3080922

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Hazardous WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Solid WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Medical WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Radioactive WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Waste ProductsPublic Health and Nutrition
  • Air PollutionPublic Health and Nutrition

All 114 articles in Public Health and Nutrition →

At a glance

2,191
PubMed records on this heading
48%
published since 2020
226
review articles
2
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Hazardous WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Solid WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Medical WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Radioactive WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Waste ProductsPublic Health and Nutrition

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support