Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (838 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Incomplete rupture of the zonule with the displaced lens remaining behind the pupil. In dislocation, or complete rupture, the lens is displaced forward into the anterior chamber or backward into the vitreous body. When congenital, this condition is known as ectopia lentis.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Lens Subluxations; Subluxation, Lens; Subluxations, Lens; Lens Dislocation; Dislocation, Lens; Dislocations, Lens; Lens Dislocations; Lens Dislocation and Subluxation.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Lens Diseases
- Narrower topics
- Ectopia Lentis
Related concepts
- Ectopia Lentis
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 2,009 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Lens Subluxation” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 383 of them (19.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 655 records.
Reviews account for 108 records (5.4%) and meta-analyses for 4. Randomized controlled trials number 14 (0.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 655 |
| 2000-2009 | 421 |
| 2010-2019 | 550 |
| 2020 onward | 383 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 108 | 5.4% |
| Meta-analyses | 4 | 0.2% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 14 | 0.7% |
Method: PubMed query "Lens Subluxation"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.
Reading the evidence in eye, ear, nose and throat
Eye, hearing, nose and throat studies rely on specialist tests (visual acuity, eye pressure, audiograms, scopes) and on patient-reported symptoms, which vary between people and with age. Some conditions improve without treatment, so comparison groups matter. Nothing on this page is advice about diagnosis or treatment; sudden loss of sight or hearing needs urgent care from a qualified clinician. Check how the outcome was tested, the age of the people studied and how long they were followed.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-term follow-up after scleral lens fixation in patients with Marfan syndrome | 2017 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 27 | cc by PMID 29207985 · DOI · PMC5718067 |
| Visual outcomes of lens subluxation surgery with Cionni modified capsular tension rings in Marfan syndrome | 2021 | Randomized controlled trial Design not recorded in structured metadata | 23 | cc by PMID 33542371 · DOI · PMC7862488 |
| Long-term surgical outcomes of primary retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of intraocular lens dislocation | 2021 | Clinical trial Design not recorded in structured metadata | 22 | cc by PMID 33436860 · DOI · PMC7804091 |
| Advanced Artificial-Intelligence-Based Jiang Formula for Intraocular Lens Power in Congenital Ectopia Lentis | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1 | cc by PMID 39903164 · DOI · PMC11801393 |
Long-term follow-up after scleral lens fixation in patients with Marfan syndrome [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundThe dislocation of the crystalline lens is a common finding in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS).
- Closing excerpt
- We therefore recommend addressing this complication preoperatively.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (219 words)
BackgroundThe dislocation of the crystalline lens is a common finding in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Scleral intraocular lens (IOL) fixation is an accepted treatment method of this complication. To now, no long-term data on scleral IOL fixation in MFS exist.MethodsWe present a retrospective study of 27 eyes of 17 MFS patients that underwent scleral lens fixation at our clinic between 1999 and 2012. These patients are compared to an age- and surgeon-matched group of 31 eyes of 27 patients who underwent the same procedure for reasons other than MFS.ResultsThe median age in the MFS group was 35.4 years versus 35.6 years in the non-MFS group. The median follow-up was 4 years for MFS and 3 years for non-MFS. In the MFS group, significantly more IOL-dislocations occurred than compared to the non-MFS group (30% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.02). Retinal detachment occurred in four MFS-eyes compared to three eyes in the non-MFS group. Biometry prediction error was 1.11 diopters (D) for MFS and 1.33 D for non-MFS (p = 0.11). Median BCVA (best-corrected visual acuity, logMAR) was 0.1 in the MFS group versus 0.3 in non-MFS patients.ConclusionScleral lens fixation in MFS patients achieves satisfying visual and refractive outcomes. Our data shows a significantly higher rate of IOL dislocations in patients with MFS. We therefore recommend addressing this complication preoperatively.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29207985 · DOI · PMC5718067
Visual outcomes of lens subluxation surgery with Cionni modified capsular tension rings in Marfan syndrome [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a hereditary disease with an incidence of 0.
- Closing excerpt
- In conclusion, better visual outcomes can be achieved when patients received an early operation with MCTR implantation.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (208 words)
Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a hereditary disease with an incidence of 0.3% in the general population. Approximately 60% of MFS patients with FBN1 gene mutation will suffer ectopia lentis (EL) from the age of 3. With the development of EL, severe loss of vision will accrue because of lens tilt and glaucoma. Cionni modified capsular tension rings (MCTR) has been applied in the surgery for EL in MFS patients. To evaluate visual acuity and safety of using MCTR during lens subluxation surgery in MFS patients, 66 MFS patients (110 eyes) were included in our study, with the mean duration of follow-up of 4.7 months (SD 1.76 months). The capsular bags were preserved in 101 eyes (91.81%) with MCTR implantation. There was an overall significant improvement in BCVA at 1-month follow-up which was maintained at 3 months. Multivariable linear regression revealed that older age at first visit was associated with greater postoperative BCVA at the 1-month follow-up (P = 0.007). A significant difference was found between different degrees of lens subluxation and the length of surgical time and complications. At follow-up, only two eyes (1.98%) were identified to have developed retinal detachments. In conclusion, better visual outcomes can be achieved when patients received an early operation with MCTR implantation.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33542371 · DOI · PMC7862488
Long-term surgical outcomes of primary retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of intraocular lens dislocation [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of primary retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens (R-IOL) implantation in patients with complete intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation.
- Closing excerpt
- Overall, primary R-IOL implantation with pars plana vitrectomy is effective and safe for correcting IOL dislocation due to various causes.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (188 words)
We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of primary retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens (R-IOL) implantation in patients with complete intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation. In this single-center retrospective case series, we reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent R-IOL implantation surgery with pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of IOL dislocation between September 2014 and July 2019. The primary outcome was change in visual acuity (VA) up to 24 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included changes in intraocular pressure (IOP), refractive errors, and endothelial cell count (ECC) over the same period. Data of 103 eyes (98 patients) were analyzed. The mean uncorrected VA was significantly improved at one month postoperatively (- 0.69 logMAR, P 2, P = 0.027) significantly decreased one month post-surgery and remained stable thereafter. Postoperative mean spherical equivalents were similar to the prediction error throughout the follow-up period. IOP elevation (n = 8, 7.8%), cystoid macular edema (n = 4, 3.9%), and dislocation of the R-IOL (n = 10, 9.7%) were managed successfully. Overall, primary R-IOL implantation with pars plana vitrectomy is effective and safe for correcting IOL dislocation due to various causes.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33436860 · DOI · PMC7804091
Advanced Artificial-Intelligence-Based Jiang Formula for Intraocular Lens Power in Congenital Ectopia Lentis [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- PurposeThe purpose of this study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based intraocular lens (IOLs) power calculation formula for improving the accuracy of IOLs power calculations in patients with congenital ectopia lentis (CEL).
- Closing excerpt
- Translational relevanceThe Jiang Formula, an AI-integrated two-layer ensemble learning model, enhances IOLs power calculation accuracy in patients with CEL, ultimately improving surgical outcomes and supporting more effective, personalized treatment in this unique patient group.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (223 words)
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based intraocular lens (IOLs) power calculation formula for improving the accuracy of IOLs power calculations in patients with congenital ectopia lentis (CEL).MethodsA total of 651 eyes with CEL that underwent IOLs implantation surgery were included in this study. An AI-based ensemble formula-the Jiang Formula, was developed using a training dataset of 520 eyes and evaluated on a testing dataset of 131 eyes. A five-fold cross-validation and a two-layer ensemble learning model were constructed. The formula was then tested in a test set and compared against five current classic formulas.ResultsThe cohort included young patients (mean age = 14.38 ± 13.35 years). The Jiang Formula showed the lowest prediction error (PE; = 0.08 ± 1.01 diopters [D]), absolute error (AE; = 0.77 ± 0.65 D), median absolute error (MedAE; = 0.66 D), and root mean square error (RMSE; = 1.02 D) among six formulas (P ConclusionsAI-integrated two-layer ensemble learning model demonstrates promising applications in IOLs power calculations for patients with CEL, not only providing higher predictive accuracy than current classic formulas but also accommodating extreme values and variations in surgical techniques.Translational relevanceThe Jiang Formula, an AI-integrated two-layer ensemble learning model, enhances IOLs power calculation accuracy in patients with CEL, ultimately improving surgical outcomes and supporting more effective, personalized treatment in this unique patient group.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39903164 · DOI · PMC11801393
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article The eye in the Marfan syndrome [5]
- Research article Management of the subluxated crystalline lens [6]
- Research article Zinn's zonule [7]
- Research article Genetics of ectopia lentis [8]
- Research article Pathophysiology of zonular diseases [9]
- Research article Ectopia lentis phenotypes and the FBN1 gene [10]
References
- Luebke J, Reinhard T, Agostini H, Boehringer D, Eberwein P. Long-term follow-up after scleral lens fixation in patients with Marfan syndrome. . 2017. PMID 29207985 · DOI · PMC5718067
- Chen T, Deng M, Zhang M, Chen J, Chen Z, Jiang Y. Visual outcomes of lens subluxation surgery with Cionni modified capsular tension rings in Marfan syndrome. . 2021. PMID 33542371 · DOI · PMC7862488
- Choi EY, Lee CH, Kang HG, Han JY, Byeon SH, Kim SS, et al.. Long-term surgical outcomes of primary retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of intraocular lens dislocation. . 2021. PMID 33436860 · DOI · PMC7804091
- Liu Y, Wang X, Song L, Sun Y, Chen Z, Jia W, et al.. Advanced Artificial-Intelligence-Based Jiang Formula for Intraocular Lens Power in Congenital Ectopia Lentis. . 2025. PMID 39903164 · DOI · PMC11801393
- Maumenee IH. The eye in the Marfan syndrome. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1981. PMID 7043871 · PMC1312201
- Hoffman RS, Snyder ME, Devgan U, Allen QB, Yeoh R, Braga-Mele R, et al.. Management of the subluxated crystalline lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013. PMID 24286841 · DOI
- Bassnett S. Zinn's zonule. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021. PMID 32980533 · DOI · PMC8139560
- Sadiq MA, Vanderveen D. Genetics of ectopia lentis. Semin Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID 24138040 · DOI
- Dureau P. Pathophysiology of zonular diseases. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008. PMID 18090894 · DOI
- Adès LC, Holman KJ, Brett MS, Edwards MJ, Bennetts B. Ectopia lentis phenotypes and the FBN1 gene. Am J Med Genet A. 2004. PMID 15054843 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.