Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Digestive System and Liver›Esophageal Achalasia

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Esophageal Achalasia

Digestive System and Liver · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A motility disorder of the esophagus in which the lower esophageal sphincter (near the cardia) fails to relax resulting in functional obstruction of the esophagus, and dysphagia.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,042 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A motility disorder of the esophagus in which the lower esophageal sphincter (near the cardia) fails to relax resulting in functional obstruction of the esophagus, and dysphagia. Achalasia is characterized by a grossly contorted and dilated esophagus (megaesophagus).

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Achalasias, Esophageal; Esophageal Achalasias; Achalasia; Achalasias; Achalasia, Esophageal; Cardiospasm; Cardiospasms; Megaesophagus.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Esophageal Motility Disorders

Related concepts

  • Esophagus
  • Lower Esophageal Sphincter
  • Cardia
  • Dysphagia

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 8,354 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Esophageal Achalasia” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 1,537 of them (18.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 3,832 records.

Reviews account for 982 records (11.8%) and meta-analyses for 114. Randomized controlled trials number 108 (1.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 3,832 records; 2000-2009: 1,187 records; 2010-2019: 1,798 records; 2020 onward: 1,537 records3,832through 19991,1872000-20091,7982010-20191,5372020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19993,832
2000-20091,187
2010-20191,798
2020 onward1,537
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 11.8 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.3 percentReviews11.8% (982)Meta-analyses1.4% (114)Randomized controlled trials1.3% (108)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 8,354 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews98211.8%
Meta-analyses1141.4%
Randomized controlled trials1081.3%

Method: PubMed query "Esophageal Achalasia"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.

Reading the evidence in digestive system and liver

Gut and liver research ranges from laboratory studies of the microbiome to large trials of drugs and surgery. Symptoms such as pain, reflux or bowel change are reported by patients and overlap between conditions, and diet and microbiome studies are mostly observational. Check whether the study measured symptoms, tissue findings or long-term outcomes, how the diagnosis was made and how long people were followed. Nothing here replaces advice from a qualified clinician.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Protein signature of human skin fibroblasts allows the study of the molecular etiology of rare neurological diseases
Hentschel A, Czech A, Münchberg U, Freier E, Schara-Schmidt U, Sickmann A, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
33cc by
PMID 33563298 · DOI · PMC7874489
A single-cell transcriptional landscape of immune cells shows disease-specific changes of T cell and macrophage populations in human achalasia
Liu ZQ, Dai H, Yao L, Chen WF, Wang Y, Ma LY, et al.
2023Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
21cc by
PMID 37542039 · DOI · PMC10403544
Comparative efficacy of first-line therapeutic interventions for achalasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Facciorusso A, Singh S, Abbas Fehmi SM, Annese V, Lipham J, Yadlapati R
2021Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
20cc by
PMID 32856150 · DOI · PMC8011535
Peroral endoscopic myotomy in spastic esophageal disorders: Clinical outcomes and optimal approaches
Tatsuta T, Inoue H, Shimamura Y, Iwasaki M, Ushikubo K, Yamamoto K, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
7cc by
PMID 40094186 · DOI · PMC12244300

Protein signature of human skin fibroblasts allows the study of the molecular etiology of rare neurological diseases [1]

Research article Hentschel A, Czech A, Münchberg U, Freier E, Schara-Schmidt U, Sickmann A, et al. · · 2021 · cited 33 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundThe elucidation of pathomechanisms leading to the manifestation of rare (genetically caused) neurological diseases including neuromuscular diseases (NMD) represents an important step toward the understanding of the genesis of the respective disease and might help to define starting points for (new) therapeutic intervention concepts.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsOur combined data reveal that human fibroblasts may serve as an in vitro system to study the molecular etiology of rare neurological diseases exemplified on Allgrove syndrome in an unbiased fashion.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (373 words)

BackgroundThe elucidation of pathomechanisms leading to the manifestation of rare (genetically caused) neurological diseases including neuromuscular diseases (NMD) represents an important step toward the understanding of the genesis of the respective disease and might help to define starting points for (new) therapeutic intervention concepts. However, these "discovery studies" are often limited by the availability of human biomaterial. Moreover, given that results of next-generation-sequencing approaches frequently result in the identification of ambiguous variants, testing of their pathogenicity is crucial but also depending on patient-derived material.MethodsHuman skin fibroblasts were used to generate a spectral library using pH8-fractionation of followed by nano LC-MS/MS. Afterwards, Allgrove-patient derived fibroblasts were subjected to a data independent acquisition approach. In addition, proteomic signature of an enriched nuclear protein fraction was studied. Proteomic findings were confirmed by immunofluorescence in a muscle biopsy derived from the same patient and cellular lipid homeostasis in the cause of Allgrove syndrome was analysed by fluorescence (BODIPY-staining) and coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy.ResultsTo systematically address the question if human skin fibroblasts might serve as valuable biomaterial for (molecular) studies of NMD, we generated a protein library cataloguing 8280 proteins including a variety of such linked to genetic forms of motoneuron diseases, congenital myasthenic syndromes, neuropathies and muscle disorders. In silico-based pathway analyses revealed expression of a diversity of proteins involved in muscle contraction and such decisive for neuronal function and maintenance suggesting the suitability of human skin fibroblasts to study the etiology of NMD. Based on these findings, next we aimed to further demonstrate the suitability of this in vitro model to study NMD by a use case: the proteomic signature of fibroblasts derived from an Allgrove-patient was studied. Dysregulation of paradigmatic proteins could be confirmed in muscle biopsy of the patient and protein-functions could be linked to neurological symptoms known for this disease. Moreover, proteomic investigation of nuclear protein composition allowed the identification of protein-dysregulations according with structural perturbations observed in the muscle biopsy. BODIPY-staining on fibroblasts and CARS microscopy on muscle biopsy suggest altered lipid storage as part of the underlying disease etiology.ConclusionsOur combined data reveal that human fibroblasts may serve as an in vitro system to study the molecular etiology of rare neurological diseases exemplified on Allgrove syndrome in an unbiased fashion.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33563298 · DOI · PMC7874489

A single-cell transcriptional landscape of immune cells shows disease-specific changes of T cell and macrophage populations in human achalasia [2]

Research article Liu ZQ, Dai H, Yao L, Chen WF, Wang Y, Ma LY, et al. · · 2023 · cited 21 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Achalasia is a rare motility disorder of the esophagus caused by the gradual degeneration of myenteric neurons.
Closing excerpt
Thus, we profile the immune cell transcriptional landscape and identify C1QC+ macrophages and TRM as disease-associated immune cell subsets in achalasia.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (179 words)

Achalasia is a rare motility disorder of the esophagus caused by the gradual degeneration of myenteric neurons. Immune-mediated ganglionitis has been proposed to underlie the loss of myenteric neurons. Here, we measure the immune cell transcriptional profile of paired lower esophageal sphincter (LES) tissue and blood samples in achalasia and controls using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). In achalasia, we identify a pattern of expanded immune cells and a specific transcriptional phenotype, especially in LES tissue. We show C1QC+ macrophages and tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM), especially ZNF683+ CD8+ TRM and XCL1+ CD4+ TRM, are significantly expanded and localized surrounding the myenteric plexus in the LES tissue of achalasia. C1QC+ macrophages are transcriptionally similar to microglia of the central nervous system and have a neurodegenerative dysfunctional phenotype in achalasia. TRM also expresses transcripts of dysregulated immune responses in achalasia. Moreover, inflammation increases with disease progression since immune cells are more activated in type I compared with type II achalasia. Thus, we profile the immune cell transcriptional landscape and identify C1QC+ macrophages and TRM as disease-associated immune cell subsets in achalasia.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37542039 · DOI · PMC10403544

Comparative efficacy of first-line therapeutic interventions for achalasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis [3]

Systematic review Facciorusso A, Singh S, Abbas Fehmi SM, Annese V, Lipham J, Yadlapati R · · 2021 · cited 20 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundSeveral interventions with variable efficacy are available as first-line therapy for patients with achalasia.
Closing excerpt
POEM may have lower rate of serious adverse events compared to LHM and PD, but higher rate of GERD.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (246 words)

BackgroundSeveral interventions with variable efficacy are available as first-line therapy for patients with achalasia. We assessed the comparative efficacy of different strategies for management of achalasia, through a network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect treatment comparisons.MethodsWe identified six randomized controlled trials in adults with achalasia that compared the efficacy of pneumatic dilation (PD; n = 260), laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM; n = 309), and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM; n = 176). Primary efficacy outcome was 1-year treatment success (patient-reported improvement in symptoms based on validated scores); secondary efficacy outcomes were 2-year treatment success and physiologic improvement; safety outcomes were risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), severe erosive esophagitis, and procedure-related serious adverse events. We performed pairwise and network meta-analysis for all treatments, and used GRADE criteria to appraise quality of evidence.ResultsLow-quality evidence, based primarily on direct evidence, supports the use of POEM (RR [risk ratio], 1.29; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.99-1.69), and LHM (RR, 1.18 [0.96-1.44]) over PD for treatment success at 1 year; no significant difference was observed between LHM and POEM (RR 1.09 [0.86-1.39]). The incidence of severe esophagitis after POEM, LHM, and PD was 5.3%, 3.7%, and 1.5%, respectively. Procedure-related serious adverse event rate after POEM, LHM, and PD was 1.4%, 6.7%, and 4.2%, respectively.ConclusionsPOEM and LHM have comparable efficacy, and may increase treatment success as compared to PD with low confidence in estimates. POEM may have lower rate of serious adverse events compared to LHM and PD, but higher rate of GERD.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32856150 · DOI · PMC8011535

Peroral endoscopic myotomy in spastic esophageal disorders: Clinical outcomes and optimal approaches [4]

Research article Tatsuta T, Inoue H, Shimamura Y, Iwasaki M, Ushikubo K, Yamamoto K, et al. · · 2025 · cited 7 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectivesThe efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for spastic esophageal disorders (SED), including type III achalasia, distal esophageal spasm (DES), and jackhammer esophagus (JE), remain uncertain due to its rarity.
Closing excerpt
LES-preserving POEM is a viable strategy for treating DES and JE, offering comparable efficacy, while potentially minimizing GERD risk.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (244 words)

ObjectivesThe efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for spastic esophageal disorders (SED), including type III achalasia, distal esophageal spasm (DES), and jackhammer esophagus (JE), remain uncertain due to its rarity. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and optimal strategies for managing SED.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent POEM for SED between March 2014 and December 2023. Myotomy was tailored to target spastic segments in all cases. For type III achalasia, the myotomy extended into the gastric cardia, while for DES and JE, the procedure either preserved the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) or included a gastric myotomy. Outcomes assessed included procedural details, technical and clinical success, adverse events, and the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) post-POEM. Clinical success was defined as an Eckardt score of ≤3.ResultsAmong 2938 POEM procedures, 106 (3.6%) were for SED. The cohort included 58 patients (54.8%) with type III achalasia, 24 (22.6%) with DES, and 24 (22.6%) with JE. The technical success rate was 100%, with clinical success rates of 98.1% at 2-3 months and 92.6% at 1 year. Erosive esophagitis occurred in 27.7% at 2-3 months and 16.1% at 1 year. LES-preserving POEM for DES and JE showed comparable efficacy to POEM with gastric myotomy, with a trend toward reduced GERD incidence.ConclusionPeroral endoscopic myotomy is an effective treatment for all types of SED. LES-preserving POEM is a viable strategy for treating DES and JE, offering comparable efficacy, while potentially minimizing GERD risk.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40094186 · DOI · PMC12244300

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Achalasia [5]
    Boeckxstaens GE, Zaninotto G, Richter JE · Lancet · 2014 · cited 410 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article ACG Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia [6]
    Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Yadlapati RH, Greer KB, Kavitt RT · Am J Gastroenterol · 2020 · cited 293 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Achalasia: a systematic review [7]
    Pandolfino JE, Gawron AJ · JAMA · 2015 · cited 292 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Versus Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [8]
    Schlottmann F, Luckett DJ, Fine J, Shaheen NJ, Patti MG · Ann Surg · 2018 · cited 241 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article ASGE guideline on the management of achalasia [9]
    Khashab MA, Vela MF, Thosani N, Agrawal D, Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, et al. · Gastrointest Endosc · 2020 · cited 150 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a meta-analysis [10]
    Akintoye E, Kumar N, Obaitan I, Alayo QA, Thompson CC · Endoscopy · 2016 · cited 149 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Hentschel A, Czech A, Münchberg U, Freier E, Schara-Schmidt U, Sickmann A, et al.. Protein signature of human skin fibroblasts allows the study of the molecular etiology of rare neurological diseases. . 2021. PMID 33563298 · DOI · PMC7874489
  2. Liu ZQ, Dai H, Yao L, Chen WF, Wang Y, Ma LY, et al.. A single-cell transcriptional landscape of immune cells shows disease-specific changes of T cell and macrophage populations in human achalasia. . 2023. PMID 37542039 · DOI · PMC10403544
  3. Facciorusso A, Singh S, Abbas Fehmi SM, Annese V, Lipham J, Yadlapati R. Comparative efficacy of first-line therapeutic interventions for achalasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. . 2021. PMID 32856150 · DOI · PMC8011535
  4. Tatsuta T, Inoue H, Shimamura Y, Iwasaki M, Ushikubo K, Yamamoto K, et al.. Peroral endoscopic myotomy in spastic esophageal disorders: Clinical outcomes and optimal approaches. . 2025. PMID 40094186 · DOI · PMC12244300
  5. Boeckxstaens GE, Zaninotto G, Richter JE. Achalasia. Lancet. 2014. PMID 23871090 · DOI
  6. Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Yadlapati RH, Greer KB, Kavitt RT. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID 32773454 · DOI · PMC9896940
  7. Pandolfino JE, Gawron AJ. Achalasia: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015. PMID 25965233 · DOI
  8. Schlottmann F, Luckett DJ, Fine J, Shaheen NJ, Patti MG. Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Versus Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2018. PMID 28549006 · DOI
  9. Khashab MA, Vela MF, Thosani N, Agrawal D, Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, et al.. ASGE guideline on the management of achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020. PMID 31839408 · DOI
  10. Akintoye E, Kumar N, Obaitan I, Alayo QA, Thompson CC. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2016. PMID 27617421 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Esophageal Motility DisordersDigestive System and Liver
  • Gastroesophageal RefluxDigestive System and Liver
  • Esophageal PerforationDigestive System and Liver
  • Esophageal FistulaDigestive System and Liver
  • Tracheoesophageal FistulaRespiratory Medicine
  • Esophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaCancer and Oncology

All 66 articles in Digestive System and Liver →

At a glance

8,354
PubMed records on this heading
18%
published since 2020
982
review articles
108
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-11-04; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Esophageal Motility DisordersDigestive System and Liver
  • Gastroesophageal RefluxDigestive System and Liver
  • Esophageal PerforationDigestive System and Liver
  • Esophageal FistulaDigestive System and Liver
  • Tracheoesophageal FistulaRespiratory Medicine

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support