Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Esophagus
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Esophagus

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 6 min read

The muscular membranous segment between the pharynx and the stomach in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,172 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The muscular membranous segment between the pharynx and the stomach in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Upper Gastrointestinal Tract
Narrower topics
Esophageal Mucosa; Esophageal Sphincter, Upper; Esophagogastric Junction
See also
Esophagoplasty; Esophagoscopy; Esophagostomy; Esophagectomy

Related concepts

  • Pharynx
  • Stomach
  • Upper Gastrointestinal Tract

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 57,031 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Esophagus” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 6,104 of them (10.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 30,173 records.

Reviews account for 4,997 records (8.8%) and meta-analyses for 326. Randomized controlled trials number 1,350 (2.4%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 30,173 records; 2000-2009: 8,924 records; 2010-2019: 11,830 records; 2020 onward: 6,104 records30,173through 19998,9242000-200911,8302010-20196,1042020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199930,173
2000-20098,924
2010-201911,830
2020 onward6,104
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 8.8 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.6 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 2.4 percentReviews8.8% (4,997)Meta-analyses0.6% (326)Randomized controlled trials2.4% (1,350)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 57,031 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4,9978.8%
Meta-analyses3260.6%
Randomized controlled trials1,3502.4%

Method: PubMed query "Esophagus"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
The efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced, HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Pu W, Li S, Zhang J, Huang J, Li J, Jiang Y, et al.
2025Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
23cc by
PMID 40207218 · DOI · PMC11979168
Heterogeneity of predictive biomarker expression in gastric and esophago-gastric junction carcinoma with peritoneal dissemination
Angerilli V, Callegarin M, Govoni I, De Lisi G, Paudice M, Fugazzola P, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
17cc by
PMID 40205072 · DOI · PMC12174275
PD-1 antibody camrelizumab plus apatinib and SOX as first-line treatment in patients with AFP-producing gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (CAP 06): a multi-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial
Wang Y, Lu J, Chong X, Wang C, Chen X, Peng Z, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
16cc by
PMID 40082418 · DOI · PMC11906745
First-line zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 and nivolumab in unresectable CLDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a phase 2 trial
Shitara K, Shoji H, Fazio N, Lonardi S, Lee KW, Bai LY, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
14cc by
PMID 41840238 · DOI · PMC13278966

The efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced, HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [1]

Meta-analysis Pu W, Li S, Zhang J, Huang J, Li J, Jiang Y, et al. · · 2025 · cited 23 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (Chemo) have been approved as an initial treatment strategy for metastatic or recurrent human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC).
Closing excerpt
Lastly, dual anti-therapy might be a useful tactic for the population with low PD-L1 expression in the future.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (477 words)

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (Chemo) have been approved as an initial treatment strategy for metastatic or recurrent human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC). However, since programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or its ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have just recently been investigated for the treatment of unresectable GC/GEJC, there is ongoing debate regarding their safety and effectiveness for prespecified subgroups. The purpose of this research is to establish a foundation toward stratified decision-making by methodically assessing the merits and drawbacks of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemo in the clinical utilization of advanced HER2-negative GC/GEJC according to certain prominent large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In addition, we limitedly explored the favorable short-term efficacy of PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibodies for the above-mentioned tumors.MethodsThe researchers retrieved several databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library, to collect all the relevant literature published since the establishment of the databases until October 30, 2024, and then screened to determine the qualified literature and extracted the relevant information. We only included RCTs for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with or without chemo in advanced GC or GEJC. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). A subgroup analysis for the median overall survival (mOS) was conducted for the following variables: microsatellite instability (MSI) status, PD-L1 expression, combined positive scores (CPS), metastasis status, and primary tumor location. When moderate heterogeneity was found, a random-effect model was applied. The outcome indicators were then statistically analyzed, taking advantage of Review Manager 5.4. Hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio (RR) were selected as the effect values for statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 7 eligible RCTs and 6537 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemo significantly improved patients' OS compared with chemo alone, especially in the tumor cell PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% [HR = 0.62, 95% CI (0.48, 0.81); a p-value = 0.0004], PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10 [HR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.57, 0.77); a p-value ConclusionFor patients with advanced HER2-negative GC/GEJC, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with chemo have almost demonstrated consistent synergistic anti-tumor benefits to survival outcomes when compared to chemo alone. However, the subgroup analysis in this meta-study revealed that neither PD-L1 expression level nor MSI status could fully predict the efficacy of the dual treatment model but faced a higher possibility of serious treatment-related adverse events (sTRAEs), particularly in the synchronous therapy arm. Therefore, urging the need for more investigations into the development of collaborative prognostic forecasting models for achieving precise stratification, established harmonized testing standards and methods for PD-L1 expression and positivity, optimal CPS threshold for benefits, as well as alternative molecular biomarkers for the reason that certain indicators alone may not discriminate responders clearly. Lastly, dual anti-therapy might be a useful tactic for the population with low PD-L1 expression in the future.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40207218 · DOI · PMC11979168

Heterogeneity of predictive biomarker expression in gastric and esophago-gastric junction carcinoma with peritoneal dissemination [2]

Research article Angerilli V, Callegarin M, Govoni I, De Lisi G, Paudice M, Fugazzola P, et al. · · 2025 · cited 17 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundTemporal and spatial molecular heterogeneity contributes to resistance to targeted and immune therapies in gastric and esophagogastric junction carcinoma (G/EGJ).
Closing excerpt
2 shows substantial concordance between primary G/EGJ and PM and could be a promising target in HER2/PD-L1-negative G/EGJ with PM.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (202 words)

BackgroundTemporal and spatial molecular heterogeneity contributes to resistance to targeted and immune therapies in gastric and esophagogastric junction carcinoma (G/EGJ). This study evaluates differences in biomarker expression between primary G/EGJ and paired peritoneal metastases (PM).MethodsWe analyzed 74 cases of primary G/EGJ and paired PM using immunohistochemistry for HER2, PD-L1, Claudin18 (CLDN18), DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, p53, E-cadherin, and in situ hybridization for EBER. Biomarker concordance between primary and metastatic tumors was assessed.ResultsPrimary G/EGJ were predominantly poorly cohesive (45.9%) or mixed-type (37.8%). Regarding predictive biomarkers, low rates of HER2 overexpression (5.4%), MMR deficiency (4.1%), and EBER positivity (1.4%) were observed, while PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 occurred in 79.7% of cases and CLDN18 positivity was observed in 31.1% of cases. Concordance was perfect for MMR and EBER, while PD-L1 showed the highest discordance (32.4%). HER2 had a low discordance rate (2.7%). CLDN18 exhibited good concordance (86.5%) and showed consistent positivity in PD-L1- and HER2-negative primary tumors (28.6%).ConclusionG/EGJ with PM show distinct molecular features and spatial heterogeneity, with MMR, EBER, and HER2 demonstrating strong concordance, while PD-L1 showed greater variability. As for novel biomarkers, CLDN18.2 shows substantial concordance between primary G/EGJ and PM and could be a promising target in HER2/PD-L1-negative G/EGJ with PM.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40205072 · DOI · PMC12174275

PD-1 antibody camrelizumab plus apatinib and SOX as first-line treatment in patients with AFP-producing gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (CAP 06): a multi-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial [3]

Research article Wang Y, Lu J, Chong X, Wang C, Chen X, Peng Z, et al. · · 2025 · cited 16 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (AFP-G/GEJ) cancer, a rare gastric cancer subtype, exhibits increased angiogenesis and more immunosuppression than non-AFP-G/GEJ cancer.
Closing excerpt
Further studies are necessary to validate these findings.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (234 words)

Alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (AFP-G/GEJ) cancer, a rare gastric cancer subtype, exhibits increased angiogenesis and more immunosuppression than non-AFP-G/GEJ cancer. The potential benefits of anti-angiogenic agents and immunotherapy for this specific subtype remain unknown. This multi-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04609176) evaluated the antitumor activity, safety, and biomarkers of camrelizumab plus apatinib and S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX), followed by maintenance treatment with camrelizumab plus apatinib, as a first-line treatment in patients with AFP-G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 in the full analysis set. Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response, time to response, and safety. Between December 4, 2020, and August 4, 2023, 36 patients were enrolled and treated. The trial met its primary endpoint with a confirmed ORR of 66.7% (95% CI: 49.0-81.4). The DCR was 88.9% (95% CI: 73.9-96.9). With a median follow-up of 11.7 months (range: 3.2-37.9), the median PFS reached 7.8 months (95% CI: 4.9-12.3) and the median OS reached 18.0 months (95% CI: 10.5-NR). No new safety concerns were identified. In exploratory analysis, patients with durable clinical benefit exhibited higher pre-treatment (PD-1+) CD8+ T cell densities and effective scores. First-line treatment with camrelizumab plus apatinib and SOX, followed by maintenance treatment with camrelizumab plus apatinib, is effective and safe in AFP-G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40082418 · DOI · PMC11906745

First-line zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 and nivolumab in unresectable CLDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a phase 2 trial [4]

Research article Shitara K, Shoji H, Fazio N, Lonardi S, Lee KW, Bai LY, et al. · · 2026 · cited 14 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
There is an unmet need for effective and safe treatments for patients with metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction (mG/GEJ) adenocarcinoma.
Closing excerpt
gov: NCT03505320 .
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (259 words)

There is an unmet need for effective and safe treatments for patients with metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction (mG/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Targeting claudin 18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), represents a promising strategy. Zolbetuximab, a CLDN18.2-targeting antibody, plus chemotherapy improved survival outcomes in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Cohort 4 of the global, open-label, phase 2 ILUSTRO study examined first-line zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 and nivolumab (a PD-L1 inhibitor). Here we report results from cohorts 4A (safety lead-in phase) and 4B (expansion phase). The primary endpoint of ILUSTRO was specific to cohort 1 and was previously published; the main efficacy endpoint of interest for cohort 4 was progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by the investigators per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. At data cutoff (2 September 2025) for this final analysis, 77 patients were enrolled in 4A + 4B (85.5% with CLDN18.2-high tumors). Cohort 4B median follow-up was 11.5 months, and median PFS (95% confidence interval (CI)) was 14.8 months (8.3-not estimable) overall (n = 71) and 18.0 months (11.1-not estimable) in patients with CLDN18.2-high tumors (n = 59). Objective response rate (measurable disease; 95% CI) was 62.1% (48.4-74.5) in 4B overall (n = 58) and 68.1% (52.9-80.9) in CLDN18.2-high (n = 47). In 4A + 4B, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (80.5%) and decreased appetite (72.7%). Efficacy and safety data support randomized evaluation of zolbetuximab plus chemoimmunotherapy in patients with CLDN18.2-positive and PD-L1-positive mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma in the ongoing phase 3 LUCERNA study. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03505320 .

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41840238 · DOI · PMC13278966

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer [5]
    Joshi SS, Badgwell BD · CA Cancer J Clin · 2021 · cited 1,462 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article ACG Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia [6]
    Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Yadlapati RH, Greer KB, Kavitt RT · Am J Gastroenterol · 2020 · cited 293 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Neoadjuvant treatment for resectable cancer of the esophagus and the gastroesophageal junction: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials [7]
    Kaklamanos IG, Walker GR, Ferry K, Franceschi D, Livingstone AS · Ann Surg Oncol · 2003 · cited 181 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
    Biere SS, Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL · Dig Surg · 2011 · cited 175 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Meta-analysis of postoperative morbidity and perioperative mortality in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancers [9]
    Kumagai K, Rouvelas I, Tsai JA, Mariosa D, Klevebro F, Lindblad M, et al. · Br J Surg · 2014 · cited 169 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article ASGE guideline on the management of achalasia [10]
    Khashab MA, Vela MF, Thosani N, Agrawal D, Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, et al. · Gastrointest Endosc · 2020 · cited 150 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Pu W, Li S, Zhang J, Huang J, Li J, Jiang Y, et al.. The efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced, HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. . 2025. PMID 40207218 · DOI · PMC11979168
  2. Angerilli V, Callegarin M, Govoni I, De Lisi G, Paudice M, Fugazzola P, et al.. Heterogeneity of predictive biomarker expression in gastric and esophago-gastric junction carcinoma with peritoneal dissemination. . 2025. PMID 40205072 · DOI · PMC12174275
  3. Wang Y, Lu J, Chong X, Wang C, Chen X, Peng Z, et al.. PD-1 antibody camrelizumab plus apatinib and SOX as first-line treatment in patients with AFP-producing gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (CAP 06): a multi-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial. . 2025. PMID 40082418 · DOI · PMC11906745
  4. Shitara K, Shoji H, Fazio N, Lonardi S, Lee KW, Bai LY, et al.. First-line zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 and nivolumab in unresectable CLDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a phase 2 trial. . 2026. PMID 41840238 · DOI · PMC13278966
  5. Joshi SS, Badgwell BD. Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021. PMID 33592120 · DOI · PMC9927927
  6. Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Yadlapati RH, Greer KB, Kavitt RT. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID 32773454 · DOI · PMC9896940
  7. Kaklamanos IG, Walker GR, Ferry K, Franceschi D, Livingstone AS. Neoadjuvant treatment for resectable cancer of the esophagus and the gastroesophageal junction: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003. PMID 12900366 · DOI
  8. Biere SS, Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg. 2011. PMID 21293129 · DOI
  9. Kumagai K, Rouvelas I, Tsai JA, Mariosa D, Klevebro F, Lindblad M, et al.. Meta-analysis of postoperative morbidity and perioperative mortality in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancers. Br J Surg. 2014. PMID 24493117 · DOI
  10. Khashab MA, Vela MF, Thosani N, Agrawal D, Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, et al.. ASGE guideline on the management of achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020. PMID 31839408 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • StomachAnatomy and Physiology
  • Esophagogastric JunctionAnatomy and Physiology
  • CardiaAnatomy and Physiology
  • Esophageal MucosaAnatomy and Physiology
  • DuodenumAnatomy and Physiology
  • PylorusAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

57,031
PubMed records on this heading
11%
published since 2020
4,997
review articles
1,350
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • StomachAnatomy and Physiology
  • Esophagogastric JunctionAnatomy and Physiology
  • CardiaAnatomy and Physiology
  • Esophageal MucosaAnatomy and Physiology
  • DuodenumAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support