Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (887 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The separation and isolation of tissues for surgical purposes, or for the analysis or study of their structures.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Dissections.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Specimen Handling; Surgical Procedures, Operative
- Narrower topics
- Microdissection
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 17,931 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Dissection” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 3,277 of them (18.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 7,860 records.
Reviews account for 1,260 records (7.0%) and meta-analyses for 97. Randomized controlled trials number 306 (1.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 2,256 |
| 2000-2009 | 4,538 |
| 2010-2019 | 7,860 |
| 2020 onward | 3,277 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,260 | 7.0% |
| Meta-analyses | 97 | 0.5% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 306 | 1.7% |
Method: PubMed query "Dissection"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.
Reading the evidence in diagnostics and medical technology
A test or device is judged by how well it detects a condition, how often it gives false alarms or misses cases, and whether using it improves outcomes for people. Accuracy depends on who is tested and how common the condition is, so a test that performs well in a specialist hospital can perform differently in the community. Check the reference standard, the population studied, the sensitivity and specificity and whether results were confirmed in a separate group.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene expression profiling of single cells from archival tissue with laser-capture microdissection and Smart-3SEQ | 2019 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 129 | cc by PMID 31519740 · DOI · PMC6836736 |
| An optimised protocol for isolation of RNA from small sections of laser-capture microdissected FFPE tissue amenable for next-generation sequencing | 2017 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 56 | cc by PMID 28835206 · DOI · PMC5569520 |
| Pulmonary sequestration in adults: a retrospective review of resected and unresected cases | 2018 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 48 | cc by PMID 29871620 · DOI · PMC5989460 |
| MR-SP2: A Microreactor-Based Workflow for Few-Cell Spatial Proteomics on the Legacy Zeiss PALM MicroBeam | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 41914927 · DOI · PMC13140122 |
Gene expression profiling of single cells from archival tissue with laser-capture microdissection and Smart-3SEQ [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is a sensitive and accurate method for quantifying gene expression.
- Closing excerpt
- In particular, Smart-3SEQ's compatibility with FFPE tissue unlocks an enormous number of archived clinical samples; combined with LCM it allows unprecedented studies of small cell populations and single cells isolated by their in situ context.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (160 words)
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is a sensitive and accurate method for quantifying gene expression. Small samples or those whose RNA is degraded, such as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, remain challenging to study with nonspecialized RNA-seq protocols. Here, we present a new method, Smart-3SEQ, that accurately quantifies transcript abundance even with small amounts of total RNA and effectively characterizes small samples extracted by laser-capture microdissection (LCM) from FFPE tissue. We also obtain distinct biological profiles from FFPE single cells, which have been impossible to study with previous RNA-seq protocols, and we use these data to identify possible new macrophage phenotypes associated with the tumor microenvironment. We propose Smart-3SEQ as a highly cost-effective method to enable large gene expression profiling experiments unconstrained by sample size and tissue availability. In particular, Smart-3SEQ's compatibility with FFPE tissue unlocks an enormous number of archived clinical samples; combined with LCM it allows unprecedented studies of small cell populations and single cells isolated by their in situ context.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31519740 · DOI · PMC6836736
An optimised protocol for isolation of RNA from small sections of laser-capture microdissected FFPE tissue amenable for next-generation sequencing [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundFormalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue constitutes a vast treasury of samples for biomedical research.
- Closing excerpt
- The possibility to study gene expression signatures in specific small sections of archival FFPE tissue, which often entail large amounts of highly relevant clinical follow-up data, unlocks a new dimension of hitherto difficult-to-analyse samples which now become amenable for investigation.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (284 words)
BackgroundFormalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue constitutes a vast treasury of samples for biomedical research. Thus far however, extraction of RNA from FFPE tissue has proved challenging due to chemical RNA-protein crosslinking and RNA fragmentation, both of which heavily impact on RNA quantity and quality for downstream analysis. With very small sample sizes, e.g. when performing Laser-capture microdissection (LCM) to isolate specific subpopulations of cells, recovery of sufficient RNA for analysis with reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) becomes very cumbersome and difficult.MethodsWe excised matched cancer-associated stroma (CAS) and normal stroma from clinical specimen of FFPE canine mammary tumours using LCM, and compared the commonly used protease-based RNA isolation procedure with an adapted novel technique that additionally incorporates a focused ultrasonication step.ResultsWe successfully adapted a protocol that uses focused ultrasonication to isolate RNA from small amounts of deparaffinised, stained, clinical LCM samples. Using this approach, we found that total RNA yields could be increased by 8- to 12-fold compared to a commonly used protease-based extraction technique. Surprisingly, RNA extracted using this new approach was qualitatively at least equal if not superior compared to the old approach, as Cq values in RT-qPCR were on average 2.3-fold lower using the new method. Finally, we demonstrate that RNA extracted using the new method performs comparably in NGS as well.ConclusionsWe present a successful isolation protocol for extraction of RNA from difficult and limiting FFPE tissue samples that enables successful analysis of small sections of clinically relevant specimen. The possibility to study gene expression signatures in specific small sections of archival FFPE tissue, which often entail large amounts of highly relevant clinical follow-up data, unlocks a new dimension of hitherto difficult-to-analyse samples which now become amenable for investigation.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28835206 · DOI · PMC5569520
Pulmonary sequestration in adults: a retrospective review of resected and unresected cases [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundPulmonary sequestration (PS) is a form of congenital pulmonary malformation that is generally diagnosed in childhood or adolescence and usually resected when diagnosed.
- Closing excerpt
- The decision regarding surgical resection needs to weigh various factors including clinical manifestations related to PS, risk of surgical complications, comorbidities, and individual patient preferences.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (241 words)
BackgroundPulmonary sequestration (PS) is a form of congenital pulmonary malformation that is generally diagnosed in childhood or adolescence and usually resected when diagnosed. We aim to identify the clinical presentation and course of patients diagnosed to have PS during adulthood.MethodsUsing a computer-assisted search of Mayo clinic medical records, we identified adult patients with PS diagnosed between 1997 and 2016. Clinical and radiological data were collected including postoperative course for those who underwent surgical resection.ResultsWe identified 32 adult patients with PS; median age at diagnosis was 42 years (IQR 28-53); 17 patients (53%) were men. The median sequestration size was 6.6 cm (IQR 4.4-9.3). The type of sequestration was intralobar in 81% and extralobar in 19%. The most common location was left lower lobe posteromedially (56%). Forty-seven percent of the patients presented with no relevant symptoms. The most common radiographic finding was mass/consolidation in 61% and the most common feeding artery origin was the thoracic aorta (54%). Surgical resection was performed in 18 patients (56%) and postoperative complication was reported in 5 patients (28%). There was no surgical mortality. Median duration of follow-up after diagnosis for unresected cases, most of whom were asymptomatic, was 19 months (IQR 4-26) with no complications related to the PS reported.ConclusionsNearly one-half of adult patients with PS present with no relevant symptoms. The decision regarding surgical resection needs to weigh various factors including clinical manifestations related to PS, risk of surgical complications, comorbidities, and individual patient preferences.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29871620 · DOI · PMC5989460
MR-SP2: A Microreactor-Based Workflow for Few-Cell Spatial Proteomics on the Legacy Zeiss PALM MicroBeam [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Laser capture microdissection (LCM) combined with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) enables spatial proteomics at the few-cell level but is constrained by cumulative losses during specimen capture, surface adsorption during processing, and sample transfer prior to LC-MS/MS analysis.
- Closing excerpt
- MR-SP2 improves identification depth for few-cell FFPE samples by nearly 3-fold compared to conventional tube-based workflows.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (202 words)
Laser capture microdissection (LCM) combined with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) enables spatial proteomics at the few-cell level but is constrained by cumulative losses during specimen capture, surface adsorption during processing, and sample transfer prior to LC-MS/MS analysis. The capture-associated losses are particularly relevant for pressure catapulting systems such as the legacy Zeiss PALM MicroBeam, which, despite discontinuation, remains in active use and therefore requires compatible low-loss workflows. We present MR-SP2 (microreactor-based sample preparation for spatial proteomics), a one-pot workflow integrating reproducible Zeiss LCM-cut specimen capture, processing with minimized adsorptive losses, and pipetting-free transfer with Evotip disposable precolumns. The workflow was evaluated using a formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) murine kidney tissue analyzed by timsTOF flex LC-MS/MS analysis. Across 50,000 μm3 regions (22 cells), MR-SP2 modestly improved proteome depth (3381 ± 80 versus 3174 ± 59 proteins). Decreasing sample input further accentuated the advantage of MR-SP2 in maintaining higher identification rates, highlighting the successful reduction of the adsorptive losses. At 12,500 μm3 (5-6 cells), identifications increased to 1145 ± 188 versus 302 ± 126. At 3125 μm3 (1-2 cells), identifications reached 695 ± 112 versus 206 ± 51. MR-SP2 improves identification depth for few-cell FFPE samples by nearly 3-fold compared to conventional tube-based workflows.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41914927 · DOI · PMC13140122
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review [5]
- Research article Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer [6]
- Research article Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century [7]
- Research article Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract [8]
- Research article The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics [9]
- Research article Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection [10]
References
- Foley JW, Zhu C, Jolivet P, Zhu SX, Lu P, Meaney MJ, et al.. Gene expression profiling of single cells from archival tissue with laser-capture microdissection and Smart-3SEQ. . 2019. PMID 31519740 · DOI · PMC6836736
- Amini P, Ettlin J, Opitz L, Clementi E, Malbon A, Markkanen E. An optimised protocol for isolation of RNA from small sections of laser-capture microdissected FFPE tissue amenable for next-generation sequencing. . 2017. PMID 28835206 · DOI · PMC5569520
- Alsumrain M, Ryu JH. Pulmonary sequestration in adults: a retrospective review of resected and unresected cases. . 2018. PMID 29871620 · DOI · PMC5989460
- Metzger M, Maldacker M, Hutzenlaub T, Paust N, Schilling O, Klatt JN. MR-SP2: A Microreactor-Based Workflow for Few-Cell Spatial Proteomics on the Legacy Zeiss PALM MicroBeam. . 2026. PMID 41914927 · DOI · PMC13140122
- Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Ann Anat. 2016. PMID 26996541 · DOI
- Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M, Oda I, Nimura S, Yahagi N, et al.. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer. Dig Endosc. 2016. PMID 26234303 · DOI
- Ghosh SK. Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century. Anat Sci Educ. 2017. PMID 27574911 · DOI
- Cao Y, Liao C, Tan A, Gao Y, Mo Z, Gao F. Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy. 2009. PMID 19693750 · DOI
- Aziz MA, McKenzie JC, Wilson JS, Cowie RJ, Ayeni SA, Dunn BK. The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics. Anat Rec. 2002. PMID 11891622 · DOI
- Fujiya M, Tanaka K, Dokoshi T, Tominaga M, Ueno N, Inaba Y, et al.. Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID 25592748 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.