Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Treatment options for patients with pilonidal sinus disease: PITSTOP, a mixed-methods evaluation›References

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Treatment options for patients with pilonidal sinus disease: PITSTOP, a mixed-methods evaluation · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 17 min read

  1. Søndenaa K, Andersen E, Nesvik I, Søreide JA, Sondenaa K, Andersen E, et al. Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10(1):39–42.7745322
  2. Hull TL, Wu J. Pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am 2002;82(6):1169–85.12516846
  3. Karydakis GE. Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. Aust N Z J Surg 1992;62(5):385–9.1575660
  4. Ertan T, Koc M, Gocmen E, Aslar AK, Keskek M, Kilic M, et al. Does technique alter quality of life after pilonidal sinus surgery? Am J Surg 2005;190(3):388–92.16105524
  5. Jensen SL, Harling H. Prognosis after simple incision and drainage for a first-episode acute pilonidal abscess. Br J Surg 1988;75(1):60–1.3337954
  6. Elsey E, Lund JN. Fibrin glue in the treatment for pilonidal sinus: high patient satisfaction and rapid return to normal activities. Tech Coloproctol 2013;17(1):101–4.23224857
  7. Patti R, Angileri M, Migliore G, Sparancello M, Termine S, Crivello F, et al. Use of fibrin glue in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a pilot study. G Chir 2006;27(8–9):331–4.17064495
  8. Thompson MR, Senapati A, Kitchen P. Simple day-case surgery for pilonidal sinus disease. Br J Surg 2011;98(2):198–209.21125608
  9. Enriquez-Navascues JM, Emparanza JI, Alkorta M, Placer C. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing different techniques with primary closure for chronic pilonidal sinus. Tech Coloproctol 2014;18(10):863–72.24845110
  10. Hospital Episode Statistics. Admitted Patient Care – England 2012-13; 2013.
  11. Vermeulen H, Ubbink D, Goossens A, de Vos R, Legemate D. Dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;2004(2):CD003554.
  12. Price PE, Butterworth RJ, Bale S, Harding KG. Measuring quality of life in patients with granulating wounds. J Wound Care 1994;3(1):49–50.27922418
  13. Stauffer VK, Luedi MM, Kauf P, Schmid M, Diekmann M, Wieferich K, et al. Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: a meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence. Sci Rep 2018;8(1):3058.29449548
  14. Brown SR, Lund JN. The evidence base for pilonidal sinus surgery is the pits. Tech Coloproctol 2019;23(12):1173–5.31754976
  15. Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;2010(1):CD006213.
  16. McCallum IJD, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2008;336(7649):868–71.18390914
  17. Harris CL, Holloway S. Development of an evidence-based protocol for care of pilonidal sinus wounds healing by secondary intent using a modified Reactive Delphi procedure Part 2: methodology, analysis and results. Int Wound J 2012;9(2):173–88.22296455
  18. Lund J, Tou S, Doleman B, Williams JP. Fibrin glue for pilonidal sinus disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;1(1):CD011923.
  19. Handmer M. Sticking to the facts: a systematic review of fibrin glue for pilonidal disease. ANZ J Surg 2012;82(4):221–4.22510177
  20. Lund JN, Leveson SH. Fibrin glue in the treatment of pilonidal sinus: results of a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48(5):1094–6.15868239
  21. Isik A, Eryılmaz R, Okan I, Dasiran F, Firat D, Idiz O, et al. The use of fibrin glue without surgery in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014;7(4):1047–51.24955180
  22. Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of internet e-surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 2004;6(3):e34.15471760
  23. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, CondeJG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2008;42(2):377–81. 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.01018929686
  24. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O'Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95:103208. 10.1016/j.jbi.201931078660
  25. Ojo D, Flashman K, Thomas G, Tozer P, Senapati A. Cleft closure (Bascom’s cleft lift) for 714 patients – treatment of choice for complex and recurrent pilonidal disease (a cohort study). Colorect Dis 2023;25(9):1839–43.
  26. Fearnhead NS, Lee MJ, Acheson AG, Worley G, Faiz OD, Brown SR. Variation in practice of pouch surgery in England – using SWORD data to cut to the chase and justify centralization. Colorect Dis 2018;20(7):597–605.
  27. O’Connell E, McDevitt J, Hill ADK, McNamara DA, Burke JP. Centralisation of rectal cancer care has improved patient survival in the republic of Ireland. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022;48(4):890–5.34774395
  28. Shabbir J, Chaudhary BN, Britton DC. Management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: a snapshot of current practice. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011;26(12):1619–20.21404057
  29. Burnett D, Smith SR, Young CJ. The surgical management of pilonidal disease is uncertain because of high recurrence rates. Cureus 2018;10(5):e2625.30027017
  30. Strong E, Callaghan T, Beal E, Moffatt C, Wickramasekera N, Brown S, et al. Patient decision‐making and regret in pilonidal sinus surgery: a mixed‐methods study. Color Dis 2021;23(6):1487–98.
  31. Murphy S, Wysocki AP. Pilonidal sinus disease surveys. Pilonidal Sinus J 2017;3(1):19–27.
  32. Schein M. Treating pilonidal disease: you do not need to detonate a naval mine to catch a fish. World J Surg 2017;41(5):1303–4.28144747
  33. Fabricius R, Petersen LW, Bertelsen CA. Treatment of pilonidal sinuses in Denmark is not optimal. Dan Med Bull 2010;57(12):A4200.21122458
  34. Bradburn MJ, Clark TG, Love SB, Altman DG. Survival analysis part III: multivariate data analysis – choosing a model and assessing its adequacy and fit. Br J Cancer 2003;89(4):605–11.12915864
  35. Busso M, DiNardo J, McCrary J. New evidence on the finite sample properties of propensity score reweighting and matching estimators. Rev Econ Stat 2014;96(5):885–97.
  36. Harlak A, Mentes O, Kilic S, Coskun K, Duman K, Yilmaz F. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: analysis of previously proposed risk factors. Clinics 2010;65(2):125–31.20186294
  37. Iesalnieks I, Ommer A, Petersen S, Doll D, Herold A. German national guideline on the management of pilonidal disease. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2016;401(5):599–609.27311698
  38. Steele SR, Perry WB, Mills S, Buie WD; Surgeons SPTF of the AS of C and R. Practice parameters for the management of pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56(9):1021–7.23929010
  39. Baur T, Stauffer VK, Vogt AP, Kauf P, Schmid M, Luedi MM, et al. Recurrence rates after uncommon surgical procedures for pilonidal sinus disease. Coloproctology 2019;41(2):96–100.
  40. Bi S, Sun K, Chen S, Gu J. Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2020;10(1):13720.32792519
  41. Milone M, Velotti N, Manigrasso M, Anoldo P, Milone F, De Palma GD. Long-term follow-up for pilonidal sinus surgery: a review of literature with metanalysis. Surgeon 2018;16(5):315–20.29699781
  42. Gallo G, Carpino A, De Paola G, Fulginiti S, Novelli E, Ferrari F, et al. Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: a tertiary care academic center experience. Front Surg 2021;8:723050.34434960
  43. Yildiz MK, Ozkan E, Odabasi HM, Kaya B, Eris C, Abuoglu HH, et al. Karydakis flap procedure in patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: experience of a single centre in Istanbul. ScientificWorldJournal 2013;2013:807027.23766710
  44. Sinnott CJ, Glickman LT. Limberg flap reconstruction for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease with and without acute abscess: our experience and a review of the literature. Arch Plast Surg 2019;46(03):235–40.31006184
  45. Immerman SC. The Bascom cleft lift as a solution for all presentations of pilonidal disease. Cureus 2021;13(2):e13053.33552799
  46. Badejo MA, Ramtin S, Rossano A, Ring D, Koenig K, Crijns TJ. Does adjusting for social desirability reduce ceiling effects and increase variation of patient-reported experience measures? J Patient Exp 2022;9:237437352210791.
  47. Tsai T, Shih L-C, Lee IT, Ng T-Y, Wang J-Y, Hsu C-L, et al. Older age is associated with better compliance with follow-up in Taiwan after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. In Vivo 2020;34(5):2571–6.32871786
  48. DiMatteo MR. Variations in patients’ adherence to medical recommendations. Med Care 2004;42(3):200–9.15076819
  49. Dag A, Colak T, Turkmenoglu O, Sozutek A, Gundogdu R. Phenol procedure for pilonidal sinus disease and risk factors for treatment failure. Surgery 2012;151(1):113–7.21982072
  50. Boztug CY, Karaagac Akyol T, Benlice C, Koc MA, Doganay Erdogan B, Ozcebe OI, et al. Platelet-rich plasma treatment improves postoperative recovery in patients with pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Surg 2021;21(1):373.34670534
  51. Milone M, Velotti N, Manigrasso M, Vertaldi S, Di Lauro K, De Simone G, et al. Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing endoscopic versus conventional treatment of pilonidal sinus. Int J Surg 2020;74:81–5.31926328
  52. Elbanna HG, Emile SH, Youssef M, Thabet W, El-Hamed TMA, Ghnnam WM. Novel approach of treatment of pilonidal sinus disease with thrombin gelatin matrix as a sealant. Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59(8):775–80.27384096
  53. Milone M, Fernandez LMS, Musella M, Milone F. Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2016;151(6):547–53.26819186
  54. Yang Y, Yu L, Wang Y, Shi J, Li J, Shang F, et al. Comparative analysis on the effect of Z‐plasty versus conventional simple excision for the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: A retrospective randomised clinical study. Int Wound J 2020;17(3):555–61.31975537
  55. Yildiz A. Partial primary closure in sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: Modified with suture technique. Asian J Surg 2022;45(1):381–5.34303591
  56. Shabbir F, Ayyaz M, Farooka MW, Toor AA, Sarwar H, Malik AA. Modified Limberg’s flap versus primary closure for treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a comparative study. J Pak Med Assoc 2014;64(11):1270–3.25831644
  57. Arslan K, Said Kokcam S, Koksal H, Turan E, Atay A, Dogru O. Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study. Tech Coloproctol 2014;18(1):29–37.23430349
  58. Saydam M, Ozturk B, Sinan H, Balta AZ, Demir P, Ozer MT, et al. Comparison of modified Limberg flap transposition and lateral advancement flap transposition with Burow’s triangle in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. Am J Surg 2015;210(4):772–7.26138521
  59. Yin R.Case Study Research: Identifying Your Case(s) and Establishing the Logic of Your Case Study. London: Sage Publications; 2014.
  60. Elwyn G, James P, Grande SW, Thompson R, Walsh T, Ozanne EM. Patient Education and Counseling Developing CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2013;93(1):102–7.23768763
  61. Brehaut JC, O’Connor AM, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E, et al. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making 2003;23:281–92.12926578
  62. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 2006;18(1):59–82.
  63. Morse JM. Data were saturated. Qual Health Res 2015;25(5):587–8.25829508
  64. Witt J, Elwyn G, Wood F, Brain K. Decision making and coping in healthcare: the coping in deliberation (CODE) framework. Patient Educ Couns 2012;88(2):256–61.22465484
  65. Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17(1):88.28126032
  66. Ritchie J, Cartwright MFJ.Chapter 11. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 1994. pp. 173–94.
  67. Yin RK. Mixed methods research: are the methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel? Res Sch 2006;13(1):41–8.
  68. Guetterman TC, Fetters MD, Creswell JW. Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Ann Fam Med 2015;13(6):554–61.26553895
  69. Upadhaya S, Yu JX, Oliva C, Hooton M, Hodge J, Hubbard-Lucey VM. Impact of COVID-19 on oncology clinical trials. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2020;19(6):376–7.32424343
  70. Patel SS, Webster RK, Greenberg N, Weston D, Brooks SK. Research fatigue in COVID-19 pandemic and post-disaster research: causes, consequences and recommendations. Disaster Prev Manag 2020;29(4):445–5.33679011
  71. Bradt J. Impact of COVID-19 on clinical research. Nord J Music Ther 2020;29(4):297–9.
  72. Slauson-Blevins K, Johnson KM. Doing gender, doing surveys? Women’s gatekeeping and men’s non-participation in multi-actor reproductive surveys. Sociol Inq 2016;86(3):427–49.
  73. Rourke DO, Lakner E. Gender bias: analysis of factors causing male underrepresentation in surveys. Int J Public Opin Res 1989;1:164–76.
  74. Segre D. What you should remember in managing pilonidal disease. Front Surg 2021;8:792121.34950697
  75. Graham K, Grewal I, Lewis J.Ethics in Social Research: The Views of Research Participants. London; 2007.
  76. Carson P, Hong CJ, Otero-Vinas M, Arsenault EF, Falanga V. Liver enzymes and lipid levels in patients with lipodermatosclerosis and venous ulcers treated with a prototypic anabolic steroid (stanozolol). Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2015;14(1):11–8.25652757
  77. Yamauchi K, Nakao M, Nakashima M. Correlates of regret with treatment decision-making among Japanese women with breast cancer: results of an internet-based cross-sectional survey. BMC Womens Health 2019;19(1):86.31266493
  78. Wilson A, Ronnekleiv-Kelly SM, Pawlik TM. Regret in surgical decision making: a systematic review of patient and physician perspectives. World J Surg 2017;41(6):1454–65.28243695
  79. Becerra Pérez MM, Menear M, Brehaut JC, Légaré F. Extent and predictors of decision regret about health care decisions. Med Decis Mak 2016;36(6):777–90.
  80. Kannan S, Seo J, Riggs KR, Geller G, Boss ZDB EF. Surgeons’ views on shared decision-making. J Patient-Centered Res Rev 2020;7:8–18.
  81. Shelton RC, Brotzman LE, Crookes DM, Robles P, Neugut AI. Decision-making under clinical uncertainty: An in-depth examination of provider perspectives on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2019;102(2):284–90.30262401
  82. Gaston CM, Mitchell G. Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2005;61(10):2252–64.15922501
  83. Niburski K, Guadagno E, Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi S, Poenaru D. Shared decision making in surgery: a meta-analysis of existing literature. Patient 2020;13(6):667–81.32880820
  84. Harrison JD, Young JM, Price MA, Butow PN, Solomon MJ. What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2009;17(8):1117–28.19319577
  85. Raybould G, Babatunde O, Evans AL, Jordan JL, Paskins Z. Expressed information needs of patients with osteoporosis and/or fragility fractures: a systematic review. Arch Osteoporos 2018;13(1):55.29736627
  86. Adams E, Boulton M, Watson E. The information needs of partners and family members of cancer patients: a systematic literature review. Patient Educ Couns 2009;77(2):179–86.19406609
  87. Wang T, Molassiotis A, Chung BPM, Tan J-Y. Unmet care needs of advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 2018;17(1):96.30037346
  88. Williams D, Edwards A, Wood F, Lloyd A, Brain K, Thomas N, et al. Ability of observer and self-report measures to capture shared decision-making in clinical practice in the UK: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2019;9(8):e029485.
  89. Heen AF, Vandvik PO, Brandt L, Montori VM, Lytvyn L, Guyatt G, et al. A framework for practical issues was developed to inform shared decision-making tools and clinical guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 2021;129:104–13.33049326
  90. Lagha E, Noble A, Smith A, Denvir M, Leslie S. Patient reported experience measures (PREMs) in chronic heart failure. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2012;42(4):301–5.23240114
  91. Saunders CL, Elliott MN, Lyratzopoulos G, Abel GA. Do differential response rates to patient surveys between organizations lead to unfair performance comparisons? Med Care 2016;54(1):45–54.26595223
  92. Ahmed F, Burt J, Roland M, Ahmed F, Burt J, Roland AM, et al. Measuring patient experience: concepts and methods. Patient 2014;7:235–41.24831941
  93. Cabitza F, Dui LG, Banfi G. PROs in the wild: assessing the validity of patient reported outcomes in an electronic registry. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2019;181:104837.30709564
  94. Jenkinson C. The picker patient experience questionnaire: development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries. Int J Qual Heal Care 2002;14(5):353–8.
  95. Trujols J, Iraurgi I, Oviedo-Joekes E, Guàrdia J. A critical analysis of user satisfaction surveys in addiction services: opioid maintenance treatment as a representative case study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2014;8:107–17.24482571
  96. Moffatt S, White M, Mackintosh J, Howel D. Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research – what happens when mixed method findings conflict? BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6(1):28.16524479
  97. Munafò MR, Davey Smith G. Robust research needs many lines of evidence. Nature 2018;553(7689):399–401.
  98. McCaughan D, Sheard L, Cullum N, Dumville J, Chetter I. Nurses’ and surgeons’ views and experiences of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention: a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs 2020;29(13–14):2557–71.32279371
  99. Bekker CL, Mohsenian Naghani S, Natsch S, Wartenberg NS, van den Bemt BJF. Information needs and patient perceptions of the quality of medication information available in hospitals: a mixed method study. Int J Clin Pharm 2020;42(6):1396–404.32857256
  100. McHugh GA, Luker KA. Individuals’ expectations and challenges following total hip replacement: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34(16):1351–7.22233116
  101. Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Oettingen G. Pragmatic prospection: how and why people think about the future. Rev Gen Psychol 2016;20(1):3–16.
  102. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2002;29(6):1273–9.12064846
  103. Purkiss SF. Decision making in surgery: a pilonidal sinus. Br J Hosp Med 1993;50(9):554–6.8287257
  104. Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M, Montori VM, Cook DJ, Yusuf S, et al. Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2005;330(7482):88.15637373
  105. Mottram A. ‘They are marvellous with you whilst you are in but the aftercare is rubbish’: a grounded theory study of patients’ and their carers’ experiences after discharge following day surgery. J Clin Nurs 2011;20(21–22):3143–51.21762418
  106. Aune E, Struksnes S. Home care nurses’ experience of providing health-care to patients with hard-to-heal wounds. J Wound Care 2019;28(3):178–87.30840548
  107. Friman A, Klang B, Ebbeskog B. Wound care by district nurses at primary healthcare centres: a challenging task without authority or resources. Scand J Caring Sci 2011;25(3):426–34.21077928
  108. Maybin J, Charles A, Honeyman M.Understanding Quality in District Nursing Services: Learning from Patients, Carers and Staff. The Kings Fund; 2016. URL: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/reports/understanding-quality-district-nursing-services (accessed 23 September 2023).
  109. Wickramasekera N, Strong E, Shackley P, Callaghan T, Lee M, Hind D, et al. Patient preferences for pilonidal sinus treatments: a discrete choice experiment survey. Colorect Dis 2023;25:984–994. 10.1111/codi.16482
  110. Beal EM, Lee MJ, Hind D, Wysocki AP, Yang F, Brown SR. A systematic review of classification systems for pilonidal sinus. Tech Coloproctol 2019;23(5):435–43.31098861
  111. Hahn G, Shapiro S.A Catalogue and Computer Program for the Design and Analysis of Orthogonal Symmetric and Asymmetric Fractional Factorial Designs. Schenectady, New York: General Electric Research and Development Center; 1966.
  112. de Bekker-Grob EW, Donkers B, Jonker MF, Stolk EA. Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: a practical guide. Patient 2015;8(5):373–84.25726010
  113. Orme B.Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research. 2nd ed. Madison: Research Publishers; 2010.
  114. Hole AR. A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures. Health Econ 2007;16(8):827–40.17238222
  115. Stewart AM, Baker JD, Elliott D. The effects of a sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus wound on activities of living: thematic analysis of participant interviews. J Clin Nurs 2011;20(21–22):3174–82.21831106
  116. Harris C, Sibbald RG, Mufti A, Somayaji R. Pilonidal sinus disease: 10 steps to optimize care. Adv Skin Wound Care 2016;29(10):469–78.27632444
  117. Goodson N, Wicks P, Morgan J, Hashem L, Callinan S, Reites J. Opportunities and counterintuitive challenges for decentralized clinical trials to broaden participant inclusion. Digit Med 2022;5(1):58.
  118. Rolfe G, Freshwater D, Jasper M.Critical Reflection for Nursing and the Helping Professions: A User’s Guide. London: Palgrave; 2001.
  119. Kumar M, Clay WH, Lee MJ, Brown SR, Hind D. A mapping review of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease. Tech Coloproctol 2021;25(6):675–82.33728570
  120. Horton R. Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers. Lancet 1996;347(9007):984–5.8606606
  121. Hinchey EJ, Schaal PG, Richards GK. Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg 1978;12:85–109.735943
  122. Kozar RA, Crandall M, Shanmuganathan K, Zarzaur BL, Coburn M, Cribari C, et al. Organ injury scaling 2018 update: spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2018;85(6):1119–22.30462622
  123. Park JJH, Siden E, Zoratti MJ, Dron L, Harari O, Singer J, et al. Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols. Trials 2019;20(1):572.31533793
  124. Jayne DG, Scholefield J, Tolan D, Gray R, Senapati A, Hulme CT, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of the Surgisis anal fistula plug versus surgeon’s preference for transsphincteric fistula-in-ano: the FIAT trial. Ann Surg 2021;273(3):433–41.32516229
  125. Girling C, Lee MJ, Vimalchandran D, Jayne DJ, Stancliffe S, Wailoo A, et al. Protocol for the ORION trial (RadiO fRequency ablatION for haemorrhoids): a randomised controlled trial. Tech Coloproctol 2023;27(2):117–24.36352146
  126. Webbe J, Sinha I, Gale C. Core outcome sets. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2018;103(3):163–6.28667046
  127. Tripartite Gastrointestinal Recovery SBO Group. A core outcome set for clinical studies of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Colorectal Dis 2022;24(10):1204–10.35445534
  128. Lapsekill E, Coskun M, Oztas M, Urkan M, Can MF. A classification proposal for the sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease (SPSD). Eur Surg Res 2013;50(Suppl 1):144.
  129. Irkörücü O. Management for pilonidal disease: before you compare, use a classification system. Asian J Surg 2016;39(4):260–1.27321177
  130. Irkorucu O, Erdem H, Reyhan E. The best therapy for pilonidal disease: which management for which type? World J Surg 2012;36(3):691–2.21956594
  131. Quinodoz PD, Chilcott M, Grolleau JL, Chavoin JP, Costagliola M. Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease by excision and skin flaps: the Toulouse experience. Eur J Surg 1999;165(11):1061–5.10595611
  132. Doll D, Vassiliu P. Another pilonidal classification—PLLATIN. Pilonidal Sinus J 2018;4(1):1–3.
  133. Guner A, Cekic AB, Boz A, Turkyilmaz S, Kucuktulu U. A proposed staging system for chronic symptomatic pilonidal sinus disease and results in patients treated with stage-based approach. BMC Surg 2016;16(1):18.27084534
  134. Tezel E. A new classification according to navicular area concept for sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Color Dis 2007;9(6):575–6.
  135. Awad M, Elbaset A, Ebraheem S, Tantawy E, Elhafez M, Elsayed A. A scoring system as a method to evaluate pilonidal sinus disease to make an easy decision for its management. Indian J Plast Surg 2009;42(1):43.19881019
  136. Wysocki AP, Andersson RE, Gips M, Girgin M, Guner A, Immerman S, et al. Towards a classification for sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease – Berlin 2017. Pilonidal Sinus J 2018;4(1):5–12.
  137. International Pilonidal Society. Survey towards pilonidal classification. Pilonidal Sinus J 2018;4(1):5–12.
  138. Flight L, Julious SA. The disagreeable behaviour of the kappa statistic. Pharm Stat 2015;14(1):74–8.25470361
  139. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2021.
  140. Rotondi MA, Donner A. A confidence interval approach to sample size estimation for interobserver agreement studies with multiple raters and outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65(7):778–84.22560852
  141. Dekker L, Han-Geurts IJM, Grossi U, Gallo G, Veldkamp R. Is the Goligher classification a valid tool in clinical practice and research for hemorrhoidal disease? Tech Coloproctol 2022;26(5):387–92.35141793
  142. Jensen P, Krogsgaard MR, Christiansen J, Braendstrup O, Johansen A, Olsen J. Observer variability in the assessment of type and dysplasia of colorectal adenomas, analyzed using kappa statistics. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38(2):195–8.7851176
  143. Ergina PL, Barkun JS, McCulloch P, Cook JA, Altman DG. IDEAL Group IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages. BMJ 2013;346:f3011.23778426
  144. Vohra RS, Spreadborough P, Johnstone M, Marriott P, Bhangu A, Alderson D, et al. Protocol for a multicentre, prospective, population-based cohort study of variation in practice of cholecystectomy and surgical outcomes (the CholeS study). BMJ Open 2015;5(1):e006399.
  145. Lee MJ, Sayers AE, Drake TM, Marriott PJ, Anderson ID, Bach SP, et al. National prospective cohort study of the burden of acute small bowel obstruction. BJS Open 2019;3(3):354–66.31183452
  146. Glancz LJ, Poon MTC, Coulter IC, Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Brennan PM. Does drain position and duration influence outcomes in patients undergoing burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma? Lessons from a UK multicenter prospective cohort study. Neurosurgery 2019;85(4):486–93.30169738
  147. Milone M, Basso L, Manigrasso M, Pietroletti R, Bondurri A, La Torre M, et al. Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of pilonidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 2021;25(12):1269–80.34176001
  148. Segre D, Pozzo M, Perinotti R, Roche B, Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery. The treatment of pilonidal disease: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR). Tech Coloproctol 2015;19(10):607–13.26377583
  149. Beal E, Hind D, Bradburn M, Lee E, Howard A, Shackley P, et al. Design and rationale of the PIlonidal sinus Treatment – STudying the OPtions (PITSTOP) study: a multicentre cohort, nested mixed-methods case study and discrete choice experiment (poster presentation). Int J Surg 2018;59:S6.
← DiscussionAdditional information →

Attribution. Steven Brown; Daniel Hind; Emily Strong; Mike Bradburn; Farhat Vanessa Nasim Din; Ellen Lee et al. (2024). Treatment options for patients with pilonidal sinus disease: PITSTOP, a mixed-methods evaluation. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2024 Brown et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK605214. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support