Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Transfer of thawed frozen embryo versus fresh embryo to improve the healthy baby rate in women undergoing IVF: the E-Freeze RCT›References

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Transfer of thawed frozen embryo versus fresh embryo to improve the healthy baby rate in women undergoing IVF: the E-Freeze RCT · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 9 min read

  1. Maheshwari A, Bhattacharya S, Bowler U, Brison D, Child T, Cole C, et al. Study protocol: E-Freeze – freezing of embryos in assisted conception: a randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of a policy of freezing embryos followed by thawed frozen-embryo transfer compared with a policy of fresh-embryo transfer, in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation. Reprod Health 2019;16:81. 10.1186/s12978-019-0737-231196113
  2. Oakley L, Doyle P, Maconochie N. Lifetime prevalence of infertility and infertility treatment in the UK: results from a population-based survey of reproduction. Hum Reprod 2008;23:447–50. 10.1093/humrep/dem36918033808
  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Fertility: Assessment and Treatment for People with Fertility Problems [CG156]. URL: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156 (accessed 24 August 2015).
  4. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Fertility Treatment in 2012: Trends and Figures. URL: www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/FertilityTreatment2012TrendsFigures.PDF (accessed 24 August 2015).
  5. Society For Assisted Reproductive Technology. National Summary Report: Live Births Per Intended Egg Retrieval (All Embryo Transfers). 2018. URL: www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?reportingYear=2018 (accessed September 2020).
  6. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome, Management (Green-Top Guideline No. 5). URL: www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg5/ (accessed 24 August 2015).
  7. Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2012;18:485–503. 10.1093/humupd/dms01822611174
  8. Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Solà I, Geber S, Carreras R, Checa MA. Fresh-embryo transfer versus frozen-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2013;99:156–62. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.00323040524
  9. Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2012;98:368–77.e9. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.01922698643
  10. Aflatoonian A, Oskouian H, Ahmadi S, Oskouian L. Can fresh-embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010;27:357–63. 10.1007/s10815-010-9412-920373015
  11. Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril 2011;96:344–8. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.05021737072
  12. Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers in high responders. Fertil Steril 2011;96:516–18. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.05921737071
  13. Bell JL, Hardy P, Greenland M, Juszczak E, Cole C, Maheshwari A, et al. E-Freeze – a randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of a policy of freezing embryos followed by thawed frozen-embryo transfer compared with a policy of fresh-embryo transfer, in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation: a statistical analysis plan. Trials 2020;21:596. 10.1186/s13063-020-04441-932605633
  14. Cutting R, Morroll D, Roberts SA, Pickering S, Rutherford A, BFS and ACE. Elective single embryo transfer: guidelines for practice British Fertility Society and Association of Clinical Embryologists. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2008;11:131–46. 10.1080/1464727080230262918766953
  15. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority: The New Version of the Code of Practice is Now Available. URL: www.hfea.gov.uk/about-us/news-and-press-releases/2019-news-and-press-releases/new-version-of-the-code-of-practice-has-been-launched/ (accessed 15 December 2021).
  16. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.
  17. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials group. The CONSORT Statement. URL: www.consort-statement.org (accessed 15 December 2021).
  18. Cole TJ, Freeman JV, Preece MA. British 1990 growth reference centiles for weight, height, body mass index and head circumference fitted by maximum penalized likelihood. Stat Med 1998;17:407–29. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980228)17:4<407::AID-SIM742>3.0.CO;2-L9496720
  19. Dunn G, Maracy M, Dowrick C, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Dalgard OS, Page H, et al. Estimating psychological treatment effects from a randomised controlled trial with both non-compliance and loss to follow-up. Br J Psychiatry 2003;183:323–31. 10.1192/bjp.183.4.32314519610
  20. Hewitt CE, Torgerson DJ, Miles JNV. Is there another way to take account of noncompliance in randomized controlled trials? Can Med Assoc J 2006;175:347–8. 10.1503/cmaj.05162516908892
  21. Opondo C, Halliday K, Witek-McManus S, Allen E. Estimating Intervention Effect in Cluster Randomised Controlled Trials with Non-compliance. 4th International Clinical Trials Methodology Conference (ICTMC) and the 38th Annual Meeting of the Society for Clinical Trials, Liverpool, UK, 7–10 May 2017, abstract P195.
  22. White IR, Thompson SG. Adjusting for partially missing baseline measurements in randomized trials. Stat Med 2005;24:993–1007. 10.1002/sim.198115570623
  23. Maheshwari A, Bell JL, Bhide P, Brison D, Child T, Chong HY, et al. Elective freezing of embryos versus fresh embryo transfer in IVF: a multicentre randomized controlled trial in the UK (E-Freeze). Human Reprod 2022:deab279. 10.1093/humrep/deab279
  24. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Defining Adult Overweight & Obesity. URL: www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html (accessed 15 December 2021).
  25. Curtis L, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2019. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent; 2019. URL: www.pssru.ac.uk/project-pages/unit-costs/unit-costs-2019/ (accessed April 2020).
  26. Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC). NHS Reference Costs 2018/19. London: DHSC; 2020. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/national-cost-collection/#ncc1819 (accessed May 2020).
  27. Joint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary (online). URL: https://bnf.nice.org.uk/ (accessed May 2020).
  28. Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC). NHS Reference Costs 2017/18. London: DHSC; 2019. URL: https://improvement.nhs.uk/resources/reference-costs/ (accessed May 2020).
  29. Sagili H, Mohamed K. Review: Pregnancy of Unknown Location: An Evidence-based Approach to Management. URL: https://elearning.rcog.org.uk/sites/default/files/Early%20pregnancy%20loss%20-%20management/sagili_tog_2008.pdf (accessed September 2020).
  30. National Casemix Office. Code to Group: HRG4+ 2019/20 Local Payment Grouper. London: NHS Digital; 2019. URL: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/national-casemix-office/downloads-groupers-and-tools/local-payment-grouper-2019-20 (accessed May 2020).
  31. HM Revenue and Customs. Expenses and Benefits: Business Travel Mileage for Employees’ Own Vehicles. URL: www.gov.uk/expenses-and-benefits-business-travel-mileage/rules-for-tax (accessed 6 May 2020).
  32. Office for National Statistics. Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings. 2019 Provisional. URL: www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkinghours/datasets/agegroupashetable6 (accessed May 2020).
  33. Office for National Statistics. Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings. 2016. Unpaid Work Calculator. URL: www.ons.gov.uk/visualisations/dvc376/index.html (accessed May 2020).
  34. Department for Transport. Transport Analysis Guidance (TAG) Data Book. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/tag-data-book (accessed May 2020).
  35. Glick HA, Doshi JA, Sonnad SS, Polsky D. Economic Evaluation in Clinical Trials. Handbooks in Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
  36. Howard S. The hidden costs of infertility treatment. BMJ 2018;361:k2204. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29789345/ (accessed December 2021).29789345
  37. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Fertility Treatement 2019: Trends and Figures. URL: https://hfea.gov.uk/about-us/publications/research-and-data/fertility-treatment-2019-trends-and-figures/ (accessed June 2021).
  38. Li Z, Wang AY, Bowman M, Hammarberg K, Farquhar C, Johnson L, et al. Cumulative live birth rates following a ‘freeze-all’ strategy: a population-based study. Hum Reprod Open 2019;2019:hoz004. 10.1093/hropen/hoz00430895269
  39. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2013. URL: www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/chapter/foreword (accessed December 2021).
  40. Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome, N Engl J Med 2016;375:523–33. 10.1056/NEJMoa1513873.pmid:2750910127509101
  41. Aflatoonian A, Mansoori-Torshizi M, Farid Mojtahedi M, Aflatoonian B, Khalili MA, Amir-Arjmand MH, et al. Fresh versus frozen-embryo transfer after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles among high responder women: a randomized, multi-center study. Int J Reprod Biomed 2018;16:9–18. 10.29252/ijrm.16.1.929675483
  42. Vuong LN, Dang VQ, Ho TM, Huynh BG, Ha DT, Pham TD, et al. IVF transfer of fresh or frozen embryos in women without polycystic ovaries. N Engl J Med 2018;378:137–47. 10.1056/NEJMoa170376829320655
  43. Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, Zhang H, Wei D, Zhang Y et al. Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women. N Engl J Med 2018;378:126–36. 10.1056/NEJMoa170533429320646
  44. Wei D, Liu JY, Sun Y, Shi Y, Zhang B, Liu JQ, et al. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019;393:1310–18. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32843-530827784
  45. Stormlund S, Sopa N, Zedeler A, Bogstad J, Prætorius L, Nielsen HS, et al. Freeze-all versus fresh blastocyst transfer strategy during in vitro fertilisation in women with regular menstrual cycles: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2020;370:m2519. 10.1136/bmj.m251932759285
  46. Wong KM, van Wely M, Verhoeve HR, Kaaijk EM, Mol F, van der Veen F, et al. Transfer of fresh or frozen embryos: a randomised controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2021;36:998–1006. 10.1093/humrep/deaa30533734369
  47. Corps D, Office for National Statistics. Birth Characteristics in England and Wales: 2019. 2020. URL: www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/bulletins/birthcharacteristicsinenglandandwales/2019 (accessed September 2020).
  48. Hirst JE, Knight HE, Ohuma EO, Dwyer T, Hennig BD, Papageorghiou AT, et al. Social gradient of birthweight in England assessed using the INTERGROWTH-21st gestational age-specific standard. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2019;104:F486–92. 10.1136/archdischild-2018-31529530464006
  49. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. URL: www.hfea.gov.uk/media/2463/january-2018-ovarian-hyperstimulation-syndrome.pdf (accessed December 2021).
  50. Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Amalraj Raja E, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Is frozen-embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer? Hum Reprod Update 2018;24:35–58. 10.1093/humupd/dmx03129155965
  51. Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. Fresh versus elective frozen-embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update 2019;25:2–14. 10.1093/humupd/dmy03330388233
  52. Bosdou JK, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF, Kolibianakis EM. Higher probability of live birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2019;34:491–505. 10.1093/humrep/dey38830689865
  53. Weissman A, IVF Worldwide. Results: Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer. 2008. URL: https://ivf-worldwide.com/survey/frozen-thawed-embryo-transfer/results-frozen-thawed-embryo-transfer.html (accessed 21 January 2021).
  54. von Versen-Höynck F, Häckl S, Selamet Tierney ES, Conrad KP, Baker VL, Winn VD. Maternal vascular health in pregnancy and postpartum after assisted reproduction. Hypertension 2020;75:549–60. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.1377931838910
  55. Stormlund S, Schmidt L, Bogstad J, Løssl K, Prætorius L, Zedeler A, Pinborg A. Patients’ attitudes and preferences towards a freeze-all strategy in ART treatment. Hum Reprod 2019;34:679–88. 10.1093/humrep/dez00630811549
  56. Abdulrahim B, Scotland G, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A. Assessing couples’ preferences for fresh or elective frozen-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilisation: a discrete choice experiment. Hum Reprod 2021;36:2891–903. 10.1093/humrep/deab20734550368
  57. Roque M, Valle M, Guimarães F, Sampaio M, Geber S. Cost-effectiveness of the freeze-all policy. JBRA Assist Reprod 2015;19:125–30. 10.5935/1518-0557.2015002827203090
  58. Le KD, Vuong LN, Ho TM, Dang VQ, Pham TD, Pham CT, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of freeze-only or fresh-embryo transfer in IVF of non-PCOS women. Hum Reprod 2018;33:1907–14. 10.1093/humrep/dey25330239784
  59. Simón C, Gómez C, Cabanillas S, Vladimirov I, Castillón G, Giles J, et al. A 5-year multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing personalized, frozen and fresh blastocyst transfer in IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 2020;41:402–15. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.06.00232723696
  60. The Scottish Government. National Infertility Group Report 2016. 2016. URL: www.gov.scot/Publications/2016/06/9960 (accessed May 2020).
  61. Hull MG, Glazener CM, Kelly NJ, Conway DI, Foster PA, Hinton RA, et al. Population study of causes, treatment, and outcome of infertility. Br Med J 1985;291:1693–7. 10.1136/bmj.291.6510.16933935248
  62. Maheshwari A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Effect of female age on the diagnostic categories of infertility. Hum Reprod 2008;23:538–42. 10.1093/humrep/dem43118308834
  63. Lensen S, Osavlyuk D, Armstrong S, Stadelmann C, Hennes A, Napier E, et al. A randomized trial of endometrial scratching before in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2019;380:325–34. 10.1056/NEJMoa180873730673547
  64. Munné S, Kaplan B, Frattarelli JL, Child T, Nakhuda G, Shamma FN, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril 2019;112:1071–9.e7.31551155
  65. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Fertility Treatment 2018: Trends and Figures. URL: www.hfea.gov.uk/about-us/publications/research-and-data/fertility-treatment-2018-trends-and-figures/ (accessed 21 January 2021).
  66. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Treatment Add-Ons with Limited Evidence. URL: www.hfea.gov.uk/treatments/treatment-add-ons/ (accessed 21 January 2021).
  67. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Elective Freeze All Cycles. URL: www.hfea.gov.uk/treatments/treatment-add-ons/elective-freeze-all-cycles/ (accessed 21 January 2021).
  68. Lumby T. Frozen embryo pregnancy boost. Express. 30 August 2018. URL: www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1010619/Frozen-embryo-pregnancy-ivf-baby-science-health-fertility (accessed 17 December 2021).
  69. Maheshwari A, McLernon D, Bhattacharya S. Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus? Hum Reprod 2016;31:572–81. 10.1093/humrep/dev33626783243
  70. Smith ADAC, Tilling K, Lawlor DA, Nelson SM. Live birth rates and perinatal outcomes when all embryos are frozen compared with conventional fresh and frozen-embryo transfer: a cohort study of 337,148 in vitro fertilisation cycles. BMC Med 2019;17:202. 10.1186/s12916-019-1429-z31718643
  71. Riley RD, Lambert PC, Abo-Zaid G. Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting. BMJ 2010;340:c221. 10.1136/bmj.c22120139215
  72. Office for National Statistics. UK Harmonised European Time Use Survey (HETUS), 2015. URL: www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkinghours/articles/womenshouldertheresponsibilityofunpaidwork/2016-11-10 (accessed May 2020).
← Discussion and conclusionsAcknowledgements →

Attribution. Abha Maheshwari; Vasha Bari; Jennifer L Bell; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Priya Bhide; Ursula Bowler et al. (2022). Transfer of thawed frozen embryo versus fresh embryo to improve the healthy baby rate in women undergoing IVF: the E-Freeze RCT. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2022 Maheshwari et al. This work was produced by Maheshwari et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This is an Open Access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaption in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. For attribution the title, original author(s), the publication source – NIHR Journals Library, and the DOI of the publication must be cited. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK580665. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support