Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›The epidemiology, management and impact of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention: a research programme including the SWHSI feasibility RCT›Aims

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

The epidemiology, management and impact of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention: a research programme including the SWHSI feasibility RCT · Aims

Aims

CC BY 4.0 · NIHR Journals Library · approximately 1 min read

We aimed to characterise and quantify SWHSIs, their outcomes and impact, and to begin to identify effective SWHSI treatments. The core aims of the research were achieved via four interdependent workstreams. The links between the four workstreams are shown in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1 Overview of the whole research programme and its inter-relationships. (Figure not reproduced here; see the original article.)

Workstream 1

Workstream 1 aimed to describe the number, characteristics, current treatments, impacts and health outcomes of patients with SWHSIs. This was achieved using an initial prevalence survey and a subsequent inception cohort of patients with a SWHSI to collect naturalistic data regarding treatments used, rates of healing, adverse events and quality-of-life changes.

Workstream 2

Workstream 2 aimed to use all available research data to estimate the cost-effectiveness of current treatments for SWHSIs, as identified in workstream 1, and was completed using evidence synthesis and decision-analytic modelling. If assessments of cost-effectiveness suggested that there was decision uncertainty (i.e. uncertainty about which treatment offers best value to the NHS), we would extend analyses to assess whether or not investment in future research on treatments for SWHSIs was likely to be worthwhile and, if so, what research would offer best value for money.

Workstream 3

Workstream 3 aimed to determine the impact of SWHSIs on patients, specifically their perspectives and experiences of living with a SWHSI, of wound management and relevant wound outcomes. In addition, this workstream aimed to determine NHS professionals’ views about SWHSI treatments and important outcomes to measure treatment effects. This was achieved through qualitative interviews with both patients and NHS professionals.

Workstream 4

Workstream 4 aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting further primary research on SWHSIs through a pilot, feasibility RCT.

This synopsis describes the results of our findings from all four workstreams. Publications arising from this research programme are listed in the Acknowledgements.

← SYNOPSISPatient and carer involvement →

Attribution. Ian Chetter; Catherine Arundel; Kerry Bell; Hannah Buckley; Karl Claxton; Belen Corbacho Martin et al. (2020). The epidemiology, management and impact of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention: a research programme including the SWHSI feasibility RCT. NIHR Journals Library. Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2020. This work was produced by Chetter et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK562056. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Aims

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support