Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Synthesis for health services and policy: case studies in the scoping of reviews›Acknowledgements

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Synthesis for health services and policy: case studies in the scoping of reviews · Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

CC BY 4.0 · NIHR Journals Library · approximately 4 min read

We are grateful to many current and former colleagues in each of our centres for their academic expertise, collegiality and dedication to producing high-quality and useful evidence syntheses as part of this commissioned programme. They include Jane Dalton, Gillian Parker, Andrew Street, Kath Wright, Sue Whiffin, Jenny Lowe, Anna Price, Latika Ahuja, Alison Bethel, Elizabeth Croot, Maxine Johnson, Ruth Wong and Susan K Baxter. We thank the Families Lobbying & Advising Sheffield (FLASh) carers group (Sheffield, UK), the Royal Mencap Society’s ‘Treat Me Well’ group (London, UK), staff employed by Mencap support unit and Speakup Self Advocacy (Rotherham, UK) for contributions to the intellectual disabilities project. We thank Emma Hock and Lesley Uttley on the Access to Social Care project. We thank members of the Public Advisory Group for the Sheffield Health Services and Delivery Evidence Synthesis Centre and their convener, Susan K Baxter, for input across all three Sheffield case studies. We would also like to thank the staff at the NIHR HSDR programme for their expert advice and flexibility, not just in commissioning these projects, but in enabling us to conduct them in a genuine spirit of partnership and collaboration with all stakeholders.

Rob Anderson would also like to thank Dr Ingemar Bohlin (University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden) for the invitation to attend and present at the International Workshop on Formalised Procedures and Informality in Research Practices, 28 February–1 March 2018, Gothenburg, Sweden, which partly inspired the suggested focus and informed some of the reflections in this report.

Contributions of authors

Rob Anderson (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3523-8559) (Professor of Health Services and Implementation Research) initially proposed the focus and methods for this reflective report; drafted the Exeter case studies; wrote the discussion section, partly based on an online ‘sandpit’ meeting about the case studies and the draft discussion section; and read, provided feedback and approved the final submitted version.

Andrew Booth (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-3880) (Reader in Evidence-Based Information Practice) drafted the Sheffield case studies with input from the other Sheffield synthesis centre members; wrote the discussion section, partly based on an online ‘sandpit’ meeting about the case studies and the draft discussion section; and read, provided feedback and approved the final submitted version.

Alison Eastwood (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1079-7781) (Professor of Research) wrote the two York case studies with input from their wider team; was involved in an online ‘sandpit’ meeting about the case studies and the draft discussion section; and read, provided feedback and approved the final submitted version.

Mark Rodgers (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5196-9239) (Research Fellow, evidence synthesis) wrote the two York case studies with input from their wider team; was involved in an online ‘sandpit’ meeting about the case studies and the draft discussion section; and read, provided feedback and approved the final submitted version.

Liz Shaw (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6092-5019) (Research Fellow, systematic reviews) drafted the Exeter case studies; was involved in an online ‘sandpit’ meeting about the case studies and the draft discussion section; and read, provided feedback and approved the final submitted version.

Jo Thompson Coon (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5161-0234) (Professor of Evidence Synthesis and Health Policy) drafted the Exeter case studies; was involved in an online ‘sandpit’ meeting about the case studies and the draft discussion section; read, provided feedback and approved the final submitted version.

Simon Briscoe (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6982-4521) (Information Specialist) drafted the Exeter case studies and read, provided feedback and approved the final submitted version.

Anna Cantrell (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0040-9853) (Research Fellow, evidence synthesis) provided input for the Sheffield case studies and read, provided feedback and approved the final submitted version.

Duncan Chambers (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0154-0469) (Research Fellow, evidence synthesis) provided input for the Sheffield case studies and read, provided feedback and approved the final submitted version.

Elizabeth Goyder (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3691-1888) (Professor of Public Health) provided input for the Sheffield case studies and read, provided feedback and approved the final submitted version.

Michael Nunns (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5500-0911) (Research Fellow, systematic reviews) drafted the Exeter case studies and read, provided feedback and approved the final submitted version.

Louise Preston (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7477-4517) (Senior Research Fellow) provided input for the Sheffield case studies and read, provided feedback and approved the final submitted version.

Gary Raine (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0354-0518) (Research Fellow, Evidence Synthesis) provided input for the two York case studies and read, provided feedback and approved the final submitted version.

Sian Thomas (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0917-0068) (former Research Fellow, Evidence Synthesis) provided input for the two York case studies and read, provided feedback and approved the final submitted version.

Data-sharing statement

Requests for access to data should be addressed to the corresponding author or, if appropriate, to the corresponding author of the case study reviews. Access to anonymised data may be granted following review.

Disclaimers

This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HS&DR programme or the Department of Health and Social Care. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinions expressed by the interviewees are those of the interviewees and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors, those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HS&DR programme or the Department of Health and Social Care.

← References

Attribution. Rob Anderson; Andrew Booth; Alison Eastwood; Mark Rodgers; Liz Shaw; Jo Thompson Coon et al. (2021). Synthesis for health services and policy: case studies in the scoping of reviews. NIHR Journals Library. Copyright © 2021 Anderson et al. This work was produced by Anderson et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This is an Open Access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaption in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. For attribution the title, original author(s), the publication source – NIHR Journals Library, and the DOI of the publication must be cited. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK573412. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Acknowledgements

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support