Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Strategies to manage emergency ambulance telephone callers with sustained high needs: the STRETCHED mixed-methods evaluation with linked data›References

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Strategies to manage emergency ambulance telephone callers with sustained high needs: the STRETCHED mixed-methods evaluation with linked data · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 9 min read

  1. Aslam RW, Snooks H, Porter A, Khanom A, Cole R, Edwards A, et al. STRategies to manage Emergency ambulance Telephone Callers with sustained High needs: an Evaluation using linked Data (STRETCHED): a study protocol. BMJ Open 2022;12:e053123.
  2. Edwards MJ, Bassett G, Sinden L, Fothergill RT. Frequent callers to the ambulance service: patient profiling and impact of case management on patient utilisation of the ambulance service. Emerg Med J 2015;32:392–6.25312857
  3. HSCIC. Ambulance Services England 2014–2015. URL: www.gov.uk/guidance/cost-consequence-analysis-health-economic-studies (accessed 17 March 2023).
  4. AACE. AACE Annual Report 2014–2015. 2015. URL: http://aace.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/AACE-ANNUAL-REPORT-2014-2015-FINAL-W.pdf (accessed 27 April 2023).
  5. Hugo G. Ambulance Crews Deal with 20 Hoax Calls Every Day Putting Services at Risk. inews 2020. URL: https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/ambulance-crews-hoax-calls-delays-lockdown-yorkshire-697560 (accessed 27 April 2023).
  6. Matthew W. Ambulance target failures highlight NHS crisis, say health chiefs. Guardian 2016. URL: www.theguardian.com/society/2016/nov/30/ambulance-target-failures-health-chiefs-say-problem-system-wide (accessed 19 November 2024).
  7. Scott J, Strickland AP, Warner K, Dawson P. Describing and predicting frequent callers to an ambulance service: analysis of 1 year call data. Emerg Med J 2014;31:408–14.23413152
  8. Hansagi H, Olsson M, Sjöberg S, Tomson Y, Göransson S. Frequent use of the hospital emergency department is indicative of high use of other health care services. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:561–7.11385324
  9. Søvsø MB, Kløjgaard TA, Hansen PA, Christensen EF. Repeated ambulance use is associated with chronic diseases: a population-based historic cohort study of patients’ symptoms and diagnoses. Scand J Trauma Resus Emerg Med 2019;27:46.
  10. Scott J, Strickland AP, Warner K, Dawson P. Frequent callers to and users of emergency medical systems: a systematic review. Emerg Med J 2014;31:684–91.23825060
  11. Snooks HA, Khanom A, Cole R, Edwards A, Edwards BM, Evans BA, et al. What are emergency ambulance services doing to meet the needs of people who call frequently? A national survey of current practice in the United Kingdom. BMC Emerg Med 2019;19:82.31883535
  12. Brown JF, Raven MC, Tangherlini NL, Kennedy Hall M. Frequent users of 9-1-1 emergency medical services: sign of success or symptom of impending failure? Prehosp Emerg Care 2018;23:94–6.30130427
  13. Scott J, Pakpahan E, Marlow B, Daxner N. Defining a threshold above which an adult can be considered to frequently use ambulance services: a retrospective cross-sectional study of emergency calls to an ambulance service in England. Br Paramed J 2023;7:35–45.36875826
  14. Bronsky ES, McGraw C, Johnson R, Giordano K, Orlando A; Bar-Or D. CARES. A community-wide collaboration identifies super-utilizers and reduces their 9-1-1 call, emergency department, and hospital visit rates. Prehosp Emerg Care 2017;21:693–9.28657819
  15. Welsh Government. Ambulance Services in Wales 2016–17. 2107. URL: www.gov.wales/sites/default/files/statistics-and-research/2019-01/170628-ambulance-services-2016-17-en.pdf (accessed 30 January 2024).
  16. Scottish Government. NHS Scotland Performance: Ambulance Standard. URL: www.gov.scot/About/Performance/scotPerforms/partnerstories/NHSScotlandperformance/ambulanceStandard (accessed 4 January 2017).
  17. Department of Health. Transforming NHS Ambulance Services. National Audit Office. 2011. URL: www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/n10121086.pdf (accessed 30 January 2024).
  18. NHS England. Ambulance Quality Indicators 2016. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/ambulance-quality-indicators/ (accessed 25 April 2023).
  19. Mahmuda S, Wade-Vallance A, Stosic A, Guenter D, Howard M, Agarwal G, et al. Understanding why frequent users of EMS call 9-1-1: a grounded theory study. Health Promot Pract 2020;21:440–7.30222003
  20. Agarwal G, Lee J, McLeod B, Mahmuda S, Howard M, Cockrell K, Angeles R. Social factors in frequent callers: a description of isolation, poverty and quality of life in those calling emergency medical services frequently. BMC Public Health 2019;19:684.31159766
  21. Duncan EAS, Best C, Dougall N, Skar S, Evans J, Corfield AR, et al. Epidemiology of emergency ambulance service calls related to mental health problems and self harm: a national record linkage study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2019;27:34.30894214
  22. Scharf B, Bissell R, Trevitt J, Jenkins J. Diagnosis prevalence and comorbidity in a population of mobile integrated community health care patients. Prehosp Disaster Med 2018;34:1–10.
  23. Solberg RG, Edwards BL, Chidester JP, Perina DG, Brady WJ, Williams MD. The prehospital and hospital costs of emergency care for frequent ED patients. Am J Emerg Med 2016;34:459–63.26763824
  24. Aitavaara-Anttila M, Liisanantti J, Ehrola A, Spalding M, Ala-Kokko T, Raatiniemi L. Use of prehospital emergency medical services according to income of residential area. Emerg Med J 2020;37:429–33.32245748
  25. Department of Health. Taking Healthcare to the Patient: Transforming NHS Ambulance Services. 2005. URL: https://ircp.info/Portals/11/Future/NHS%20EMS%20Policy%20Recommendation2005.pdf (accessed 30 January 2024).
  26. McClelland S. A Strategic Review of Welsh Ambulance Services. Public Health Wales. 2013.
  27. Fletcher D, Fellow D. Overview of Frequent Callers of London Ambulance Services. 2016. URL: https://wiseowlresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/FC-Overview-.pdf (accessed 30 January 2024).
  28. Dale J, Williams S, Foster T, Higgins J, Snooks H, Crouch R, et al. Safety of telephone consultation for ‘non-serious’ emergency ambulance service patients. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:363–73.15465940
  29. Snooks HA, Anthony R, Chatters R, Dale J, Fothergill RT, Gaze S, et al. Paramedic assessment of older adults after falls, including community care referral pathway: cluster randomized trial. Ann Emerg Med 2017;70:495–505.e28.28302422
  30. Mason S, Knowles E, Freeman J, Snooks H. Safety of paramedics with extended skills. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15:607–12.18691211
  31. Mason S, Knowles E, Colwell B, Dixon S, Wardrope J, Gorringe R, et al. Effectiveness of paramedic practitioners in attending 999 calls from elderly people in the community: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2007;335:919.17916813
  32. Snooks H, Kearsley N, Dale J, Halter M, Redhead J, Cheung WY. Towards primary care for non-serious 999 callers: results of a controlled study of ‘Treat and Refer’ protocols for ambulance crews. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:435–43.15576705
  33. Porter A, Snooks H, Youren A, Gaze S, Whitfield R, Rapport F, Woollard M. ‘Should I stay or should I go?’ Deciding whether to go to hospital after a 999 call. J Health Serv Res Pol 2007;12:32–8.
  34. Snooks HA, Kearsley N, Dale J, Halter M, Redhead J, Foster J. Gaps between policy, protocols and practice: a qualitative study of the views and practice of emergency ambulance staff concerning the care of patients with non-urgent needs. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:251–7.16076788
  35. NHS England. High Quality Care for All, Now and for Future Generations: Transforming Urgent and Emergency Care Services in England – Urgent and Emergency Care Review. 2013. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/urg-emerg-care-ev-bse.pdf (accessed 30 January 2024).
  36. Welsh Government. Six Goals for Urgent and Emergency Care: Policy Handbook for 2021 to 2026. 2022. URL: www.gov.wales/six-goals-urgent-and-emergency-care-policy-handbook-2021-2026 (accessed 30 January 2024).
  37. NHS England. NHS Long Term Plan. 2020. URL: www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/ (accessed 27 July 2023).
  38. Snooks HA, Anthony R, Chatters R, Dale J, Fothergill R, Gaze S, et al. Support and assessment for fall emergency referrals (SAFER) 2: a cluster randomised trial and systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new protocols for emergency ambulance paramedics to assess older people following a fall with referral to community-based care when appropriate. Health Technol Assess 2017;21:1–218.
  39. Saron L. Providing streamlined multiagency care for high-intensity users of mental health and emergency services. Ment Health Pract 2018;45:e1190.
  40. Tangherlini N, Villar J, Brown J, Rodriguez RM, Yeh C, Friedman BT, Wada P. The HOME Team: evaluating the effect of an EMS-based outreach team to decrease the frequency of 911 use among high utilizers of EMS. Prehosp Disaster Med 2016;31:603–7.27640612
  41. Kumar GS, Klein R. Effectiveness of case management strategies in reducing emergency department visits in frequent user patient populations: a systematic review. J Emerg Med 2013;44:717–29.23200765
  42. Smith DP, McNally A. Delivering enhanced safety, productivity and experience: early results from a frequent caller management system. J Paramed Pract 2014;6:634–41.
  43. Tadros AS, Castillo EM, Chan TC, Jensen AM, Patel E, Watts K, Dunford JV. Effects of an emergency medical services–based resource access program on frequent users of health services. Prehosp Emerg Care 2012;16:541–7.22712694
  44. British Red Cross. Nowhere else to turn: exploring high intensity use of Accident & Emergency services. 2021. URL: www.redcross.org.uk/about-us/what-we-do/we-speak-up-for-change/exploring-the-high-intensity-use-of-accident-and-emergency-services (accessed 19 November 2024).
  45. Schaad L, Graells M, Kasztura M, Schmutz E, Moullin J, Hugli O, et al. Perspectives of frequent users of emergency departments on a case management intervention: a qualitative study. INQUIRY: J Health Care Organ Prov Financ 2023;60:e11597.
  46. Iglesias K, Baggio S, Moschetti K, Wasserfallen JB, Hugli O, Daeppen JB, et al. Using case management in a universal health coverage system to improve quality of life of frequent Emergency Department users: a randomized controlled trial. Qual Life Res 2018;27:503–13.29188481
  47. Lantz PM. ‘Super-utilizer’ interventions: what they reveal about evaluation research, wishful thinking, and health equity. Milbank Q 2020;98:31–4.32030820
  48. Malebranche M, Grazioli VS, Kasztura M, Hudon C, Bodenmann P. Case management for frequent emergency department users: no longer a question of if but when, where and how. CJEM 2021;23:12–4.33683597
  49. Reddy S, Mazhar S, Lencucha R. The financial sustainability of the World Health Organization and the political economy of global health governance: a review of funding proposals. Global Health 2018;14:119. 10.1186/s12992-018-0436-830486890
  50. NHS Employers. NHS Terms and Conditions Annual, Hourly and HCAS Pay Values Scales for 2018/19 (Agenda for Change). 2019. URL: www.nhsconfed.org/system/files/2021-05/annex-2-wales.pdf (accessed 17 March 2023).
  51. Curtis LA. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2019. London: PSSRU, University of Kent; 2019.
  52. NHS Digital. 2018/19 National Cost Collection Data Publication – National Schedule of NHS Costs 2018/19. 2021. URL: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/national-casemix-office/downloads-groupers-and-tools (accessed 30 January 2024).
  53. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher, D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332. 10.1136/bmj.c33220332509
  54. Mauskopf J. Prevalence-based economic evaluation. Value Health 1998;1:251–9.16674550
  55. Drummond M, Sculpher G, Torrance B, O’Brien G. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
  56. Office for Health Improvement and Disparities. Cost Consequence Analysis: Health Economic Studies. 2020. URL: www.gov.uk/guidance/cost-consequence-analysis-health-economic-studies (accessed 18 April 2023).
  57. NHS Digital. Downloads – Groupers and Tools. 2023. URL: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/national-casemix-office/downloads-groupers-and-tools (accessed 18 April 2023).
  58. Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied Thematic Analysis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2011.
  59. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101.
  60. Evans BA, Bedson E, Bell P, Hutchings H, Lowes L, Rea D, et al.; On behalf of the West Wales Organization for Rigorous Trials in Health (WWORTH). Involving service users in trials: developing a standard operating procedure. Trials 2013;14:219.23866730
  61. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 1994.
  62. Crowe S, Adebajo A, Esmael H, Denegri S, Martin A, McAlister B, et al. ‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research. Res Involv Engag 2020;6:1–9.
  63. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, Barber R. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011;27:391–9.22004782
  64. Khanom A, Edwards A, Edwards B, Hughes H, John A, Petterson R, et al. InFORM: improving care for people who frequently call 999: co-production of guidance through an observational study using routine linked data and mixed methods. Int J Popul Data Sci 2019;4:1228.
  65. Deaton A, Cartwright N. Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials. Soc Sci Med 2018;210:2–21.29331519
  66. Lyons RA, Jones KH, John G, Brooks CJ, Verplancke J-P, Ford DV, et al. The SAIL databank: linking multiple health and social care datasets. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009;9:3.19149883
  67. Husereau D, Drummond M, Augustovski F, de Bekker-Grob E, Briggs AH, Carswell C, et al.; CHEERS 2022 ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations. BMJ 2022;376:e067975.35017145
  68. The UK Public Involvement Standards Development Partnership. UK Standards for Public Involvement. 2019. URL: www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/UK-standards-for-public-involvement-v6.pdf (accessed 30 January 2024).
  69. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, Goodlad S, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ 2017;358:j3453.28768629
  70. Liabo K, Boddy K, Bortoli S, Irvine J, Boult H, Fredlund M, et al. Public involvement in health research: what does ‘good’ look like in practice? Res Involv Engagem 2020;6:11.32266085
  71. Evans BA, Gallanders J, Griffiths L, Harris-Mayes R, James M, Jones S, et al.; SUPER Group and PRIME Centre Wales. Public involvement and engagement in primary and emergency care research: the story from PRIME Centre Wales. Int J Popul Data Sci 2020;5:1363.33644413
  72. NHS England. MDT Development: Working toward an Effective Multidisciplinary/Multiagency Team. 2014.
  73. NHS England. Person-Centred Care. 2021. URL: www.hee.nhs.uk/our-work/person-centred-care (accessed 1 November 2021).
  74. Plishka M, Angeles R, Pirrie M, Marzanek F, Agarwal G. Challenges in recruiting frequent users of ambulance services for a community paramedic home visit program. BMC Health Serv Res 2023;23:1091.37821905
  75. Joo JY, Huber DL. Case management effectiveness on health care utilization outcomes: a systematic review of reviews. West J Nurs Res 2019;41:111–33.29542405
  76. Hudon C, Chouinard M-C, Aubrey-Bassler K, Muhajarine N, Burge F, Bush PL, et al. Case management in primary care for frequent users of health care services: a realist synthesis. Ann Fam Med 2020;18:218–26.32393557
  77. Hudon C, Chouinard M-C, Pluye P, El Sherif R, Bush PL, Rihoux B, et al. Characteristics of case management in primary care associated with positive outcomes for frequent users of health care: a systematic review. Ann Fam Med 2019;17:448–58.31501208
  78. Wenzel H. Health Monitoring of Bridges. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
← Discussion and conclusionsAdditional information →

Attribution. Alan Watkins; Rabeea’h Aslam; Alex Dearden; Timothy Driscoll; Adrian Edwards; Bethan Edwards et al. (2025). Strategies to manage emergency ambulance telephone callers with sustained high needs: the STRETCHED mixed-methods evaluation with linked data. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2025 Watkins et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK618802. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support