Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team›Reflections on the research team and wider involvement

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team · Reflections on the research team and wider involvement

Reflections on the research team and wider involvement

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 1 min read

Research team

The research team for the overarching study was a small, mixed-methods, multidisciplinary group (applied health services research, health services management, health economics, statistics). Team members included two senior researchers, two mid-career researchers and a number of early career researchers. The research team had a majority of female members. All team members’ contributions have been recognised, and all were given opportunities to attend analysis workshops. Throughout the overarching study and as an integral part of our research method, the research team held frequent meetings to discuss project management, data collection, analysis and write-up, with additional workshops to shape the interpretation of findings.

Wider involvement

Throughout the evaluation, the team sought the advice of external academic experts experienced in aspects of the study (‘critical friend’ colleagues at the University of Birmingham and RAND Europe who were not otherwise involved in this study), the BRACE Steering Group and members of the BRACE PPI Panel.

← Research topics relating to equality, diversity and inclusionPatient and public involvement →

Attribution. Jon Sussex; Judith Smith; Frances M Wu (2024). Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2024 Sussex et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK604637. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Reflections on the research team and wider involvement

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support