Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team›Introduction

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team · Introduction

Introduction

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 3 min read

This is the report of an overarching study of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)-funded Birmingham RAND and Cambridge Rapid Evaluation Centre’s (BRACE) portfolio of studies, undertaken to explore the ways in which evaluations of service innovations take account of and impact on people living with multiple long-term conditions. The report is a thematic synopsis of 10 evaluations that have each been published as a standalone research report by the NIHR Journals Library. The 10 evaluations are set out in Table 1 along with the corresponding references where their findings can be read in full.

TABLE 1 Source documents for the BRACE evaluations
EvaluationsSource documents
Primary Care Networks – evaluation of early development and implementation1Smith J, Parkinson S, Harshfield A, Sidhu M. Early evidence of the development of primary care networks in England: a rapid evaluation study. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2022;10(27).
Acute hospitals managing general practice services – Phase 12Sidhu M, Pollard J, Sussex J. Vertical integration of GP practices with acute hospitals in England and Wales: rapid evaluation. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2022;10(17).
Children and Young People’s Mental Health Trailblazers3Ellins J, Hocking L, Al-Haboubi M, Newbould J, Fenton S-J, Daniel K,et al. Early evaluation of the Children and Young People’s Mental Health Trailblazer programme: a rapid mixed-methods study. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2023;11(8). https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr-tr-130818
Telephone-first primary care for people with multiple conditions4Saunders CL, Gkousis E. Impact of telephone triage on access to primary care for people living with multiple long term health conditions: rapid evaluation. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2022;10(18).
COVID Oximetry at Home main evaluation5Fulop N, Walton H, Crellin N, Georghiou T, Herlitz L, Litchfield I, et al. A rapid mixed methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2023;11(13).
COVID Oximetry at Home in care homes6Sidhu M, Litchfield I, Miller R, Fulop NJ, Janta B, Tanner J-R, et al. Using pulse oximeters in care homes for residents with COVID-19 and other conditions: a rapid mixed-methods evaluation. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2022;10(35).
Artificial intelligence and social care7Glasby J, Litchfield I, Parkinson S, Hocking L, Tanner D, Roe B, Bousfield J. New and emerging technology for adult social care – the example of home sensors with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2023;11(9):1–64. https://doi.org/10.3310/HRYW428
Digital-first primary care as experienced by people with multiple conditions and their carers8Newbould J, Hocking L, Sidhu M, Daniel K. Digital first primary care for those with multiple long-term conditions: the views of stakeholders. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2023 (under review).
Acute hospitals managing general practice services – Phase 29Sidhu M, Saunders CL, Davies C, McKenna G, Wu F, Litchfield I, et al. Vertical integration of GP practices with acute hospitals in England: rapid impact evaluation. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2023;11(17).
Women’s reproductive health hubs10Daniel K, Bousfield J, Hocking L, Jackson L, Taylor B. Evaluation of Women’s Health Hubs. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2023 (under review).

This report sets out a reflective account of 5 years’ learning from scoping, undertaking and disseminating a portfolio of rapid evaluations. The cross-project analysis and reflection were supplemented by a programme of patient, public and professional engagement workshops; a set of interviews with national and regional stakeholders working in or alongside integrated care systems; and a rapid evidence review of remote monitoring within the care of people living with multiple long-term conditions. Lessons are drawn from this overarching study about how the needs of people with multiple long-term conditions can be better embedded within practice, policy and research.

The protocol for this study, along with an update to the approach agreed in October 2022 to take account of the English NHS context of new Integrated Care Systems, is available in www.fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/NIHR134284.

Background →

Attribution. Jon Sussex; Judith Smith; Frances M Wu (2024). Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2024 Sussex et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK604637. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Introduction

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support