Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Randomised controlled trial with economic and process evaluations of domiciliary welfare rights advice for socioeconomically disadvantaged older people recruited via primary health care (the Do-Well study)›References

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Randomised controlled trial with economic and process evaluations of domiciliary welfare rights advice for socioeconomically disadvantaged older people recruited via primary health care (the Do-Well study) · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · NIHR Journals Library · approximately 13 min read

  1. Haighton C, Moffatt S, Howel D, McColl E, Milne E, Deverill M, et al. The Do-Well study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial, economic and qualitative process evaluations of domiciliary welfare rights advice for socio-economically disadvantaged older people recruited via primary health care. BMC Public Health 2012;12:382. 10.1186/1471-2458-12-38222639988
  2. Howel D, Moffatt S, Haighton C, Bryant A, Becker F, Steer M, et al. Does domiciliary welfare rights advice improve health-related quality of life in independent-living, socio-economically disadvantaged people aged ≥ 60 years? Randomised controlled trial, economic and process evaluations in the North East of England. PLoS One 2019;14:e0209560.
  3. Marmot M, Atkinson T, Black C, Broadfoot P, Cumberledge J, Diamond I, et al. Fair Society, Healthy Lives (The Marmot Review). London: University College London Institute of Health Equity; 2010.
  4. Charlton BG, White M. Living on the margin: a salutogenic model for socio-economic differentials in health. Public Health 1995;109:235–43. 10.1016/S0033-3506(95)80200-27667487
  5. Morciano M, Hancock RM, Pudney SE. Birth-cohort trends in older-age functional disability and their relationship with socio-economic status: evidence from a pooling of repeated cross-sectional population-based studies for the UK. Soc Sci Med 2015;136–137:1–9. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.035
  6. Chandola T, Ferrie J, Sacker A, Marmot M. Social inequalities in self reported health in early old age: follow-up of prospective cohort study. BMJ 2007;334:990. 10.1136/bmj.39167.439792.5517468119
  7. Han SD, Boyle PA, James BD, Yu L, Bennett DA. Poorer financial and health literacy among community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment. J Aging Health 2015;27:1105–17. 10.1177/089826431557778025903976
  8. Jivraj S, Nazroo J. Determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in subjective well-being in later life: a cross-country comparison in England and the USA. Qual Life Res 2014;23:2545–58. 10.1007/s11136-014-0694-824789666
  9. Allin S, Masseria C, Mossialos E. Inequality in Health Care Use among Older People in the United Kingdom: An Analysis of Panel Data. LSE health working papers, 1/2006. London: London School of Economics and Political Science; 2006.
  10. Argyle E. Poverty, disability and the role of older carers. Disabil Soc 2001;16:585–95. 10.1080/09687590120059559
  11. Mackintosh J, White M, Howel D, Chadwick T, Moffatt S, Deverill M, Sandell A. Randomised controlled trial of welfare rights advice accessed via primary health care: pilot study [ISRCTN61522618.] BMC Public Health 2006;6:162. 10.1186/1471-2458-6-16216790053
  12. Moffatt S, Mackintosh J, White M, Howel D, Sandell A. The acceptability and impact of a randomised controlled trial of welfare rights advice accessed via primary health care: qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2006;6:163. 10.1186/1471-2458-6-16316790054
  13. Moor N, de Graaf PM, Komter A. Family, welfare state generosity and the vulnerability of older adults: a cross-national study. J Aging Stud 2013;27:347–57. 10.1016/j.jaging.2013.07.00224300055
  14. Wu J, Varnik A, Tooding L, Varrnik P, Kasearu K. Suicide among older people in relation to their subjective and objective well-being in different European regions. Eur J Ageing 2014;11:131–40. 10.1007/s10433-013-0297-128804321
  15. Iparraguirre J. Have winter fuel payments reduced excess winter mortality in England and Wales? J Public Health 2015;37:26–33. 10.1093/pubmed/fdu063
  16. Benzeval M, Bond L, Campbell M, Egan M, Lorenc T, Petticrew M, et al. How Does Money Influence Health? York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2014.
  17. Glasgow Centre for Population Health. Asset Based Approaches for Health Improvement: Redressing the Balance. Glasgow: Glasgow Centre for Population Health; 2011.
  18. McDonough P, Duncan GJ, Williams D, House J. Income dynamics and adult mortality in the United States, 1972 through 1989. Am J Public Health 1997;87:1476–83. 10.2105/AJPH.87.9.14769314800
  19. Allmark P, Baxter S, Goyder E, Guillaume L, Crofton-Martin G. Assessing the health benefits of advice services: using research evidence and logic model methods to explore complex pathways. Health Soc Care Community 2013;21:59–68. 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01087.x23039788
  20. Connor J, Rodgers A, Priest P. Randomised studies of income supplementation: a lost opportunity to assess health outcomes. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:725–30. 10.1136/jech.53.11.72510656103
  21. Scholz R, Maier H. German Unification and the Plasticity of Mortality at Older Ages. Rostock: Max-Planck-Institute for Demographic Research; 2003.
  22. Vogt T, Gampe J. Money or Medicine? The Contribution of Rising Income and Improving Health Care to the East-West German Mortality Convergence. Boston, MA: Population Association of America: 2014 Annual Meeting; 2013.
  23. Secretary of State for Health. Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation. Cm 4386. London: The Stationery Office; 1998.
  24. Acheson D. Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health. London: The Stationery Office; 1998.
  25. Bauld L, Judge K, Barnes M, Benzeval M, Mackenzie M, Sullivan H. Promoting social change: the experience of Health Action Zones in England. J Soc Policy 2005;34:427–45. 10.1017/S0047279405008858
  26. Consilium Research and Consultancy. The Role of Advice Services in Health Outcomes Evidence Review and Mapping Study. London: Advice Services Alliance; 2015.
  27. Department of Health and Social Care. Reducing Health Inequalities: An Action Report. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 1999.
  28. Department for Work and Pensions. Income Related Benefits Estimates of Take-Up. London: Department for Work and Pensions; 2010. URL: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-work-pensions (accessed 3 February 2016).
  29. Age Concern. Confusion over Benefits System Keeping Pensioners from Claiming their Dues – Worrying New Statistics Revealed by Age Concern. 2007. URL: www.ageconcern.org.uk/AgeConcern/ACF27D5BD87F43B1B35155C67A628760.asp (accessed 15 June 2009).
  30. National Audit Office. Tackling Pensioner Poverty: Encouraging Take-up of Entitlements. London: National Audit Office; 2002.
  31. Moffatt S, Scambler G. Can welfare-rights advice targeted at older people reduce social exclusion? Ageing Soc 2008;28:875–99. 10.1017/S0144686X08007253
  32. Adams J, White M, Moffatt S, Howel D, Mackintosh J. A systematic review of the health, social and financial impacts of welfare rights advice delivered in healthcare settings. BMC Public Health 2006;6:81. 10.1186/1471-2458-6-8116571122
  33. Moffatt S, White M, Stacy R, Downey D, Hudson E. The impact of welfare advice in primary care: a qualitative study. Crit Public Health 2004;14:295–309. 10.1080/09581590400007959
  34. McConaghy M, Hill C, Kane C, Lader D, Costigan P, Thornby M. Entitled but not Claiming? Pensioners, the MIG and the Pension Credit. Leeds: Department for Work and Pensions; 2003.
  35. The Poverty Site. Take-up of Benefits. URL: www.poverty.org.uk/66/index.shtml (accessed 17 June 2010).
  36. Corden A. Claiming Entitlements: Take-up of Benefits. In Ditch J, editor. Introduction to Social Security. London: Routledge; 1999. pp. 134–55.
  37. Coppel DH, Packham CJ, Varnam MA. Providing welfare rights advice in primary care. Public Health 1999;113:131–5. 10.1016/S0033-3506(99)00137-710910410
  38. Cornwallis E, O’Neil J. Promoting Health by Tackling Poverty. Scottish RCGP Magazine; 1998. pp. 8–9.
  39. Jarman B. Giving advice about welfare benefits in general practice. Br Med J 1985;290:522–4. 10.1136/bmj.290.6467.519-a3918657
  40. Paris JA, Player D. Citizens’ advice in general practice. BMJ 1993;306:1518–20. 10.1136/bmj.306.6891.15188518682
  41. Widdowfield H, Rickard P. Health Centre Advice Service Report. Sunderland: Wear Valley Citizens Advice Bureau; 1996.
  42. Abbott S, Hobby L. An Evaluation of the Health and Advice Project: Its Impact on the Health of Those Using the Service. Report No. 99/63. Liverpool: Health and Community Care Research Unit; 1999.
  43. Abbott S, Hobby L. Welfare benefits advice in primary care: evidence of improvements in health. Public Health 2000;114:324–7. 10.1016/s0033-3506(00)00356-511035449
  44. Veitch D. Prescribing Citizens Advice. Birmingham: Social Services and Health Authority; 1995.
  45. Greasley P, Small N. Providing welfare advice in general practice: referrals, issues and outcomes. Health Soc Care Community 2005;13:249–58. 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00557.x15819746
  46. Greasley P, Small N. Establishing a welfare advice service in family practices: views of advice workers and primary care staff. Fam Pract 2005;22:513–19. 10.1093/fampra/cmi04715964868
  47. Levy J, Payne M. Welfare rights advocacy in a specialist health and social care setting: a service audit. Brit J Soc Work. 2006;36:323–31.
  48. Fruin C, Pitt PI. Welfare benefit promotion within a district general hospital rheumatology centre: a joint project with the local Citizens Advice Bureau. Musculoskeletal Care 2008;6:211–19. 10.1002/msc.13318697185
  49. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:137–45. 10.1002/art.17802302027362664
  50. Moffatt S, Noble E, White M. Addressing the financial consequences of cancer: qualitative evaluation of a welfare rights advice service. PLOS ONE 2012;7:e42979. 10.1371/journal.pone.004297922900073
  51. Krska J, Palmer S, Dalzell-Brown A, Nicholl P. Evaluation of welfare advice in primary care: effect on practice workload and prescribing for mental health. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2013;14:307–14. 10.1017/S146342361200046123046829
  52. Moffatt S, White M, Mackintosh J, Howel D. Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research – what happens when mixed method findings conflict? [ISRCTN61522618.] BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6:28. 10.1186/1472-6963-6-2816524479
  53. Thomson H, Hoskins R, Petticrew M, Ogilvie D, Craig N, Quinn T, Lindsay G. Evaluating the health effects of social interventions. BMJ 2004;328:282–5. 10.1136/bmj.328.7434.28214751903
  54. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance. Medical Research Council; 2008.
  55. Angus VC, Entwistle VA, Emslie MJ, Walker KA, Andrew JE. The requirement for prior consent to participate on survey response rates: a population-based survey in Grampian. BMC Health Serv Res 2003;3:21. 10.1186/1472-6963-3-2114622444
  56. Hewison J, Haines A. Overcoming barriers to recruitment in health research. BMJ 2006;333:300–2. 10.1136/bmj.333.7562.30016888308
  57. Wiggins RD, Netuveli G, Hyde M, Higgs P, Blane D. The evaluation of a self-enumerated scale of quality of life (CASP-19) in the context of research on ageing: a combination of exploratory and confirmatory approaches. Soc Indic Res 2008;89:61–77. 10.1007/s11205-007-9220-5
  58. Corden A, Sainsbury R, Irvine A, Clarke S. The Impact of Disability Living Allowance and Attendance Allowance: Findings from Exploratory Qualitative Research. Research Report No. 649. London: Department for Work and Pensions; 2010.
  59. Abbott S, Hobby L, Cotter S. What is the impact on individual health of services in general practice settings which offer welfare benefits advice? Health Soc Care Community 2006;14:1–8. 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00582.x16324182
  60. Forster N, Dalkin SM, Lhussier M, Hodgson P, Carr SM. Exposing the impact of Citizens Advice Bureau services on health: a realist evaluation protocol. BMJ Open 2016;6:e009887. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009887
  61. Abbott S. Prescribing welfare benefits advice in primary care: is it a health intervention, and if so, what sort? J Public Health Med 2002;24:307–12. 10.1093/pubmed/24.4.30712546209
  62. Greasley P, Small N. Welfare Advice in Primary Care. Bradford: University of Leeds; 2002.
  63. Hyde M, Wiggins P, Higgs P, Blane DB. A measure of quality of life in early old age: the theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging Ment Health 2003;7:186–94. 10.1080/136078603100010115712775399
  64. Netuveli G, Wiggins RD, Hildon Z, Montgomery SM, Blane D. Quality of life at older ages: evidence from the English longitudinal study of aging (wave 1). J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:357–63. 10.1136/jech.2005.04007116537355
  65. Howel D. Interpreting and evaluating the CASP-19 quality of life measure in older people. Age Ageing 2012;41:612–17. 10.1093/ageing/afs02322391614
  66. Craig P. Costs and benefits: a review of research on take-up of income related benefits. J Soc Policy 1991;20:537–65. 10.1017/S0047279400019796
  67. Sandell A. Oxford Handbook of Patients’ Welfare: A Doctor’s Guide to Benefits and Services. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  68. Moffatt S, White M, Stacy R, Hudson E, Downey D. ‘If We Had Not Got Referred and Got The Advice, I Don’t Know Where We’d Be, It Doesn’t Bear Thinking About’. The Impact of Welfare Advice Provided in General Practice. A Qualitative Study. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University; 1999.
  69. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2015;350:h1258. 10.1136/bmj.h125825791983
  70. Collins A, Colwell N, McClowry S. Maintaining Fidelity of the Intervention. In Melnyk B, Beedy D, editors. Intervention Research: Designing, Conducting, Analyzing, and Funding. New York, NY: Springer; 2012. pp. 213–27.
  71. Dumas JE, Lynch AM, Laughlin JE, Phillips Smith E, Prinz RJ. Promoting intervention fidelity. Conceptual issues, methods, and preliminary results from the EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial. Am J Prev Med 2001;20(Suppl. 1):38–47. 10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00272-511146259
  72. Griffin T, Peters TJ, Sharp D, Salisbury C, Purdy S. Validation of an improved area-based method of calculating general practice-level deprivation. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:746–51. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.07.01919914798
  73. Schulz K, Altman D, Moher D, for the Consort Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials 2010;11:32. 10.1186/1745-6215-11-3220334632
  74. Hoffmann T, Glasziou P, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014;348:1687. 10.1136/bmj.g1687
  75. Great Britain. Data Protection Act 1998. London: The Stationery Office; 2011. URL: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Managingyourorganisation/Informationpolicy/Recordsmanagement/DH_4000489 (accessed 22 March 2016).
  76. Löwe B, Kroenke K, Herzog W, Gräfe K. Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). J Affect Disord 2004;81:61–6. 10.1016/S0165-0327(03)00198-815183601
  77. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiat Ann 2002;32:1–7. 10.3928/0048-5713-20020901-06
  78. Cameron IM, Crawford JR, Lawton K, Reid IC. Psychometric comparison of PHQ-9 and HADS for measuring depression severity in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2008;58:32–6. 10.3399/bjgp08X26379418186994
  79. Ford G, Ecob R, Hunt K, Macintyre S, West P. Patterns of class inequality in health through the lifespan: class gradients at 15, 35 and 55 years in the west of Scotland. Soc Sci Med 1994;39:1037–50. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90375-17809657
  80. Walker A, Maher J, Coulthard M, Goddard E, Thomas M. Living in Britain. Results from the 2000 General Household Survey. London: The Stationery Office; 2001.
  81. Szende A, Oppe M, Devlin N. EQ-5D Value Sets: Inventory, Comparative Review and User Guide. Berlin: Springer; 2007. 10.1007/1-4020-5511-0
  82. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199–208. 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-910109801
  83. Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Alcohol Timeline Followback Users’ Manual. Toronto, ON: Addiction Research Foundation; 1995.
  84. Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jette AM, Janney CA. The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:153–62. 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90053-48437031
  85. The Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study Team. The description of activities of daily living in 5 centres in England and Wales. Age Ageing 1998;27:605–13. 10.1093/ageing/27.5.60512683341
  86. Marmot MG, Smith GD, Stansfeld S, Patel C, North F, Head J, et al. Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet 1991;337:1387–93. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93068-K1674771
  87. Banks J, Lessof C, Nazroo J, Rogers N, Stafford M, Steptoe A. Financial Circumstances, Health and Well-being of the Older Population in England: The 2008 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (Wave 4). London: Institute for Fiscal Studies; 2010.
  88. Health Research Authority. Research Ethics. Health Research Authority; 2016. URL: www.hra.nhs.uk/research-ethics-committee-members/guidance-on-ethical-review-for-members/ (accessed 22 March 2016).
  89. Department of Health and Social Care. NHS Caldicott Guardians. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2012. URL: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Managingyourorganisation/Informationpolicy/Patientconfidentialityandcaldicottguardians/DH4100563 (accessed 22 March 2016).
  90. Peyre H, Leplège A, Coste J. Missing data methods for dealing with missing items in quality of life questionnaires. A comparison by simulation of personal mean score, full information maximum likelihood, multiple imputation, and hot deck techniques applied to the SF-36 in the French 2003 decennial health survey. Qual Life Res 2011;20:287–300. 10.1007/s11136-010-9740-320882358
  91. Carpenter J, Kenward M. Multiple Imputation and its Application. New York, NY: Wiley; 2013. 10.1002/9781119942283
  92. Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ 2009;338:b2393. 10.1136/bmj.b239319564179
  93. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage; 2000.
  94. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice. A Guide for Social Scientists. London: Sage; 2003.
  95. Silverman D. Doing Qualitative Research. London: Sage; 2000.
  96. Clayman SE, Maynard DW. Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. In Have P, Psathas G, editors. Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organisation of Talk and Embodied Activities. Washington, DC: University Press of America; 1994.
  97. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Methods for the Development of NICE Public Health Guidance. London: NICE; 2012.
  98. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997;35:1095–108. 10.1097/00005650-199711000-000029366889
  99. Drummond M, Sculpher M, Torrance G, O’Brien B, Stoddart G. Methods for The Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2005.
  100. Little R, Rubin D. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. 2nd edn. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2002. 10.1002/9781119013563
  101. Fiebig D. Seemingly Unrelated Regression. In Baltagi B, editor. A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2001. pp. 101–21.
  102. Willan AR, Briggs AH, Hoch JS. Regression methods for covariate adjustment and subgroup analysis for non-censored cost-effectiveness data. Health Econ 2004;13:461–75. 10.1002/hec.84315127426
  103. White M, Howel D, Deverill M, Moffatt S, Lock K, McColl E, et al. Do-Well Study Protocol Version 3.1 (12th July 2013). National Institute for Health Research; 2013. URL: www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/phr/09300902
  104. UK Government. Redundancy: Your Rights. 2016. URL: www.gov.uk/redundant-your-rights/consultation (accessed 22 March 2016).
  105. The Poverty Site. Numbers in Low Income. 2016. URL: http://poverty.org.uk/01/index.shtml (accessed 16 January 2016).
  106. Abrahams D. Health Inequalities: What is in Store? In Wood C, editor. Health in Austerity. London: Demos; 2013.
  107. Whitehead M. Due North: Report of the Inquiry on Health Equity for the North 2014. University of Liverpool and Centre for Local Economic Strategies; 2014. URL: www.cles.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Due-North-Report-of-the-Inquiry-on-Health-Equity-in-the-North-final1.pdf (accessed 29 February 2016).
  108. Great Britain. Health and Social Care Act 2012. London: The Stationery Office; 2012.
  109. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. London: NICE: 2013.
  110. Moffatt S, Higgs P. Charity of entitlement? Generational habitus and the welfare state among older people in North-east England. Soc Policy Admin 2007;41:449–64. 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00567.x
  111. Garthwaite K. ‘The language of shirkers and scroungers?’ Talking about illness, disability and coalition welfare reform. Disabil Soc 2011;26:369–72. 10.1080/09687599.2011.560420
  112. Garthwaite K, Bambra C, Warren J. ‘The unwilling and the unwell?’ Exploring stakeholders perceptions of working with long term sickness benefits recipients. Disabil Soc 2013;28:1104–17. 10.1080/09687599.2012.758032
  113. Loopstra R, McKee M, Katikireddi SV, Taylor-Robinson D, Barr B, Stuckler D. Austerity and old-age mortality in England: a longitudinal cross-local area analysis, 2007–2013. J R Soc Med 2016;109:109–16. 10.1177/014107681663221526980412
  114. Lazzarino AI, Hamer M, Stamatakis E, Steptoe A. The combined association of psychological distress and socioeconomic status with all-cause mortality: a national cohort study. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:22–7. 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.95123212347
  115. Serwinski B, Salavecz G, Kirschbaum C, Steptoe A. Associations between hair cortisol concentration, income, income dynamics and status incongruity in healthy middle-aged women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2016;67:182–8. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.02.00826923848
← DiscussionAcknowledgements →

Attribution. Catherine Haighton; Suzanne Moffatt; Denise Howel; Mel Steer; Frauke Becker; Andrew Bryant et al. (2019). Randomised controlled trial with economic and process evaluations of domiciliary welfare rights advice for socioeconomically disadvantaged older people recruited via primary health care (the Do-Well study). NIHR Journals Library. Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2019. This work was produced by Haighton et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK536270. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support