Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Optimum models of hospice at home services for end-of-life care in England: a realist-informed mixed-methods evaluation›References

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Optimum models of hospice at home services for end-of-life care in England: a realist-informed mixed-methods evaluation · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 21 min read

  1. Economist Intelligence Unit. The 2015 Quality of Death Index. Ranking Palliative Care Across the World. London: Economist Intelligence Unit; 2015.
  2. Hospice UK. Facts and Figures about Hospice Care, 2015. URL: https://professionals.hospiceuk.org/about-hospice-care/media-centre/facts-and-figures (accessed 21 February 2021).
  3. Department of Health and Social Care. End of Life Care Strategy: Promoting High Quality Care for all Adults at the End of Life. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2008.
  4. Gomes B, Higginson IJ, Calanzani N, Cohen J, Deliens L, Daveson BA, et al. Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: a population survey in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. Ann Oncol 2012;23:2006–15. 10.1093/annonc/mdr60222345118
  5. Shepperd S, Gonçalves-Bradley DC, Straus SE, Wee B. Hospital at home: home-based end-of-life care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;2:CD009231. 10.1002/14651858.CD009231.pub2
  6. Higginson IJ, Sarmento VP, Calanzani N, Benalia H, Gomes B. Dying at home – is it better: a narrative appraisal of the state of the science. Palliat Med 2013;27:918–24. 10.1177/026921631348794023698451
  7. Palliative and end of life care Priority Setting Partnership (PeolcPSP). Putting Patients, Carers and Clinicians at the Heart of Palliative and End of Life Care Research. Southampton: PeolcPSP, James Lind Alliance; 2015. URL: www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/priority-setting-partnerships/palliative-and-end-of-life-care/downloads/Palliative-and-end-of-life-care-PSP-final-report.pdf (accessed 1 March 2021).
  8. Public Health England. Palliative and End of Life Care Profiles. London: Public Health England; 2021.
  9. Garber J, Leadbeater C. Dying for Change. London: Demos; 2010.
  10. Stosz L. Literature Review of the Evidence Base for a Hospice at Home Service. Canterbury: Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent; 2008.
  11. Holdsworth LM, Gage H, Coulton S, King A, Butler C. A quasi-experimental controlled evaluation of the impact of a hospice rapid response community service for end-of-life care on achievement of preferred place of death. Palliat Med 2015;29:817–25. 10.1177/026921631558212425881623
  12. Holdsworth LM. Bereaved carers’ accounts of the end of life and the role of care providers in a ‘good death’: a qualitative study. Palliat Med 2015;29:834–41. 10.1177/026921631558486525944545
  13. Jack B, Groves K, Baldry C, Gaunt K, Sephton J, Whelan A, et al. Evaluation of the Queenscourt at Home Pilot Service. Ormskirk: Edge Hill University; 2010.
  14. King G, Mackenzie J, Smith H, Clark D. Dying at home: evaluation of a hospice rapid-response service. Int J Palliat Nurs 2000;6:280–7. 10.12968/ijpn.2000.6.6.907711249449
  15. Butler C, Brigden C, Gage H, Williams P, Holdsworth L, Greene K, et al. Optimum hospice at home services for end-of-life care: protocol of a mixed-methods study employing realist evaluation. BMJ Open 2018;8:e021192. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021192
  16. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. 2nd edn. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2001.
  17. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realist Evaluation. 2004. URL: www.urban-response.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/pawson---tilley-%282004%29-realist-evaluation.pdf (accessed 1 July 2022).
  18. Hashem F, Brigden C, Wilson P, Butler C. Understanding what works, why and in what circumstances in hospice at home services for end-of-life care: applying a realist logic of analysis to a systematically searched literature review. Palliat Med 2020;34:16–31. 10.1177/026921631986742431849270
  19. Gomes B, Calanzani N, Curiale V, McCrone P, Higginson IJ. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;6:CD007760. 10.1002/14651858.CD007760.pub2
  20. Butler C, Holdsworth LM, Coulton S, Gage H. Evaluation of a hospice rapid response community service: a controlled evaluation. BMC Palliat Care 2012;11:11. 10.1186/1472-684X-11-1122846107
  21. Bell G, Greene K, Hunt J, Varvel S. Developing national standards for hospice-at-home services. End Life J 2013;3:1–5. 10.1136/eoljnl-03-01.8
  22. Rees-Roberts M, Williams P, Hashem F, Brigden C, Greene K, Gage H, et al. Hospice at home services in England: a national survey. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021;11:454–60. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001818
  23. Taylor R, Ellis J, Gao W, Searle L, Heaps K, Davies R, et al. A scoping review of initiatives to reduce inappropriate or non-beneficial hospital admissions and bed days in people nearing the end of their life: much innovation, but limited supporting evidence. BMC Palliat Care 2020;19:24. 10.1186/s12904-020-0526-232103745
  24. Bainbridge D, Seow H, Sussman J. Common components of efficacious in-home end-of-life care programs: a review of systematic reviews. J Am Geriatr Soc 2016;64:632–9. 10.1111/jgs.1402527000336
  25. Sarmento VP, Gysels M, Higginson IJ, Gomes B. Home palliative care works: but how? A meta-ethnography of the experiences of patients and family caregivers. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2017;7:0. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001141
  26. Luckett T, Phillips J, Agar M, Virdun C, Green A, Davidson PM. Elements of effective palliative care models: a rapid review. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:136. 10.1186/1472-6963-14-13624670065
  27. Shepperd S, Wee B, Straus SE. Hospital at home: home-based end of life care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;7:CD009231. 10.1002/14651858.CD009231
  28. Firth AM, O’Brien SM, Guo P, Seymour J, Richardson H, Bridges C, et al. Establishing key criteria to define and compare models of specialist palliative care: a mixed-methods study using qualitative interviews and Delphi survey. Palliat Med 2019;33:1114–24. 10.1177/026921631985823731250704
  29. Addington-Hall J ,Gerard K, Brien S, England H, Salisbury C, Leydon G, et al. Variations in ‘out of hours’ end of life care service provision across primary care organisations in England and Scotland: the case of nursing care (oral presentation). Palliat Med 2012;26:426–7.
  30. Addington-Hall J, Gerard K, Brien S, Brailsford S, Salisbury C, Heaney D, et al. Variations in Out of Hours End of Life Care Provision Across Primary Care Organisations in England and Scotland. Final Report. Southampton: National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation Programme; 2013.
  31. Waight C, Noble B. Dying at home the Midhurst way. Future Healthc J 2018;5:7–9. 10.7861/futurehosp.5-1-731098523
  32. Johnston B, Patterson A, Bird L, Wilson E, Almack K, Mathews G, Seymour J. Impact of the Macmillan specialist Care at Home service: a mixed methods evaluation across six sites. BMC Palliat Care 2018;17:36. 10.1186/s12904-018-0281-929475452
  33. Woodyatt N, Singh S. P-162 Championing specialist care at home in everyday dying. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2016;6:A68. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001245.184
  34. Wye L, Lasseter G, Percival J, Simmonds B, Duncan L, Purdy S. Independent Evaluation of the Marie Curie Cancer Care Delivering Choice Programme in Somerset and North Somerset. Bristol: University of Bristol; 2012.
  35. Payne S. Independent Evaluation of the Marie Curie Cancer Care ‘Delivering Choice Programme’. Lancaster: International Observatory on End of Life Care; 2008.
  36. Purdy S, Lasseter G, Griffin T, Wye L. Impact of the Marie Curie Cancer Care Delivering Choice Programme in Somerset and North Somerset on place of death and hospital usage: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2015;5:34–9. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000645
  37. Wye L, Lasseter G, Percival J, Duncan L, Simmonds B, Purdy S. What works in ‘real life’ to facilitate home deaths and fewer hospital admissions for those at end of life? Results from a realist evaluation of new palliative care services in two English counties. BMC Palliat Care 2014;13:37. 10.1186/1472-684X-13-3725075202
  38. Grande GE, Todd CJ, Barclay SI, Farquhar MC. Does hospital at home for palliative care facilitate death at home? Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1999;319:1472–5. 10.1136/bmj.319.7223.147210582932
  39. Buck J, Webb L, Moth L, Morgan L, Barclay S. Persistent inequalities in hospice at home provision. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2020;10:e23. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001367
  40. Tyrer F, Exley C. Receiving care at home at end of life: characteristics of patients receiving Hospice at Home care. Fam Pract 2005;22:644–6. 10.1093/fampra/cmi07116055465
  41. Travers E, Grady A. Hospice at home 1: the development of a crisis intervention service. Int J Palliat Nurs 2002;8:162–8. 10.12968/ijpn.2002.8.4.1037412048445
  42. Spencer L. Hospice to home: a patient-centric multi professional community approach. Int J Palliat Nurs 2015;21:245–50. 10.12968/ijpn.2015.21.5.24526107547
  43. Baldry CR, Jack BA, Groves KE, Birch H, Shard A. Establishing a hospice at home service: lessons to share. Int Pract Dev J 2011;1:1–9. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.95
  44. Buck J, Moth L, Webb L, Morgan L, Morris Z, Lay M, et al. Hospice at home: optimising care and enabling home death. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2014;4:A44.2–A44. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000654.123
  45. Davis C. End of life care: a rapid response hospice at home service. Nurs Older People 2010;22:22–4. 10.7748/nop2010.05.22.4.22.c7733
  46. Gibson V, McEvilly L, Standfield R. Help the hospices poster presentations: P12 hospice at Home Service Listening, responding, developing. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2013;3:A13–14. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000591.34
  47. Koffman J, Higginson I, Naysmith A. Hospice at home – a new service for patients with advanced HIV/AIDS: a pilot evaluation of referrals and outcomes. Br J Gen Pract 1996;46:539–40.8917875
  48. Exley C, Tyrer F. Bereaved carers’ views of a hospice at home service. Int J Palliat Nurs 2005;11:242–6. 10.12968/ijpn.2005.11.5.24215944499
  49. Jack BA, O’Brien MR, Scrutton J, Baldry CR, Groves KE. Supporting family carers providing end-of-life home care: a qualitative study on the impact of a hospice at home service. J Clin Nurs 2015;24:131–40. 10.1111/jocn.1269525236658
  50. McLaughlin D, Sullivan K, Hasson F. Hospice at home service: the carer’s perspective. Support Care Cancer 2007;15:163–70. 10.1007/s00520-006-0110-116944220
  51. Grande GE, Farquhar MC, Barclay SI, Todd CJ. Caregiver bereavement outcome: relationship with hospice at home, satisfaction with care, and home death. J Palliat Care 2004;20:69–77. 10.1177/08258597040200020215332470
  52. Jack BA, Baldry CR, Groves KE, Whelan A, Sephton J, Gaunt K. Supporting home care for the dying: an evaluation of healthcare professionals’ perspectives of an individually tailored hospice at home service. J Clin Nurs 2013;22:2778–86. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04301.x23600967
  53. Grady A, Travers E. Hospice at home 2: evaluating a crisis intervention service. Int J Palliat Nurs 2003;9:326–35. 10.12968/ijpn.2003.9.8.1152212968118
  54. Wilson J, Steers J, Steele K, Turner J, Tinker A. Service evaluation of community-based palliative care and a hospice-at-home service. End Life J 2015;5:1–11.
  55. Lucas B, Small N, Greasley P, Daley A. A reassuring presence: an evaluation of Bradford District Hospice at Home service. BMC Palliat Care 2008;7:9. 10.1186/1472-684X-7-918673558
  56. Blanchard H. An evaluation of a hospice at home service: a questionnaire survey of GP & district nurse referrers. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2011;1:264–4. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.182
  57. Richardson R, Maw K, Willis D. Hospice at home. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2020;10:148. 10.1136/spcare-2020-PCC.168
  58. Taylor K, Ali S, Bunting M. P-163 The palliative care partnership . . . the story so far. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2016;6:A68. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001245.185
  59. Morgan L. P-212 The design and implementation of the hospice night support team. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019;9:A88–9. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-HUKNC.234
  60. Sevant D. P-201 Strategic success of a whole system approach to end of life care. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019;9:A84. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-HUKNC.223
  61. Varnam D. P-214 Hospice at home respite service. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019;9:A89. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-HUKNC.236
  62. Connolly A, Meissner J. P-213 Willen at home an integrated community service. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019;9:A89. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-HUKNC.235
  63. Grande GE, Todd CJ, Barclay SI, Farquhar MC. A randomized controlled trial of a hospital at home service for the terminally ill. Palliat Med 2000;14:375–85. 10.1191/02692160070153620011064784
  64. Grande GE, McKerral A, Todd CJ. Which cancer patients are referred to hospital at home for palliative care? Palliat Med 2002;16:115–23. 10.1191/0269216302pm519oa11969142
  65. Todd CJ, Grande GE, Barclay SI, Farquhar MC. General practitioners’ and district nurses’ views of hospital at home for palliative care. Palliat Med 2002;16:251–4. 10.1191/0269216302pm513oa12047003
  66. Gage H, Holdsworth LM, Flannery C, Williams P, Butler C. Impact of a hospice rapid response service on preferred place of death, and costs. BMC Palliat Care 2015;14:75. 10.1186/s12904-015-0065-426701763
  67. Spiro S, Ward A, Sixsmith J, Graham A, Varvel S. The cost of visit-based home care for up to two weeks in the last three months of life: a pilot study of community care based at a hospice at home service in south east of England. J Community Health Nurs 2020;37:203–13. 10.1080/07370016.2020.180985633150810
  68. Addicott R, Dewar S. Improving Choice at End of Life: A Descriptive Analysis of the Impact and Costs of the Marie Curie Choice Programme in Lincolnshire. London: The King’s Fund; 2008.
  69. Whitmore S. An innovative approach to creating a hospice at home team. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2011;1:226–6. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.65
  70. Butler C, Holdsworth L. Setting up a new evidence-based hospice-at-home service in England. Int J Palliat Nurs 2013;19:355–9. 10.12968/ijpn.2013.19.7.35524273813
  71. Marchal B, Dedzo M, Kegels G. A realist evaluation of the management of a well-performing regional hospital in Ghana. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:24. 10.1186/1472-6963-10-2420100330
  72. Bhaskar R. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Routledge; 2013. 10.4324/9780203090732
  73. Porter S. Realism. In Millar R, Brewer J, editors. A to Z of Social Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2003. pp. 256–9.
  74. Fletcher A, Jamal F, Moore G, Evans RE, Murphy S, Bonell C. Realist complex intervention science: applying realist principles across all phases of the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions. Evaluation 2016;22:286–303. 10.1177/135638901665274327478401
  75. Gilmore B, McAuliffe E, Power J, Valliéres F. Data analysis and synthesis within a realist evaluation: toward more transparent methodological approaches. Int J Qual Methods 2019;18:1–11. 10.1177/1609406919859754
  76. Shearn K, Allmark P, Piercy H, Hirst J. Building realist program theory for large complex and messy interventions. Int J Qual Methods 2017;16:1–11. 10.1177/1609406917741796
  77. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R. RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews. J Adv Nurs 2013;69:987–1004. 10.1111/jan.1209223356699
  78. May C, Rapley T, Mair FS, Treweek S, Murray E, Ballini L, et al. Normalization Process Theory Online Users’ Manual, Toolkit and NoMAD Instrument. URL: www.normalizationprocess.org/npt-toolkit/ (accessed 28 June 2017).
  79. Dalkin SM, Hardwick RJL, Haighton CA, Finch TL. Combining realist approaches and normalization process theory to understand implementation: a systematic review. Implement Sci Commun 2021;2:68. 10.1186/s43058-021-00172-334174966
  80. Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, Salsberg J, Bush PL, Henderson J, et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Q 2012;90:311–46. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00665.x22709390
  81. Wong G. Data gathering in realist reviews: looking for needles in haystacks. In Emmel N, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Monaghan M, Dalkin S, editors. Doing Realist Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018. pp. 131–45. 10.4135/9781526451729.n9
  82. Exworthy M, Peckham S, Powell M. Shaping Health Policy: Case Study Methods and Analysis. Bristol: Policy Press; 2011. 10.1332/policypress/9781847427588.001.0001
  83. Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.; 2014.
  84. Marinetto M. Studies of the Policy Process: A Case Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall Europe; 1998.
  85. Cicely Saunders Institute. Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS). URL: https://pos-pal.org/maix/ipos_in_english.php (accessed 28 June 2021).
  86. Murtagh FE, Ramsenthaler C, Firth A, Groeneveld EI, Lovell N, Simon ST, et al. A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS). Palliat Med 2019;33:1045–57. 10.1177/026921631985426431185804
  87. Witt J, Murtagh FEM, de Wolf-Linder S, Higginson IJ, Daveson BA. Introducing the Outcome Assessment and Complexity Collaborative (OACC) Suite of Measures: A Brief Introduction. London: King’s College London; 2014.
  88. Masso, M, Allingham, SF, Banfield M. Palliative care phase: inter-rater reliability and acceptability in a national study. Palliat Med 2015;29:22–30. 10.1177/026921631455181425249239
  89. Abernethy AP, Shelby-James T, Fazekas BS, Woods D, Currow DC. The Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS) scale: a revised scale for contemporary palliative care clinical practice [ISRCTN81117481]. BMC Palliat Care 2005;4:7. 10.1186/1472-684X-4-716283937
  90. Guerriere DN, Coyte PC. The Ambulatory and Home Care Record: a methodological framework for economic analyses in end-of-life care. J Aging Res 2011;2011:374237. 10.4061/2011/37423721629752
  91. Holdsworth LM, Gage H, Williams P, Butler C. Adaptation of the ambulatory and home care record for collecting palliative care service utilisation data from family carers in the UK: a pilot study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018;4:141. 10.1186/s40814-018-0332-230140443
  92. Higginson IJ, Gao W, Jackson D, Murray J, Harding R. Short-form Zarit Caregiver Burden Interviews were valid in advanced conditions. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:535–42. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.01419836205
  93. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982;5:649–55. 10.1097/00000421-198212000-000147165009
  94. Addington–Hall J, McCarthy M. Regional study of care for the dying: methods and sample characteristics. Palliat Med 1995;9:27–35. 10.1177/0269216395009001057719516
  95. Hales S, Zimmermann C, Rodin G. Review: the quality of dying and death: a systematic review of measures. Palliat Med 2010;24:127–44. 10.1177/026921630935178320085963
  96. Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Engelberg RA, Norris K, Asp C, Byock I. A measure of the quality of dying and death. Initial validation using after-death interviews with family members. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002;24:17–31. 10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00419-012183092
  97. End-of-Life Care Research Program at UW School of Medicine. Instruments – Quality of Dying and Death (QODD). URL: https://depts.washington.edu/eolcare/products/instruments/ (accessed 9 February 2022).
  98. Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2013.
  99. Stanfield RB. The Workshop Book: From Individual Creativity to Group Action. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers; 2013.
  100. Hales S, Chiu A, Husain A, Braun M, Rydall A, Gagliese L, et al. The quality of dying and death in cancer and its relationship to palliative care and place of death. J Pain Symptom Manage 2014;48:839–51. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.12.24024703943
  101. Clark K, Cain J, Campbell L, Byfieldt N. Caring for people dying in acute hospitals: a mixed-methods study to examine relative’s perceptions of care. Palliat Support Care 2015;13:335–43. 10.1017/S147895151400006624622248
  102. Lewis-Newby M, Curtis JR, Martin DP, Engelberg RA. Measuring family satisfaction with care and quality of dying in the intensive care unit: does patient age matter? J Palliat Med 2011;14:1284–90. 10.1089/jpm.2011.013822107108
  103. The National Council for Palliative Care. Minimum Data Set for Palliative Care, Individual Reports 2013/14. London: The National Council for Palliative Care; 2014.
  104. Curtis L, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2019. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent; 2019.
  105. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 2002. pp. 173–94. 10.4324/9780203413081_chapter_9
  106. Eastwood JG, Jalaludin BB, Kemp LA. Realist explanatory theory building method for social epidemiology: a protocol for a mixed method multilevel study of neighbourhood context and postnatal depression. Springerplus 2014;3:12. 10.1186/2193-1801-3-1224422187
  107. Gysels M, Evans CJ, Lewis P, Speck P, Benalia H, Preston NJ, et al. MORECare research methods guidance development: recommendations for ethical issues in palliative and end-of-life care research. Palliat Med 2013;27:908–17. 10.1177/026921631348801823695828
  108. Hewitt G, Sims S, Harris R. The realist approach to evaluation research: an introduction. Int J Ther Rehabil 2012;19:250–9. 10.12968/ijtr.2012.19.5.250
  109. Chambers E, Gardiner C, Thompson J, Seymour J. Patient and carer involvement in palliative care research: an integrative qualitative evidence synthesis review. Palliat Med 2019;33:969–84. 10.1177/026921631985824731250702
  110. Gott M. User Involvement in palliative care: rhetoric or reality? In Payne S, Seymour J, Ingleton C, editors. Palliative Care Nursing: Principles and Evidence for Practice. 1st edn. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2004.
  111. Elliot J, Lodemore M, Minogue V, Wellings A. Public Co-applicants in Research: Guidance on Roles and Responsibilities. Southampton: INVOLVE; 2019.
  112. INVOLVE. Budgeting for Involvement: Practical Advice on Budgeting for Actively Involving the Public in Research Studies. London: INVOLVE; 2013.
  113. Hickey DG. The potential for coproduction to add value to research. Health Expect 2018;21:693–4. 10.1111/hex.1282130168263
  114. Brigden CL, Goodwin M, Silsbury G, Rees-Roberts M, Butler C, Greene K, et al. Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Hospice Research: An Example of Co-Production in Action. National Association for Hospice at Home Annual Conference 2018, Harrogate, 4–5 October.
  115. Brigden C, Silsbury G. Co-production in the OPEL Hospice at Home Study. Presented at Co-producing research: How do we do it? INVOLVE, Research Design Service South East and Partners, London, 5 July 2018.
  116. Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care (CRIPACC). Guidance for Researchers: Feedback. Patient and Public Involvement (PPI): Feedback from Researchers to PPI Contributors. Hertford: CRIPACC; 2018.
  117. Mathie E, Wythe H, Munday D, Millac P, Rhodes G, Roberts N, et al. Reciprocal relationships and the importance of feedback in patient and public involvement: a mixed methods study. Health Expect 2018;21:899–908. 10.1111/hex.1268429654644
  118. Howe A, Mathie E, Munday D, Cowe M, Goodman C, Keenan J, et al. Learning to work together – lessons from a reflective analysis of a research project on public involvement. Res Involv Engagem 2017;3:1. 10.1186/s40900-016-0051-x29062526
  119. Cicely Saunders Institute. How to Score POS. URL: www.pos-pal.org/maix/how-to-score.php (accessed 30 November 2020).
  120. Aoun SM, Ewing G, Grande G, Toye C, Bear N. The impact of supporting family caregivers before bereavement on outcomes after bereavement: adequacy of end-of-life support and achievement of preferred place of death. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018;55:368–78. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.09.02329030206
  121. Cai J, Zhang L, Guerriere D, Coyte PC. Congruence between preferred and actual place of death for those in receipt of home-based palliative care. J Palliat Med 2020;23:1460–7. 10.1089/jpm.2019.058232286904
  122. Ali M, Capel M, Jones G, Gazi T. The importance of identifying preferred place of death. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019;9:84–91. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000878
  123. Lobb EA, Bindley K, Sanderson C, MacLeod R, Mowll J. Navigating the path to care and death at home – it is not always smooth: a qualitative examination of the experiences of bereaved family caregivers in palliative care. J Psychosoc Oncol Res Pract 2019;1:e3. 10.1097/OR9.0000000000000003
  124. Carvajal A, Haraldsdottir E, Kroll T, McCormack B, Errasti-Ibarrondo B, Larkin P. Barriers and facilitators perceived by registered nurses to providing person-centred care at the end of life. A scoping review. Int Pract Dev J 2019;9. 10.19043/ipdj.92.008
  125. Ganann R, Weeres A, Lam A, Chung H, Valaitis R. Optimization of home care nurses in Canada: a scoping review. Health Soc Care Community 2019;27:e604–e621. 10.1111/hsc.1279731231890
  126. Jack BA, Mitchell TK, Cope LC, O’Brien MR. Supporting older people with cancer and life-limiting conditions dying at home: a qualitative study of patient and family caregiver experiences of Hospice at Home care. J Adv Nurs 2016;72:2162–72. 10.1111/jan.1298327113470
  127. Wahid AS, Sayma M, Jamshaid S, Kerwat D, Oyewole F, Saleh D, et al. Barriers and facilitators influencing death at home: a meta-ethnography. Palliat Med 2018;32:314–28. 10.1177/026921631771342728604232
  128. von Heymann-Horan A, Bidstrup PE, Johansen C, Rottmann N, Andersen EAW, Sjøgren P, et al. Dyadic coping in specialized palliative care intervention for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: effects and mediation in a randomized controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology 2019;28:264–70. 10.1002/pon.493230353600
  129. Hydén LC, Nilsson E. Couples with dementia: positioning the ‘we’. Dementia 2015;14:716–33. 10.1177/147130121350692324339120
  130. Rand S, Forder J, Malley J. A study of dyadic interdependence of control, social participation and occupation of adults who use long-term care services and their carers. Qual Life Res 2017;26:3307–21. 10.1007/s11136-017-1669-328786019
  131. Abrahamson V, Jensen J, Springett K, Sakel M. Experiences of patients with traumatic brain injury and their carers during transition from in-patient rehabilitation to the community: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2017;39:1683–94. 10.1080/09638288.2016.121175527557977
  132. Nursing and Midwifery Council. The Code. Professional Standards of Practice and Behaviour for Nurses, Midwives and Nursing Associates. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council; 2015.
  133. Murray SA, Kendall M, Boyd K, Sheikh A. Illness trajectories and palliative care. BMJ 2005;330:1007–11. 10.1136/bmj.330.7498.100715860828
  134. Holtslander L, Baxter S, Mills K, Bocking S, Dadgostari T, Duggleby W, et al. Honoring the voices of bereaved caregivers: a metasummary of qualitative research. BMC Palliat Care 2017;16:48. 10.1186/s12904-017-0231-y28877699
  135. Duke S. An exploration of anticipatory grief: the lived experience of people during their spouses’ terminal illness and in bereavement. J Adv Nurs 1998;28:829–39. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00742.x9829672
  136. Department of Health and Social Care. Care and Support Statutory Guidance. Issued under the Care Act 2014. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2016.
  137. Grande GE, Austin L, Ewing G, O’Leary N, Roberts C. Assessing the impact of a Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) intervention in palliative home care: a stepped wedge cluster trial. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2017;7:326–34. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000829
  138. Hewitt D. Coronavirus: Third of hospices on brink of redundancies and service cuts ahead of ‘surge in demand’. ITV News, 25 September 2020. URL: www.itv.com/news/2020-09-24/exclusive-third-of-hospices-on-brink-of-redundancies-and-services-cuts-ahead-of-surge-in-demand (accessed 26 January 2022).
  139. Nagraj S, Barclay S. Bereavement care in primary care: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61:e42–8. 10.3399/bjgp11X54900921401990
  140. Hudson P, Hall C, Boughey A, Roulston A. Bereavement support standards and bereavement care pathway for quality palliative care. Palliat Support Care 2018;16:375–87. 10.1017/S147895151700045128701233
  141. Prigerson HG, Horowitz MJ, Jacobs SC, Parkes CM, Aslan M, Goodkin K, et al. Prolonged grief disorder: psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLOS Med 2009;6:e1000121. 10.1371/journal.pmed.100012119652695
  142. Shear MK, Simon N, Wall M, Zisook S, Neimeyer R, Duan N, et al. Complicated grief and related bereavement issues for DSM-5. Depress Anxiety 2011;28:103–17. 10.1002/da.2078021284063
  143. National Palliative and End of Life Care Partnership. Ambitions for Palliative and End of Life Care: A National Framework for Local Action 2015–2020. 2015. URL: www.nationalvoices.org.uk/sites/default/files/public/publications/ambitions-for-palliative-and-end-of-life-care.pdf (accessed 26 January 2022).
  144. Department of Health and Children. Report of the National Advisory Committee on Palliative Care. Dublin: Department of Health and Children; 2001.
  145. Axelsson L, Alvariza A, Holm M, Årestedt K. Intensity of predeath grief and postdeath grief of family caregivers in palliative care in relation to preparedness for caregiving, caregiver burden, and social support. Palliat Med Rep 2020;1:191–200. 10.1089/pmr.2020.003334223476
  146. Hall C, Hudson P, Boughey A. Bereavement Support Standards for Specialist Palliative Care Services. Melbourne, VIC: Department of Health; 2012.
  147. Aoun SM, Rumbold B, Howting D, Bolleter A, Breen LJ. Bereavement support for family caregivers: the gap between guidelines and practice in palliative care. PLOS One 2017;12:e0184750. 10.1371/journal.pone.018475028977013
  148. Funk LM, Dansereau L, Novek S. Carers as system navigators: exploring sources, processes and outcomes of structural burden. Gerontologist 2019;59:426–35. 10.1093/geront/gnx17529165584
  149. Valaitis RK, Carter N, Lam A, Nicholl J, Feather J, Cleghorn L. Implementation and maintenance of patient navigation programs linking primary care with community-based health and social services: a scoping literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17:116. 10.1186/s12913-017-2046-128166776
  150. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). End of Life Care for Adults. Quality Standard [QS13]. London: NICE; 2017.
  151. Stajduhar KI. Provocations on privilege in palliative care: are we meeting our core mandate? Prog Palliat Care 2020;28:89–93. 10.1080/09699260.2019.1702334
  152. Carter N, Valaitis RK, Lam A, Feather J, Nicholl J, Cleghorn L. Navigation delivery models and roles of navigators in primary care: a scoping literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:96. 10.1186/s12913-018-2889-029422057
  153. Freeman HP, Rodriguez RL. History and principles of patient navigation. Cancer 2011;117(Suppl. 15):3539–42. 10.1002/cncr.2626221780088
  154. Bernardo BM, Zhang X, Beverly Hery CM, Meadows RJ, Paskett ED. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of patient navigation programs across the cancer continuum: a systematic review. Cancer 2019;125:2747–61. 10.1002/cncr.3214731034604
  155. Bennett MI, Ziegler L, Allsop M, Daniel S, Hurlow A. What determines duration of palliative care before death for patients with advanced disease? A retrospective cohort study of community and hospital palliative care provision in a large UK city. BMJ Open 2016;6:e012576. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012576
  156. Gadoud A, Kane E, Oliver SE, Johnson MJ, Macleod U, Allgar V. Palliative care for non-cancer conditions in primary care: a time trend analysis in the UK (2009–2014) [published online ahead of print January 13 2020]. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2020. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001833
  157. Weerawardena J, McDonald RE, Mort GS. Sustainability of nonprofit organizations: an empirical investigation. J World Bus 2010;45:346–56. 10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.004
  158. Hodgson DE, Bailey S, Exworthy M, Bresnen M, Hassard J, Hyde P. On the character of the new entrepreneurial NHS in England: reforming health care from within? [published online ahead of print November 3 2021]. Public Adm 2021. 10.1111/padm.12797
  159. Stuart H. Managing a corporate brand in a challenging stakeholder environment: charity branding. Int Stud Manag Organ 2016;46:228–34. 10.1080/00208825.2016.1140519
  160. Barker R. How Does English End of Life Care and the Views of Stakeholders Fit with the Ambitions of National Policy: Insights From a Realist Evaluation. Canterbury: University of Kent; 2020.
  161. NHS England. Commissioning Person Centred End of Life Care: A Toolkit for Health and Social Care. Leeds: NHS England; 2016.
  162. Chamanga E, Dyson J, Loke J, McKeown E. Factors influencing the recruitment and retention of registered nurses in adult community nursing services: an integrative literature review. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2020;21:e31. 10.1017/S146342362000035332912372
  163. Haslam C, Tsitsianis N, Theodosopoulos G, Lee E. Accounting for voluntary hospices in England: a business model perspective. Crit Perspect Account 2018;54:27–40. 10.1016/j.cpa.2017.10.001
  164. Scott R, Jindal-Snape D, Manwaring G. Exploring the relationship between volunteering and hospice sustainability in the UK: a theoretical model. Int J Palliat Nurs 2018;24:212–19. 10.12968/ijpn.2018.24.5.21229792765
  165. Morris SM, Payne S, Ockenden N, Hill M. Hospice volunteers: bridging the gap to the community? Health Soc Care Community 2017;25:1704–13. 10.1111/hsc.1223225810042
  166. Aoun SM, Keegan O, Roberts A, Breen LJ. The impact of bereavement support on wellbeing: a comparative study between Australia and Ireland. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2020;14:2632352420935132. 10.1177/2632352420935132
  167. Abel J, Bowra J, Walter T, Howarth G. Compassionate community networks: supporting home dying. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2011;1:129–33. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000068
  168. Sallnow L, Richardson H, Murray SA, Kellehear A. The impact of a new public health approach to end-of-life care: a systematic review. Palliat Med 2016;30:200–11. 10.1177/026921631559986926269324
  169. Abel J. Compassionate communities and end-of-life care. Clin Med 2018;18:6–8. 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-1-6
  170. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
← ConclusionsAcknowledgements →

Attribution. Claire Butler; Patricia Wilson; Vanessa Abrahamson; Rasa Mikelyte; Heather Gage; Peter Williams et al. (2022). Optimum models of hospice at home services for end-of-life care in England: a realist-informed mixed-methods evaluation. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2022 Butler et al. This work was produced by Butler et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This is an Open Access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaption in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. For attribution the title, original author(s), the publication source – NIHR Journals Library, and the DOI of the publication must be cited. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK583604. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support