Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Optimising the impact of health services research on the organisation and delivery of health services: a mixed-methods study›References

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Optimising the impact of health services research on the organisation and delivery of health services: a mixed-methods study · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · NIHR Journals Library · approximately 23 min read

  1. Lomas J. Essay: using ‘linkage and exchange’ to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation: encouraging partnerships between researchers and policymakers is the goal of a promising new Canadian initiative. Health Aff 2000;19:236–40. 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.236
  2. Rycroft-Malone J, Wilkinson J, Burton CR, Harvey G, McCormack B, Graham I, Staniszewska S. Collaborative action around implementation in Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: towards a programme theory. J Health Serv Res Policy 2013;18(Suppl. 3):13–26. 10.1177/1355819613498859
  3. Davies HT, Powell AE, Nutley SM. Mobilising knowledge to improve UK health care: learning from other countries and other sectors – a multimethod mapping study. Health Serv Deliv Res 2015;3(27). 10.3310/hsdr03270
  4. Boaz A, Davies H, Fraser A, Nutley S. What Works Now? Evidence-informed Policy and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press; 2019.
  5. Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, Patten SB, Waye Perry B. Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Q 2007;85:729–68. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x18070335
  6. Greenhalgh T, Wieringa S. Is it time to drop the ‘knowledge translation’ metaphor? A critical literature review. J R Soc Med 2011;104:501–9. 10.1258/jrsm.2011.11028522179293
  7. Engebretsen E, Sandset TJ, Ødemark J. Expanding the knowledge translation metaphor. Health Res Pol Syst 2017;15:19. 10.1186/s12961-017-0184-x
  8. Ferlie E, Crilly T, Jashapara A, Peckham A. Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare: a critical review of health sector and generic management literature. Soc Sci Med 2012;74:1297–304. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.04222385813
  9. Nutley S, Walter I, Davies H. Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press; 2007. 10.2307/j.ctt9qgwt1
  10. Soper B, Hinrichs S, Drabble S, Yaqub O, Marjanovic S, Hanney S, et al. Delivering the aims of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: understanding their strategies and contributions. Health Serv Deliv Res 2015;3(25). 10.3310/hsdr03250
  11. Salter KL, Kothari A. Knowledge ‘translation’ as social learning: negotiating the uptake of research-based knowledge in practice. BMC Med Educ 2016;16:76. 10.1186/s12909-016-0585-526925578
  12. Bullock A, Morris ZS, Atwell C. A Formative Evaluation of the Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO) Management Fellowships. Final Report. Southampton: NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation programme; 2012.
  13. Currie G, Waring J, Finn R. The limits of knowledge management for UK public services modernization: the case of patient safety and service quality. Public Adm 2008;86:363–85. 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00705.x
  14. Best A, Greenhalgh T, Lewis S, Saul JE, Carroll S, Bitz J. Large-system transformation in health care: a realist review. Milbank Q 2012;90:421–56. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00670.x22985277
  15. Martin GP, Williams O. Evidence and Service Delivery. In Boaz A, Davies H, Fraser A, Nutley S, editors. What Works Now?: Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press; 2019. pp. 41–60.
  16. Kitson A, Brook A, Harvey G, Jordan Z, Marshall R, O’Shea R, Wilson D. Using complexity and network concepts to inform healthcare knowledge translation. Int J Health Policy Manag 2018;7:231–43. 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.7929524952
  17. Beckett K, Farr M, Kothari A, Wye L, le May A. Embracing complexity and uncertainty to create impact: exploring the processes and transformative potential of co-produced research through development of a social impact model. Health Res Policy Syst 2018;16:118. 10.1186/s12961-018-0375-030537975
  18. Reed MS, Stringer LC, Fazey I, Evely AC, Kruijsen JHJ. Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management. J Environ Manage 2014;146:337–45. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.02125194520
  19. Greenhalgh T, Papoutsi C. Studying complexity in health services research: desperately seeking an overdue paradigm shift. BMC Med 2018;16:95. 10.1186/s12916-018-1089-429921272
  20. Greenhalgh T. What is this knowledge that we seek to ‘exchange’? Milbank Q 2010;88:492. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00610.x21166867
  21. Wehrens R. Beyond two communities – from research utilization and knowledge translation to co-production? Public Health 2014;128:545–51. 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.02.00424854762
  22. Jackson CL, Greenhalgh T. Co-creation: a new approach to optimising research impact? Med J Aust 2015;203:283–4. 10.5694/mja15.0021926424059
  23. McCabe KE, Wallace A, Crosland A. A model for collaborative working to facilitate knowledge mobilisation in public health. Evid Policy 2015;11:559–76. 10.1332/174426415X14298767491657
  24. Clarke J, Waring J, Timmons S. The challenge of inclusive coproduction: the importance of situated rituals and emotional inclusivity in the coproduction of health research projects. Soc Policy Admin 2019;53:233–48. 10.1111/spol.12459
  25. Duijn M, Rijnveld M, van Hulst M. Meeting in the middle: joining reflection and action in complex public sector projects. Public Money Manag 2010;30:227–33. 10.1080/09540962.2010.492183
  26. Beebeejaun Y, Durose C, Rees J, Richardson J, Richardson L. Public harm or public value? Towards coproduction in research with communities. Environ Plan 2015;33:552–65. 10.1068/c12116
  27. Ostrom E. Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development. World Dev 1996;24:1073–87. 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
  28. Boyle D, Harris M. The Challenge of Co Production: How Equal Partnerships between Professionals and the Public Are Crucial to Improving Public Services. London: New Economics Foundation; 2009.
  29. Osborne SP, Strokosch K. It takes two to tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives. Br J Manag 2013;24:S31–S47. 10.1111/1467-8551.12010
  30. Orr K, Bennett M. The politics of co-produced research: editorial. Public Money Manag 2010;30:199–203. 10.1080/09540962.2010.492171
  31. Orr K, Bennett M. Public administration scholarship and the politics of coproducing academic–practitioner research. Public Adm Rev 2012;72:487–95. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02522.x
  32. Heaton J, Day J, Britten N. Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study. Implement Sci 2016;11:20. 10.1186/s13012-016-0383-926897169
  33. Rycroft-Malone J, Burton CR, Bucknall T, Graham ID, Hutchinson AM, Stacey D. Collaboration and co-production of knowledge in healthcare: opportunities and challenges. Int J Health Policy Manag 2016;5:221–3. 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.0827239867
  34. Brandsen T, Verschuere B, Pestoff V. Conclusion: Taking Research on Co-production a Step Further. In Pestoff V, Brandsen T, Verschuere B, editors. New Public Governance, the Third Sector, and Co-Production. London: Routledge; 2012. pp. 399–406. 10.4324/9780203152294-29
  35. Verschuere B, Brandsen T, Pestoff V. Co-production: the state of the art in research and the future agenda. VOLUNTAS 2012;23:1083–101. 10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8
  36. Durose C, Needham C, Mangan C, Rees J. Generating ‘good enough’ evidence for co-production. Evid Policy 2017;13:135–51. 10.1332/174426415X14440619792955
  37. Hewison A, Gale N, Shapiro J. Co-production in research: some reflections on the experience of engaging practitioners in health research. Public Money Manag 2012;32:297–302. 10.1080/09540962.2012.691311
  38. Flinders M, Wood M, Cunningham M. The politics of co-production: risks, limits and pollution. Evid Policy 2016;12:261–79. 10.1332/174426415X14412037949967
  39. Crompton A. Inside co-production: stakeholder meaning and situated practice. Soc Policy Admin 2019;53:219–32. 10.1111/spol.12466
  40. Bell DM, Pahl K. Co-production: towards a utopian approach. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2018;21:105–17. 10.1080/13645579.2017.1348581
  41. Weiss CH. Research for policy’s sake: the enlightenment function of social research. Policy Anal 1977;3:531–45.
  42. Kothari A, Wathen CN. Integrated knowledge translation: digging deeper, moving forward. J Epidemiol Community Health 2017;71:619–23. 10.1136/jech-2016-20849028298415
  43. Miles S, Renedo A, Marston C. ‘Slow co-production’ for deeper patient involvement in health care. JHD 2018;3:57–62. 10.21853/JHD.2018.39
  44. Pollard K, Moule P, Evans D, Donald C, Donskoy A, Rice C. User Engagement in the Co-production of Knowledge for Knowledge Exchange in Health and Social Care. Bristol: University of the West of England Bristol; 2020.
  45. Kislov R, Wilson PM, Knowles S, Boaden R. Learning from the emergence of NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs): a systematic review of evaluations. Implement Sci 2018;13:111. 10.1186/s13012-018-0805-y30111339
  46. Boaz A, Hanney S, Borst R, O’Shea A, Kok M. How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement. Health Res Policy Syst 2018;16:60. 10.1186/s12961-018-0337-629996848
  47. Gradinger F, Elston J, Asthana S, Martin S, Byng R. Reflections on the researcher-in-residence model co-producing knowledge for action in an integrated care organisation: a mixed methods case study using an impact survey and field notes. Evid Pol 2019;15:197–215. 10.1332/174426419X15538508969850
  48. Gagliardi AR, Berta W, Kothari A, Boyko J, Urquhart R. Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review. Implement Sci 2016;11:38. 10.1186/s13012-016-0399-126988000
  49. Graham ID, Kothari A, McCutcheon C, Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network Project Leads. Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation. Implement Sci 2018;13:22. 10.1186/s13012-017-0700-y29394932
  50. Bailie J, Cunningham FC, Bainbridge RG, Passey ME, Laycock AF, Bailie RS, et al. Comparing and contrasting ‘innovation platforms’ with other forms of professional networks for strengthening primary healthcare systems for Indigenous Australians. BMJ Glob Health 2018;3:e000683. 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000683
  51. Kanani N, Hahn EE, Gould MK, Brunisholz KD, Savitz LA, Holve EC. Academy Health’s Delivery System Science Fellowship: training embedded researchers to design, implement, and evaluate new models of care. J Hosp Med 2017;12:570–4. 10.12788/jhm.277628699948
  52. Ghaffar A, Langlois EV, Rasanathan K, Peterson S, Adedokun L, Tran NT. Strengthening health systems through embedded research. Bull World Health Organ 2017;95:87. 10.2471/BLT.16.18912628250505
  53. Glegg SM, Hoens A. Role domains of knowledge brokering: a model for the health care setting. J Neurol Phys Ther 2016;40:115–23. 10.1097/NPT.000000000000012226937654
  54. Hoens AM, Reid WD, Camp PG. Knowledge brokering: an innovative model for supporting evidence-informed practice in respiratory care. Can Respir J 2013;20:271–4. 10.1155/2013/12165423936885
  55. Ward V, Smith S, House A, Hamer S. Exploring knowledge exchange: a useful framework for practice and policy. Soc Sci Med 2012;74:297–304. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.02122014420
  56. Wright N. First-time knowledge brokers in health care: the experiences of nurses and allied health professionals of bridging the research-practice gap. Evid Pol 2013;9:557–70. 10.1332/174426413X13836462527470
  57. Chew S, Armstrong N, Martin G. Institutionalising knowledge brokering as a sustainable knowledge translation solution in healthcare: how can it work in practice? Evid Pol 2013;9:335–51. 10.1332/174426413X662734
  58. Frost H, Geddes R, Haw S, Jackson CA, Jepson R, Mooney JD, et al. Experiences of knowledge brokering for evidence-informed public health policy and practice: three years of the Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy. Evid Pol 2012;8:347–59. 10.1332/174426412X654068
  59. Booth A. Bridging the ‘Know–Do Gap’: a role for health information professionals? Health Info Libr J 2011;28:331–4. 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00960.x22051133
  60. Dobbins M, Greco L, Yost J, Traynor R, Decorby-Watson K, Yousefi-Nooraie R. A description of a tailored knowledge translation intervention delivered by knowledge brokers within public health departments in Canada. Health Res Policy Syst 2019;17:63. 10.1186/s12961-019-0460-z31221187
  61. Marshall MN. Bridging the ivory towers and the swampy lowlands; increasing the impact of health services research on quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 2014;26:1–5. 10.1093/intqhc/mzt076
  62. Marshall M. Researchers-in-residence: a solution to the challenge of evidence-informed improvement? Prim Health Care Res Dev 2014;15:337–8. 10.1017/S146342361400031025111565
  63. Marshall M, Eyre L, Lalani M, Khan S, Mann S, de Silva D, Shapiro J. Increasing the impact of health services research on service improvement: the researcher-in-residence model. J R Soc Med 2016;109:220–5. 10.1177/014107681663431826933156
  64. Eyre L, George B, Marshall M. Protocol for a process-oriented qualitative evaluation of the Waltham Forest and East London Collaborative (WELC) integrated care pioneer programme using the researcher-in-residence model. BMJ Open 2015;5:e009567. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009567
  65. Vindrola-Padros C, Eyre L, Baxter H, Cramer H, George B, Wye L, et al. Addressing the challenges of knowledge co-production in quality improvement: learning from the implementation of the researcher-in-residence model. BMJ Qual Saf 2019;28:67–73. 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007127
  66. Langley J, Wolstenholme D, Cooke J. ‘Collective making’ as knowledge mobilisation: the contribution of participatory design in the co-creation of knowledge in healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:585. 10.1186/s12913-018-3397-y30045726
  67. Embedded Research. Embedded Research: Increasing the Influence of Health Services Research on Decisions about the Improvement and Redesign of NHS Services. What is Embedded Research? URL: www.embeddedresearch.org.uk (accessed 1 March 2021).
  68. Bate P, Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:307–10. 10.1136/qshc.2005.01652717074863
  69. Snape D, Kirkham J, Preston J, Popay J, Britten N, Collins M, et al. Exploring areas of consensus and conflict around values underpinning public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004217. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004217
  70. Sunderji N, Nicholas EA, Polaha J, Gao C. Why and how to use patient-oriented research to promote translational research. Fam Syst Health 2019;37:1–9. 10.1037/fsh000040530920259
  71. Boaz A, Locock L, Ward V. Whose evidence is it anyway? Evid Pol 2015;11:145–8. 10.1332/174426515X14313738355534
  72. Lancaster K, Seear K, Treloar C, Ritter A. The productive techniques and constitutive effects of ‘evidence-based policy’ and ‘consumer participation’ discourses in health policy processes. Soc Sci Med 2017;176:60–8. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.03128131022
  73. Kouri D. Knowledge exchange strategies for interventions and policy in public health. Evid Pol 2009;5:71–83. 10.1332/174426409X395420
  74. Ward V. Why, whose, what and how? A framework for knowledge mobilisers. Evid Pol 2017;13:477–97. 10.1332/174426416X14634763278725
  75. Glasziou P, Haynes B. The paths from research to improved health outcomes. Evid Based Nurs 2005;8:36–8. 10.1136/ebn.8.2.3615830412
  76. Dopson S, Locock L, Gabbay J, Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L. Evidence-based medicine and the implementation gap. Health 2003;7:311–30. 10.1177/1363459303007003004
  77. Davies H, Nutley S, Walter I. Why ‘knowledge transfer’ is misconceived for applied social research. J Health Serv Res Policy 2008;13:188–90. 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.00805518573770
  78. Fitzgerald L, Harvey G. Translational networks in healthcare? Evidence on the design and initiation of organizational networks for knowledge mobilization. Soc Sci Med 2015;138:192–200. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.01526117554
  79. Filipe A, Renedo A, Marston C. The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLOS Biol 2017;15:e2001403. 10.1371/journal.pbio.200140328467412
  80. Holmes B, Best A, Davies H, Hunter D, Kelly M, Marshall M, et al. Mobilising knowledge in complex health systems: a call to action. Evid Pol 2016;13:539–60. 10.1332/174426416X14712553750311
  81. Palmer VJ, Weavell W, Callander R, Piper D, Richard L, Maher L, et al. The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement. Med Humanit 2019;45:247–57. 10.1136/medhum-2017-01139829954854
  82. Oliver K, Kothari A, Mays N. The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Res Pol Syst 2019;17:33. 10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3
  83. Nicholas G, Foote J, Kainz K, Midgley G, Prager K, Zurbriggen C. Towards a heart and soul for co-creative research practice: a systemic approach. Evid Pol 2019;15:353–70. 10.1332/174426419X15578220630571
  84. Smith S, Ward V. The role of boundary maintenance and blurring in a UK collaborative research project: how researchers and health service managers made sense of new ways of working. Soc Sci Med 2015;130:225–33. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.02325721334
  85. Torraco RJ. Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Hum Resour Dev Rev 2005;4:356–67. 10.1177/1534484305278283
  86. Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009;9:59. 10.1186/1471-2288-9-5919671152
  87. Dixon-Woods M. Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies. BMC Med 2011;9:39. 10.1186/1741-7015-9-3921492447
  88. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:117. 10.1186/1471-2288-13-11724047204
  89. Jabareen Y. Building a conceptual framework: philosophy, definitions, and procedure. Int J Qual Methods 2009;8:49–62. 10.1177/160940690900800406
  90. Lövbrand E. Co-producing European climate science and policy: a cautionary note on the making of useful knowledge. Sci Public Policy 2011;38:225–36. 10.3152/030234211X12924093660516
  91. Jull J, Giles A, Graham ID. Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: advancing the co-creation of knowledge. Implement Sci 2017;12:150. 10.1186/s13012-017-0696-329258551
  92. Rowley E, Morriss R, Currie G, Schneider J. Research into practice: Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, Lincolnshire (NDL). Implement Sci 2012;7:40. 10.1186/1748-5908-7-4022553966
  93. Hutchins K, Lindenfeld LA, Bell KP, Leahy J, Silka L. Strengthening knowledge co-production capacity: examining interest in community-university partnerships. Sustainability 2013;5:3744–70. 10.3390/su5093744
  94. Martin S. Co-production of social research: strategies for engaged scholarship. Public Money Manag 2010;30:211–8. 10.1080/09540962.2010.492180
  95. Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q 2016;94:392–429. 10.1111/1468-0009.1219727265562
  96. Klenk N, Meehan K. Climate change and transdisciplinary science: problematizing the integration imperative. Environ Sci Policy 2015;54:160–7. 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.017
  97. Brown MB. Politicizing science: conceptions of politics in science and technology studies. Soc Stud Sci 2015;45:3–30. 10.1177/030631271455669425803915
  98. Olesen BR, Nordentoft HM. Walking the talk? A micro-sociological approach to the co-production of knowledge and power in action research. Int J Action Res 2013;9:67–94.
  99. Anderson L, Ellwood P, Coleman C. The impactful academic: relational management education as an intervention for impact. Brit J Manag 2017;28:14–28. 10.1111/1467-8551.12202
  100. Wall TU, McNie E, Garfin GM. Use-inspired science: making science usable by and useful to decision makers. Front Ecol Environ 2017;15:551–9. 10.1002/fee.1735
  101. Scaratti G, Galuppo L, Gorli M, Gozzoli C, Ripamonti S. The social relevance and social impact of knowledge and knowing. Manag Learn 2017;48:57–64. 10.1177/1350507616680563
  102. Antonacopoulou EP. Beyond co-production: practice-relevant scholarship as a foundation for delivering impact through powerful ideas. Public Money Manag 2010;30:219–26. 10.1080/09540962.2010.492182
  103. Pain R, Kesby M, Askins K. Geographies of impact: power, participation and potential. Area 2011;43:183–8. 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00978.x
  104. Cherney A. Academic–industry collaborations and knowledge co-production in the social sciences. J Sociol 2015;51:1003–16. 10.1177/1440783313492237
  105. Bremer S, Meisch S. Co-production in climate change research: reviewing different perspectives. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 2017;8:e482. 10.1002/wcc.482
  106. Durose C, Beebeejaun Y, Rees J, Richardson J, Richardson L. Towards Co-production in Research with Communities. Manchester: Arts and Humanities Research Council, The University of Manchester; 2012.
  107. Rossi F, Rosli A, Yip N. Academic engagement as knowledge co-production and implications for impact: evidence from knowledge transfer partnerships. J Bus Res 2017;80:1–9. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.06.019
  108. Campbell LK, Svendsen ES, Roman LA. Knowledge co-production at the research–practice interface: embedded case studies from urban forestry. Environ Manage 2016;57:1262–80. 10.1007/s00267-016-0680-826902482
  109. Kitson AL, Harvey G. Methods to succeed in effective knowledge translation in clinical practice. J Nurs Scholarsh 2016;48:294–302. 10.1111/jnu.1220627074390
  110. Kothari A, Hovanec N, Hastie R, Sibbald S. Lessons from the business sector for successful knowledge management in health care: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2011;11:173. 10.1186/1472-6963-11-17321787403
  111. Nowotny H. Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Sci Public Policy 2003;30:151–6. 10.3152/147154303781780461
  112. Kothari A, Wathen CN. A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation. Health Policy 2013;109:187–91. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.11.00423228520
  113. Phillips LJ. Analysing the dialogic turn in the communication of research-based knowledge: an exploration of the tensions in collaborative research. Public Underst Sci 2011;20:80–100. 10.1177/0963662509340092
  114. Pohl C, Rist S, Zimmermann A, Fry P, Gurung GS, Schneider F, et al. Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Sci Public Policy 2010;37:267–81. 10.3152/030234210X496628
  115. Schuttenberg H, Guth HK. Seeking our shared wisdom: a framework for understanding knowledge coproduction and coproductive capacities. Ecol Soc 2015;20:15. 10.5751/ES-07038-200115
  116. Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, Salsberg J, Bush PL, Henderson J, et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Q 2012;90:311–46. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00665.x22709390
  117. Rycroft-Malone J, Langley J. Re-framing the knowledge to action challenge through NIHR knowledge mobilisation research fellows; comment on “CIHR Health System Impact Fellows: Reflections on ‘Driving Change’ within the health system”. Int J Health Policy Manag 2020;9:531–5. 10.15171/ijhpm.2020.0232610771
  118. O’Hare P, Coaffee J, Hawkesworth M. Managing sensitive relations in co-produced planning research. Public Money Manag 2010;30:243–50. 10.1080/09540962.2010.492188
  119. Burns D, Hyde P, Killett A, Poland F, Gray R. Participatory organizational research: examining voice in the co-production of knowledge. Br J Manag 2014;25:133–44. 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00841.x
  120. Klenk NL, Wyatt S. The design and management of multi-stakeholder research networks to maximize knowledge mobilization and innovation opportunities in the forest sector. For Policy Econ 2015;61:77–86. 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.06.008
  121. Fenge L-A, Fannin A, Hicks C. Co-production in scholarly activity: valuing the social capital of lay people and volunteers. J Soc Work 2012;12:545–59. 10.1177/1468017310393796
  122. Arancibia F. Rethinking activism and expertise within environmental health conflicts. Sociol Compass 2016;10:477–90. 10.1111/soc4.12374
  123. Orr K, Bennett M. Down and out at the British Library and other dens of co-production. Manag Learn 2012;43:427–42. 10.1177/1350507612440409
  124. Pinfold V, Szymczynska P, Hamilton S, Peacocke R, Dean S, Clewett N, et al. Co-production in mental health research: reflections from the People Study. MHRJ 2015;20:220–31. 10.1108/MHRJ-09-2015-0028
  125. Lehmann U, Gilson L. Action learning for health system governance: the reward and challenge of co-production. Health Policy Plan 2015;30:957–63. 10.1093/heapol/czu09725161271
  126. Miszczak S, Patel Z. The role of engaged scholarship and co-production to address urban challenges: a case study of the Cape Town Knowledge Transfer Programme. S Afr Geogr J 2018;100:233–48. 10.1080/03736245.2017.1409649
  127. Campbell H, Vanderhoven D. Knowledge that Matters: Realising the Potential of Co-production. Manchester: N8 Research Partnership; 2016.
  128. Polk M. Transdisciplinary co-production: designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures 2015;65:110–22. 10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001
  129. Bremer S, Funtowicz S. Negotiating a place for sustainability science: narratives from the Waikaraka Estuary in New Zealand. Environ Sci Policy 2015;53:47–59. 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.11.006
  130. Ospina S, El Hadidy W, Hofmann-Pinilla A. Cooperative inquiry for learning and connectedness. Action Learn Res Pract 2008;5:131–47. 10.1080/14767330802185673
  131. Kernick D, Mitchell A. Working with lay people in health service research: a model of co-evolution based on complexity theory. J Interprof Care 2010;24:31–40. 10.3109/1356182090301207319718571
  132. Borg M, Karlsson B, Kim HS, McCormack B. Opening up for many voices in knowledge construction. Article 1. Forum Qual Soc Res 2012;13.
  133. Edelenbos J, Van Buuren A, van Schie N. Co-producing knowledge: joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects. Environ Sci Policy 2011;14:675–84. 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.004
  134. Chesters G. Social movements and the ethics of knowledge production. Soc Mov Stud 2012;11:145–60. 10.1080/14742837.2012.664894
  135. Jasanoff S. The Idiom of Co-production and Ordering Knowledge. In Jasanoff S, editor. States of Knowledge. Oxford: Routledge; 2004. 10.4324/9780203413845
  136. Castree N. Coproducing global change research and geography: the means and ends of engagement. Dialogues Hum Geogr 2015;5:343–8. 10.1177/2043820615613265
  137. Cunliffe AL. Reflexive inquiry in organizational research: questions and possibilities. Hum Relat 2003;56:983–1003. 10.1177/00187267030568004
  138. Bekker M, van Egmond S, Wehrens R, Putters K, Bal R. Linking research and policy in Dutch healthcare: infrastructure, innovations and impacts. Evid Pol 2010;6:237–53. 10.1332/174426410X502464
  139. Pols J. Enacting appreciations: beyond the patient perspective. Health Care Anal 2005;13:203–21. 10.1007/s10728-005-6448-616223211
  140. Ewert B, Evers A. An ambiguous concept: on the meanings of co-production for health care users and user organizations? VOLUNTAS 2014;25:425–42. 10.1007/s11266-012-9345-2
  141. Nunn N. Emotional and relational approaches to masculine knowledge. Soc Cult Geogr 2017;18:354–70. 10.1080/14649365.2016.1180705
  142. Maclean K, Cullen L. Research methodologies for the co production of knowledge for environmental management in Australia. J R Soc N Z 2009;39:205–8. 10.1080/03014220909510581
  143. Gillard S, Simons L, Turner K, Lucock M, Edwards C. Patient and public involvement in the coproduction of knowledge: reflection on the analysis of qualitative data in a mental health study. Qual Health Res 2012;22:1126–37. 10.1177/104973231244854122673090
  144. Frantzeskaki N, Kabisch N. Designing a knowledge co-production operating space for urban environmental governance – lessons from Rotterdam, Netherlands and Berlin, Germany. Environ Sci Policy 2016;62:90–8. 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010
  145. Klenk N, Fiume A, Meehan K, Gibbes C. Local knowledge in climate adaptation research: moving knowledge frameworks from extraction to co-production. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 2017;8:e475. 10.1002/wcc.475
  146. Ward V, Tooman T, Reid B, Davies H, Marshall M. Embedding researchers into organisations: a study of the features of embedded research initiatives [published online ahead of print 19 April 2021]. Evid Policy 2021. 10.1332/174426421X16165177580453
  147. World Health Organization (WHO). Changing Mindsets: Strategy on Health Policy and Systems Research. Geneva: WHO; 2012.
  148. Koon AD, Rao KD, Tran NT, Ghaffar A. Embedding health policy and systems research into decision-making processes in low- and middle-income countries. Health Res Policy Syst 2013;11:30. 10.1186/1478-4505-11-3023924162
  149. Wolfenden L, Yoong SL, Williams CM, Grimshaw J, Durrheim DN, Gillham K, Wiggers J. Embedding researchers in health service organizations improves research translation and health service performance: the Australian Hunter New England Population Health example. J Clin Epidemiol 2017;85:3–11. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.00728341367
  150. Eyre L, Farrelly M, Marshall M. What can a participatory approach to evaluation contribute to the field of integrated care? BMJ Qual Saf 2017;26:588–94. 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005777
  151. Marshall M, Pagel C, French C, Utley M, Allwood D, Fulop N, et al. Moving improvement research closer to practice: the Researcher-in-Residence model. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:801–5. 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002779
  152. Cheetham M, Wiseman A, Khazaeli B, Gibson E, Gray P, Van der Graaf P, Rushmer R. Embedded research: a promising way to create evidence-informed impact in public health? J Public Health 2018;40:i64–i70. 10.1093/pubmed/fdx125
  153. Cunliffe AL, Scaratti G. Embedding impact in engaged research: developing socially useful knowledge through dialogical sensemaking. Br J Manag 2017;28:29–44. 10.1111/1467-8551.12204
  154. Wong S. Tales from the frontline: the experiences of early childhood practitioners working with an ‘embedded’ research team. Eval Program Plann 2009;32:99–108. 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.10.00319036451
  155. Duggan JR. Critical friendship and critical orphanship: embedded research of an English local authority initiative. Manag Educ 2014;28:12–8. 10.1177/0892020613510118
  156. Rowley H. Going beyond procedure: engaging with the ethical complexities of being an embedded researcher. Manag Educ 2014;28:19–24. 10.1177/0892020613510119
  157. Booth A, Harris J, Croot E, Springett J, Campbell F, Wilkins E. Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual ‘richness’ for systematic reviews of complex interventions: case study (CLUSTER). BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:118. 10.1186/1471-2288-13-11824073615
  158. Vindrola-Padros C, Pape T, Utley M, Fulop NJ. The role of embedded research in quality improvement: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf 2017;26:70–80. 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004877
  159. Bate P. Synthesizing research and practice: using the action research approach in health care settings. Soc Policy Admin 2000;34:478–93. 10.1111/1467-9515.00205
  160. Cheek J. The Practice and Politics of Funded Qualitative Research. In Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2005. pp. 387–410.
  161. Hackett EJ, Rhoten DR. Engaged, embedded, enjoined: science and technology studies in the National Science Foundation. Sci Eng Ethics 2011;17:823–38. 10.1007/s11948-011-9307-x21993903
  162. Wye L, Cramer H, Beckett K, Farr M, le May A, Carey J, et al. Collective knowledge brokering: the model and impact of an embedded team. Evid Pol 2019;16:429–52. 10.1332/174426419X15468577044957
  163. Crowe S, Grieco L, Vindrola-Padros C, Elkhodair S. Multidisciplinary embedded research to identify solutions to emergency department overcrowding. Int J Qual Health Care 2017;29:55–6. 10.1093/intqhc/mzx125.8927836999
  164. Jenness V. Pluto, prisons, and plaintiffs: notes on systematic back-translation from an embedded researcher. Soc Probl 2008;55:1–22. 10.1525/sp.2008.55.1.1
  165. Lewis SJ, Russell AJ. Being embedded: a way forward for ethnographic research. Ethnogr 2011;12:398–416. 10.1177/1466138110393786
  166. Wye L, Cramer H, Carey J, Anthwal R, Rooney J, Robinson R, et al. Knowledge brokers or relationship brokers? The role of an embedded knowledge mobilisation team. Evid Pol 2019;15:277–92. 10.1332/174426417X15123845516148
  167. Van de Ven AH, Johnson PE. Knowledge for theory and practice. Acad Manage Rev 2006;31:802–21. 10.5465/amr.2006.22527385
  168. Gibbons M. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 1994.
  169. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:349–57. 10.1093/intqhc/mzm04217872937
  170. Carlile PR. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organ Sci 2002;13:442–55. 10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
  171. Waring J, Clarke JM, Vickers R. A comparative ethnographic study of collective knowledge brokering across the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic knowledge boundaries in applied health research. Evid Pol 2021;17:111–30. 10.1332/174426420X15825348594538
  172. Stake RE. The Art of Case Study Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 1995.
  173. Flyvbjerg B. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual Inq 2006;12:219–45. 10.1177/1077800405284363
  174. Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th edn. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009.
  175. Knoke D, Yang S. Social Network Analysis. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2008. 10.4135/9781412985864
  176. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014.
  177. Clarke V, Braun V, Hayfield N. Thematic Analysis. In Smith JA, editor. Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2015. pp. 222–48.
  178. Ward V, Tooman T, Reid B, Davies H, O’Brien B, Mear L, et al. A framework to support the design and cultivation of embedded research initiatives [published online ahead of print 19 April 2021]. Evid Policy 2021. 10.1332/174426421X16165177707227
  179. University of St Andrews. Welcome to the RURU Website! URL: www.ruru.ac.uk (accessed 10 March 2021).
  180. Contandriopoulos D, Lemire M, Denis JL, Tremblay E. Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q 2010;88:444–83. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00608.x21166865
  181. Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25:986–92. 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411
  182. Walshe K, Davies HT. Health research, development and innovation in England from 1988 to 2013: from research production to knowledge mobilization. J Health Serv Res Policy 2013;18(Suppl. 3):1–12. 10.1177/1355819613502011
  183. Ovretveit J, Hempel S, Magnabosco JL, Mittman BS, Rubenstein LV, Ganz DA. Guidance for research-practice partnerships (R-PPs) and collaborative research. J Health Organ Manag 2014;28:115–26. 10.1108/JHOM-08-2013-016424783669
  184. Gould MK, Sharp AL, Nguyen HQ, Hahn EE, Mittman BS, Shen E, et al. Embedded research in the learning healthcare system: ongoing challenges and recommendations for researchers, clinicians, and health system leaders. J Gen Intern Med 2020;35:3675–80. 10.1007/s11606-020-05865-432472492
  185. Nyström ME, Hansson J, Garvare R, Andersson-Bäck M. Locally based research and development units as knowledge brokers and change facilitators in health and social care of older people in Sweden. Evid Pol 2015;11:57–80. 10.1332/174426514X14098428292539
  186. Greene SM, Reid RJ, Larson EB. Implementing the learning health system: from concept to action. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:207–10. 10.7326/0003-4819-157-3-201208070-0001222868839
  187. Antil T, Desrochers M, Joubert P, Bouchard C. Implementation of an innovative grant programme to build partnerships between researchers, decision-makers and practitioners: the experience of the Quebec Social Research Council. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003;8(Suppl. 2):35–43. 10.1258/13558190332240515314596746
  188. Walter I, Davies H, Nutley S. Increasing research impact through partnerships: evidence from outside health care. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003;8(Suppl. 2):58–61. 10.1258/13558190332240518014596749
  189. Chafe R, Dobrow M. Health services researchers working within healthcare organizations: the intriguing sound of three hands clapping. Healthc Policy 2008;4:37–45. 10.12927/hcpol.2008.2026619377368
  190. Bammer G, Michaux A, Sanson A. Bridging the ‘Know–Do’ Gap: Knowledge Brokering to Improve Child Wellbeing. Canberra, ACT: ANU Press; 2010. 10.26530/OAPEN_458835
  191. Mitchell P, Pirkis J, Hall J, Haas M. Partnerships for knowledge exchange in health services research, policy and practice. J Health Serv Res Policy 2009;14:104–11. 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.00809119299264
  192. Campbell DM, Redman S, Jorm L, Cooke M, Zwi AB, Rychetnik L. Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers. Aust New Zealand Health Policy 2009;6:21. 10.1186/1743-8462-6-2119698186
  193. Lomas J. The in-between world of knowledge brokering. BMJ 2007;334:129–32. 10.1136/bmj.39038.593380.AE17235094
  194. Phipps D, Morton S. Qualities of knowledge brokers: reflections from practice. Evid Pol 2013;9:255–65. 10.1332/174426413X667784
  195. Bevir M, Needham C, Waring J. Inside co production: ruling, resistance, and practice. Soc Policy Admin 2019;53:197–202. 10.1111/spol.12483
  196. Cooke J. Building research capacity for impact in applied health services research partnerships; comment on “Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering With University-Based Researchers in Canada – A Call to ‘Re-imagine’ Research”. Int J Health Pol Manag 2020;10:93–7. 10.15171/ijhpm.2020.11
  197. Cruz Rivera S, Kyte DG, Aiyegbusi OL, Keeley TJ, Calvert MJ. Assessing the impact of healthcare research: a systematic review of methodological frameworks. PLOS Med 2017;14:e1002370. 10.1371/journal.pmed.100237028792957
  198. Williams O, Sarre S, Papoulias SC, Knowles S, Robert G, Beresford P, et al. Lost in the shadows: reflections on the dark side of co-production. Health Res Policy Syst 2020;18:43. 10.1186/s12961-020-00558-032380998
  199. Morton S, Wilson S, Inglis S, Ritchie K, Wales A. Developing a framework to evaluate knowledge into action interventions. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:133. 10.1186/s12913-018-2930-329466994
  200. Fazey I, Bunse L, Msika J, Pinke M, Preedy K, Evely AC, et al. Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research. Global Environ Chang 2014;25:204–20. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.012
  201. Patton MQ. Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York, NY: The Guildford Press; 2011.
  202. Silverman D. Qualitative Research. 4th edn. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2016.
  203. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 1994.
← Integration, discussion and conclusionsAcknowledgements →

Attribution. Martin Marshall; Huw Davies; Vicky Ward; Justin Waring; Naomi J Fulop; Liz Mear et al. (2022). Optimising the impact of health services research on the organisation and delivery of health services: a mixed-methods study. NIHR Journals Library. Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2022. This work was produced by Marshall et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK577853. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support