Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Methylphenidate versus placebo for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: the MePFAC randomised controlled trial›Implication for decision-makers

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Methylphenidate versus placebo for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: the MePFAC randomised controlled trial · Implication for decision-makers

Implication for decision-makers

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 1 min read

Methylphenidate does not currently have a licence for the management of cancer-related fatigue, although individual practitioners may take responsibility for prescribing medication beyond the licenced indications. The PCF42 currently describes a limited role for prescribing MPH in palliative care populations beyond license, in situations where fatigue is refractory to other measures. However, in the light of the results of our study, clinicians should be discouraged from doing so. Local and professional guidelines should amend their recommendations accordingly. Palliative medicine higher specialist training programmes should discourage practitioners from using MPH for the relief of fatigue in palliative care patients with advanced cancer. Although there have been conflicting results from previous studies, the balance of evidence describes that MPH, although generally safe, is ineffective for this indication.

← Impact and learningResearch recommendations →

Attribution. Patrick Stone; Ollie Minton; Alison Richardson; Peter Buckle; Zinat E Enayat; Louise Marston et al. (2025). Methylphenidate versus placebo for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: the MePFAC randomised controlled trial. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2025 Stone et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK616759. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Implication for decision-makers

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support