Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Improving care for women and girls who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting: qualitative systematic reviews›References

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Improving care for women and girls who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting: qualitative systematic reviews · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · NIHR Journals Library · approximately 40 min read

  1. WHO. Female Genital Mutilation: Fact Sheet. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
  2. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Global Concern. New York, NY: UNICEF; 2016.
  3. Green G, Davison C, Bradby H, Krause K, Mejías FM, Alex G. Pathways to care: how superdiversity shapes the need for navigational assistance. Sociol Health Illn 2014;36:1205–19. 10.1111/1467-9566.1216125040675
  4. Newall D, Phillimore J, Sharpe H. Migration and maternity in the age of superdiversity. Pract Midwife 2012;15:20–2.
  5. Phillimore J. Migrant maternity in an era of superdiversity: new migrants’ access to, and experience of, antenatal care in the West Midlands, UK. Soc Sci Med 2016;148:152–9. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.03026705910
  6. Vertovec S. Super-diversity and its implications. Ethn Rac Stud 2007;30:1024–54. 10.1080/01419870701599465
  7. Phillimore J. Approaches to health provision in the age of super-diversity: accessing the NHS in Britain’s most diverse city. Crit Soc Policy 2011;31:5–29. 10.1177/0261018310385437
  8. City University, Equality Now, Royal College of Midwives, ROSA, Trust for London. Taking Local Action on FGM: An Essential Guide for Local Authorities. London: Trust for London; 2015.
  9. Macfarlane A, Dorkenoo E. Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation in England and Wales: National and Local Estimates. London: City University; 2015.
  10. Department of Health and Social Care. Commissioning Services to Support Women and Girls with Female Genital Mutilation. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2015.
  11. Brown E. The FGM Initiative: Summary of PEER Research Findings: Endline Phase 1. London: Options Consultancy Services; 2013.
  12. Dawson A, Turkmani S, Fray S, Nanayakkara S, Varol N, Homer C. Evidence to inform education, training and supportive work environments for midwives involved in the care of women with female genital mutilation: a review of global experience. Midwifery 2015;31:229–38. 10.1016/j.midw.2014.08.01225246318
  13. Creighton S, Hodes D. Chapter 3: Female Genital Mutilation. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2015.
  14. Royal College of Midwives, Royal College of Nursing, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Equality Now, UNITE. Intercollegiate Guidelines Tackling FGM in the UK: Intercollegiate Recommendations for Identifying, Recording and Reporting. London; 2013.
  15. NHS England. Commissioning Services to Meet the Needs of Women and Girls with FGM. London: NHS England; 2018.
  16. Van Baelen L, Ortensi L, Leye E. Estimates of first-generation women and girls with female genital mutilation in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2016;21:474–82. 10.1080/13625187.2016.123459727652839
  17. NHS Digital. Female Genital Mutilation (FGM): Annual Report 2016/7 [PAS]. London: NHS Digital; 2017.
  18. NHS Digital. Female Genital Mutilation (FGM): Annual Report 2017/18. London: NHS Digital; 2018. 10.7748/phc.28.1.18.s19
  19. WHO. A Systematic Review of the Health Complications of Female Genital Mutilation Including Sequelae in Childbirth. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
  20. Mulongo P, McAndrew S, Hollins Martin C. Crossing borders: discussing the evidence relating to the mental health needs of women exposed to female genital mutilation. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2014;23:296–305. 10.1111/inm.1206024548699
  21. Mulongo P, Martin CH, McAndrew S. The psychological impact of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) on girls/women’s mental health: a narrative literature review. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2014;32:469–85. 10.1080/02646838.2014.949641
  22. Berg RC, Denison EAF. Psychological, Social and Sexual Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C): A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies. Oslo: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; 2010.
  23. Berg RC, Denison E. Does female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) affect women’s sexual functioning? A systematic review of the sexual consequences of FGM/C. Sex Res & Soc Pol 2012;9:41–56. 10.1007/s13178-011-0048-z
  24. Berg RC, Underland V. The obstetric consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Int 2013;2013:496564. 10.1155/2013/49656423878544
  25. Berg RC, Underland V, Odgaard-Jensen J, Fretheim A, Vist GE. Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2014;4:e006316. 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006316
  26. HM Government. Multi-Agency Practice Guidelines: Female Genital Mutilation. London: HM Government; 2014.
  27. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green-Top Guideline No. 53: Female Genital Mutilation and its Management. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2015.
  28. WHO. WHO Guidelines on the Management of Health Complications from Female Genital Mutilation. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
  29. Royal College of Nursing. Female Genital Mutilation: An RCN Resource for Nursing and Midwifery Practice (2nd ed). London: Royal College of Nursing; 2015.
  30. Abdulcadir J, Rodriguez MI, Say L. Research gaps in the care of women with female genital mutilation: an analysis. BJOG 2015;122:294–303. 10.1111/1471-0528.1321725514892
  31. Esu E, Udo A, Okusanya BO, Agamse D, Meremikwu MM. Antepartum or intrapartum deinfibulation for childbirth in women with type III female genital mutilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136(Suppl. 1):21–9. 10.1002/ijgo.1205528164285
  32. Albert J, Bailey E, Duaso M. Does the timing of deinfibulation for women with type 3 female genital mutilation affect labour outcomes? Br J Midwifery 2015;23:430–7. 10.12968/bjom.2015.23.6.430
  33. Paliwal P, Ali S, Bradshaw S, Hughes A, Jolly K. Management of type III female genital mutilation in Birmingham, UK: a retrospective audit. Midwifery 2014;30:282–8. 10.1016/j.midw.2013.04.00823747293
  34. Okusanya BO, Oduwole O, Nwachuku N, Meremikwu MM. Deinfibulation for preventing or treating complications in women living with type III female genital mutilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136(Suppl. 1):13–20. 10.1002/ijgo.12056
  35. Gayle C, Rymer J. Female genital mutilation and pregnancy: associated risks. Br J Nurs 2016;25:978–83. 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.17.97827666099
  36. Bishai D, Bonnenfant YT, Darwish M, Adam T, Bathija H, Johansen E, et al. Estimating the obstetric costs of female genital mutilation in six African countries. Bull World Health Organ 2010;88:281–8. 10.2471/BLT.09.06480820431792
  37. Great Britain. UK Female Genital Mutilation Act [2003]. London: The Stationery Office; 2003. URL: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/31/contents (accessed 28 January 2019).
  38. Great Britain. Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation (Scotland) Act 2005. London: The Stationery Office; 2005. URL: www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2005/8/contents (accessed 25 June 2019).
  39. GOV.UK. New Government Measures to End FGM. URL: www.gov.uk/government/news/new-government-measures-to-end-fgm (accessed 25 June 2019).
  40. Great Britain. Serious Crime Act 2015. London: The Stationery Office; 2015. URL: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/9/part/5/enacted (accessed 25 June 2019).
  41. NHS England. Female Genital Mutilation: Standards for Training Professionals. London: NHS England; 2018.
  42. Baillot H, Murray N, Connelly E, Howard N. Addressing female genital mutilation in Europe: a scoping review of approaches to participation, prevention, protection, and provision of services. Int J Equity Health 2018;17:21. 10.1186/s12939-017-0713-929422053
  43. Johansen REB, Ziyada MM, Shell-Duncan B, Kaplan AM, Leye E. Health sector involvement in the management of female genital mutilation/cutting in 30 countries. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:240. 10.1186/s12913-018-3033-x29615033
  44. McCormick C. Care of the Perineum, Repair and Female Genital Mutilation. In Marshall J, Raynor M, editors. Myles Textbook for Midwives. 16th edn. London: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. pp.145–65.
  45. NHS England. NHS Specialist Services for Female Genital Mutilation. URL: www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/AboutNHSservices/sexual-health-services/Documents/List%20of%20FGM%20Clinics%20Mar%2014%20FINAL.pdf (accessed 28 April 2018).
  46. Clayton-Hathway K. A Pilot Evaluation of Health Services for Communities Affected by FGM in Oxfordshire: Final Report. Oxford: Healthwatch Oxfordshire; 2016.
  47. Norman K, Gegzabher SB, Otoo-Oyortey N. ‘Between Two Cultures’: A Rapid PEER Study Exploring Migrant Communities’ Views on Female Genital Mutilation in Essex and Norfolk, UK. London: FORWARD & National FGM Centre Report; 2016.
  48. Berg RC, Denison E. A tradition in transition: factors perpetuating and hindering the continuance of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) summarized in a systematic review. Health Care Women Int 2013;34:837–59. 10.1080/07399332.2012.72141723489149
  49. Varol N, Turkmani S, Black K, Hall J, Dawson A. The role of men in abandonment of female genital mutilation: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2015;15:1034. 10.1186/s12889-015-2373-226449728
  50. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services. Effectiveness of Interventions Designed to Reduce the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation-Cutting. Oslo: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2009.
  51. Berg RC, Denison EM. A realist synthesis of controlled studies to determine the effectiveness of interventions to prevent genital cutting of girls. Paediatr Int Child Health 2013;33:322–33. 10.1179/2046905513Y.000000008624196703
  52. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services. Psychological, Social and Sexual Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies. Oslo: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2010.
  53. Berg RC, Taraldsen S, Said MA, Sørbye IK, Vangen S. Reasons for and experiences with surgical interventions for female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a systematic review. J Sex Med 2017;14:977–90. 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.05.01628666656
  54. Sunday-Adeoye I, Serour G. Management of health outcomes of female genital mutilation: systematic reviews and evidence syntheses. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136(Suppl. 1):1–2. 10.1002/ijgo.12041
  55. Stein K, Hindin MJ, Chou D, Say L. Prioritizing and synthesizing evidence to improve the health care of girls and women living with female genital mutilation: an overview of the process. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136(Suppl. 1):3–12. 10.1002/ijgo.1205028164287
  56. Bulman KH, McCourt C. Somali refugee women’s experiences of maternity care in west London: a case study. Crit Public Health 2002;12:365–80. 10.1080/0958159021000029568
  57. Hussein E. Women’s Experiences, Perceptions and Attitudes of Female Genital Mutilation: The Bristol PEER Study. London: FORWARD; 2010. URL: www.forwarduk.org.uk/forward-publications/womens-experiences-perceptions-and-attitudes-of-female-genital-mutilation/ (accessed 12 July 2019).
  58. Norman K, Hemmings J, Hussein E, Otoo-Oyortey N. ‘FGM is Always With Us’: Experiences, Perceptions and Beliefs of Women Affected by Female Genital Mutilation in London: Results from a PEER Study. London: Options Consultancy Services and FORWARD; 2009. URL: www.forwarduk.org.uk/news-events/fgm-is-always-with-us-experiences-perceptions-and-beliefs-of-women-affected-by-female-genital-mutilation-in-london/ (accessed 12 July 2019).
  59. Straus L, McEwen A, Hussein FM. Somali women’s experience of childbirth in the UK: perspectives from Somali health workers. Midwifery 2009;25:181–6. 10.1016/j.midw.2007.02.00217600598
  60. Smith H, Stein K. Health information interventions for female genital mutilation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136(Suppl. 1):79–82. 10.1002/ijgo.1205228164294
  61. Smith H, Stein K. Surgical or medical interventions for female genital mutilation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136(Suppl. 1):43–6. 10.1002/ijgo.1205328164291
  62. Smith H, Stein K. Psychological and counselling interventions for female genital mutilation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136(Suppl. 1):60–4. 10.1002/ijgo.1205128164298
  63. Hamid A, Grace KT, Warren N. A meta-synthesis of the birth experiences of African immigrant women affected by female genital cutting. J Midwifery Womens Health 2018;63:185–95. 10.1111/jmwh.1270829569363
  64. Turkmani S, Homer CSE, Dawson A. Maternity care experiences and health needs of migrant women from female genital mutilation-practicing countries in high-income contexts: a systematic review and meta-synthesis [published online ahead of print June 28 2018]. Birth 2018. 10.1111/birt.12367
  65. Dawson A, Homer CS, Turkmani S, Black K, Varol N. A systematic review of doctors’ experiences and needs to support the care of women with female genital mutilation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;131:35–40. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.03326118329
  66. Reig-Alcaraz M, Siles-Gonzalez J, Solano-Ruiz C. A mixed-method synthesis of knowledge, experiences and attitudes of health professionals to female genital mutilation. J Adv Nurs 2015;72:245–60. 10.1111/jan.1282326434563
  67. Zenner N, Liao LM, Richens Y, Creighton SM. Quality of obstetric and midwifery care for pregnant women who have undergone female genital mutilation. J Obstet Gynaecol 2013;33:459–62. 10.3109/01443615.2013.76778523815196
  68. Abdulcadir J, Dugerdil A, Boulvain M, Yaron M, Margairaz C, Irion O, Petignat P. Missed opportunities for diagnosis of female genital mutilation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014;125:256–60. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.11.01624713414
  69. Ford CM, Darlow K, Massie A, Gorman DR. Using electronic maternity records to estimate female genital mutilation in Lothian from 2010 to 2013. Eur J Public Health 2018;28:657–61. 10.1093/eurpub/cky04529596591
  70. Cappon S, L’Ecluse C, Clays E, Tency I, Leye E. Female genital mutilation: knowledge, attitude and practices of Flemish midwives. Midwifery 2015;31:e29–35. 10.1016/j.midw.2014.11.01225575861
  71. Isman E, Mahmoud Warsame A, Johansson A, Fried S, Berggren V. Midwives’ experiences in providing care and counselling to women with female genital mutilation (FGM) related problems. Obstet Gynecol Int 2013;2013:785148. 10.1155/2013/78514824163698
  72. Kaplan-Marcusán A, Del Rio NF, Moreno-Navarro J, Castany-Fàbregas MJ, Nogueras MR, Muñoz-Ortiz L, et al. Female genital mutilation: perceptions of healthcare professionals and the perspective of the migrant families. BMC Public Health 2010;10:193. 10.1186/1471-2458-10-19320388216
  73. Kaplan-Marcusan A, Torán-Monserrat P, Moreno-Navarro J, Castany Fàbregas MJ, Muñoz-Ortiz L. Perception of primary health professionals about female genital mutilation: from healthcare to intercultural competence. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:11. 10.1186/1472-6963-9-1119146694
  74. León-Larios F, Casado-Mejía R. [Knowledge, attitudes and professional experiences of midwives in primary health care in Seville on female genital mutilation.] Matronas Profesion 2014;15:56–61.
  75. Tamaddon L, Johnsdotter S, Liljestrand J, Essén B. Swedish health care providers’ experience and knowledge of female genital cutting. Health Care Women Int 2006;27:709–22. 10.1080/0739933060081774116893807
  76. Dawson AJ, Turkmani S, Varol N, Nanayakkara S, Sullivan E, Homer CS. Midwives’ experiences of caring for women with female genital mutilation: insights and ways forward for practice in Australia. Women Birth 2015;28:207–14. 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.01.00725686876
  77. Degni F, Suominen S, Essén B, El Ansari W, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K. Communication and cultural issues in providing reproductive health care to immigrant women: health care providers’ experiences in meeting the needs of [corrected] Somali women living in Finland. J Immigr Minor Health 2012;14:330–43. 10.1007/s10903-011-9465-621465142
  78. Fawcett L. Somali Refugee Women and their U.S. Healthcare Providers: Knowledge, Perceptions and Experiences of Childbearing. PhD thesis. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University; 2014. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8676/82b17de150aee7281a365e984214acaa855d.pdf (accessed 12 July 2019).
  79. Widmark C, Levál A, Tishelman C, Ahlberg BM. Obstetric care at the intersection of science and culture: Swedish doctors’ perspectives on obstetric care of women who have undergone female genital cutting. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;30:553–8. 10.3109/01443615.2010.48411020701500
  80. Widmark C, Tishelman C, Ahlberg BM. A study of Swedish midwives’ encounters with infibulated African women in Sweden. Midwifery 2002;18:113–25. 10.1054/midw.2002.030712139909
  81. Hannes K, Harden A. Multi-context versus context-specific qualitative evidence syntheses: combining the best of both. Res Synth Methods 2011;2:271–8. 10.1002/jrsm.5526061890
  82. Weir MC, Grimshaw JM, Mayhew A, Fergusson D. Decisions about lumping vs. splitting of the scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions are not well justified: a case study in systematic reviews of health care professional reminders. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65:756–63. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.01222498429
  83. Noyes J, Hannes K, Booth A, Harris J, Harden A, Popay J, et al. Qualitative and Implementation Evidence and Cochrane Reviews, Version 1.02a. In Higgins JA, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5/3 (updated October 2015). The Cochrane Collaboration; 2015. pp. QQ1–26. URL: https://methods.cochrane.org/sites/methods.cochrane.org.qi/files/public/uploads/Handbook52_QQ_Qualitative_web%20update%20Oct%202015.pdf (accessed 12 August 2019).
  84. Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI Reviewer’s Manual. 2019. URL: https://wiki.joannabriggs.org/display/MANUAL/JBI+Reviewer%27s+Manual (accessed 12 August 2019).
  85. Zeeb H, Makarova N, Brand T, Knecht M. Super-diversity: a new concept for migrant health? Public Health Forum 2015;23:124–5. 10.1515/pubhef-2015-0045
  86. Rechel B, Mladovsky P, Ingleby D, Mackenbach JP, McKee M. Migration and health in an increasingly diverse Europe. Lancet 2013;381:1235–45. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62086-823541058
  87. O’Donnell CA, Higgins M, Chauhan R, Mullen K. Asylum seekers’ expectations of and trust in general practice: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2008;58:e1–11. 10.3399/bjgp08X376104
  88. Ochieng B. Black African migrants: the barriers with accessing and utilising health promotion services in the UK. Eur J Public Health 2013;23:265–9. 10.1093/eurpub/cks06322683768
  89. Agudelo-Suárez AA, Gil-González D, Vives-Cases C, Love JG, Wimpenny P, Ronda-Pérez E. A metasynthesis of qualitative studies regarding opinions and perceptions about barriers and determinants of health services’ accessibility in economic migrants. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:461. 10.1186/1472-6963-12-46123245431
  90. Suphanchaimat R, Kantamaturapoj K, Putthasri W, Prakongsai P. Challenges in the provision of healthcare services for migrants: a systematic review through providers’ lens. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:390. 10.1186/s12913-015-1065-z26380969
  91. Robertshaw L, Dhesi S, Jones LL. Challenges and facilitators for health professionals providing primary healthcare for refugees and asylum seekers in high-income countries: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research. BMJ Open 2017;7:e015981. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015981
  92. Department of Health and Social Care. Midwifery 2020: Delivering Expectations. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2010.
  93. Balaam M-C, Akerjordet K, Lyberg A, Kaiser B, Schoening E, Fredriksen A-M, Ensel A, et al. A qualitative review of migrant women’s perceptions of their needs and experiences related to pregnancy and childbirth. J Adv Nurs 2013;69:1919–30. 10.1111/jan.1213923560897
  94. Benza S, Liamputtong P. Pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood: a meta-synthesis of the lived experiences of immigrant women. Midwifery 2014;30:575–84. 10.1016/j.midw.2014.03.00524690130
  95. Wikberg A, Bondas T. A patient perspective in research on intercultural caring in maternity care: a meta-ethnography. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2010;5:1. 10.3402/qhw.v5i1.4648
  96. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Pregnancy and Complex Social Factors: A Model for Service Provision for Pregnant Women with Complex Social Factors. London: NICE; 2010.
  97. Gagnon AJ, Zimbeck M, Zeitlin J, Alexander S, Blondel B, Buitendijk S, et al. Migration to western industrialised countries and perinatal health: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:934–46. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.02719664869
  98. NHS England. National Maternity Review. Better Births: Improving Outcomes of Maternity Services in England. London: NHS England; 2016.
  99. Phillimore J, Klaas F, Padilla B, Hernandez-Plaza S, Rodrigues V. Adaptation of Health Services to Diversity: An Overview of Approaches, Working Paper No. 15. Birmingham: Institute for Research into Superdiversity, University of Birmingham; 2016.
  100. Popay J, Williams G. Qualitative research and evidence-based healthcare. J R Soc Med 1998;91(Suppl. 35):32–7. 10.1177/014107689809135S08
  101. Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995;311:42–5. 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.427613329
  102. Glenton C, Colvin CJ, Carlsen B, Swartz A, Lewin S, Noyes J, Rashidian A. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;10:CD010414. 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2
  103. Hannes K, Booth A, Harris J, Noyes J. Celebrating methodological challenges and changes: reflecting on the emergence and importance of the role of qualitative evidence in Cochrane reviews. Syst Rev 2013;2:84. 10.1186/2046-4053-2-8424135194
  104. Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:181. 10.1186/1471-2288-12-18123185978
  105. Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009;9:59. 10.1186/1471-2288-9-5919671152
  106. Paterson B. ‘It Looks Great But How Do I Know it fits?’: An Introduction to Meta-synthesis Research. In Hannes H, Lockwood C, editors. Synthesizing Qualitative Research: Choosing the Right Approach. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell BMJ Books; 2012. pp. 1–21. 10.1002/9781119959847.ch1
  107. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:45. 10.1186/1471-2288-8-4518616818
  108. Boyatzis R. Transforming Qualitative Data: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 1998.
  109. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  110. Noyes J, Booth A, Flemming K, Garside R, Harden A, Lewin S, et al. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 3: methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings. J Clin Epidemiol 2018;97:49–58. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.02029247700
  111. Noyes J, Booth A, Hannes K, Harden A, Harris J, Lewin S, Lockwood C. Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 1. Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Methods Group; 2011. URL: https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/ (accessed 12 August 2019).
  112. Lewin S, Booth A, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas H, Rashidian A, Wainwright M, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series. Implement Sci 2018;13:2. 10.1186/s13012-017-0688-329384079
  113. Noyes J, Booth A, Cargo M, Flemming K, Garside R, Hannes K, et al. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 1: introduction. J Clin Epidemiol 2018;97:35–8. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.02529242094
  114. Harris JL, Booth A, Cargo M, Hannes K, Harden A, Flemming K, et al. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol 2018;97:39–48. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.02329248725
  115. Evans C, Higginbottom G, McGarry J, McCormick C, Eldridge J, Nkoyo V, Tweheyo R. The experiences of healthcare across the life course for women and girls who have undergone female genital mutilation: a qualitative systematic review. PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015030001. URL: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=30001 (accessed 12 August 2019).
  116. Evans C, Higginbottom G, McGarry J, McCormick C, Eldridge J, Nkoyo V, Tweheyo R. Exploring health professionals’ views on, and experiences of, providing care for women and girls who have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM): a qualitative systematic review. PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015030004. URL: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=30004 (accessed 12 August 2019).
  117. Evans C, Tweheyo R, McGarry J, Eldridge J, McCormick C, Nkoyo V, Higginbottom GMA. What are the experiences of seeking, receiving and providing FGM-related healthcare? Perspectives of health professionals and women/girls who have undergone FGM: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence. BMJ Open 2017;7:e018170. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018170
  118. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). About. Paris: OECD. URL: www.oecd.org/about/ (accessed 2 January 2018).
  119. World Bank. World Bank Country and Lending Groups. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. URL: http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups#High_income (accessed 2 January 2018).
  120. National Information Center on Health Services Research and Healthcare Technology (NICHSR). Health Services Research and Health Policy Grey Literature Project: Summary Report. Bethesda, MA: United States National Library of Medicine; 2006.
  121. Adams J, Hillier-Brown FC, Moore HJ, Lake AA, Araujo-Soares V, White M, Summerbell C. Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies. Syst Rev 2016;5:164. 10.1186/s13643-016-0337-y27686611
  122. Mahood Q, Van Eerd D, Irvin E. Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits. Res Synth Methods 2014;5:221–34. 10.1002/jrsm.110626052848
  123. Adams RJ, Smart P, Huff AS. Shades of grey: guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. Int J Manag Rev 2017;19:432–54. 10.1111/ijmr.12102
  124. Department of Health and Social Care. FGM Safeguarding and Risk Assessment: Quick Guide for Professionals. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2017.
  125. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Med 2009;6:e1000097. 10.1371/journal.pmed.100009719621072
  126. Carroll C, Booth A, Lloyd-Jones M. Should we exclude inadequately reported studies from qualitative systematic reviews? An evaluation of sensitivity analyses in two case study reviews. Qual Health Res 2012;22:1425–34. 10.1177/104973231245293722865107
  127. Cohen DJ, Crabtree BF. Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations. Ann Fam Med 2008;6:331–9. 10.1370/afm.81818626033
  128. Hannes K, Lockwood C, Pearson A. A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments’ ability to assess validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res 2010;20:1736–43. 10.1177/104973231037865620671302
  129. Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, Briggs M, Carr E, Andrews J, Barker K. ‘Trying to pin down jelly’ – exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:46. 10.1186/1471-2288-13-4623517438
  130. Hannes K, Pearson A. Obstacles to the Implementation of Evidence Based Practice in Belgium: A Worked Example of Meta-aggregation. In Hannes K, Lockwood C, editors. Synthesizing Qualitative Research: Choosing the Right Approach. London: BMJ Books, Wiley Blackwell; 2012. pp. 21–41. 10.1002/9781119959847.ch2
  131. Lewin S, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas H, Carlsen B, Colvin CJ, Gülmezoglu M, et al. Using qualitative evidence in decision making for health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual). PLOS Med 2015;12:e1001895. 10.1371/journal.pmed.100189526506244
  132. Dixon-Woods M, Sutton A, Shaw R, Miller T, Smith J, Young B, et al. Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. J Health Serv Res Policy 2007;12:42–7. 10.1258/13558190777949748617244397
  133. Dixon-Woods M, Booth A, Sutton AJ. Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports. Qual Res 2007;7:375–422. 10.1177/1468794107078517
  134. Dixon-Woods M, Shaw RL, Agarwal S, Smith JA. The problem of appraising qualitative research. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:223–5. 10.1136/qhc.13.3.22315175495
  135. Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Reading qualitative studies. Int J Qual Methods 2002;1:74–108. 10.1177/160940690200100107
  136. Munthe-Kaas H, Bohren MA, Glenton C, Lewin S, Noyes J, Tunçalp Ö, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings – paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations. Implement Sci 2018;13:9. 10.1186/s13012-017-0690-929384078
  137. Pearson A, Robertson-Malt S, Rittenmeyer L. Synthesizing Qualitative Evidence. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Joanna Briggs Institute; 2011.
  138. Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI QARI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Interpretive and Critical Research. Adelaide, SA: Joanna Briggs Institute. URL: https://joannabriggs.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/JBI_Critical_Appraisal-Checklist_for_Qualitative_Research2017_0.pdf (accessed 12 August 2019).
  139. Evans C, Tweheyo R, McGarry J, Eldridge J, Albert J, Nkoyo V, Higginbottom G. Seeking culturally safe care: a qualitative systematic review of the healthcare experiences of women and girls who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting. BMJ Open 2019;9:e027452. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027452
  140. Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, Engel M, Fretheim A, Volmink J. Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:21. 10.1186/1471-2288-8-2118416812
  141. Higginbottom GM, Morgan M, Alexandre M, Chiu Y, Forgeron J, Kocay D, Barolia R. Immigrant women’s experiences of maternity-care services in Canada: a systematic review using a narrative synthesis. Syst Rev 2015;4:13. 10.1186/2046-4053-4-13
  142. Higginbottom GM, Hadziabdic E, Yohani S, Paton P. Immigrant women’s experience of maternity services in Canada: a meta-ethnography. Midwifery 2014;30:544–59. 10.1016/j.midw.2013.06.00423948185
  143. Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res 1998;8:341–51. 10.1177/10497323980080030510558335
  144. Noyes J, Popay J. Directly observed therapy and tuberculosis: how can a systematic review of qualitative research contribute to improving services? A qualitative meta-synthesis. J Adv Nurs 2007;57:227–43. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04092.x17233644
  145. Evans C, Tweheyo R, McGarry J, Eldridge J, Albert J, Nkoyo V, Higginbottom G. Crossing cultural divides: a qualitative systematic review of factors influencing the provision of healthcare related to female genital mutilation from the perspective of health professionals. PLOS ONE 2019;14:e0211829 10.1371/journal.pone.021182930830904
  146. Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI QARI Data Extraction Form for Interpretive and Critical Research. Adelaide, SA: Joanna Briggs Institute. URL: https://wiki.joannabriggs.org/display/MANUAL/Appendix+2.3%3A+JBI+Qualitative+data+extraction+tool (accessed 12 August 2019).
  147. Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Finding the findings in qualitative studies. J Nurs Scholarsh 2002;34:213–19. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00213.x12237982
  148. Booth A, Carroll C, Ilott I, Low LL, Cooper K. Desperately seeking dissonance: identifying the disconfirming case in qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res 2013;23:126–41. 10.1177/104973231246629523166156
  149. Noyes J, Booth A, Lewin S, Carlsen B, Glenton C, Colvin CJ, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings–paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data. Implement Sci 2018;13:4. 10.1186/s13012-017-0693-629384080
  150. Lewin S, Bohren M, Rashidian A, Munthe-Kaas H, Glenton C, Colvin CJ, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings – paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a summary of qualitative findings table. Implement Sci 2018;13:10. 10.1186/s13012-017-0689-229384082
  151. Glenton C, Carlsen B, Lewin S, Munthe-Kaas H, Colvin CJ, Tunçalp Ö, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings – paper 5: how to assess adequacy of data. Implement Sci 2018;13:14. 10.1186/s13012-017-0692-729384077
  152. Colvin CJ, Garside R, Wainwright M, Munthe-Kaas H, Glenton C, Bohren MA, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings – paper 4: how to assess coherence. Implement Sci 2018;13:13. 10.1186/s13012-017-0691-829384081
  153. Booth A, Lewin S, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas H, Toews I, Noyes J, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings – paper 7: understanding the potential impacts of dissemination bias. Implement Sci 2018;13:12. 10.1186/s13012-017-0694-529384076
  154. Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Vist G, Liberati A, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ 2008;10:1170–3. 10.1136/bmj.39504.506319.80
  155. Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic Inquiry. California, CA: Sage Publications Ltd; 1985. 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
  156. Finlay L, Gough B. Reflexivity: A Practical Guide for Researchers in Health and Social Sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd; 2003. 10.1002/9780470776094
  157. Newton BJ, Rothlingova Z, Gutteridge R, LeMarchand K, Raphael JH. No room for reflexivity? Critical reflections following a systematic review of qualitative research. J Health Psychol 2012;17:866–85. 10.1177/135910531142761522147063
  158. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 2000;320:50–2. 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.5010617534
  159. Khaja K. Female Circumcision: Life Histories of Somali Women. PhD thesis. Salt Lake City, UT: The University of Utah; 2004.
  160. Khaja K, Lay K, Boys S. Female circumcision: toward an inclusive practice of care. Health Care Women Int 2010;31:686–99. 10.1080/07399332.2010.49031320623393
  161. Thierfelder C. Female Genital Mutilation and the Swiss Health Care System. PhD thesis. Basel: University of Basel; 2003. URL: https://edoc.unibas.ch/139/ (accessed 12 July 2019).
  162. Thierfelder C, Tanner M, Bodiang CM. Female genital mutilation in the context of migration: experience of African women with the Swiss health care system. Eur J Public Health 2005;15:86–90. 10.1093/eurpub/cki12015788809
  163. Abdi R. Carving culture: creating identity through female genital cutting. Durham Anthropol J 2012;18:115–53.
  164. Behrendt A. Listening to African Voices: Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Among Immigrants in Hamburg: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice. Hamburg: Plan; 2011. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.400.67&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 12 July 2019).
  165. Hussen MA. Services for Women with Female Genital Mutilation in Christchurch: Perspectives of Women and their Health Providers. MSc thesis. Christchurch: University of Canterbury; 2014. URL: https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/10437 (accessed 12 July 2019).
  166. Shaw E. Female circumcision: perceptions of clients and caregivers. J Am Coll Health 1985;33:193–7. 10.1080/07448481.1985.99396044008761
  167. Vangen S, Johansen RE, Sundby J, Traeen B, Stray-Pedersen B. Qualitative study of perinatal care experiences among Somali women and local health care professionals in Norway. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;112:29–35. 10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00313-014687735
  168. Vaughan C, White N, Keogh L, Tobin J, Ha B, Ibrahim M, Bayly C. Listening to North Yarra Communities About Female Genital Cutting. Melbourne VIC: The University of Melbourne; 2014. URL: https://socialequity.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/1980902/Listening-to-North-Yarra-Communities-WEB.pdf (accessed 12 July 2019).
  169. Vaughan C, White N, Keogh L, Tobin J, Murdolo A, Quiazon R, Bayly C. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in Regional Victoria. Research to Practice. Report no. 1470-0328. Melbourne VIC: The University of Melbourne; 2014. URL: www.netfa.com.au/downloads/FGMC-in-Regional-Victoria-Report-WEB.pdf (accessed 12 July 2019).
  170. Asefaw F. [Female Genital Mutilation: A Field Study with Special Consideration of the Background as well as the Health and Psychosexual Consquences for those Affected and their Partners in Eritrea and in Germany.] PhD thesis. Berlin: Humboldt University of Berlin; 2007. URL: https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/13487?show=full (accessed 12 July 2019).
  171. Maier C. [Echoes of Silence: Voices of Concern for Genital Mutilation in African Immigrant Women in Vienna: An Ethnological Study.] PhD thesis. Vienna: University of Vienna; 2003.
  172. Ballesteros Meseguer C, Almansa Martinez P, Pastor Bravo MdM, Jimenez Ruiz I. [The voice of women subjected to female genital mutilation in the region of Murcia, Spain.] Gac Sanit 2014;28:287–91. 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.02.00624674834
  173. Bravo Pastor del Mar M. [Women Subjected to Female Genital Mutilation: Knowledge for the Nursing Discipline.] PhD thesis. Murcia: University of Murcia; 2014.
  174. Baldeh F. Obstetric Care in Scotland: The Experience of Women who have Undergone Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). MSc thesis. Edinburgh: Queen Margaret University; 2013. URL: http://etheses.qmu.ac.uk/1469 (accessed 12 July 2019).
  175. Betts V. Transnational Gender, Sexuality and Identity Construction: Ambivalent Subjectivities of Somali Refugee Women in the GTA. MA thesis. Guelph, ON: University of Guelph; 2011.
  176. Gali MA. Female Circumcision: A Transcultural Study of Attitudes, Identity and Reproductive Health of East African Immigrants. PhD thesis. Berkeley, CA: The Wright Institute, University of Berkeley; 1997. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=5531937 (accessed 12 July 2019).
  177. Glazer E. Embodiment, Pain and Circumcision in Somali-Canadian Women. MSc thesis. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto; 2012.
  178. Shermarke MAA. Understanding the Canadian Community Context of Female Circumcision. MSc thesis. Montreal, QC: McGill University; 1996.
  179. Jones A. Working Psychologically with Female Genital Mutilation: An Exploration of the Views and Experiences of Women who have Experienced FGM and of Clinical Psychologists. Doctorate of Clinical Psychology. London: University of East London; 2010. URL: https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/86251 (accessed 12 July 2019).
  180. Maternity Action. Women’s Voices on Health: Addressing Barriers to Accessing Primary Care. London: Women’s Health and Equality Consortium; 2014.
  181. O’Brien O, Baldeh F, Hassan J, Baillie M. My Voice: Participatory Action Research Project with Men, Women and Young People on Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) in Scotland: (Phase 2). Edinburgh: Waverly Care, Queen Margaret University; 2017. URL: www.waverleycare.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/MyVoice-2017_web-Copy.pdf (accessed 12 July 2019).
  182. O’Brien O, Baldeh F, Sivapatham S, Brown E, O’May F. Participatory Action Research Project with Men, Women and Young People on Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) in Scotland: (Phase 1). Edinburgh: Waverly Care, Queen Margaret University; 2016. URL: www.fgmaware.org/uploads/4/6/7/9/46792493/my_voice_report_2016.pdf (accessed 12 July 2019).
  183. Palfreyman A, Brown E, Nam S. Understanding Female Genital Mutilation in Birmingham: Findings from a PEER Study. Options Consultancy Services and Birmingham & Solihull Women’s Aid; 2011. URL: https://eige.europa.eu/gender-based-violence/methods-and-tools/united-kingdom/understanding-female-genital-mutilation-birmingham-findings-peer-study (accessed 12 July 2019).
  184. Ahmed M. Attitudes Towards FGM Among Somali Women Living in the UK. In Momoh C, editor. Female Genital Mutilation. London: Radcliffe; 2005. pp. 95–117.
  185. Abdullahi A, Copping J, Kessel A, Luck M, Bonell C. Cervical screening: perceptions and barriers to uptake among Somali women in Camden. Public Health 2009;123:680–5. 10.1016/j.puhe.2009.09.01119863980
  186. Ahlberg BM, Krantz I, Lindmark G, Waroame M. ‘It’s only a tradition’: making sense of eradication interventions and the persistence of female ‘circumcision’ within a Swedish context. Crit Soc Policy 2004;24:50–78. 10.1177/0261018304241003
  187. Ameresekere M, Borg R, Frederick J, Vragovic O, Saia K, Raj A. Somali immigrant women’s perceptions of cesarean delivery and patient-provider communication surrounding female circumcision and childbirth in the USA. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2011;115:227–30. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.07.019
  188. Beine K, Fullerton J, Palinkas L, Anders B. Conceptions of prenatal care among Somali women in San Diego. J Nurse Midwifery 1995;40:376–81. 10.1016/0091-2182(95)00024-E7674057
  189. Berggren V, Bergström S, Edberg AK. Being different and vulnerable: experiences of immigrant African women who have been circumcised and sought maternity care in Sweden. J Transcult Nurs 2006;17:50–7. 10.1177/104365960528198116410436
  190. Carroll J, Epstein R, Fiscella K, Gipson T, Volpe E, Jean-Pierre P. Caring for Somali women: implications for clinician-patient communication. Patient Educ Couns 2007;66:337–45. 10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.00817337152
  191. Chalmers B, Omer-Hashi K. What Somali women say about giving birth in Canada. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2002;20:267–82. 10.1080/0264683021000033183
  192. Degni F, Suominen SB, El Ansari W, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Essen B. Reproductive and maternity health care services in Finland: perceptions and experiences of Somali-born immigrant women. Ethn Health 2014;19:348–66. 10.1080/13557858.2013.79756723679186
  193. d’Entremont M, Smythe L, McAra-Couper J. The sounds of silence – a hermeneutic interpretation of childbirth post excision. Health Care Women Int 2014;35:300–19. 10.1080/07399332.2013.83824524180489
  194. Essén B, Johnsdotter S, Hovelius B, Gudmundsson S, Sjöberg NO, Friedman J, Ostergren PO. Qualitative study of pregnancy and childbirth experiences in Somalian women resident in Sweden. BJOG 2000;107:1507–12. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11676.x11192108
  195. Ghebre RG, Sewali B, Osman S, Adawe A, Nguyen HT, Okuyemi KS, Joseph A. Cervical cancer: barriers to screening in the Somali community in Minnesota. J Immigr Minor Health 2015;17:722–8. 10.1007/s10903-014-0080-125073605
  196. Glover J, Liebling H, Barrett H, Goodman S. The psychological and social impact of female genital mutilation: a holistic conceptual framework. J Int Stud 2017;10:219–38. 10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-2/16
  197. Guerin PB, Allotey P, Hussein Elmi F, Baho S. Advocacy as a means to an end: assisting refugee women to take control of their reproductive health needs. Women Health 2006;43:7–25. 10.1300/J013v43n04_0217135086
  198. Hill N, Hunt E, Hyrkas K. Somali immigrant women’s health care experiences and beliefs regarding pregnancy and birth in the United States. J Transcult Nurs 2012;23:72–81. 10.1177/104365961142382822052095
  199. Johansen RE. Undoing female genital cutting: perceptions and experiences of infibulation, defibulation and virginity among Somali and Sudanese migrants in Norway. Cult Health Sex 2017;19:528–42. 10.1080/13691058.2016.123983827796158
  200. Lundberg PC, Gerezgiher A. Experiences from pregnancy and childbirth related to female genital mutilation among Eritrean immigrant women in Sweden. Midwifery 2008;24:214–25. 10.1016/j.midw.2006.10.00317316934
  201. McNeely S, Christie-de Jong F. Somali refugees’ perspectives regarding FGM/C in the US. Int J Migr Health Soc Care 2016;12:157–69. 10.1108/IJMHSC-09-2015-0033
  202. Moxey JM, Jones LL. A qualitative study exploring how Somali women exposed to female genital mutilation experience and perceive antenatal and intrapartum care in England. BMJ Open 2016;6:e009846. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009846
  203. Murray L, Windsor C, Parker E, Tewfik O. The experiences of African women giving birth in Brisbane, Australia. Health Care Women Int 2010;31:458–72. 10.1080/0739933090354892820390666
  204. Recchia N, McGarry J. ‘Don’t judge me’: narratives of living with FGM. Int J Hum Rights Healthc 2017;10:4–13. 10.1108/IJHRH-10-2016-0016
  205. Safari F. A qualitative study of women’s lived experience after deinfibulation in the UK. Midwifery 2013;29:154–8. 10.1016/j.midw.2011.12.00523084491
  206. Salad J, Verdonk P, de Boer F, Abma TA. ‘A Somali girl is Muslim and does not have premarital sex – is vaccination really necessary?’ A qualitative study into the perceptions of Somali women in the Netherlands about the prevention of cervical cancer. Int J Equity Health 2015;14:1–13. 10.1186/s12939-015-0198-325566790
  207. Upvall MJ, Mohammed K, Dodge PD. Perspectives of Somali Bantu refugee women living with circumcision in the United States: a focus group approach. Int J Nurs Stud 2009;46:360–8. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.04.00918550061
  208. Vloeberghs E, van der Kwaak A, Knipscheer J, van den Muijsenbergh M. Coping and chronic psychosocial consequences of female genital mutilation in the Netherlands. Ethn Health 2012;17:677–95. 10.1080/13557858.2013.77114823534507
  209. Wiklund H, Aden AS, Högberg U, Wikman M, Dahlgren L. Somalis giving birth in Sweden: a challenge to culture and gender specific values and behaviours. Midwifery 2000;16:105–15. 10.1054/midw.1999.019711151546
  210. Johansen RE. Care for infibulated women giving birth in Norway: an anthropological analysis of health workers’ management of a medically and culturally unfamiliar issue. Med Anthropol Q 2006;20:516–44. 10.1525/maq.2006.20.4.51617225657
  211. Essén B, Binder P, Johnsdotter S. An anthropological analysis of the perspectives of Somali women in the West and their obstetric care providers on caesarean birth. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2011;32:10–18. 10.3109/0167482X.2010.54796621291343
  212. Higginbottom GM, Safipour J, Yohani S, O’Brien B, Mumtaz Z, Paton P. An ethnographic study of communication challenges in maternity care for immigrant women in rural Alberta. Midwifery 2015;31:297–304. 10.1016/j.midw.2014.09.00925451546
  213. Bulman K, McCourt C. Report on Somali Womens’ Experiences of Maternity Services. London: Centre for Midwifery Practice, Wolfson Institute of Health Sciences, Thames Valley University and Hammersmith Hospitals National Health Service Trust; 1997.
  214. Ogunsiji O. Female genital mutilation (FGM): Australian midwives’ knowledge and attitudes. Health Care Women Int 2015;36:1179–93. 10.1080/07399332.2014.99252125558808
  215. Ogunsiji O. Australian midwives’ perspectives on managing obstetric care of women living with female genital circumcision/mutilation. Health Care Women Int 2016;37:1156–69. 10.1080/07399332.2016.121546227451008
  216. Bergqvist H, Svensson J. [Midwives Experiences of Encounters wth Young Women who come from Areas Where the Practice of Genital Mutilation is Common.] MSc thesis. Skövde: University of Skövde; 2016.
  217. Bibi N, Rahimian N. [Nurses’ Experience and Knowledge about Female Genital Mutilation.] MSc thesis. Stockholm: Sophiahemmet University; 2013. URL: http://shh.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A693139&dswid=-9636 (accessed 12 July 2019).
  218. Brodin E, Mårtensson N. [District Nurses’ Knowledge and Experience of Female Genital Mutilation] Distriktssköterskors Kunskap Och Erfarenhet Av Kvinnlig Könsstympning.] MSc thesis. Örebro: University of Örebro; 2016.
  219. Gertsson M, Serpan H. [Meeting with the Unthinkable: Value Conflicts in Meetings with Women Vulnerable to Female Genital Mutilation.] MSc thesis. Kalmar: University of Kalmar; 2009. URL: www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A290536&dswid=-170 (accessed 12 July 2019).
  220. Holm L, Kammensjö H. [School Nurses’ Experiences of Female Genital Mutilation Among Girls.] MSc thesis. Skövde: University of Skövde; 2012.
  221. León-Larios F, Casado-Mejía R. [Influence of gender on knowledge, perception and approach to harmful traditional practices: female genital mutilation.] Evidentia 2012;9:1–7.
  222. Burchill J, Pevalin DJ. Demonstrating cultural competence within health-visiting practice: working with refugee and asylum-seeking families. Divers Equal Health Care 2014;11:151–9. 10.21767/2049-5471.100010
  223. Byrskog U, Olsson P, Essén B, Allvin MK. Being a bridge: Swedish antenatal care midwives’ encounters with Somali-born women and questions of violence; a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:1. 10.1186/s12884-015-0429-z25591791
  224. Johansen RE. Virility, pleasure and female genital mutilation/cutting. A qualitative study of perceptions and experiences of medicalized defibulation among Somali and Sudanese migrants in Norway. Reprod Health 2017;14:25. 10.1186/s12978-017-0287-428187741
  225. Lazar JN, Johnson-Agbakwu CE, Davis OI, Shipp MP. Providers’ perceptions of challenges in obstetrical care for somali women. Obstet Gynecol Int 2013;2013:149640. 10.1155/2013/14964024223041
  226. Leval A, Widmark C, Tishelman C, Maina Ahlberg B. The encounters that rupture the myth: contradictions in midwives’ descriptions and explanations of circumcised women immigrants’ sexuality. Health Care Women Int 2004;25:743–60. 10.1080/0739933049047559315371079
  227. Jatau M. Living Between Two Cultures: A Reproductive Health Journey of African Refugee Women. PhD thesis. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University; 2011. URL: https://repository.asu.edu/items/14386 (accessed 12 July 2019).
  228. Moore K. Female Genital Mutilation and Cultural Competency: Moving Towards Improved Management of Obstetric Care. MSc thesis. Edinburgh: Queen Margaret University; 2012. URL: https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/7180 (accessed 12 July 2019).
  229. Rubin EA. When Cultures Collide: An Exploration of Cultural Competence and Cross-Cultural Communication between American Medical Providers and Immigrant Women who have been Circumcised. PhD thesis. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts; 2000.
  230. Van den Muijsenbergh M, Van Weel-Baumgarten E, Burns N, O’Connell C, Mair F, Spiegel W. Communication in cross-cultural consultations in primary care in Europe: the case for improvement. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2014;15:122–33. 10.1017/S146342361300015723601205
  231. Leininger M, MacFarlane M. Transcultural Nursing: Concepts, Theories, Research and Practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2002.
  232. Browne AJ, Varcoe C, Smye V, Reimer-Kirkham S, Lynam MJ, Wong S. Cultural safety and the challenges of translating critically oriented knowledge in practice. Nurs Philos 2009;10:167–79. 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2009.00406.x19527438
  233. Ramsden I. Cultural Safety and Nursing Education in Aotearoa and Te Waipounamu. PhD thesis. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington; 2002. URL: https://croakey.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/RAMSDEN-I-Cultural-Safety_Full.pdf (accessed 12 July 2019).
  234. Phiri J, Dietsch E, Bonner A. Cultural safety and its importance for Australian midwifery practice. Collegian 2010;17:105–11. 10.1016/j.colegn.2009.11.00121046963
  235. Duke J, Connor M, McEldowney R. Becoming a culturally competent health practitioner in the delivery of culturally safe care. J Cult Divers 2009;16:40–9.
  236. Gerlach AJ. A critical reflection on the concept of cultural safety. Can J Occup Ther 2012;79:151–8. 10.2182/cjot.2012.79.3.422822692
  237. Cooney C. A comparative analysis of transcultural nursing and cultural safety. Nurs Prax N Z 1994;9:6–12.8003896
  238. Brascoupé S, Waters C. Cultural safety: exploring the applicability of the concept of cultural safety to aboriginal health and community wellness. J Aborig Health 2009;5:6–41.
  239. Wepa D. Cultural Safety in Aotearoa New Zealand. North Shore City: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2005.
  240. Johnstone MJ, Kanitsaki O. An exploration of the notion and nature of the construct of cultural safety and its applicability to the Australian health care context. J Transcult Nurs 2007;18:247–56. 10.1177/104365960730130417607062
  241. Vissandjée B, Denetto S, Migliardi P, Proctor J. Female genital cutting (FGC) and the ethics of care: community engagement and cultural sensitivity at the interface of migration experiences. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2014;14:13. 10.1186/1472-698X-14-1324758156
  242. Narruhn R, Schellenberg IR. Caring ethics and a Somali reproductive dilemma. Nurs Ethics 2013;20:366–81. 10.1177/096973301245336323275457
  243. WHO. WHO Recommendations: Intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
  244. White Ribbon Alliance. Respectful Maternity Care Charter: The Universal Rights of Childbearing Women. Washington DC, WA: White Ribbon Alliance; 2011.
  245. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. PLOS Med 2015;12:e1001847. 10.1371/journal.pmed.100184726126110
  246. Denny E. Respectful maternity care needs to be the standard for all women worldwide (mini-commentary). Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2017;125:943. 10.1111/1471-0528.15055
  247. Shakibazadeh E, Namadian M, Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Rashidian A, Nogueira Pileggi V, et al. Respectful care during childbirth in health facilities globally: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2018;125:932–42. 10.1111/1471-0528.15015
  248. Sripad P, Ozawa S, Merritt MW, Jennings L, Kerrigan D, Ndwiga C, et al. Exploring meaning and types of trust in maternity care in peri-urban Kenya: a qualitative cross-perspective analysis. Qual Health Res 2018;28:305–20. 10.1177/104973231772358528821220
  249. Bischoff A, Bovier PA, Rrustemi I, Gariazzo F, Eytan A, Loutan L. Language barriers between nurses and asylum seekers: their impact on symptom reporting and referral. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:503–12. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00376-312791492
  250. Gilson L. Trust and the development of health care as a social institution. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:1453–68. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00142-912614697
  251. Murray B, McCrone S. An integrative review of promoting trust in the patient-primary care provider relationship. J Adv Nurs 2015;71:3–23. 10.1111/jan.1250225113235
  252. Greenhalgh T, Voisey C, Robb N. Interpreted consultations as ‘business as usual’? An analysis of organisational routines in general practices. Sociol Health Illn 2007;29:931–54. 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01047.x17986023
  253. Flores G. The impact of medical interpreter services on the quality of health care: a systematic review. Med Care Res Rev 2005;62:255–99. 10.1177/107755870527541615894705
  254. Zendedel R, Schouten BC, van Weert JCM, van den Putte B. Informal interpreting in general practice: are interpreters’ roles related to perceived control, trust and satisfaction? Patient Educ Couns 2018;101:1058–65. 10.1016/j.pec.2018.01.01229402573
  255. Karliner LS, Jacobs EA, Chen AH, Mutha S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res 2007;42:727–54. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00629.x17362215
  256. Martin M, Phelan M. Interpreters and cultural mediators: different but complementary roles. Migr Health 2010;6:1–8.
  257. Akhavan S, Edge D. Foreign-born women’s experiences of community-based doulas in Sweden – a qualitative study. Health Care Women Int 2012;33:833–48. 10.1080/07399332.2011.64610722891742
  258. Akhavan S, Lundgren I. Midwives’ experiences of doula support for immigrant women in Sweden – a qualitative study. Midwifery 2012;28:80–5. 10.1016/j.midw.2010.11.00421236529
  259. Dundek LH. Establishment of a Somali doula program at a large metropolitan hospital. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2006;20:128–37. 10.1097/00005237-200604000-0000616714912
  260. Shelp A. Women helping women: the Somali doula initiative. Int J Childbirth Educ 2004;19:4–7.
  261. Hall MA, Dugan E, Zheng B, Mishra AK. Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? Milbank Q 2001;79:613–39. 10.1111/1468-0009.0022311789119
  262. Moore L, Britten N, Lydahl D, Naldemirci Ö, Elam M, Wolf A. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of person-centred care in different healthcare contexts. Scand J Caring Sci 2017;31:662–73. 10.1111/scs.1237627859459
  263. Gravel F, Legare F, Graham I. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision making in clincial practice: a systematic review of health professional’s perceptions. Implement Sci 2006;1:16. 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1616899124
  264. Mainous AG, Baker R, Love MM, Gray DP, Gill JM. Continuity of care and trust in one’s physician: evidence from primary care in the United States and the United Kingdom. Fam Med 2001;33:22–7.11199905
  265. Saha S, Beach MC, Cooper LA. Patient centeredness, cultural competence and healthcare quality. J Natl Med Assoc 2008;100:1275–85. 10.1016/S0027-9684(15)31505-419024223
  266. Johansen RE. Pain as a counterpoint to culture: toward an analysis of pain associated with infibulation among Somali immigrants in Norway. Med Anthropol Q 2002;16:312–40. 10.1525/maq.2002.16.3.31212227259
  267. James S. Women’s experiences of symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after traumatic childbirth: a review and critical appraisal. Arch Womens Ment Health 2015;18:761–71. 10.1007/s00737-015-0560-x26264506
  268. Raja S, Hasnain M, Hoersch M, Gove-Yin S, Rajagopalan C. Trauma informed care in medicine: current knowledge and future research directions. Fam Community Health 2015;38:216–26. 10.1097/FCH.000000000000007126017000
  269. Abdulcadir J, Bianchi Demicheli F, Willame A, Recordon N, Petignat P. Posttraumatic stress disorder relapse and clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:371–6. 10.1097/AOG.000000000000183528079769
  270. Abayomi O, Chibuzor MT, Okusanya BO, Esu E, Odey E, Meremikwu MM. Supportive psychotherapy or client education alongside surgical procedures to correct complications of female genital mutilation: a systematic review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136(Suppl. 1):51–5. 10.1002/ijgo.1204228164290
  271. Adelufosi A, Edet B, Arikpo D, Aquaisua E, Meremikwu MM. Cognitive behavioral therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, or anxiety disorders in women and girls living with female genital mutilation: a systematic review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136(Suppl. 1):56–9. 10.1002/ijgo.1204328164288
  272. Jones A, Byrne A. Working psychologically with female genital mutilation: an exploration of the views and experiences of women who have experienced FGM and of clinical psychologists. Clin Psychol Forum 2013;246:26–30.
  273. Albert J. Female genital mutilation: the role of the midwife. Midirs 2016;26:159–65.
  274. Johnsdotter S. The impact of migration on attitudes to female genital cutting and experiences of sexual dysfunction among migrant women with FGC. Curr Sex Health Rep 2018;10:18–24. 10.1007/s11930-018-0139-429541003
  275. O’Neill S, Dubourg D, Florquin S, Bos M, Zewolde S, Richard F. ‘Men have a Role to Play but they don’t Play it’: A Mixed Methods Study Exploring Men’s Involvement in Female Genital Mutilation in Belgium, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom: Full Report. Brussels: Men Speak Out Project; 2017.
  276. Creighton SM, Dear J, de Campos C, Williams L, Hodes D. Multidisciplinary approach to the management of children with female genital mutilation (FGM) or suspected FGM: service description and case series. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010311. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010311
  277. Mbanya VN, Gele AA, Diaz E, Kumar B. Health care seeking patterns for female genital mutilation/cutting among young Somalis in Norway. BMC Public Health 2018;18:517. 10.1186/s12889-018-5440-729669570
  278. Rone M, Carter J, Wright C, Bayly J, Wright A. Female genital mutilation (FGM): a prospective audit of the management of women with FGM in antenatal clinic. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2015;122:40.
  279. WHO. Care of Girls and Women Living with Female Genital Mutilation: A Clinical Handbook. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
  280. Bello S, Ogugbue M, Chibuzor M, Okomo U, Meremikwu MM. Counselling for deinfibulation among women with type III female genital mutilation: a systematic review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136(Suppl. 1):47–50. 10.1002/ijgo.12044
  281. Zurynski Y, Sureshkumar P, Phu A, Elliott E. Female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2015;15:32. 10.1186/s12914-015-0070-y26652275
  282. Evans C, Nalubega S, McLuskey J, Darlington N, Croston M, Bath-Hextall F. The views and experiences of nurses and midwives in the provision and management of provider-initiated HIV testing and counseling: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2016;13:130–286. 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2345
  283. WHO. Service Delivery Approaches to HIV Testing and Counselling (HTC): A Strategic Programme Framework. Geneva: WHO; 2012.
  284. Hamberger LK, Rhodes K, Brown J. Screening and intervention for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: creating sustainable system-level programs. J Womens Health 2015;24:86–91. 10.1089/jwh.2014.4861
  285. O’Doherty L, Hegarty K, Ramsay J, Davidson LL, Feder G, Taft A. Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;7:CD007007. 10.1002/14651858.CD007007.pub3
  286. Stokes T, Shaw EJ, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Imamura M, Kanguru L, Hussein J. Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Implement Sci 2016;11:144. 10.1186/s13012-016-0508-127770807
  287. Fischer F, Lange K, Klose K, Greiner W, Kraemer A. Barriers and strategies in guideline implementation – a scoping review. Healthcare 2016;4:E36. 10.3390/healthcare403003627417624
  288. Imamura M, Kanguru L, Penfold S, Stokes T, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Shaw B, Hussein J. A systematic review of implementation strategies to deliver guidelines on obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136:19–28. 10.1002/ijgo.1200528099701
  289. The Supporting the Use of Research Evidence (SURE) Collaboration. SURE Guides for Preparing and Using Evidence-Based Policy Briefs, No.5: Identifying and Addressing Barriers to Implementing Policy Options. URL: www.who.int/evidence/sure/guides (accessed 3 May 2018).
  290. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci 2015;10:53. 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-025895742
  291. Abdulcadir J, Rodriguez MI, Say L. A systematic review of the evidence on clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation/cutting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;129:93–7. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.00825638712
  292. De Schrijver L, Leye E, Merckx M. A multidisciplinary approach to clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation: the crucial role of counselling. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2016;21:269–75. 10.3109/13625187.2016.117206327111038
  293. Dominguez Garcia L, Dominguez L, Hopkins K, Mutalak O, Harish S, Alcayde D, et al. Meeting the sexual health needs of women with female genital mutilation: an integrated model of care. Int J STD AIDS 2013;24:2.
  294. Low-Beer N, Dominguez-Garcia L, Alcayde D, Jones R, Ayida G. Accessible integrated care to meet the complex needs of women with female genital mutilation (FGM). Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2013;120:314.
  295. Turkmani S, Homer C, Varol N, Dawson A. A survey of Australian midwives’ knowledge, experience, and training needs in relation to female genital mutilation. Women Birth 2018;31:25–30. 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.06.00928687260
  296. Relph S, Inamdar R, Singh H, Yoong W. Female genital mutilation/cutting: knowledge, attitude and training of health professionals in inner city London. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013;168:195–8. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.01.00423434403
  297. Leye E, Ysebaert I, Deblonde J, Claeys P, Vermeulen G, Jacquemyn Y, Temmerman M. Female genital mutilation: knowledge, attitudes and practices of Flemish gynaecologists. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2008;13:182–90. 10.1080/1362518070178095718465481
  298. Kai J, Beavan J, Faull C, Dodson L, Gill P, Beighton A. Professional uncertainty and disempowerment responding to ethnic diversity in health care: a qualitative study. PLOS Med 2007;4:e323. 10.1371/journal.pmed.004032318001148
  299. Oringanje CM, Okoro A, Nwankwo ON, Meremikwu MM. Providing information about the consequences of female genital mutilation to healthcare providers caring for women and girls living with female genital mutilation: a systematic review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136(Suppl. 1):65–71. 10.1002/ijgo.1205728164292
  300. Jacoby SD, Smith A. Increasing certified nurse-midwives’ confidence in managing the obstetric care of women with female genital mutilation/cutting. J Midwifery Womens Health 2013;58:451–6. 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00262.x23931662
  301. Balfour J, Abdulcadir J, Say L, Hindin MJ. Interventions for healthcare providers to improve treatment and prevention of female genital mutilation: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:409. 10.1186/s12913-016-1674-127542732
  302. Elliott C, Creighton SM, Barker MJ, Liao LM. A brief interactive training for health care professionals working with people affected by female genital mutilation: initial pilot evaluation with psychosexual therapists. Sex Relation Ther 2016;31:70–82. 10.1080/14681994.2015.1093614
  303. Jackson C. Counselling professionals’ awareness and understanding of female genital mutilation/cutting: training needs for working therapeutically with survivors. Couns Psychother Res 2017;17:309–19. 10.1002/capr.1213629151816
  304. Leye E. Midwifery training needs identified when caring for women with female genital mutilation. Evid Based Nurs 2016;19:7. 10.1136/eb-2015-10208026314306
  305. Roberts TL, Poblete X. G55(P) Female genital mutilation: a survey of awareness, training and current practice. Arch Dis Child 2015;100:A23. 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308599.54
  306. Royal College of Midwives. Female Genital Mutilation: Midwives’ Views and Knowledge. London: Royal College of Midwives; 2012.
  307. Gabrasadig R, Asamoah F, Wilson N. Female genital mutilation: knowledge, training and experience of healthcare professionals at a London Hospital. Arch Dis Child 2015;100:A23–4. 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308599.55
  308. Nash E, Ranka P. Female genital mutilation: knowledge, confidence and approach to care in clinical practice of midwives and nurses in the UK. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2015;131:E110.
  309. Abdulcadir J, Say L, Pallitto C. What do we know about assessing healthcare students and professionals’ knowledge, attitude and practice regarding female genital mutilation? A systematic review. Reprod Health 2017;14:64. 10.1186/s12978-017-0318-128532515
  310. Esu E, Okoye I, Arikpo I, Ejemot-Nwadiaro R, Meremikwu MM. Providing information to improve body image and care seeking behavior of women and girls living with female genital mutilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136(Suppl. 1):72–8. 10.1002/ijgo.1205828164289
  311. Waigwa S, Doos L, Bradbury-Jones C, Taylor J. Effectiveness of health education as an intervention designed to prevent female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a systematic review. Reprod Health 2018;15:62. 10.1186/s12978-018-0503-x29650025
  312. Abdulcadir J, McLaren S, Boulvain M, Irion O. Health education and clinical care of immigrant women with female genital mutilation/cutting who request postpartum reinfibulation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016;135:69–72. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.03.02727350225
  313. Abdulcadir O, Catania L, Caselli A. Female genital mutilation (FGM): a comparison between the male and the female view. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012;119:S262–3. 10.1016/S0020-7292(12)60436-6
  314. Local Government Association. Community Engagement on Female Genital Mutilation. London: Local Government Association; 2016.
  315. Finke E. Genital mutilation as an expression of power structures: ending FGM through education, empowerment of women and removal of taboos. Afr J Reprod Health 2006;10:13–17. 10.2307/30032454
  316. Khalifa S, Brown E. Communities Tackling FGM in the UK: Best Practice Guide. London: Tackling Female Genital Mutilation Initiative and Options Consultancy Services Limited; 2016.
  317. Department for Education. National FGM Centre: An Evaluation: Research Report. London: Department for Education; 2017.
  318. Connelly E, Murray N, Baillot H, Howard N. Missing from the debate? A qualitative study exploring the role of communities within interventions to address female genital mutilation in Europe. BMJ Open 2018;8:e021430. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021430
  319. Giorgi A. The Descriptive Phenomenological Method in Psychology: A Modified Husserlian Approach. Pittsburg, PA: Duquesne University; 2009.
  320. Quickfall J. Developing a model for culturally competent primary care nursing for asylum applicants and refugees in Scotland: a review of the literature. Diversity in Health and Social Care 2004;1:53–64.
  321. Heidegger M. Being and Time (Translated by Macquarrie J and Robinson E). New York, NY: Harper and Row; 1962.
  322. Guba E, Lincoln Y. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd; 1989.
← ConclusionsAcknowledgements →

Attribution. Catrin Evans; Ritah Tweheyo; Julie McGarry; Jeanette Eldridge; Juliet Albert; Valentine Nkoyo et al. (2019). Improving care for women and girls who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting: qualitative systematic reviews. NIHR Journals Library. Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2019. This work was produced by Evans et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK546416. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support