Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›High-flow nasal cannula therapy versus continuous positive airway pressure for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care: the FIRST-ABC RCTs›List of supplementary material

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

High-flow nasal cannula therapy versus continuous positive airway pressure for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care: the FIRST-ABC RCTs · List of supplementary material

List of supplementary material

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 1 min read

  • Participant information sheet
  • Consent form
  • Step-up RCT – subgroup analysis for the cost-effectiveness analysis at 6 months
  • Step-up RCT – sensitivity analysis for the cost-effectiveness analysis at 6 months
  • Step-down RCT – screening, randomisation and follow-up in the per-protocol population
  • Step-down RCT – baseline characteristics in all randomised and consented children irrespective of whether respiratory support was started or not
  • Step-down RCT – devices and interfaces used in children who started the allocated treatment
  • Step-down RCT – timing and reasons for treatment failure (switch/escalation events) in children who started the allocated treatment
  • Step-down RCT – breakdown of the time to liberation from respiratory support by occurrence of treatment failure in children who started the allocated treatment
  • Step-down RCT – time to reintubation in the modified intention-to-treat population
  • Step-down RCT – characteristics of children who died within 6 months of randomisation in the primary analysis set
  • Step-down RCT – sensitivity analyses
  • Step-down RCT – mean (SD) resource use from Health Services Questionnaire between discharge from hospital and 6 months following initial critical care episode for patients who were alive and completed the questionnaire at 6 months post randomisation
  • Step-down RCT – subgroup analysis for the cost-effectiveness analysis at 6 months
  • Step-down RCT – sensitivity analysis for the cost-effectiveness analysis at 6 months

Supplementary material can be found on the NIHR Journals Library report page (https://doi.org/10.3310/PDBG1495).

Supplementary material has been provided by the authors to support the report and any files provided at submission will have been seen by peer reviewers, but not extensively reviewed. Any supplementary material provided at a later stage in the process may not have been peer reviewed.

← Additional information

Attribution. Padmanabhan Ramnarayan; Alvin Richards-Belle; Karen Thomas; Laura Drikite; Zia Sadique; Silvia Moler Zapata et al. (2025). High-flow nasal cannula therapy versus continuous positive airway pressure for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care: the FIRST-ABC RCTs. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2025 Ramnarayan et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK614104. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • List of supplementary material

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support