Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Evidence of the impact on and views of NHS staff following a colleague’s suicide to inform postvention guidance: a multi-methods study›Strengths and limitations

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Evidence of the impact on and views of NHS staff following a colleague’s suicide to inform postvention guidance: a multi-methods study · Strengths and limitations

Strengths and limitations

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 1 min read

This is the first study to investigate the experiences and needs of NHS staff following a colleague death by suicide. The novel findings add to knowledge of the impact of suicide in the workplace, specifically in healthcare settings. The findings are pertinent to senior leaders and policy-makers, within and beyond NHS Trusts and integrated care boards (ICBs) who wish to understand the postvention needs of staff in healthcare settings. The developed grounded theory provides an empirical evidence base that will contribute to the development of much-needed postvention guidance for the NHS. We aimed to build theory based on an inductive understanding of participants’ experiences, perceptions and needs; qualitative methods are best suited to such aims. Grounded theory is suited to un-researched topics and populations.117

We made efforts during our participant recruitment period to establish connections with ethnically diverse populations of NHS workers. Despite this, our sample was solely White British. Given that Black and minority ethnic people comprise almost a quarter of the NHS workforce,120 our findings are unlikely to represent the experiences of all staff members.

Most participants talked about deaths which ranged from less than a year ago to 4 years ago. However, four participants talked about deaths which had occurred 9–10 years ago, meaning their memories of that time may have been impacted.

← DiscussionRecommendations →

Attribution. Ruth Riley; Johanna Spiers; Hilary Causer; Jill Maben; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Nikolaos Efstathiou et al. (2025). Evidence of the impact on and views of NHS staff following a colleague’s suicide to inform postvention guidance: a multi-methods study. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2025 Riley et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK618833. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Strengths and limitations

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support