Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Evaluation of different models of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments: a mixed-methods realist evaluation

EvidenceLib · Open textbook · CC BY 4.0

Evaluation of different models of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments: a mixed-methods realist evaluation

Freya Davies, Michelle Edwards, Delyth Price, Pippa Anderson, Andrew Carson-Stevens, Mazhar Choudhry, Matthew Cooke, Jeremy Dale, Liam Donaldson, Bridie Angela Evans, Barbara Harrington, Shaun Harris, Julie Hepburn, Peter Hibbert, Thomas Hughes, Faris Hussain, Saiful Islam, Rhys Pockett, Alison Porter, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena, Helen Snooks, Alan Watkins, Adrian Edwards, Alison Cooper · 11 sections in 11 chapters. Each section is its own page.

Introduction

  • Introduction

Realist methodology

  • Realist methodology

Phase 1

  • Phase 1

Phase 2 qualitative results

  • Phase 2 qualitative results

Routine data analysis to examine clinical effectiveness and cost consequences of different general practitioner–emergency department models

  • Routine data analysis to examine clinical effectiveness and cost consequences of different general practitioner–emergency department models

Investigating the economic impact of general practitioners in emergency departments: case study in an Inside–Parallel Emergency Department with selected (‘marker’) conditions that may be managed by emergency medicine or primary care colleagues

  • Investigating the economic impact of general practitioners in emergency departments: case study in an Inside–Parallel Emergency Department with selected (‘marker’) conditions that may be managed by emergency medicine or primary care colleagues

Mixed-methods analysis and overall programme theory

  • Mixed-methods analysis and overall programme theory

Discussion

  • Discussion

References

  • References

Additional information

  • Additional information

List of supplementary material

  • List of supplementary material

Attribution. Freya Davies; Michelle Edwards; Delyth Price; Pippa Anderson; Andrew Carson-Stevens; Mazhar Choudhry et al. (2024). Evaluation of different models of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments: a mixed-methods realist evaluation. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2024 Davies et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK603513. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

About this book

Publisher
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Sections
11
Year
2024
Words
57,614
Retrieved
2026-11-04

Source record on NCBI Bookshelf ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support