Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Evaluating the national rollout of the NHS App in England using qualitative and quantitative methods

EvidenceLib · Open textbook · CC BY 4.0

Evaluating the national rollout of the NHS App in England using qualitative and quantitative methods

Felix Greaves, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Sukriti Kc, Salina Tewolde, Claire Reidy, Bernard Gudgin, Anthony A Laverty, Azeem Majeed, Ceire Costelloe, John Powell · 11 sections in 11 chapters. Each section is its own page.

Introduction

  • Introduction

Qualitative study

  • Qualitative study

Early uptake and adoption of the NHS App (quantitative study 1)

  • Early uptake and adoption of the NHS App (quantitative study 1)

Inequalities and the NHS App (quantitative study 2)

  • Inequalities and the NHS App (quantitative study 2)

Patient experience of primary care and use of the NHS App (quantitative study 3)

  • Patient experience of primary care and use of the NHS App (quantitative study 3)

Patient and public involvement

  • Patient and public involvement

Reflections on challenges of evaluating a major government project, research approaches used and research recommendations

  • Reflections on challenges of evaluating a major government project, research approaches used and research recommendations

Equality, diversity and inclusion

  • Equality, diversity and inclusion

Discussion including overall findings, impact, implications and recommendations

  • Discussion including overall findings, impact, implications and recommendations

References

  • References

Additional information

  • Additional information

Attribution. Felix Greaves; Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Sukriti Kc; Salina Tewolde; Claire Reidy; Bernard Gudgin et al. (2026). Evaluating the national rollout of the NHS App in England using qualitative and quantitative methods. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2026 Greaves et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK622647. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

About this book

Publisher
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Sections
11
Year
2026
Words
35,388
Retrieved
2026-11-04

Source record on NCBI Bookshelf ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support