Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Enhanced feedback interventions to promote evidence-based blood transfusion guidance and reduce unnecessary use of blood components: the AFFINITIE research programme including two cluster factorial RCTs›References

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Enhanced feedback interventions to promote evidence-based blood transfusion guidance and reduce unnecessary use of blood components: the AFFINITIE research programme including two cluster factorial RCTs · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · NIHR Journals Library · approximately 5 min read

  1. Stanworth SJ, Walwyn R, Grant-Casey J, Hartley S, Moreau L, Lorencatto F, et al.; AFFINITIE Collaborators. Effectiveness of enhanced performance feedback on appropriate use of blood transfusions: a comparison of 2 cluster randomized trials. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e220364. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.036435201305
  2. Hartley S, Foy R, Walwyn REA, Cicero R, Farrin AJ, Francis JJ, et al. The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials. Implement Sci 2017;12:84. 10.1186/s13012-017-0614-828673310
  3. Cane J, Richardson M, Johnston M, Ladha R, Michie S. From lists of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) to structured hierarchies: comparison of two methods of developing a hierarchy of BCTs. Br J Health Psychol 2015;20:130–50. 10.1111/bjhp.1210224815766
  4. Murphy MF, Waters JH, Wood EM, Yazer MH. Transfusing blood safely and appropriately. BMJ 2013;347:f4303. 10.1136/bmj.f430323861410
  5. Ivers NM, Sales A, Colquhoun H, Michie S, Foy R, Francis JJ, Grimshaw JM. No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention. Implement Sci 2014;9:14. 10.1186/1748-5908-9-1424438584
  6. Carver CS, Scheier MF. On the Self-regulation of Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
  7. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med 2013;46:81–95. 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-623512568
  8. Gardner B, Whittington C, McAteer J, Eccles MP, Michie S. Using theory to synthesise evidence from behaviour change interventions: the example of audit and feedback. Soc Sci Med 2010;70:1618–25. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.03920207464
  9. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;6:CD000259. 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3
  10. Presseau J, McCleary N, Lorencatto F, Patey AM, Grimshaw JM, Francis JJ. Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour. Implement Sci 2019;14:102. 10.1186/s13012-019-0951-x31806037
  11. Steinmo SH, Michie S, Fuller C, Stanley S, Stapleton C, Stone SP. Bridging the gap between pragmatic intervention design and theory: using behavioural science tools to modify an existing quality improvement programme to implement ‘Sepsis Six’. Implement Sci 2016;11:14. 10.1186/s13012-016-0376-826841877
  12. Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci 2012;7:37. 10.1186/1748-5908-7-3722530986
  13. Gould NJ, Lorencatto F, Stanworth SJ, Michie S, Prior ME, Glidewell L, et al. Application of theory to enhance audit and feedback interventions to increase the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice: an intervention development protocol. Implement Sci 2014;9:92. 10.1186/s13012-014-0092-125070404
  14. Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 1977;33:363–74. 10.2307/2529786884196
  15. Gould NJ, Lorencatto F, During C, Rowley M, Glidewell L, Walwyn R, et al. How do hospitals respond to feedback about blood transfusion practice? A multiple case study investigation. PLOS ONE 2018;13:e0206676. 10.1371/journal.pone.020667630383792
  16. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:26–33. 10.1136/qshc.2004.01115515692000
  17. Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, O’Connor D, Patey A, Ivers N, et al. A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci 2017;12:77. 10.1186/s13012-017-0605-928637486
  18. Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles M. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psych 2008;57:660–80. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00341.x
  19. van Someren MW, Barnard YF, Sandberg JAC. The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes. London: Academic Press; 1994.
  20. Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17:88. 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-828126032
  21. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014;348:g1687. 10.1136/bmj.g168724609605
  22. Bellg AJ, Borrelli B, Resnick B, Hecht J, Minicucci DS, Ory M, et al. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychol 2004;23:443–51. 10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.44315367063
  23. NHS Blood and Transplant. NHSBT Pricing Proposals for 2017–18. 2016. URL: https://nhsbtdbe.blob.core.windows.net/umbraco-assets-corp/2188/16-80.pdf (accessed 9 September 2021).
  24. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Costing Statement: Blood Transfusion. Implementing the NICE Guideline on Blood Transfusion [NG24]. London: NICE; 2015.
  25. Royal College of Nursing. NHS Pay Scales 2017–2018. 2018. URL: https://rcn.org.uk/employment-and-pay/nhs-pay-scales-2017-18 (accessed 1 January 2018).
  26. British Medical Association. Pay Scales for Junior Doctors 2017/2018. 2018. URL: https://bma.org.uk/advice/employment/pay/juniors-pay-england (accessed 1 January 2018).
  27. British Medical Association. Pay Scales for Consultants 2017/2018. 2018. URL: https://bma.org.uk/advice/employment/pay/juniors-pay-england (accessed 1 January 2018).
  28. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655. 10.1136/bmj.a165518824488
  29. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2015;350:h1258. 10.1136/bmj.h125825791983
  30. Borrelli B. The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. J Public Health Dent 2011;71:S52–63. 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x
  31. Grimshaw JM, Ivers N, Linklater S, Foy R, Francis JJ, Gude WT, Hysong SJ. Reinvigorating stagnant science: implementation laboratories and a meta-laboratory to efficiently advance the science of audit and feedback. BMJ Qual Saf 2019;28:416–23. 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008355
  32. Lorencatto F, Gould NJ, McIntyre SA, During C, Bird J, Walwyn R, et al. A multidimensional approach to assessing intervention fidelity in a process evaluation of audit and feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions: a study protocol. Implement Sci 2016;11:163. 10.1186/s13012-016-0528-x27955683
  33. Witteman HO, Presseau J, Nicholas Angl E, Jokhio I, Schwalm JD, Grimshaw JM, et al. Negotiating tensions between theory and design in the development of mailings for people recovering from acute coronary syndrome. JMIR Hum Factors 2017;4:e6. 10.2196/humanfactors.650228249831
  34. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  35. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009;4:50. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-5019664226
  36. Walton H, Spector A, Tombor I, Michie S. Measures of fidelity of delivery of, and engagement with, complex, face-to-face health behaviour change interventions: a systematic review of measure quality. Br J Health Psychol 2017;22:872–903. 10.1111/bjhp.1226028762607
  37. Rixon L, Baron J, McGale N, Lorencatto F, Francis J, Davies A. Methods used to address fidelity of receipt in health intervention research: a citation analysis and systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:663. 10.1186/s12913-016-1904-627863484
  38. Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP). National Clinical Audit and Patient Outcomes Programme: Reporting for Impact Guidance. London: HQIP; 2016.
  39. Gray-Burrows KA, Willis TA, Foy R, Rathfelder M, Bland P, Chin A, et al. Role of patient and public involvement in implementation research: a consensus study. BMJ Qual Saf 2018;27:858–64. 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006954
← Workstream 4: tools for relevant audit and feedback programmes in the wider NHSAcknowledgements →

Attribution. Robbie Foy; Fabiana Lorencatto; Rebecca Walwyn; Amanda Farrin; Jill Francis; Natalie Gould et al. (2022). Enhanced feedback interventions to promote evidence-based blood transfusion guidance and reduce unnecessary use of blood components: the AFFINITIE research programme including two cluster factorial RCTs. NIHR Journals Library. Copyright © 2022 Foy et al. This work was produced by Foy et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This is an Open Access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaption in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. For attribution the title, original author(s), the publication source – NIHR Journals Library, and the DOI of the publication must be cited. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK579198. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support