Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Cancer in English prisons: a mixed-methods study of diagnosis, treatment, care costs and patient and staff experiences›Conclusions

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Cancer in English prisons: a mixed-methods study of diagnosis, treatment, care costs and patient and staff experiences · Conclusions

Conclusions

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 1 min read

Cancer incidence in English prisons rose between 1998 and 2017 to reach similar levels to those in the general population. However, patients diagnosed in prison have fewer but longer hospital admissions, fewer curative treatments, and a lower survival rate. Following a cancer diagnosis, people in prison have significantly lower planned care costs, but higher emergency care costs and an overall higher care cost due to security escorts. This is alongside evidence of poorer experiences of care reported both in detailed interviews with patients and using an established national survey. Cancer care in prison is complex, not least because people in prison move between a patient and a prison environment. Tensions between control and choice in prison healthcare impacted patients’ experiences of cancer care in terms of the diagnostic process, symptom management, accessing information about their illness, and the involvement of family in their care. The initial policy priorities identified by prison and cancer stakeholders based on these findings are to improve understanding between prison and cancer clinical teams to improve patient care, develop the role of ‘health champions’ in prison, and raise health literacy and awareness of both cancer screening and cancer symptoms in prison.

← DiscussionReferences →

Attribution. Elizabeth A Davies; Margreet Lüchtenborg; Rachael Maree Hunter; Renske Visser; Jennie Huynh; Ross Pow et al. (2025). Cancer in English prisons: a mixed-methods study of diagnosis, treatment, care costs and patient and staff experiences. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2025 Davies et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK612288. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Conclusions

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support