Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Biomarkers for assessing acute kidney injury for people who are being considered for admission to critical care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis›Objectives

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Biomarkers for assessing acute kidney injury for people who are being considered for admission to critical care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis · Objectives

Objectives

CC BY 4.0 · NIHR Journals Library · approximately 2 min read

The overall objective of this assessment was to summarise the current evidence on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using the NephroCheck® test (Astute Medical, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), the ARCHITECT® and Alinity i™ urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) assays (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA), and the BioPorto urine and plasma NGAL tests (BioPorto Diagnostics A/S, Hellerup, Denmark) to help assess the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill hospitalised patients who are considered for admission to critical care. AKI is still a challenging clinical problem for hospitalised patients, especially for those in need of critical care. Earlier detection of kidney injury may facilitate the adoption of strategies to preserve renal function and prevent further progression of kidney disease.

There are several components to this assessment that fall within the scope of the following research questions:

  • Do novel biomarkers (i.e. the NephroCheck test, ARCHITECT and Alinity i urine NGAL assays, and BioPorto urine and plasma NGAL tests) accurately detect emerging AKI in critically ill people who are considered for critical care?
  • Do the novel biomarkers (i.e. the NephroCheck test, ARCHITECT and Alinity i urine NGAL assays, BioPorto urine and plasma NGAL tests) predict the development of future events [e.g. AKI, mortality, need for long-term renal replacement therapy (RRT)] in critically ill people at risk of developing AKI who are considered for admission to critical care?
  • Does the use of novel biomarkers (i.e. the NephroCheck test, ARCHITECT and Alinity i urine NGAL assays, and BioPorto urine and plasma NGAL tests) lead to improvements in clinical outcomes of critically ill people who are considered for admission to critical care (i.e. reduction in events rates, such as mortality and long-term RRT, among patients whose management is guided by the novel biomarkers)?
  • Does routine use of novel biomarkers (i.e. the NephroCheck test, ARCHITECT and Alinity i urine NGAL assays, and BioPorto urine and plasma NGAL tests) affect costs to the NHS, length or quality of life [i.e. quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)], or cost-effectiveness, measured as incremental cost per QALY gained for critically ill people who are considered for admission to critical care?

In brief, the main objectives of this assessment were as follows:

  • to determine the diagnostic accuracy, prognostic accuracy and clinical impact of the use of novel biomarkers (i.e. the NephroCheck test, ARCHITECT and Alinity i urine NGAL assays, and BioPorto urine and plasma NGAL tests) for the assessment of AKI in critically ill patients (adults and children) who are being assessed for admission to critical care
  • to develop an economic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of the use of novel biomarkers (i.e. NephroCheck test, ARCHITECT and Alinity i urine NGAL assays, and BioPorto urine and plasma NGAL tests) for the assessment of AKI in critically ill patients (adults and children) who are considered for admission to critical care.
Background and definition of the decision problem →

Attribution. Miriam Brazzelli; Lorna Aucott; Magaly Aceves-Martins; Clare Robertson; Elisabet Jacobsen; Mari Imamura et al. (2022). Biomarkers for assessing acute kidney injury for people who are being considered for admission to critical care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. NIHR Journals Library. Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2022. This work was produced by Brazzelli et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK577538. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Objectives

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support