Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Biomarkers for assessing acute kidney injury for people who are being considered for admission to critical care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis›Acknowledgements

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

Biomarkers for assessing acute kidney injury for people who are being considered for admission to critical care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis · Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

CC BY 4.0 · NIHR Journals Library · approximately 2 min read

The authors are grateful to Shona Methven for her help in developing the research protocol for this assessment and to Lara Kemp for her secretarial support.

Contributions of authors

Miriam Brazzelli (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7576-6751) (Reader on Research) planned the systematic review of the clinical evidence, contributed to the statistical analyses and interpreted the results. She also oversaw and co-ordinated all aspects of this assessment.

Lorna Aucott (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6277-7972) (Senior Statistician) conducted the statistical analyses.

Magaly Aceves-Martins (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9441-142X), Clare Robertson (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6019-6795) and Mari Imamura (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4871-0354) (Research Fellows) selected relevant papers from the literature, and performed data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments for all included studies.

Elisabet Jacobsen (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3211-936X) (Research Assistant) reviewed the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of the biomarkers under investigation, and contributed to the acquisition of input data and to the economic evaluation under the supervision of Dwayne Boyers.

Amudha Poobalan (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6975-3874) (Senior Lecturer in Public Health) contributed to the data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments of included studies.

Paul Manson (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1405-1795) (Information Specialist) developed and ran the literature searches, retrieved full-text copies of the selected papers and provided information support throughout the project.

Graham Scotland (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5539-8819) (Reader on Research) provided senior advice and guidance on the development of the economic model.

Callum Kaye (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6904-7048) (Consultant in Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine) and Simon Sawhney (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7960-4573) (Clinical Lecturer in Nephrology) provided expert advice and guidance on the clinical aspects of this assessment.

Dwayne Boyers (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9786-8118) (Health Economist) developed the economic model, conducted cost-effectiveness analyses and interpreted the results.

All authors contributed to the writing of this report.

Publications

Jacobsen E, Sawhney S, Brazzelli M, Aucott L, Scotland G, Aceves-Martins M, et al. Cost-effectiveness and value of information analysis of NephroCheck and NGAL tests compared to standard care for the diagnosis of acute kidney injury. BMC Nephrol 2021;22:399.

Data-sharing statement

All technical data are included in the main text or as appendices to this report. All queries should be submitted to the corresponding author for consideration.

Disclaimers

This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HTA programme or the Department of Health and Social Care. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinions expressed by the interviewees are those of the interviewees and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors, those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HTA programme or the Department of Health and Social Care.

← References

Attribution. Miriam Brazzelli; Lorna Aucott; Magaly Aceves-Martins; Clare Robertson; Elisabet Jacobsen; Mari Imamura et al. (2022). Biomarkers for assessing acute kidney injury for people who are being considered for admission to critical care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. NIHR Journals Library. Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2022. This work was produced by Brazzelli et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK577538. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Acknowledgements

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support