Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›An online supported self-management toolkit for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar experiences: the IMPART multiple case study›References

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

An online supported self-management toolkit for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar experiences: the IMPART multiple case study · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · NIHR Journals Library · approximately 17 min read

  1. Aranda-Jan CB, Mohutsiwa-Dibe N, Loukanova S. Systematic review on what works, what does not work and why of implementation of mobile health (mHealth) projects in Africa. BMC Public Health 2014;14:188. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-18824555733
  2. Murray E, Hekler EB, Andersson G, Collins LM, Doherty A, Hollis C, et al. Evaluating digital health interventions: key questions and approaches. Am J Prev Med 2016;51:843–51. 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.00827745684
  3. House of Commons Health Committee. Managing the Care of People with Long-Term Conditions: Second Report of Session 2014–15. London: The Stationery Office; 2014.
  4. Panagioti M, Richardson G, Small N, Murray E, Rogers A, Kennedy A, et al. Self-management support interventions to reduce health care utilisation without compromising outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:356. 10.1186/1472-6963-14-35625164529
  5. Ruzek JI, Yeager CM. Internet and mobile technologies: addressing the mental health of trauma survivors in less resourced communities. Glob Ment Health 2017;4:e16. 10.1017/gmh.2017.11
  6. Arnberg FK, Linton SJ, Hultcrantz M, Heintz E, Jonsson U. Internet-delivered psychological treatments for mood and anxiety disorders: a systematic review of their efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. PLOS ONE 2014;9:e98118. 10.1371/journal.pone.009811824844847
  7. Drozd F, Vaskinn L, Bergsund HB, Haga SM, Slinning K, Bjørkli CA. The implementation of internet interventions for depression: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res 2016;18:e236. 10.2196/jmir.567027608548
  8. Alvarez-Jimenez M, Alcazar-Corcoles MA, González-Blanch C, Bendall S, McGorry PD, Gleeson JF. Online, social media and mobile technologies for psychosis treatment: a systematic review on novel user-led interventions. Schizophr Res 2014;156:96–106. 10.1016/j.schres.2014.03.02124746468
  9. Hidalgo-Mazzei D, Mateu A, Reinares M, Matic A, Vieta E, Colom F. Internet-based psychological interventions for bipolar disorder: Review of the present and insights into the future. J Affect Disord 2015;188:1–13. 10.1016/j.jad.2015.08.00526342885
  10. Berry N, Lobban F, Emsley R, Bucci S. Acceptability of interventions delivered online and through mobile phones for people who experience severe mental health problems: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2016;18:e121. 10.2196/jmir.525027245693
  11. O’Hanlon P, Aref-Adib G, Fonseca A, Lloyd-Evans B, Osborn D, Johnson S. Tomorrow’s world: current developments in the therapeutic use of technology for psychosis. BJPscyh Adv 2016;22:301–10. 10.1192/apt.bp.115.014654
  12. NHS England. Five Year Forward View. London: NHS England; 2014.
  13. Gilbody S, Littlewood E, Hewitt C, Brierley G, Tharmanathan P, Araya R, et al. Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) as treatment for depression in primary care (REEACT trial): large scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2015;351:h5627. 10.1136/bmj.h562726559241
  14. Mohr DC, Weingardt KR, Reddy M, Schueller SM. Three problems with current digital mental health research . . . and three things we can do about them. Psychiatr Serv 2017;68:427–9. 10.1176/appi.ps.20160054128412890
  15. Haines A, Kuruvilla S, Borchert M. Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health. Bull World Health Organ 2004;82:724–31.15643791
  16. Big Brother Watch. NHS-Data-Breaches. A Big Brother Watch Report November 2014. London: Big Brother Watch; 2014. URL: www.bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/NHS-Data-Breaches-Report.pdf (accessed 4 August 2017).
  17. Department of Health and Social Care. Delivering 21st Century IT Support for the NHS: National Strategic Programme. Leeds: Department of Health and Social Care; 2002.
  18. National Audit Office. Review of the Final Benefits Statement for Programmes Previously Managed Under the National Programme for IT in the NHS. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2013. URL: www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/10171-001_NPfiT_Review.pdf (accessed 15 February 2015).
  19. Department of Health and Social Care. The Future of the National Programme for IT. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2010. URL: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120503092804/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/MediaCentre/Pressreleases/DH_119293 (accessed 15 February 2015).
  20. Tinder Foundation. Health & Digital: Reducing Inequalities, Improving Society. An Evaluation of the Widening Digital Participation Programme. 2016. URL: http://nhs.tinderfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Improving_Digital_Health_Skills_Report_2016.pdf (accessed 31 March 2018).
  21. McGrath JJ, Saha S, Al-Hamzawi A, Alonso J, Bromet EJ, Bruffaerts R, et al. Psychotic experiences in the general population: a cross-national analysis based on 31,261 respondents from 18 countries. JAMA Psychiatry 2015;72:697–705. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.057526018466
  22. Simeone JC, Ward AJ, Rotella P, Collins J, Windisch R. An evaluation of variation in published estimates of schizophrenia prevalence from 1990–2013: a systematic literature review. BMC Psychiatry 2015;15:193. 10.1186/s12888-015-0578-726263900
  23. McCrone PR, Dhanasiri S, Patel A, Knapp M, Lawton-Smith S. Paying the Price: The Cost of Mental Health Care in England to 2026: London: The King’s Fund; 2008.
  24. Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J, Baxter AJ, Ferrari AJ, Erskine HE, et al. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013;382:1575–86. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61611-623993280
  25. Merikangas KR, Akiskal HS, Angst J, Greenberg PE, Hirschfeld RM, Petukhova M, Kessler RC. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of bipolar spectrum disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007;64:543–52. 10.1001/archpsyc.64.5.54317485606
  26. Paykel ES, Abbott R, Morriss R, Hayhurst H, Scott J. Sub-syndromal and syndromal symptoms in the longitudinal course of bipolar disorder. Br J Psychiatry 2006;189:118–23. 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.01387016880480
  27. Andrew A, Knapp M, McCrone P, Parsonage M, Trachtenberg M. Effective Interventions in Schizophrenia – the Economic Case. A Report Prepared for the Schizophrenia Commission. London: Rethink Mental Illness; 2012.
  28. Winefield HR, Harvey EJ. Determinants of psychological distress in relatives of people with chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1993;19:619–25. 10.1093/schbul/19.3.6198235462
  29. Barrowclough C, Tarrier N, Johnston M. Distress, expressed emotion, and attributions in relatives of schizophrenia patients. Schizophr Bull 1996;22:691–702. 10.1093/schbul/22.4.6918938922
  30. Lowyck B, De Hert M, Peeters E, Wampers M, Gilis P, Peuskens J. A study of the family burden of 150 family members of schizophrenic patients. Eur Psychiatry 2004;19:395–401. 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.04.00615504645
  31. Szmukler GI, Burgess P, Herrman H, Benson A, Colusa S, Bloch S. Caring for relatives with serious mental illness: the development of the Experience of Caregiving Inventory. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1996;31:137–48. 10.1007/BF007857608766459
  32. Barton K, Jackson C. Reducing symptoms of trauma among carers of people with psychosis: pilot study examining the impact of writing about caregiving experiences. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2008;42:693–701. 10.1080/0004867080220343418622777
  33. Patterson P, Birchwood M, Cochrane R. Expressed emotion as an adaptation to loss: prospective study in first-episode psychosis. Br J Psychiatry Suppl 2005;48:s59–64. 10.1192/bjp.187.48.s5916055810
  34. Jones K. Addressing the needs of carers during early psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry 2009;3(Suppl. 1):22–6. 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2009.00127.x
  35. Tennakoon L, Fannon D, Doku V, O’Ceallaigh S, Soni W, Santamaria M, et al. Experience of caregiving: relatives of people experiencing a first episode of psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 2000;177:529–33. 10.1192/bjp.177.6.52911102328
  36. McDonell MG, Short RA, Berry CM, Dyck DG. Burden in schizophrenia caregivers: impact of family psychoeducation and awareness of patient suicidality. Fam Process 2003;42:91–103. 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00091.x12698601
  37. Magliano L, Fadden G, Madianos M, de Almeida JM, Held T, Guarneri M, et al. Burden on the families of patients with schizophrenia: results of the BIOMED I study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998;33:405–12. 10.1007/s0012700500739766166
  38. Möller-Leimkühler AM. Burden of relatives and predictors of burden. Baseline results from the Munich 5-year-follow-up study on relatives of first hospitalized patients with schizophrenia or depression. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2005;255:223–31. 10.1007/s00406-004-0550-x15549342
  39. Magliano L, Fadden G, Economou M, Held T, Xavier M, Guarneri M, et al. Family burden and coping strategies in schizophrenia: 1-year follow-up data from the BIOMED I study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2000;35:109–15. 10.1007/s00127005019210855508
  40. Lobban F, Barrowclough C, Jones S. Does expressed emotion need to be understood within a more systemic framework? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2006;41:50–5. 10.1007/s00127-005-0993-z16249970
  41. Onwumere J, Lotey G, Schulz J, James G, Afsharzadegan R, Harvey R, et al. Burnout in early course psychosis caregivers: the role of illness beliefs and coping styles. Early Interv Psychiatry 2017;11:237–43. 10.1111/eip.1222725721376
  42. Kuipers E, Watson P, Onwumere J, Bebbington P, Dunn G, Weinman J, et al. Discrepant illness perceptions, affect and expressed emotion in people with psychosis and their carers. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007;42:277–83. 10.1007/s00127-007-0165-417370044
  43. Chessick CA, Perlick DA, Miklowitz DJ, Kaczynski R, Allen MH, Morris CD, Marangell LB, STED-BD Family Experience Collaborative Study Group. Current suicide ideation and prior suicide attempts of bipolar patients as influences on caregiver burden. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2007;37:482–91. 10.1521/suli.2007.37.4.48217896888
  44. Fletcher K, Parker GB, Manicavasagar V. Coping profiles in bipolar disorder. Compr Psychiatry 2013;54:1177–84. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.05.01123810079
  45. Hosang GM, Uher R, Maughan B, McGuffin P, Farmer AE. The role of loss and danger events in symptom exacerbation in bipolar disorder. J Psychiatr Res 2012;46:1584–9. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.07.00922868047
  46. Morriss R, Yang M, Chopra A, Bentall R, Paykel E, Scott J. Differential effects of depression and mania symptoms on social adjustment: prospective study in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2013;15:80–91. 10.1111/bdi.1203623301947
  47. Lowenstein JA, Butler DW, Ashcroft K. The efficacy of a cognitively orientated carers group in an early intervention in psychosis service – a pilot study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2010;17:628–35. 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01564.x20712686
  48. Zendjidjian X, Richieri R, Adida M, Limousin S, Gaubert N, Parola N, et al. Quality of life among caregivers of individuals with affective disorders. J Affect Disord 2012;136:660–5. 10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.01122100129
  49. Chen FP, Greenberg JS. A positive aspect of caregiving: the influence of social support on caregiving gains for family members of relatives with schizophrenia. Community Ment Health J 2004;40:423–35. 10.1023/B:COMH.0000040656.89143.8215529476
  50. Veltman A, Cameron J, Stewart DE. The experience of providing care to relatives with chronic mental illness. J Nerv Ment Dis 2002;190:108–14. 10.1097/00005053-200202000-0000811889365
  51. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Psychosis and Schizophrenia in Adults (CG178) no. CG178. London: NICE; 2014.
  52. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE Clinical Guideline. Bipolar Disorder: the Assessment and Management of Bipolar Disorder in Adults, Children and Young People in Primary and Secondary Care. London: NICE; 2014.
  53. Lobban F, Glentworth D, Chapman L, Wainwright L, Postlethwaite A, Dunn G, et al. Feasibility of a supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with recent-onset psychosis: REACT study. Br J Psychiatry 2013;203:366–72. 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.11361324072754
  54. Honary M, Fisher NR, McNaney R, Lobban F. A web-based intervention for relatives of people experiencing psychosis or bipolar disorder: design study using a user-centered approach. JMIR Ment Health 2018;5:e11473. 10.2196/1147330530457
  55. Lobban F, Robinson H, Appelbe D, Barraclough J, Bedson E, Collinge L, et al. Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT). BMJ Open 2017;7:e016965. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016965
  56. Lobban F, Appleton V, Appelbe D, Barraclough J, Bowland J, Fisher NR, et al. IMPlementation of A Relatives’ Toolkit (IMPART study): an iterative case study to identify key factors impacting on the implementation of a web-based supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar experiences in a National Health Service: a study protocol. Implement Sci 2017;12:152. 10.1186/s13012-017-0687-429282135
  57. Marshall M, Lewis S, Lockwood A, Drake R, Jones P, Croudace T. Association between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in cohorts of first-episode patients: a systematic review. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:975–83. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.97516143729
  58. Rethink Mental Illness. Lost Generation: Why Young People with Psychosis are Being Left Behind, and What Needs to Change. London: Rethink Mental Illness; 2014.
  59. NHS England. Guidance to Support the Introduction of Access and Waiting Time Standards for Mental Health Services. London: NHS England; 2015.
  60. Rathod S, Kingdon D, Pinninti N, Turkington D, Phiri P. Cultural Adaptation of CBT for Serious Mental Illness: A Guide for Training and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2015. 10.1002/9781118976159
  61. Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership, Royal College of Psychiatrists. Report of the Early Intervention in Psychosis Audit. London: NHS England; 2016.
  62. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Psychosis, Schizophrenia in Adults; Quality Standard 80. London: NICE; 2015. URL: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs80 (accessed 6 December 2019).
  63. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Bipolar Disorder in Adults. Quality Standard 95. London: NICE; 2015. URL: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs95 (accessed 6 December 2019).
  64. Lobban F, Glentworth D, Pinfold V, Minns V, Dunn G, Larkin W, et al. An Evaluation of the Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Supported Self Management Package for Relatives of People with Recent Onset Psychosis. Relatives Education and Coping Toolkit (REACT) Study: NIHR Research for Patient Benefit Final Report. Southampton: NIHR; 2012.
  65. Lobban F, Postlethwaite A, Glentworth D, Pinfold V, Wainwright L, Dunn G, et al. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions reporting outcomes for relatives of people with psychosis. Clin Psychol Rev 2013;33:372–82. 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.12.00423410719
  66. Wainwright LD, Glentworth D, Haddock G, Bentley R, Lobban F. What do relatives experience when supporting someone in early psychosis? Psychol Psychother 2015;88:105–19. 10.1111/papt.1202424623726
  67. Lobban F, Glentworth D, Haddock G, Wainwright L, Clancy A, Bentley R, REACT Team. The views of relatives of young people with psychosis on how to design a Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT). J Ment Health 2011;20:567–79. 10.3109/09638237.2011.59359222126633
  68. Lobban F, Jones S, Johnson S, Minns V, Murray E. An Online Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of the Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT). NIHR Health Technology Assessment Efficient Designs Call. Southampton: National Institute for Health Research; 2015–18.
  69. Lobban F, Jones S, Johnsons S, Minns V, Pinfold V, Rycroft-Malone J, et al. IMPlementation of A Relatives’ Toolkit (IMPART Study): Examining the Critical Success Factors, Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of an Online Supported Self-management Intervention in the NHS. Southampton: National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research 2016–18.
  70. Department of Health and Social Care. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care. 2nd edn. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2005.
  71. Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, Eldridge S, Grandes G, Griffiths CJ, et al. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) statement. BMJ 2017;356:i6795. 10.1136/bmj.i679528264797
  72. Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th edn. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 2014.
  73. May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalisation process theory. Sociology 2009;43:535–54. 10.1177/0038038509103208
  74. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, A’Court C, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e367. 10.2196/jmir.877529092808
  75. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M, Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655. 10.1136/bmj.a165518824488
  76. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci 2015;10:53. 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-025895742
  77. May CR, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci 2009;4:29. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-2919460163
  78. Mair FS, May C, O’Donnell C, Finch T, Sullivan F, Murray E. Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 2012;90:357–64. 10.2471/BLT.11.09942422589569
  79. Murray E, Burns J, See TS, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive health communication applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;4:CD004274. 10.1002/14651858.CD004274.pub4
  80. Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med 2010;8:63. 10.1186/1741-7015-8-6320961442
  81. Aref-Adib G, McCloud T, Ross J, O’Hanlon P, Appleton V, Rowe S, et al. Factors affecting implementation of digital health interventions for people with psychosis or bipolar disorder, and their family and friends: a systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry 2019;6:257–66. 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30302-X30522979
  82. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci 2013;8:139. 10.1186/1748-5908-8-13924289295
  83. Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci 2015;10:21. 10.1186/s13012-015-0209-125889199
  84. Leeman J, Birken SA, Powell BJ, Rohweder C, Shea CM. Beyond ‘implementation strategies’: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice. Implement Sci 2017;12:125. 10.1186/s13012-017-0657-x29100551
  85. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 2013.
  86. Mohr DC, Lyon AR, Lattie EG, Reddy M, Schueller SM. Accelerating digital mental health research from early design and creation to successful implementation and sustainment. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e153. 10.2196/jmir.772528490417
  87. Cooperrider DL, Srivastva S. Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Res Organ Change Dev 1987;1:129–69.
  88. Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, Michie S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:228–38. 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627
  89. May C, Rapley T, Mair FS, Treweek S, Murray E, Ballini L, et al. Normalization Process Theory On-line Users’ Manual, Toolkit and NoMAD Instrument. 2015. URL: www.normalizationprocess.org/npt-toolkit/ (accessed 30 January 2020).
  90. Granja C, Janssen W, Johansen MA. Factors determining the success and failure of eHealth Interventions: systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res 2018;20:e10235. 10.2196/1023529716883
  91. Lobban F, Appelbe D, Appleton V, Billsborough J, Fisher NR, Foster S, et al. IMPlementation of An online Relatives’ Toolkit for psychosis or bipolar (IMPART study): iterative multiple case study to identify key factors impacting on staff uptake and use. BMC Health Serv Res 2020;20:1–3. 10.1186/s12913-020-5002-4
  92. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Report of the Second Round of the National Audit of Schizophrenia (NAS) 2014. London: Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership; 2014.
  93. Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med 1979;9:139–45. 10.1017/S0033291700021644424481
  94. Quirk A, Smith S, Hamilton S, Lamping D, Stahl D, Pinfold V, et al. Development and Validation of the Carer Well-Being and Support (CWS) Questionnaire: Report for the National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation Programme. London: The Stationery Office; 2009.
  95. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen MF, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 2011;20:1727–36. 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x21479777
  96. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHEALS: the eHealth literacy scale. J Med Internet Res 2006;8:e27. 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e2717213046
  97. Goldberg D. Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER Nelson; 1978.
  98. Spradley JP, McCurdy DW. Anthropology, the Cultural Perspective. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 1980.
  99. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  100. Great Britain. Data Protection Act 2018. URL: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/contents/enacted (accessed 6 December 2019).
  101. European Union. EU General Data Protection Regulation. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation (accessed 6 December 2019).
  102. Audit of Early Intervention in Psychosis. Report of the Early Intervention in Psychosis Audit. London; Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership; 2016.
  103. Bentall RP. Madness Explained: Psychosis and Human Nature. London: Penguin Books; 2004.
  104. Vermeulen B, Lauwers H, Spruytte N, Van Audenhove C. P.1.k.038 Experiences of family caregivers for persons with severe mental illness: an international exploration. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2015;25:S374. 10.1016/S0924-977X(15)30484-3
  105. Worthington A, Rooney P, Hannan R. The Triangle of Care. Carers Included: A Guide to Best Practice in Mental Health Care in England. London: Carers Trust; 2013.
  106. Department of Health and Social Care. Achieving Better Access to Mental Health Services by 2020. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2014.
  107. NHS England. The Forward View into Action: Planning for 2015/16. London: NHS England; 2014.
  108. Levy F. Computers and populism: artificial intelligence, jobs, and politics in the near term. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 2018;34:393–417. 10.1093/oxrep/gry004
  109. Department of Health and Social Care. Explanatory Notes: Care Act 2014 – Chapter 23. London: The Stationery Office; 2014.
  110. Iacobucci G. NHS plan calls for new models of care and greater emphasis on prevention. BMJ 2014;349:g6430. 10.1136/bmj.g643025342159
  111. Department of Health and Social Care. Lessons Learned Review of the WannaCry Ransomware Cyber Attack. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2018.
  112. Wise J. Survey of UK doctors highlights blame culture within the NHS. BMJ 2018;362:k4001. 10.1136/bmj.k400130237202
  113. Triandis HC. Individualism and Collectivism. Abingdon: Routledge; 2018. 10.4324/9780429499845
  114. The King’s Fund. The NHS Budget and how it has Changed. 2018. URL: www.kingsfund.org.uk/projects/nhs-in-a-nutshell/nhs-budget (accessed 30 November 2018).
  115. Rogers MA, Lemmen K, Kramer R, Mann J, Chopra V. Internet-delivered health interventions that work: systematic review of meta-analyses and evaluation of website availability. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e90. 10.2196/jmir.711128341617
  116. Greenhalgh T. How to improve success of technology projects in health and social care. Public Health Res Pract 2018;28:2831815. 10.17061/phrp283181530406256
  117. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). NICE Boosts Support for Innovative Ideas. London: NICE; 2013. URL: www.nice.org.uk/news/article/nice-boosts-support-for-innovative-ideas (accessed 30 November 2018).
  118. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res 2005;7:e11. 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e1115829473
  119. Verheijden MW, Jans MP, Hildebrandt VH, Hopman-Rock M. Rates and determinants of repeated participation in a web-based behavior change program for healthy body weight and healthy lifestyle. J Med Internet Res 2007;9:e1. 10.2196/jmir.9.1.e117478410
  120. Brewster L, Mountain G, Wessels B, Kelly C, Hawley M. Factors affecting front line staff acceptance of telehealth technologies: a mixed-method systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2014;70:21–33. 10.1111/jan.1219623786584
  121. Huryk LA. Factors influencing nurses’ attitudes towards healthcare information technology. J Nurs Manag 2010;18:606–12. 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01084.x20636510
  122. Barrowclough C, Gooding P, Hartley S, Lee G, Lobban F. Factors associated with distress in relatives of a family member experiencing recent-onset psychosis. J Nerv Ment Dis 2014;202:40–6. 10.1097/NMD.000000000000007224375211
  123. May CR, Johnson M, Finch T. Implementation, context and complexity. Implement Sci 2016;11:141. 10.1186/s13012-016-0506-327756414
  124. Wachter R. Making IT Work: Harnessing the Power of Health Information Technology to Improve Care in England. Executive Summary. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2016.
  125. Labrique A, Vasudevan L, Weiss W, Wilson K. Establishing standards to evaluate the impact of integrating digital health into health systems. Glob Health Sci Pract 2018;6:S5–17. 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-0023030305335
  126. Lamb N. Discrimination at the Heart of the NHS: Early Intervention in Psychosis: The Failure to Deliver the Same Standards of Access to Evidence-based Treatment for those with Mental Health as those with Physical Health Problems. London: Liberal Democrats; 2018.
  127. Department of Health and Social Care. The Mental Health Policy Implementation Guide. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2001.
  128. Pharoah F, Mari J, Rathbone J, Wong W. Family intervention for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;12:CD000088. 10.1002/14651858.CD000088.pub2
  129. Birken SA, Powell BJ, Shea CM, Haines ER, Alexis Kirk M, Leeman J, et al. Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey. Implement Sci 2017;12:124. 10.1186/s13012-017-0656-y29084566
  130. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE; 1997.
  131. Lobban F, Akers N, Appelbe D, Iraci Capuccinello R, Chapman L, Collinge L, et al. A web-based, peer-supported self-management intervention to reduce distress in relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: the REACT RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020;24(32). 10.3310/hta24320
  132. Zillien N, Hargittai E. Digital distinction: status-specific types of internet usage. Soc Sci Q 2009;90:274–91. 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x
  133. Kontos E, Blake KD, Chou WY, Prestin A. Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e172. 10.2196/jmir.311725048379
  134. Scheerder A, van Deursen A, van Dijk J. Determinants of internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics Informatics 2017;34:1607–24. 10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007
  135. Wainwright L. Carers’ Needs and Self Management in Bipolar Disorder and Psychosis. PhD thesis. Lancaster: Lancaster University; 2009–13.
  136. Sutton RI, Staw BM. What theory is not. Adm Sci Q 1995;40:371–84. 10.2307/2393788
← DiscussionAcknowledgements →

Attribution. Fiona Lobban; Duncan Appelbe; Victoria Appleton; Golnar Aref-Adib; Johanna Barraclough; Julie Billsborough et al. (2020). An online supported self-management toolkit for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar experiences: the IMPART multiple case study. NIHR Journals Library. Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2020. This work was produced by Lobban et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK562351. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support