Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›An interactive digital behaviour change intervention to decrease incidence of sexually transmitted infections among users of STI self-sampling websites: a feasibility RCT›References

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

An interactive digital behaviour change intervention to decrease incidence of sexually transmitted infections among users of STI self-sampling websites: a feasibility RCT · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 12 min read

  1. UK Health Security Agency. GOV.UK [Internet]. Sexually Transmitted Infections and Screening for Chlamydia in England: 2023 Report. 2024. URL: www.gov.uk/government/statistics/sexually-transmitted-infections-stis-annual-data-tables/sexually-transmitted-infections-and-screening-for-chlamydia-in-england-2023-report (accessed 20 December 2024).
  2. World Health Organization. Factsheet: Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) [Internet]. Unknown. URL: www.who.int/health-topics/sexually-transmitted-infections#tab=tab_1 (accessed March 2023).
  3. Mercer CH, Tanton C, Prah P, Erens B, Sonnenberg P, Clifton S, et al. Changes in sexual attitudes and lifestyles in Britain through the life course and over time: findings from the National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal). Lancet (London, England) 2013;382:1781–94.24286784
  4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Reducing Sexually Transmitted Infections [Internet]. Report No.: NG221. 2022. URL: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng221/resources/reducing-sexually-transmitted-infections-pdf-66143830628293 (accessed March 2023).
  5. Fothergill D, Woolgar J. Breaking Point: Securing the Future of Sexual Health Services [Internet]. Internet: Local Government Association. URL: www.local.gov.uk/publications/breaking-point-securing-future-sexual-health-services#skyrocketing-attendance (accessed March 2023).
  6. UKHSA. National GUMCAD STI and CTAD Chlamydia Surveillance Data. 2021. London: UK Health Security Agency; 2023.
  7. Hosenfeld CB, Workowski KA, Berman S, Zaidi A, Dyson J, Mosure D, et al. Repeat infection with chlamydia and gonorrhea among females: a systematic review of the literature. Sex Transm Dis 2009;36:478–89.19617871
  8. Munro CH, Patel R, Brito-Mutunayagam S, Carlin E, Kasliwal A, Manavi K, et al. FSRH/BASHH Standards for Online and Remote Providers of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services [Internet]. 2019. URL: www.fsrh.org/standards-and-guidance/documents/fsrhbashh-standards-for-online-and-remote-providers-of-sexual/ (accessed March 2023).
  9. Clarke E, Horner PJ, Muir P, Turner KME, Harding-Esch EM. Assessment of online self-testing and self-sampling service providers for sexually transmitted infections against national standards in the UK in 2020. Sex Transm Infect 2023;99:14–20.35414607
  10. Norton TR, Bogart LM, Cecil H, Pinkerton SD. Primacy of affect over cognition in determining adult men’s condom-use behavior: a review. J Appl Soc Psychol 2005;35:2493–534.
  11. Albarracín D, Kumkale GT, Johnson BT. Influences of social power and normative support on condom use decisions: a research synthesis. AIDS Care 2004;16:700–23.15370059
  12. Sheeran P, Abraham C, Orbell S. Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 1999;125:90–132.9990846
  13. Noar SM, Carlyle K, Cole C. Why communication is crucial: meta-analysis of the relationship between safer sexual communication and condom use. J Health Commun 2006;11:365–90.16720536
  14. Johnson BT, Michie S, Snyder LB. Effects of behavioral intervention content on HIV prevention outcomes: a meta-review of meta-analyses. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2014;66:S259–70.25007195
  15. von Sadovszky V, Draudt B, Boch S. A systematic review of reviews of behavioral interventions to promote condom use. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2014;11:107–17.24119245
  16. Free C, Roberts IG, Abramsky T, Fitzgerald M, Wensley F. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions promoting effective condom use. J Epidemiol Community Health 2011;65:100–10.19822557
  17. Bailey JV, Murray E, Rait G, Mercer CH, Morris RW, Peacock R, et al. Computer-based interventions for sexual health promotion: systematic review and meta-analyses. Int J STD AIDS 2012;23:408–13.22807534
  18. Schumacher L, Crutzen R, Kwah K, Brown K, Bailey JV, Bremner S, et al. Planning for successful participant recruitment and retention in trials of behavioural interventions: Feasibility randomised controlled trial of the Wrapped intervention. PLOS Digit Health 2025;4:e0000875. 10.1371/journal.pdig.000087540440340
  19. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277–88.16204405
  20. Newby K, Kwah K, Schumacher L, Crutzen R, Bailey JV, Jackson LJ, et al. An intervention to increase condom use among users of sexually transmitted infection self-sampling websites (wrapped): protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e43645.37166958
  21. Newby K, Kwah K, Schumacher L, Crutzen R, Jackson LL, Bremner S, et al. Intervention to increase condom use among users of sexually transmitted infection (STI) self-sampling websites (Wrapped): feasibility randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71611. 10.2196/7161140816724
  22. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377–81.18929686
  23. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019;95:103208.31078660
  24. Devlin NJ, Shah KK, Feng Y, Mulhern B, Hout B. Valuing health‐related quality of life: an EQ‐5D‐5L value set for England. Health Econ 2018;27:7–22.28833869
  25. Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care 2004;42:851–9.15319610
  26. Newby K, Crutzen R, Brown K, Bailey J, Saunders J, Szczepura A, et al. An intervention to increase condom use among users of chlamydia self-sampling websites (Wrapped): intervention mapping and think-aloud study. JMIR Form Res 2019;3:e11242.31042156
  27. Teare MD, Dimairo M, Shephard N, Hayman A, Whitehead A, Walters SJ. Sample size requirements to estimate key design parameters from external pilot randomised controlled trials: a simulation study. Trials 2014;15:264.24993581
  28. Greenland S, Rothman KJ. Basic Concepts. In Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, editors. Modern Epidemiology. 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. pp. 32–50.
  29. UK Health Security Agency. GOV.UK. National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP): Annual Data. 2024. URL: www.gov.uk/government/statistics/national-chlamydia-screening-programme-ncsp-data-tables (accessed 20 December 2024).
  30. Bracebridge S, Bachmann MO, Ramkhelawon K, Woolnough A. Evaluation of a systematic postal screening and treatment service for genital Chlamydia trachomatis, with remote clinic access via the internet: a cross-sectional study, East of England. Sex Transm Infect 2012;88:375–81.22375045
  31. Oakeshott P, Kerry-Barnard S, Fleming C, Phillips R, Drennan VM, Adams EJ, et al. ‘Test n Treat’ (TnT): a cluster randomized feasibility trial of on-site rapid Chlamydia trachomatis tests and treatment in ethnically diverse, sexually active teenagers attending technical colleges. Clin Microbiol Infect 2019;25:865–71.30391581
  32. Kalwij S, French S, Mugezi R, Baraitser P. Using educational outreach and a financial incentive to increase general practices’ contribution to chlamydia screening in South-East London 2003–2011. BMC Public Health 2012;12:802.22984897
  33. Drummond M, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
  34. Schnitzler L, Jackson LJ, Paulus ATG, Roberts TE, Evers SMAA. Intersectoral costs of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV: a systematic review of cost-of-illness (COI) studies. BMC Health Serv Res 2021;21:1179.
  35. FPA and Brook. Unprotected Nation – The Financial and Economic Impacts of Restricted Contraceptive and Sexual Health Services [Internet]. 2013 March [cited 10 June 2021]. URL: https://ssha.info/unprotected-nation-the-financial-and-economic-impacts-of-restricted-contraceptive-and-sexual-health-services/ (accessed March 2023).
  36. Savage E, Leong G, Peters L, Duffell S, Hughes G. Assessing the relationship between sexually transmitted infection rates, ethnic group and socio-economic deprivation in England. Sex Transm Infect 2011;87:A195–6.
  37. Mapp F, Wellings K, Mercer CH, Mitchell K, Tanton C, Clifton S, et al. Help-seeking for genitourinary symptoms: a mixed methods study from Britain’s Third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3). BMJ Open 2019;9:e030612.
  38. The King’s Fund. Written Evidence from the King’s Fund Submitted to the Health and Social Care Committee’s Sexual Health Inquiry [Internet]. 2019. URL: www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/2019-06/Sexual%20health%20inquiry_proofed.pdf (accessed March 2023).
  39. NICE. Methods for the Development of NICE Public Health Guidance. 3rd edn. [Internet]. 2012. URL: www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg4/resources/methods-for-the-development-of-nice-public-health-guidance-third-edition-pdf-2007967445701 (accessed March 2023).
  40. NICE. NICE Health Technology Evaluations: The Manual. Process and Methods [PMG37] [Internet]. 2022. URL: www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg37/chapter/about-this-guide (accessed March 2023).
  41. Neumann PJ, Sanders GD, Russell LB, Siegel JE, Ganiats TG, editors. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
  42. Tate DF, Finkelstein EA, Khavjou O, Gustafson A. Cost effectiveness of internet interventions: review and recommendations. Ann Behav Med 2009;38:40–5.19834778
  43. Kählke F, Buntrock C, Smit F, Ebert DD. Systematic review of economic evaluations for internet- and mobile-based interventions for mental health problems. NPJ Digital Med 2022;5:175.
  44. Graham AL, Chang Y, Fang Y, Cobb NK, Tinkelman DS, Niaura RS, et al. Cost-effectiveness of internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation: an economic evaluation of The iQUITT Study. Tob Control 2013;22:e11.23010696
  45. Estcourt C, Sutcliffe L, Mercer CH, Copas A, Saunders J, Roberts TE, et al. The Ballseye programme: a mixed-methods programme of research in traditional sexual health and alternative community settings to improve the sexual health of men in the UK. Programme Grants for Applied Research 2016;4:1–142.
  46. Curtis L, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2017 [Internet]. Personal Social Services Research Unit. 2017. URL: www.pssru.ac.uk/project-pages/unit-costs/unit-costs-2017 (accessed March 2023).
  47. NICE. Position Statement on Use of the EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England (Updated October 2019) [Internet]. 2019. URL: www.nice.org.uk/about/what-we-do/our-programmes/nice-guidance/technology-appraisal-guidance/eq-5d-5l (accessed March 2023).
  48. Jackson LJ, Auguste P, Low N, Roberts TE. Valuing the health states associated with Chlamydia trachomatis infections and their sequelae: a systematic review of economic evaluations and primary studies. Value Health 2014;17:116–30.24438725
  49. Petrou S, Morrell J, Spiby H. Assessing the empirical validity of alternative multi-attribute utility measures in the maternity context. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009;7:40.19419553
  50. Wang X, Guo G, Zhou L, Zheng J, Liang X, Li Z, et al. Health-related quality of life in pregnant women living with HIV: a comparison of EQ-5D and SF-12. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017;15:158.28851384
  51. Cresswell F, Asanati K, Bhagani S, Boffito M, Delpech V, Ellis J, et al. UK guideline for the use of HIV post‐exposure prophylaxis 2021. HIV Med 2022;23:494–545.35166004
  52. Hawkins J, Glasier A, Hall S, Regan L, Lohr P, Lord J, et al. Early medical abortion by telemedicine in the United Kingdom: a costing analysis. BJOG 2022;129:969–75.34839579
  53. Schumacher L, Kwah K, Crutzen R, Brown K, Bremner S, Jackson LJ, Newby K. Mixed-methods assessment of engagement with a digital intervention: the Wrapped feasibility randomised controlled trial. medRxiv 2025.09.16.25335892. 10.1101/2025.09.16.25335892
  54. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:117.24047204
  55. UKHSA. Commissioning Local HIV, Sexual and Reproductive Health Services [Internet]. 2023. URL: www.gov.uk/guidance/commissioning-regional-and-local-sexual-health-services#:~:text=and%20sexual%20rights.-,Commissioning%20responsibilities,contraception%2C%20relationships%20and%20unplanned%20pregnancy (accessed March 2023).
  56. Office for Health Improvement and Disparities. Public Health Outcomes Framework [Internet]. 2019. URL: https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/public-health-outcomes-framework (accessed March 2023).
  57. Department of Health and Social Care. A Framework for Sexual Health Improvement in England [Internet]. 2013. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-framework-for-sexual-health-improvement-in-england (accessed March 2023).
  58. NHS England. Integrated Care Systems: Guidance [Internet]. 2023. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/publication/integrated-care-systems-guidance/ (accessed March 2023).
  59. The King’s Fund. The Health and Care Act: Six Key Questions [Internet]. 2022. URL: www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/health-and-care-act-key-questions (accessed March 2023).
  60. Robertson R. Sexual Health Services and the Importance of Prevention [Internet]. London, UK: The King’s Fund; 2018 December. URL: www.kingsfund.org.uk/blog/2018/12/sexual-health-services-and-importance-prevention (accessed March 2023).
  61. Evans D. What price public health? Funding the local public health system in England post-2013. Crit Public Health 2021;31:429–40.
  62. Gibbs J, Solomon D, Jackson L, Mullick S, Burns F, Shahmanesh M. Measuring and evaluating sexual health in the era of digital health: challenges and opportunities [Internet]. Sex Health 2022;19:336–45.35970766
  63. Tucker JD, Hocking J, Oladele D, Estcourt C, Tucker JD, Hocking J, et al. Digital sexually transmitted infection and HIV services across prevention and care continuums: evidence and practical resources [Internet]. Sex Health 2022;19:278–85.35705515
  64. Berendes S, Gubijev A, McCarthy OL, Palmer MJ, Wilson E, Free C. Sexual health interventions delivered to participants by mobile technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Sex Transm Infect 2021;97:190–200.33452130
  65. Office for Health Improvement and Disparities. Integrated Sexual Health Service Specification [Internet]. 2023. URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1143246/Integrated-sexual-health-service-specification-2023.pdf (accessed March 2023).
  66. Sumray K, Lloyd KC, Estcourt CS, Burns F, Gibbs J. Access to, usage and clinical outcomes of, online postal sexually transmitted infection services: a scoping review. Sex Transm Infect 2022;98:528–35.35701146
  67. Gibbs J, Howarth AR, Sheringham J, Jackson LJ, Wong G, Copas A, et al. Assessing the impact of online postal self-sampling for sexually transmitted infections on health inequalities, access to care and clinical outcomes in the UK: protocol for ASSIST, a realist evaluation. BMJ Open 2022;12:e067170.
  68. Day S, Khan K, Kelly AM, Jones S, Kinsella R. Characteristics of newly diagnosed HIV-positive service users using a pan-London e-sexually transmitted infection screening service. Int J STD AIDS 2021;32:1036–42.33978539
  69. Manavi K, Hodson J. Observational study of factors associated with return of home sampling kits for sexually transmitted infections requested online in the UK. BMJ Open 2017;7:e017978.
  70. Public Health England. Condom Distribution Schemes in England 2015/16: A Survey of Sexual Health Commissioners [Internet]. 2017. URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/666306/Condom_Distribution_Schemes_in_England_2015.pdf (accessed March 2023).
  71. Bower P, Brueton V, Gamble C, Treweek S, Smith CT, Young B, Williamson P. Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities. Trials 2014;15:399.25322807
  72. Huang GD, Bull J, Johnston McKee K, Mahon E, Harper B, Roberts JN; CTTI Recruitment Project Team. Clinical trials recruitment planning: a proposed framework from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Contemp Clin Trials 2018;66:74–9.29330082
  73. Mercer CH, Clifton S, Riddell J, Tanton C, Freeman L, Copas AJ, et al. Impacts of COVID-19 on sexual behaviour in Britain: findings from a large, quasi-representative survey (Natsal-COVID). Sex Transm Infect 2022;98:469–77.34916335
  74. Wignall L, Portch E, McCormack M, Owens R, Cascalheira CJ, Attard-Johnson J, Cole T. Changes in sexual desire and behaviors among UK young adults during social lockdown due to COVID-19. J Sex Res 2021;58:976–85.33780311
  75. Mercer CH, Aicken CRH, Brook MG, Estcourt CS, Cassell JA. Estimating the likely public health impact of partner notification for a clinical service: an evidence-based algorithm. Am J Public Health 2011;101:2117–23.21940925
  76. Mercer CH, Prah P, Field N, Tanton C, Macdowall W, Clifton S, et al. The health and well-being of men who have sex with men (MSM) in Britain: evidence from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3). BMC Public Health 2016;16:525.27386950
  77. van Wees DA, den Daas C, Kretzschmar MEE, Heijne JCM. Who drops out and when? Predictors of nonresponse and loss to follow-up in a longitudinal cohort study among STI clinic visitors [Internet]. PLOS ONE 2019;14:e0218658.31216341
  78. van Bergen J, Götz HM, Richardus JH, Hoebe CJ, Broer J, Coenen AJ; PILOT CT study group. Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands. Sex Transm Infect 2005;81:17–23.15681716
  79. Carey MP, Senn TE, Vanable PA, Coury-Doniger P, Urban MA. Do STD clinic patients who consent to sexual health research differ from those who decline? Findings from a randomized controlled trial with implications for the generalization of research results. Sex Transm Dis 2008;35:73–7.18217228
  80. Free C, Palmer MJ, McCarthy OL, Jerome L, Berendes S, Knight M, et al. Effectiveness of a behavioural intervention delivered by text messages (safetxt) on sexually transmitted reinfections in people aged 16–24 years: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 2022;378:e070351.36170988
  81. Bailey JV, Webster R, Hunter R, Griffin M, Freemantle N, Rait G, et al. The Men’s Safer Sex project: intervention development and feasibility randomized controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men. Health Technol Assess 2016;20:1–124.
  82. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res 2005;7:e11.15829473
  83. Kohl LFM, Crutzen R, De Vries NK. Online prevention aimed at lifestyle behaviors: a systematic review of reviews. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e146.23859884
  84. Price KN, Lyons AB, Hamzavi IH, Hsiao JL, Shi VY. Facilitating clinical trials participation of low socioeconomic status patients. Dermatology 2021;237:843–6.33321504
  85. Spence T, Kander I, Walsh J, Griffiths F, Ross J. Perceptions and experiences of internet-based testing for sexually transmitted infections: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e17667.32663151
  86. Boutron I, Guittet L, Estellat C, Moher D, Hróbjartsson A, Ravaud P. Reporting methods of blinding in randomized trials assessing nonpharmacological treatments. Ford I, editor. PLOS Med 2007;4:e61.17311468
  87. Noguchi K, Albarracín D, Durantini MR, Glasman LR. Who participates in which health promotion programs? A meta-analysis of motivations underlying enrollment and retention in HIV-prevention interventions. Psychol Bull 2007;133:955–75.17967090
  88. Crutzen R, Viechtbauer W, Spigt M, Kotz D. Differential attrition in health behaviour change trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Health 2015;30:122–34.25109224
  89. Wortman PM. Differential attrition: another hazard of follow-up research. Am Psychol 1978;33:1145–6.
  90. Edwards RT, McIntosh E. Applied Health Economics for Public Health Practice and Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.
  91. Sadler S, Tosh J, Rawdin A, Squires H, Sutton A, Chilcott J. A Model to Evaluate the Cost Effectiveness of Condom Distribution (CD) Schemes, Developed for NICE Public Health Guidance on Condom Distribution Schemes and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) [Internet]. 2016. URL: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng68/documents/economic-report (accessed March 2023).
  92. Sailer FD. Development of a Multi Sexually Transmitted Infections Modelling Software. London: University College London; 2021.
  93. Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Br Med J 2016;355:i5239.27777223
← DiscussionAdditional information →

Attribution. Katie Newby; Kayleigh Kwah; Lauren Schumacher; Rik Crutzen; Julia V Bailey; Louise J Jackson et al. (2025). An interactive digital behaviour change intervention to decrease incidence of sexually transmitted infections among users of STI self-sampling websites: a feasibility RCT. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2025 Newby et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK619012. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support