EvidenceLib · Open textbook · CC BY 4.0
A realist informed mixed-methods evaluation of Schwartz Center Rounds® in England
Jill Maben, Cath Taylor, Jeremy Dawson, Mary Leamy, Imelda McCarthy, Ellie Reynolds, Shilpa Ross, Caroline Shuldham, Laura Bennett, Catherine Foot · 11 sections in 11 chapters. Each section is its own page.
Introduction and background
Methods
Literature reviews
Mapping Schwartz Rounds
Schwartz Center Rounds evaluation: survey
Staff experiences of Rounds
Contextual factors influencing variation in implementation and outcomes of Rounds
Realist evaluation
Discussion and conclusions
References
Acknowledgements
Attribution. Jill Maben; Cath Taylor; Jeremy Dawson; Mary Leamy; Imelda McCarthy; Ellie Reynolds et al. (2018). A realist informed mixed-methods evaluation of Schwartz Center Rounds® in England. NIHR Journals Library. Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2018. This work was produced by Maben et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK533087. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.