EvidenceLib · Open textbook · CC BY 4.0
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England
Naomi J Fulop, Holly Walton, Nadia Crellin, Theo Georghiou, Lauren Herlitz, Ian Litchfield, Efthalia Massou, Chris Sherlaw-Johnson, Manbinder Sidhu, Sonila M Tomini, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros, Jo Ellins, Stephen Morris, Pei Li Ng · 15 sections in 15 chapters. Each section is its own page.
Context
An overview of the methods used in the COVID-19 remote home monitoring evaluation
Capturing and informing early stages of design and implementation of COVID-19 remote home monitoring services (phase 1)
The development and implementation of COVID-19 remote home monitoring services (phase 2)
The impact of COVID-19 Oximetry @home on mortality and the use of hospital inpatient services
Impact of COVID virtual wards on hospital activity
Cost evaluation of remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients in England during wave 2 from October 2020 to April 2021
Staff experiences of delivering COVID-19 remote home monitoring services
Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with, COVID-19 remote home monitoring services
Examining disparities relating to service reach and patient engagement with COVID-19 remote home monitoring services
Technology-enabled and analogue models of remote home monitoring care for COVID-19: a rapid mixed-method evaluation of patient and staff experiences
Discussions and conclusions
References
Acknowledgements
List of supplementary material
Attribution. Naomi J Fulop; Holly Walton; Nadia Crellin; Theo Georghiou; Lauren Herlitz; Ian Litchfield et al. (2023). A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2023 Fulop et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK595751. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.