Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835
Books209
All textbooksMedical textbooksHuman anatomyOrganisms & biodiversityOther sciences
Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›A psychological talking therapy for suicidality in people experiencing non-affective psychosis: Mechanism and efficacy outcomes of the CARMS (Cognitive AppRoaches to coMbatting Suicidality) randomised controlled trial›Conclusions

Continue where you left off ()

GO BEYOND THE PAGEReading is just the beginning.

Turn scientific reading into research. Compare studies, examine evidence, and organize your findings in EvidenceHelix Workspace.

Explore Research Workspace →

A psychological talking therapy for suicidality in people experiencing non-affective psychosis: Mechanism and efficacy outcomes of the CARMS (Cognitive AppRoaches to coMbatting Suicidality) randomised controlled trial · Conclusions

Conclusions

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 1 min read

The CARMS project did not evidence a significant treatment effect in that over 6 months reductions in the severity of suicidal ideation were not significantly greater for the treatment compared to the control group of the RCT component of the CARMS project. This was the case for both the primary and secondary suicide outcome variables. However, a planned mediation analysis showed that for those in the suicide-focused therapy group, at the 6-month time point, appraisals of social support and social connectedness improved, which, in turn, led to reductions in suicidal ideation severity. Qualitative findings allowed us to probe the types of disconnectedness that participants identified as key to their psychotic and suicidal experiences which centred on not mattering, and feeling of little value. It is vital that future work explores (1) factors characterising subgroups of participants who benefited most and least from our suicide-focused therapy (2) mechanisms underlying transitions from not mattering to mattering and disconnectedness to feeling connected (3) how therapy process variables such as the alliance, therapy ‘dose’ and formulation level impact pathways to suicidal experiences involving the potential for becoming connected and becoming supported and (4) how mental health professionals fulfilling diverse roles can be part of suicide-focused service delivery.

← DiscussionReferences →

Attribution. Patricia Gooding; Yvonne Awenat; Richard Drake; Richard Emsley; Steven Jones; Navneet Kapur et al. (2026). A psychological talking therapy for suicidality in people experiencing non-affective psychosis: Mechanism and efficacy outcomes of the CARMS (Cognitive AppRoaches to coMbatting Suicidality) randomised controlled trial. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2026 Gooding et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK621220. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Conclusions

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support