Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,041 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A single lung lesion that is characterized by a small round mass of tissue, usually less than 1 cm in diameter, and can be detected by chest radiography. A solitary pulmonary nodule can be associated with neoplasm, tuberculosis, cyst, or other anomalies in the lung, the chest wall, or the pleura.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Nodules, Solitary Pulmonary; Pulmonary Nodule, Solitary; Pulmonary Nodules, Solitary; Solitary Pulmonary Nodules; Nodule, Solitary Pulmonary; Solitary Lung Nodule; Lung Nodule, Solitary; Nodule, Solitary Lung.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Lung Diseases
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 5,496 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Solitary Pulmonary Nodule” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 1,463 of them (26.6%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 1,749 records.
Reviews account for 604 records (11.0%) and meta-analyses for 44. Randomized controlled trials number 89 (1.6%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 1,119 |
| 2000-2009 | 1,165 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,749 |
| 2020 onward | 1,463 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 604 | 11.0% |
| Meta-analyses | 44 | 0.8% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 89 | 1.6% |
Method: PubMed query "Solitary Pulmonary Nodule"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.
Reading the evidence in respiratory medicine
Research on airway and lung disease mixes lung-function tests, symptom diaries, imaging and hospital records, so what was measured and in whom matters as much as the result. Many conditions here, such as asthma and COPD, vary between people and over time, and exposure studies (smoking, pollution, workplace dust) show association rather than proof of cause. Nothing on this page is advice about treatment or inhalers; anyone with breathing difficulty should seek care from a qualified clinician. Check how the condition was defined, the severity of the people studied and whether outcomes were symptoms, lung function or hospital admissions.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Navigational Bronchoscopy or Transthoracic Needle Biopsy for Lung Nodules [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundEach year, millions of pulmonary nodules are identified incidentally or through lung cancer screening, and many involve biopsy to distinguish cancer from benign processes.
- Closing excerpt
- ).
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (305 words)
BackgroundEach year, millions of pulmonary nodules are identified incidentally or through lung cancer screening, and many involve biopsy to distinguish cancer from benign processes. Both navigational bronchoscopy and computed tomography-guided transthoracic needle biopsy are commonly used in patients undergoing biopsies of peripheral pulmonary nodules, but the relative diagnostic accuracy of these two approaches is unclear.MethodsIn this multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, noninferiority trial, we assigned patients with an intermediate-risk or high-risk peripheral pulmonary nodule measuring 10 to 30 mm in diameter to undergo navigational bronchoscopy or transthoracic needle biopsy at seven centers across the United States. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy, which was defined as the percentage of patients with biopsies that showed a specific diagnosis (cancer or a specific benign condition) that was confirmed to be accurate through 12 months of clinical follow-up (nonferiority margin, 10 percentage points). Secondary outcomes included procedural complications such as the occurrence of pneumothorax.ResultsAmong the 234 patients included in the primary-outcome analysis (5 of whom were lost to follow-up), biopsy resulted in a specific diagnosis that was confirmed to be accurate through month 12 in 94 of 119 patients (79.0%) in the navigational bronchoscopy group and in 81 of 110 patients (73.6%) in the transthoracic needle biopsy group (absolute difference, 5.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -6.5 to 17.2; P = 0.003 for noninferiority; P = 0.17 for superiority). Pneumothorax occurred in 4 of 121 patients (3.3%) in the navigational bronchoscopy group and in 32 of 113 patients (28.3%) in the transthoracic needle biopsy group and led to the placement of a chest tube, hospital admission, or both in 1 patient (0.8%) and 13 patients (11.5%), respectively.ConclusionsThe diagnostic accuracy of navigational bronchoscopy was noninferior to that of transthoracic needle biopsy among patients with peripheral pulmonary nodules measuring 10 to 30 mm. (Funded by Medtronic and others; VERITAS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04250194.).
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40387025 · DOI · PMC12640718
Deep learning in pulmonary nodule detection and segmentation: a systematic review [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ObjectivesThe accurate detection and precise segmentation of lung nodules on computed tomography are key prerequisites for early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of lung cancer.
- Closing excerpt
- Factors such as external validation and transparency affect the clinical application.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (301 words)
ObjectivesThe accurate detection and precise segmentation of lung nodules on computed tomography are key prerequisites for early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of lung cancer. This study was designed to compare detection and segmentation methods for pulmonary nodules using deep-learning techniques to fill methodological gaps and biases in the existing literature.MethodsThis study utilized a systematic review with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library databases up to May 10, 2023. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 criteria was used to assess the risk of bias and was adjusted with the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging. The study analyzed and extracted model performance, data sources, and task-focus information.ResultsAfter screening, we included nine studies meeting our inclusion criteria. These studies were published between 2019 and 2023 and predominantly used public datasets, with the Lung Image Database Consortium Image Collection and Image Database Resource Initiative and Lung Nodule Analysis 2016 being the most common. The studies focused on detection, segmentation, and other tasks, primarily utilizing Convolutional Neural Networks for model development. Performance evaluation covered multiple metrics, including sensitivity and the Dice coefficient.ConclusionsThis study highlights the potential power of deep learning in lung nodule detection and segmentation. It underscores the importance of standardized data processing, code and data sharing, the value of external test datasets, and the need to balance model complexity and efficiency in future research.Clinical relevance statementDeep learning demonstrates significant promise in autonomously detecting and segmenting pulmonary nodules. Future research should address methodological shortcomings and variability to enhance its clinical utility.Key pointsDeep learning shows potential in the detection and segmentation of pulmonary nodules. There are methodological gaps and biases present in the existing literature. Factors such as external validation and transparency affect the clinical application.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38985185 · DOI · PMC11632000
Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the multi-cellular ecosystem in different radiological components of pulmonary part-solid nodules [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundEarly-stage lung adenocarcinoma that radiologically manifests as part-solid nodules, consisting of both ground-glass and solid components, has distinctive growth patterns and prognosis.
- Closing excerpt
- However, transcriptional differences exist in the vital signalling pathways of malignant and immune cells within these components.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (257 words)
BackgroundEarly-stage lung adenocarcinoma that radiologically manifests as part-solid nodules, consisting of both ground-glass and solid components, has distinctive growth patterns and prognosis. The characteristics of the tumour microenvironment and transcriptional features of the malignant cells of different radiological phenotypes remain poorly understood.MethodsTwelve treatment-naive patients with radiological part-solid nodules were enrolled. After frozen pathology was confirmed as lung adenocarcinoma, two regions (ground-glass and solid) from each of the 12 part-solid nodules and 5 normal lung tissues from 5 of the12 patients were subjected to single-cell sequencing by 10x Genomics. We used Seurat v3.1.5 for data integration and analysis.ResultsWe comprehensively dissected the multicellular ecosystem of the ground-glass and solid components of part-solid nodules at the single-cell resolution. In tumours, these components had comparable proportions of malignant cells. However, the angiogenesis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, KRAS, p53, and cell-cycle signalling pathways were significantly up-regulated in malignant cells within solid components compared to those within ground-glass components. For the tumour microenvironment, the relative abundance of myeloid and NK cells tended to be higher in solid components than in ground-glass components. Slight subtype composition differences existed between the ground-glass and solid components. The T/NK cell subsets' cytotoxic function and the macrophages' pro-inflammation function were suppressed in solid components. Moreover, pericytes in solid components had a stronger communication related to angiogenesis promotion with endothelial cells and tumour cells.ConclusionThe cellular landscape of ground-glass components is significantly different from that of normal tissue and similar to that of solid components. However, transcriptional differences exist in the vital signalling pathways of malignant and immune cells within these components.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35184398 · DOI · PMC8858630
Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT: definition of positive, indeterminate, and negative screen results. A nodule management recommendation from the European Society of Thoracic Imaging [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Early detection of lung cancer through low-dose CT lung cancer screening in a high-risk population has proven to reduce lung cancer-specific mortality.
- Closing excerpt
- Clinical relevance The ESTI nodule management recommendation aims to reduce follow-up examinations while preventing major stage shift and overtreatment.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (178 words)
Early detection of lung cancer through low-dose CT lung cancer screening in a high-risk population has proven to reduce lung cancer-specific mortality. Nodule management plays a pivotal role in early detection and further diagnostic approaches. The European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI) has established a nodule management recommendation to improve the handling of pulmonary nodules detected during screening. For solid nodules, the primary method for assessing the likelihood of malignancy is to monitor nodule growth using volumetry software. For subsolid nodules, the aggressiveness is determined by measuring the solid part. The ESTI-recommendation enhances existing protocols but puts a stronger focus on lesion aggressiveness. The main goals are to minimise the overall number of follow-up examinations while preventing the risk of a major stage shift and reducing the risk of overtreatment. KEY POINTS: Question Assessment of nodule growth and management according to guidelines is essential in lung cancer screening. Findings Assessment of nodule aggressiveness defines follow-up in lung cancer screening. Clinical relevance The ESTI nodule management recommendation aims to reduce follow-up examinations while preventing major stage shift and overtreatment.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40593170 · DOI · PMC12711968
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines [5]
- Research article British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules [6]
- Research article Meta-analysis of guided bronchoscopy for the evaluation of the pulmonary nodule [7]
- Research article Evaluating the Patient With a Pulmonary Nodule: A Review [8]
- Research article Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Preoperative Lung Localization for Pulmonary Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [9]
- Research article Nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histologic correlation and evaluation of change at follow-up [10]
References
- Lentz RJ, Frederick-Dyer K, Planz VB, Koyama T, Aboudara MC, Avasarala SK, et al.. Navigational Bronchoscopy or Transthoracic Needle Biopsy for Lung Nodules. . 2025. PMID 40387025 · DOI · PMC12640718
- Gao C, Wu L, Wu W, Huang Y, Wang X, Sun Z, et al.. Deep learning in pulmonary nodule detection and segmentation: a systematic review. . 2025. PMID 38985185 · DOI · PMC11632000
- Li Y, Li X, Chen H, Sun K, Li H, Zhou Y, et al.. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the multi-cellular ecosystem in different radiological components of pulmonary part-solid nodules. . 2022. PMID 35184398 · DOI · PMC8858630
- Snoeckx A, Silva M, Prosch H, Biederer J, Frauenfelder T, Gleeson F, et al.. Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT: definition of positive, indeterminate, and negative screen results. A nodule management recommendation from the European Society of Thoracic Imaging. . 2026. PMID 40593170 · DOI · PMC12711968
- Gould MK, Donington J, Lynch WR, Mazzone PJ, Midthun DE, Naidich DP, et al.. Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013. PMID 23649456 · DOI · PMC3749714
- Callister ME, Baldwin DR, Akram AR, Barnard S, Cane P, Draffan J, et al.. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax. 2015. PMID 26082159 · DOI
- Wang Memoli JS, Nietert PJ, Silvestri GA. Meta-analysis of guided bronchoscopy for the evaluation of the pulmonary nodule. Chest. 2012. PMID 21980059 · DOI · PMC3425336
- Mazzone PJ, Lam L. Evaluating the Patient With a Pulmonary Nodule: A Review. JAMA. 2022. PMID 35040882 · DOI
- Park CH, Han K, Hur J, Lee SM, Lee JW, Hwang SH, et al.. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Preoperative Lung Localization for Pulmonary Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Chest. 2017. PMID 27717643 · DOI
- Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, Lee CH, Chun EJ, Im JG. Nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histologic correlation and evaluation of change at follow-up. Radiographics. 2007. PMID 17374860 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.