Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Public Health and Nutrition›Sand

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Sand

Public Health and Nutrition · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

A hard granular material that is a component of soil.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (840 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A hard granular material that is a component of soil. It is composed of very small pieces (between 0.06 and 2.0 millimeters in diameter) of disintegrating rock.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Sands.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Soil; Geologic Sediments

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 1,903 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Sand” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,842 of them (96.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 1,842 records.

Reviews account for 39 records (2.0%) and meta-analyses for 4. Randomized controlled trials number 12 (0.6%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 0 records; 2010-2019: 91 records; 2020 onward: 1,842 records0through 199902000-2009912010-20191,8422020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-20090
2010-201991
2020 onward1,842
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 2.0 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.6 percentReviews2.0% (39)Meta-analyses0.2% (4)Randomized controlled trials0.6% (12)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 1,903 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews392.0%
Meta-analyses40.2%
Randomized controlled trials120.6%

Method: PubMed query "Sand"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in public health and nutrition

Population and nutrition studies mostly observe what people eat, breathe or are exposed to and then look for links with health, which shows association and not proof of cause. Self-reported diet is imprecise, people who eat or live differently also differ in other ways, and effects measured across a population may not apply to one person. Check the study design, how exposure was measured, what else was accounted for and the size of the effect, not only whether it was statistically significant.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Enzyme Induced Biocementated Sand with High Strength at Low Carbonate Content
Almajed A, Tirkolaei HK, Kavazanjian E, Hamdan N
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
34cc by
PMID 30718723 · DOI · PMC6362242
Production and Application of Biosurfactant Produced by Bacillus Licheniformis Ali5 in Enhanced Oil Recovery and Motor Oil Removal from Contaminated Sand
Ali N, Wang F, Xu B, Safdar B, Ullah A, Naveed M, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
26cc by
PMID 31817293 · DOI · PMC6943484
Health effects of desert dust and sand storms: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Tobias A, Karanasiou A, Amato F, Roqué M, Querol X
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
18cc by
PMID 31366661 · DOI · PMC6677997
Efficacy of Slow Sand Filtration Enriched with Trichoderma atroviride in the Control of Fusarium oxysporum in Soilless Cultivation Systems
Matias P, Coelho L, Reis M
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 41599075 · DOI · PMC12845089

Enzyme Induced Biocementated Sand with High Strength at Low Carbonate Content [1]

Research article Almajed A, Tirkolaei HK, Kavazanjian E, Hamdan N · · 2019 · cited 34 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Specimens of silica sand treated via enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) showed surprisingly high strength at a relatively low carbonate content when non-fat powdered milk was included in the treatment solution.
Closing excerpt
These advantages enhance the potential for development of a sustainable method of soil improvement via hydrolysis of urea.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (189 words)

Specimens of silica sand treated via enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) showed surprisingly high strength at a relatively low carbonate content when non-fat powdered milk was included in the treatment solution. EICP is a biologically-based soil improvement technique that uses free urease enzyme to catalyze the hydrolysis of urea in an aqueous solution, producing carbonate ions and alkalinity that in the presence of calcium cations leads to precipitation of calcium carbonate. The strength achieved at less than 1.4% carbonate content via a single cycle of treatment was unprecedented compared to results reported in the literature from both EICP and microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP). Scanning electron microscope images show that in the specimens treated with the solution containing powdered milk the carbonate precipitate was concentrated at interparticle contacts. The impact of these results include reductions in the concentration of substrate and enzyme required to achieve a target compressive strength, reduction in the undesirable ammonium chloride by-product, and, depending on the desired strength, reduction in the number of cycles of EICP treatment. These advantages enhance the potential for development of a sustainable method of soil improvement via hydrolysis of urea.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30718723 · DOI · PMC6362242

Production and Application of Biosurfactant Produced by Bacillus Licheniformis Ali5 in Enhanced Oil Recovery and Motor Oil Removal from Contaminated Sand [2]

Research article Ali N, Wang F, Xu B, Safdar B, Ullah A, Naveed M, et al. · · 2019 · cited 26 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The present study describes the production of biosurfactant from isolate B.
Closing excerpt
These results are indicative of potential application of biosurfactant in wettability alteration and ex-situ microbial enhanced oil recovery.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (210 words)

The present study describes the production of biosurfactant from isolate B. licheniformis Ali5. Seven different, previously-reported minimal media were screened for biosurfactant production, and two selected media were further optimized for carbon source. Further, various fermentation conditions such as (pH 2-12, temperature 20-50 °C, agitation speed 100-300 rpm, NaCl (0-30 g·L-1) were investigated. The partially purified biosurfactant was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectroscopy (MALDI-TOF MS) and found a lipopeptide mixture, similar to lichenysin-A. Biosurfactant reduced surface tension from 72.0 to 26.21 ± 0.3 and interfacial tension by 0.26 ± 0.1 mN.m-1 respectively, biosurfactant yield under optimized conditions was 1 g·L-1, with critical micelle concentration (CMC) of 21 mg·L-1 with high emulsification activity of (E24) 66.4 ± 1.4% against crude oil. Biosurfactant was found to be stable over extreme conditions. It also altered the wettability of hydrophobic surface by changing the contact angle from 49.76° to 16.97°. Biosurfactant efficiently removed (70-79%) motor oil from sand, with an efficiency of more than 2 fold as compared without biosurfactant (36-38%). It gave 32% additional oil recovery over residual oil saturation upon application to a sand-packed column. These results are indicative of potential application of biosurfactant in wettability alteration and ex-situ microbial enhanced oil recovery.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31817293 · DOI · PMC6943484

Health effects of desert dust and sand storms: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol [3]

Research article Tobias A, Karanasiou A, Amato F, Roqué M, Querol X · · 2019 · cited 18 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
IntroductionDesert dust concentrations raise concerns about adverse effects on human health.
Closing excerpt
Prospero registration numberCRD42018091809.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (256 words)

IntroductionDesert dust concentrations raise concerns about adverse effects on human health. During the last decade, special attention has been given to mineral dust particles from desert dust and sand storms. However, evidence from previous reviews reported inconclusive results on their health effects and the biological mechanism remains unclear. We aim to systematically synthesise evidence on the health effects of desert dust and sand storms accounting for the relevant desert dust patterns from source areas and emissions, transport and composition.Methods an analysisWe will conduct a systematic review that investigated the health effects of desert dust and sand storms in any population. The search will be performed for any eligible studies from previous reviews and selected electronic databases until 2018. Study selection and reporting will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data from individual studies will be extracted using a standardised data extraction form. Quality of the studies will be assessed using a risk of bias tool for environmental exposures developed by experts convened by the WHO. A meta-analysis will be performed by calculating the appropriate effect measures of association for binary and continuous outcomes from individual studies. Subgroup analyses will be performed by geographical areas to account for desert dust patterns.Ethics and disseminationNo primary data will be collected. For this reason, no formal ethical approval is required. This systematic review will help to fill the research gaps in the knowledge of desert dust on human health. The results will be disseminated through a WHO peer-reviewed publication and a conference presentation.Prospero registration numberCRD42018091809.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31366661 · DOI · PMC6677997

Efficacy of Slow Sand Filtration Enriched with Trichoderma atroviride in the Control of Fusarium oxysporum in Soilless Cultivation Systems [4]

Research article Matias P, Coelho L, Reis M · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
On a planet intending to move toward carbon neutrality while ensuring food security, maximizing water and nutrient use efficiency in agriculture is essential.
Closing excerpt
oxysporum, but further optimization is needed for consistent and complete pathogen control.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (185 words)

On a planet intending to move toward carbon neutrality while ensuring food security, maximizing water and nutrient use efficiency in agriculture is essential. Soilless cultivation offers a promising solution for food production, yet in substrate-based systems, excess nutrient solution (drainage) is often discarded to maintain phytosanitary safety, resulting in considerable water and nutrient waste. Reusing this drainage requires disinfection to eliminate pathogens. Among available methods, slow sand filtration (SSF) is ecological, economical, and simple, showing strong biological control potential, though not always fully effective against Fusarium oxysporum. Trichoderma atroviride, an antagonistic fungus, may enhance SSF performance. Its antagonistic capacity was evaluated in vitro via direct confrontation assays and in vivo using a closed-loop soilless cucumber cultivation system with eight treatment combinations of SSF, T. atroviride, and F. oxysporum. SSF reduced F. oxysporum incidence by approximately 48%, T. atroviride in irrigation by 44%, and SSF enriched with T. atroviride reached 58% disease incidence reduction, though this increase was not statistically significant. These results confirm that both SSF and T. atroviride can partially suppress F. oxysporum, but further optimization is needed for consistent and complete pathogen control.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41599075 · DOI · PMC12845089

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Sand and dust storms: a growing global health threat calls for international health studies to support policy action [5]
    Li T, Cohen AJ, Krzyzanowski M, Zhang C, Gumy S, Mudu P, et al. · Lancet Planet Health · 2025 · cited 21 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Surprising simplicities and syntheses in limbless self-propulsion in sand [6]
    Astley HC, Mendelson JR, Dai J, Gong C, Chong B, Rieser JM, et al. · J Exp Biol · 2020 · cited 21 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Potential impact of bacteria on the transport of PFAS in porous media [7]
    Dai M, Yan N, Brusseau ML · Water Res · 2023 · cited 20 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Assessing the effects of China's Three-North Shelter Forest Program over 40 years [8]
    Zhai J, Wang L, Liu Y, Wang C, Mao X · Sci Total Environ · 2023 · cited 20 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Climate Change Impacts on Microbiota in Beach Sand and Water: Looking Ahead [9]
    Brandão J, Weiskerger C, Valério E, Pitkänen T, Meriläinen P, Avolio L, et al. · Int J Environ Res Public Health · 2022 · cited 16 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Effect of Natural Turf, Artificial Turf, and Sand Surfaces on Sprint Performance. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [10]
    Sanchez-Sanchez J, Martinez-Rodriguez A, Martinez-Rodriguez A, Felipe JL, Hernandez-Martin A, Ubago-Guisado E, et al. · Int J Environ Res Public Health · 2020 · cited 12 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Almajed A, Tirkolaei HK, Kavazanjian E, Hamdan N. Enzyme Induced Biocementated Sand with High Strength at Low Carbonate Content. . 2019. PMID 30718723 · DOI · PMC6362242
  2. Ali N, Wang F, Xu B, Safdar B, Ullah A, Naveed M, et al.. Production and Application of Biosurfactant Produced by Bacillus Licheniformis Ali5 in Enhanced Oil Recovery and Motor Oil Removal from Contaminated Sand. . 2019. PMID 31817293 · DOI · PMC6943484
  3. Tobias A, Karanasiou A, Amato F, Roqué M, Querol X. Health effects of desert dust and sand storms: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. . 2019. PMID 31366661 · DOI · PMC6677997
  4. Matias P, Coelho L, Reis M. Efficacy of Slow Sand Filtration Enriched with Trichoderma atroviride in the Control of Fusarium oxysporum in Soilless Cultivation Systems. . 2026. PMID 41599075 · DOI · PMC12845089
  5. Li T, Cohen AJ, Krzyzanowski M, Zhang C, Gumy S, Mudu P, et al.. Sand and dust storms: a growing global health threat calls for international health studies to support policy action. Lancet Planet Health. 2025. PMID 39855230 · DOI · PMC11755727
  6. Astley HC, Mendelson JR, Dai J, Gong C, Chong B, Rieser JM, et al.. Surprising simplicities and syntheses in limbless self-propulsion in sand. J Exp Biol. 2020. PMID 32111654 · DOI
  7. Dai M, Yan N, Brusseau ML. Potential impact of bacteria on the transport of PFAS in porous media. Water Res. 2023. PMID 37499541 · DOI · PMC10530518
  8. Zhai J, Wang L, Liu Y, Wang C, Mao X. Assessing the effects of China's Three-North Shelter Forest Program over 40 years. Sci Total Environ. 2023. PMID 36240929 · DOI
  9. Brandão J, Weiskerger C, Valério E, Pitkänen T, Meriläinen P, Avolio L, et al.. Climate Change Impacts on Microbiota in Beach Sand and Water: Looking Ahead. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID 35162479 · DOI · PMC8834802
  10. Sanchez-Sanchez J, Martinez-Rodriguez A, Martinez-Rodriguez A, Felipe JL, Hernandez-Martin A, Ubago-Guisado E, et al.. Effect of Natural Turf, Artificial Turf, and Sand Surfaces on Sprint Performance. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID 33348874 · DOI · PMC7767268

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • ClayPublic Health and Nutrition
  • SoilPublic Health and Nutrition
  • AirPublic Health and Nutrition
  • AltitudePublic Health and Nutrition
  • BiomassPublic Health and Nutrition
  • Carbon FootprintPublic Health and Nutrition

All 114 articles in Public Health and Nutrition →

At a glance

1,903
PubMed records on this heading
97%
published since 2020
39
review articles
12
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • ClayPublic Health and Nutrition
  • SoilPublic Health and Nutrition
  • AirPublic Health and Nutrition
  • AltitudePublic Health and Nutrition
  • BiomassPublic Health and Nutrition

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support