Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Molecular Biology›S Phase
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

S Phase

Molecular Biology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Phase of the cell cycle following G1 and preceding G2 when the entire DNA content of the nucleus is replicated.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (688 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Phase of the cell cycle following G1 and preceding G2 when the entire DNA content of the nucleus is replicated. It is achieved by bidirectional replication at multiple sites along each chromosome.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Phase, S; Phases, S; S Phases; S Period; Period, S; Periods, S; S Periods.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
DNA Replication; Interphase
Narrower topics
S Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints
See also
DNA Replication; DNA Replication Timing

Related concepts

  • Cell Cycle

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 10,897 records tagged with the MeSH heading “S Phase” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 616 of them (5.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 4,027 records.

Reviews account for 569 records (5.2%) and meta-analyses for 1. Randomized controlled trials number 32 (0.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 3,267 records; 2000-2009: 4,027 records; 2010-2019: 2,987 records; 2020 onward: 616 records3,267through 19994,0272000-20092,9872010-20196162020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19993,267
2000-20094,027
2010-20192,987
2020 onward616
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.2 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.3 percentReviews5.2% (569)Meta-analyses0.0% (1)Randomized controlled trials0.3% (32)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 10,897 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews5695.2%
Meta-analyses10.0%
Randomized controlled trials320.3%

Method: PubMed query "S Phase"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in molecular biology

Molecular biology establishes mechanisms through controlled experiments, often in simplified systems such as purified proteins, cultured cells or model organisms. Such work can show what is possible in a defined system, but whether a pathway matters in a whole organism or in human disease needs further evidence. Check the experimental system, whether findings were reproduced by independent groups, and whether the authors tested the mechanism directly or inferred it from correlation.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
DNA damage during S-phase mediates the proliferation-quiescence decision in the subsequent G1 via p21 expression
Barr AR, Cooper S, Heldt FS, Butera F, Stoy H, Mansfeld J, et al.
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
355cc by
PMID 28317845 · DOI · PMC5364389
Genetic instability from a single S phase after whole-genome duplication
Gemble S, Wardenaar R, Keuper K, Srivastava N, Nano M, Macé AS, et al.
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
130cc by
PMID 35355016 · DOI · PMC8986533
β-Thujaplicin induces autophagic cell death, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest through ROS-mediated Akt and p38/ERK MAPK signaling in human hepatocellular carcinoma
Zhang G, He J, Ye X, Zhu J, Hu X, Shen M, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
120cc by
PMID 30874538 · DOI · PMC6420571
Nuclear compartmentalization at the G1/S transition plays a key role in DNA replication control
Oji A, Yusa K, Noda I, Ichinose T, Kondo Y, Hiratani I
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 42575893 · DOI · PMC13458202

DNA damage during S-phase mediates the proliferation-quiescence decision in the subsequent G1 via p21 expression [1]

Research article Barr AR, Cooper S, Heldt FS, Butera F, Stoy H, Mansfeld J, et al. · · 2017 · cited 355 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Following DNA damage caused by exogenous sources, such as ionizing radiation, the tumour suppressor p53 mediates cell cycle arrest via expression of the CDK inhibitor, p21.
Closing excerpt
Thus, we characterize how p21 regulates the proliferation-quiescence decision to maintain genomic stability.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (149 words)

Following DNA damage caused by exogenous sources, such as ionizing radiation, the tumour suppressor p53 mediates cell cycle arrest via expression of the CDK inhibitor, p21. However, the role of p21 in maintaining genomic stability in the absence of exogenous DNA-damaging agents is unclear. Here, using live single-cell measurements of p21 protein in proliferating cultures, we show that naturally occurring DNA damage incurred over S-phase causes p53-dependent accumulation of p21 during mother G2- and daughter G1-phases. High p21 levels mediate G1 arrest via CDK inhibition, yet lower levels have no impact on G1 progression, and the ubiquitin ligases CRL4Cdt2 and SCFSkp2 couple to degrade p21 prior to the G1/S transition. Mathematical modelling reveals that a bistable switch, created by CRL4Cdt2, promotes irreversible S-phase entry by keeping p21 levels low, preventing premature S-phase exit upon DNA damage. Thus, we characterize how p21 regulates the proliferation-quiescence decision to maintain genomic stability.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28317845 · DOI · PMC5364389

Genetic instability from a single S phase after whole-genome duplication [2]

Research article Gemble S, Wardenaar R, Keuper K, Srivastava N, Nano M, Macé AS, et al. · · 2022 · cited 130 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Diploid and stable karyotypes are associated with health and fitness in animals.
Closing excerpt
These findings provide an explanation for the genetic instability landscape that favours tumorigenesis after tetraploidization.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (172 words)

Diploid and stable karyotypes are associated with health and fitness in animals. By contrast, whole-genome duplications-doublings of the entire complement of chromosomes-are linked to genetic instability and frequently found in human cancers1-3. It has been established that whole-genome duplications fuel chromosome instability through abnormal mitosis4-8; however, the immediate consequences of tetraploidy in the first interphase are not known. This is a key question because single whole-genome duplication events such as cytokinesis failure can promote tumorigenesis9. Here we find that human cells undergo high rates of DNA damage during DNA replication in the first S phase following induction of tetraploidy. Using DNA combing and single-cell sequencing, we show that DNA replication dynamics is perturbed, generating under- and over-replicated regions. Mechanistically, we find that these defects result from a shortage of proteins during the G1/S transition, which impairs the fidelity of DNA replication. This work shows that within a single interphase, unscheduled tetraploid cells can acquire highly abnormal karyotypes. These findings provide an explanation for the genetic instability landscape that favours tumorigenesis after tetraploidization.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35355016 · DOI · PMC8986533

β-Thujaplicin induces autophagic cell death, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest through ROS-mediated Akt and p38/ERK MAPK signaling in human hepatocellular carcinoma [3]

Research article Zhang G, He J, Ye X, Zhu J, Hu X, Shen M, et al. · · 2019 · cited 120 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a common liver malignancy worldwide, has high morbidity and mortality.
Closing excerpt
Taken together these findings suggest that β-Thujaplicin have an ability of anti-HCC cells and may conducively promote the development of novel anti-cancer agents.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (217 words)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a common liver malignancy worldwide, has high morbidity and mortality. β-Thujaplicin, a tropolone derivative, has been used in some health-care products and clinical adjuvant drugs, but its use for HCC is unknown. In this study, we found that β-Thujaplicin inhibits the growth of HCC cells, but not normal liver cells, with nanomolar potency. Mechanistically, we found that β-Thujaplicin could induce autophagy, as judged by western blot, confocal microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. Further using β-Thujaplicin combined with an autophagy blocker or agonist treatment HepG2 cells, we found that β-Thujaplicin induced autophagic cell death (ACD) mediated by ROS caused inhibition of the Akt-mTOR signaling pathway. Moreover, β-Thujaplicin triggered HepG2 apoptosis and increased cleaved PARP1, cleaved caspase-3, and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, which indicated that β-Thujaplicin induced apoptosis mediated by the mitochondrial-dependent pathway. We also found that increased expression of p21 and decreased expression of CDK7, Cyclin D1, and Cyclin A2 participating in β-Thujaplicin caused the S-phase arrest. It seems that β-Thujaplicin exerts these functions by ROS-mediated p38/ERK MAPK but not by JNK signaling pathway activation. Consistent with in vitro findings, our in vivo study verified that β-Thujaplicin treatment significantly reduced HepG2 tumor xenograft growth. Taken together these findings suggest that β-Thujaplicin have an ability of anti-HCC cells and may conducively promote the development of novel anti-cancer agents.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30874538 · DOI · PMC6420571

Nuclear compartmentalization at the G1/S transition plays a key role in DNA replication control [4]

Research article Oji A, Yusa K, Noda I, Ichinose T, Kondo Y, Hiratani I · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Upon entry into the G1 phase following mitosis, mammalian chromosomal DNA becomes spatially segregated into A and B compartments, which correspond closely to classic euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively.
Closing excerpt
Our findings uncover a previously unrecognized role for GINS4 in regulating nuclear architecture and underscore the biological significance of nuclear compartmentalization in DNA replication control.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)

Upon entry into the G1 phase following mitosis, mammalian chromosomal DNA becomes spatially segregated into A and B compartments, which correspond closely to classic euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. The functional significance of this spatial segregation, however, has remained unexplored due to the lack of means to manipulate this level of chromosomal organization. Through a genome-wide loss-of-function CRISPR screen, we identify GINS4, a component of the replicative DNA helicase complex, as a factor essential for segregation of A and B compartments during the G1-to-S phase transition. Using GINS4 depletion experiments, we show that proper A/B compartment organization at the time of S-phase entry plays a key role in efficient DNA synthesis. Furthermore, DNA synthesis with attenuated A/B compartments is associated with defects in replication timing regulation. Our findings uncover a previously unrecognized role for GINS4 in regulating nuclear architecture and underscore the biological significance of nuclear compartmentalization in DNA replication control.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42575893 · DOI · PMC13458202

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork [5]
    Moldovan GL, Pfander B, Jentsch S · Cell · 2007 · cited 1,452 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases [6]
    Bertoli C, Skotheim JM, de Bruin RA · Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol · 2013 · cited 1,198 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway as a master regulator of the G1- to S-phase transition [7]
    Meloche S, Pouysségur J · Oncogene · 2007 · cited 871 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Dangers of using "optimal" cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors [8]
    Altman DG, Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M · J Natl Cancer Inst · 1994 · cited 812 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Checking on DNA damage in S phase [9]
    Bartek J, Lukas C, Lukas J · Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol · 2004 · cited 560 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article DNA replication origin activation in space and time [10]
    Fragkos M, Ganier O, Coulombe P, Méchali M · Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol · 2015 · cited 434 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Barr AR, Cooper S, Heldt FS, Butera F, Stoy H, Mansfeld J, et al.. DNA damage during S-phase mediates the proliferation-quiescence decision in the subsequent G1 via p21 expression. . 2017. PMID 28317845 · DOI · PMC5364389
  2. Gemble S, Wardenaar R, Keuper K, Srivastava N, Nano M, Macé AS, et al.. Genetic instability from a single S phase after whole-genome duplication. . 2022. PMID 35355016 · DOI · PMC8986533
  3. Zhang G, He J, Ye X, Zhu J, Hu X, Shen M, et al.. β-Thujaplicin induces autophagic cell death, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest through ROS-mediated Akt and p38/ERK MAPK signaling in human hepatocellular carcinoma. . 2019. PMID 30874538 · DOI · PMC6420571
  4. Oji A, Yusa K, Noda I, Ichinose T, Kondo Y, Hiratani I. Nuclear compartmentalization at the G1/S transition plays a key role in DNA replication control. . 2026. PMID 42575893 · DOI · PMC13458202
  5. Moldovan GL, Pfander B, Jentsch S. PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork. Cell. 2007. PMID 17512402 · DOI
  6. Bertoli C, Skotheim JM, de Bruin RA. Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013. PMID 23877564 · DOI · PMC4569015
  7. Meloche S, Pouysségur J. The ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway as a master regulator of the G1- to S-phase transition. Oncogene. 2007. PMID 17496918 · DOI
  8. Altman DG, Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M. Dangers of using "optimal" cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994. PMID 8182763 · DOI
  9. Bartek J, Lukas C, Lukas J. Checking on DNA damage in S phase. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004. PMID 15459660 · DOI
  10. Fragkos M, Ganier O, Coulombe P, Méchali M. DNA replication origin activation in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015. PMID 25999062 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • G2 PhaseMolecular Biology
  • G1 PhaseMolecular Biology
  • InterphaseMolecular Biology
  • Cell CycleMolecular Biology
  • Cell DivisionMolecular Biology
  • MitosisMolecular Biology

All 100 articles in Molecular Biology →

At a glance

10,897
PubMed records on this heading
6%
published since 2020
569
review articles
32
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • G2 PhaseMolecular Biology
  • G1 PhaseMolecular Biology
  • InterphaseMolecular Biology
  • Cell CycleMolecular Biology
  • Cell DivisionMolecular Biology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support