Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (683 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The interval between two successive cell divisions during which the chromosomes are not individually distinguishable. It is composed of the G phases (G1 phase; G0 phase; G2 phase) and S phase (when DNA replication occurs).
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Interphases.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Cell Cycle
- Narrower topics
- G1 Phase; G2 Phase; Resting Phase, Cell Cycle; S Phase
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 36,368 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Interphase” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 2,606 of them (7.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 11,393 records.
Reviews account for 1,613 records (4.4%) and meta-analyses for 3. Randomized controlled trials number 37 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 11,393 |
| 2000-2009 | 10,998 |
| 2010-2019 | 11,371 |
| 2020 onward | 2,606 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,613 | 4.4% |
| Meta-analyses | 3 | 0.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 37 | 0.1% |
Method: PubMed query "Interphase"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in molecular biology
Molecular biology establishes mechanisms through controlled experiments, often in simplified systems such as purified proteins, cultured cells or model organisms. Such work can show what is possible in a defined system, but whether a pathway matters in a whole organism or in human disease needs further evidence. Check the experimental system, whether findings were reproduced by independent groups, and whether the authors tested the mechanism directly or inferred it from correlation.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senescence in Post-Mitotic Cells: A Driver of Aging? | 2021 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 146 | cc by PMID 32164429 · DOI · PMC7821432 |
| Genetic instability from a single S phase after whole-genome duplication | 2022 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 130 | cc by PMID 35355016 · DOI · PMC8986533 |
| Stress-mediated exit to quiescence restricted by increasing persistence in CDK4/6 activation | 2020 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 89 | cc0 PMID 32255427 · DOI · PMC7213986 |
| Interphase chromosome conformation is specified by distinct folding programmes inherited through mitotic chromosomes or the cytoplasm | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 23 | cc by PMID 41429936 · DOI · PMC12807859 |
Senescence in Post-Mitotic Cells: A Driver of Aging? [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Significance: Cell senescence was originally defined by an acute loss of replicative capacity and thus believed to be restricted to proliferation-competent cells.
- Closing excerpt
- 34, 308-323.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (212 words)
Significance: Cell senescence was originally defined by an acute loss of replicative capacity and thus believed to be restricted to proliferation-competent cells. More recently, senescence has been recognized as a cellular stress and damage response encompassing multiple pathways or senescence domains, namely DNA damage response, cell cycle arrest, senescence-associated secretory phenotype, senescence-associated mitochondrial dysfunction, autophagy/mitophagy dysfunction, nutrient and stress signaling, and epigenetic reprogramming. Each of these domains is activated during senescence, and all appear to interact with each other. Cell senescence has been identified as an important driver of mammalian aging. Recent Advances: Activation of all these senescence domains has now also been observed in a wide range of post-mitotic cells, suggesting that senescence as a stress response can occur in nondividing cells temporally uncoupled from cell cycle arrest. Here, we review recent evidence for post-mitotic cell senescence and speculate about its possible relevance for mammalian aging. Critical Issues: Although a majority of senescence domains has been found to be activated in a range of post-mitotic cells during aging, independent confirmation of these results is still lacking for most of them. Future Directions: To define whether post-mitotic senescence plays a significant role as a driver of aging phenotypes in tissues such as brain, muscle, heart, and others. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 34, 308-323.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32164429 · DOI · PMC7821432
Genetic instability from a single S phase after whole-genome duplication [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Diploid and stable karyotypes are associated with health and fitness in animals.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings provide an explanation for the genetic instability landscape that favours tumorigenesis after tetraploidization.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (172 words)
Diploid and stable karyotypes are associated with health and fitness in animals. By contrast, whole-genome duplications-doublings of the entire complement of chromosomes-are linked to genetic instability and frequently found in human cancers1-3. It has been established that whole-genome duplications fuel chromosome instability through abnormal mitosis4-8; however, the immediate consequences of tetraploidy in the first interphase are not known. This is a key question because single whole-genome duplication events such as cytokinesis failure can promote tumorigenesis9. Here we find that human cells undergo high rates of DNA damage during DNA replication in the first S phase following induction of tetraploidy. Using DNA combing and single-cell sequencing, we show that DNA replication dynamics is perturbed, generating under- and over-replicated regions. Mechanistically, we find that these defects result from a shortage of proteins during the G1/S transition, which impairs the fidelity of DNA replication. This work shows that within a single interphase, unscheduled tetraploid cells can acquire highly abnormal karyotypes. These findings provide an explanation for the genetic instability landscape that favours tumorigenesis after tetraploidization.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35355016 · DOI · PMC8986533
Stress-mediated exit to quiescence restricted by increasing persistence in CDK4/6 activation [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Mammalian cells typically start the cell-cycle entry program by activating cyclin-dependent protein kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6).
- Closing excerpt
- Together, our study reveals a regulation of G1 length by temporary inactivation of CDK4/6 activity after mitosis, and a progressively increasing persistence in CDK4/6 activity that restricts cells from returning to quiescence as cells approach S phase.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)
Mammalian cells typically start the cell-cycle entry program by activating cyclin-dependent protein kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6). CDK4/6 activity is clinically relevant as mutations, deletions, and amplifications that increase CDK4/6 activity contribute to the progression of many cancers. However, when CDK4/6 is activated relative to CDK2 remained incompletely understood. Here, we developed a reporter system to simultaneously monitor CDK4/6 and CDK2 activities in single cells and found that CDK4/6 activity increases rapidly before CDK2 activity gradually increases, and that CDK4/6 activity can be active after mitosis or inactive for variable time periods. Markedly, stress signals in G1 can rapidly inactivate CDK4/6 to return cells to quiescence but with reduced probability as cells approach S phase. Together, our study reveals a regulation of G1 length by temporary inactivation of CDK4/6 activity after mitosis, and a progressively increasing persistence in CDK4/6 activity that restricts cells from returning to quiescence as cells approach S phase.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc0 licence; © the authors. PMID 32255427 · DOI · PMC7213986
Interphase chromosome conformation is specified by distinct folding programmes inherited through mitotic chromosomes or the cytoplasm [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Identity-specific chromosome conformation must be re-established at each cell division.
- Closing excerpt
- The combined and interdependent action of chromosome-intrinsic and cytoplasmic inherited folding programmes determines the interphase chromatin conformation as cells exit mitosis.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (149 words)
Identity-specific chromosome conformation must be re-established at each cell division. To uncover how interphase folding is inherited, we developed an approach that segregates chromosome-intrinsic mechanisms from those propagated through the cytoplasm during G1 nuclear reassembly. Inducible degradation of proteins essential for the establishment of nucleocytoplasmic transport during mitotic exit enabled analysis of folding programmes with distinct modes of inheritance. Here we show that genome compartmentalization is driven entirely by chromosome-intrinsic factors. In addition to conventional compartmental segregation, the chromosome-intrinsic folding programme leads to prominent genome-scale microcompartmentalization of mitotically bookmarked cis-regulatory elements. The microcompartment conformation forms transiently during telophase and is subsequently modulated by a second folding programme inherited through the cytoplasm in early G1. This programme includes cohesin-mediated loop extrusion and factors involved in transcription and RNA processing. The combined and interdependent action of chromosome-intrinsic and cytoplasmic inherited folding programmes determines the interphase chromatin conformation as cells exit mitosis.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41429936 · DOI · PMC12807859
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression [5]
- Research article G1 phase progression: cycling on cue [6]
- Research article PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork [7]
- Research article Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases [8]
- Research article Regulation of the G2/M transition by p53 [9]
- Research article G1 cell-cycle control and cancer [10]
References
- von Zglinicki T, Wan T, Miwa S. Senescence in Post-Mitotic Cells: A Driver of Aging?. . 2021. PMID 32164429 · DOI · PMC7821432
- Gemble S, Wardenaar R, Keuper K, Srivastava N, Nano M, Macé AS, et al.. Genetic instability from a single S phase after whole-genome duplication. . 2022. PMID 35355016 · DOI · PMC8986533
- Yang HW, Cappell SD, Jaimovich A, Liu C, Chung M, Daigh LH, et al.. Stress-mediated exit to quiescence restricted by increasing persistence in CDK4/6 activation. . 2020. PMID 32255427 · DOI · PMC7213986
- Schooley A, Venev SV, Aksenova V, Lehman JW, Navarrete E, Pai AA, et al.. Interphase chromosome conformation is specified by distinct folding programmes inherited through mitotic chromosomes or the cytoplasm. . 2026. PMID 41429936 · DOI · PMC12807859
- Sherr CJ, Roberts JM. CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 1999. PMID 10385618 · DOI
- Sherr CJ. G1 phase progression: cycling on cue. Cell. 1994. PMID 7954821 · DOI
- Moldovan GL, Pfander B, Jentsch S. PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork. Cell. 2007. PMID 17512402 · DOI
- Bertoli C, Skotheim JM, de Bruin RA. Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013. PMID 23877564 · DOI · PMC4569015
- Taylor WR, Stark GR. Regulation of the G2/M transition by p53. Oncogene. 2001. PMID 11313928 · DOI
- Massagué J. G1 cell-cycle control and cancer. Nature. 2004. PMID 15549091 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.