Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Molecular Biology›G2 Phase
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

G2 Phase

Molecular Biology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

The period of the cell cycle following DNA synthesis (S phase) and preceding M phase (cell division phase).

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (779 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The period of the cell cycle following DNA synthesis (S phase) and preceding M phase (cell division phase). The chromosomes are tetraploid in this point.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: G2 Phases; Phase, G2; Phases, G2; Gap Phase 2; Phase 2, Gap; Second Gap Phase; Gap Phase, Second; Gap Phases, Second.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Interphase
Narrower topics
G2 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints

Related concepts

  • Cell Cycle
  • Phase
  • Chromosomes

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 8,518 records tagged with the MeSH heading “G2 Phase” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 976 of them (11.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 3,665 records.

Reviews account for 256 records (3.0%) and meta-analyses for 0. Randomized controlled trials number 0 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,085 records; 2000-2009: 2,792 records; 2010-2019: 3,665 records; 2020 onward: 976 records1,085through 19992,7922000-20093,6652010-20199762020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,085
2000-20092,792
2010-20193,665
2020 onward976
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 3.0 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.0 percentReviews3.0% (256)Meta-analyses0.0% (0)Randomized controlled trials0.0% (0)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 8,518 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2563.0%
Meta-analyses00.0%
Randomized controlled trials00.0%

Method: PubMed query "G2 Phase"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in molecular biology

Molecular biology establishes mechanisms through controlled experiments, often in simplified systems such as purified proteins, cultured cells or model organisms. Such work can show what is possible in a defined system, but whether a pathway matters in a whole organism or in human disease needs further evidence. Check the experimental system, whether findings were reproduced by independent groups, and whether the authors tested the mechanism directly or inferred it from correlation.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Regulation of G2/M Transition by Inhibition of WEE1 and PKMYT1 Kinases
Schmidt M, Rohe A, Platzer C, Najjar A, Erdmann F, Sippl W
2017Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
177cc by
PMID 29168755 · DOI · PMC6149964
Withaferin A triggers G2/M arrest and intrinsic apoptosis in glioblastoma cells via ATF4-ATF3-CHOP axis
Tang Q, Ren L, Liu J, Li W, Zheng X, Wang J, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
90cc by
PMID 31642559 · DOI · PMC6985693
Histone deacetylase inhibitors promote glioma cell death by G2 checkpoint abrogation leading to mitotic catastrophe
Cornago M, Garcia-Alberich C, Blasco-Angulo N, Vall-Llaura N, Nager M, Herreros J, et al.
2014Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
87cc by
PMID 25275596 · DOI · PMC4237242
Changes in nuclear and actin mechanics from G1 to G2 affect nuclear integrity
Bunner S, Huang K, Shah A, Figueroa S, Lang N, Chu C, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 41549998 · DOI · PMC12989073

Regulation of G2/M Transition by Inhibition of WEE1 and PKMYT1 Kinases [1]

Review article Schmidt M, Rohe A, Platzer C, Najjar A, Erdmann F, Sippl W · · 2017 · cited 177 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
In the cell cycle, there are two checkpoint arrests that allow cells to repair damaged DNA in order to maintain genomic integrity.
Closing excerpt
Inhibition by a small molecule inhibitor is therefore proposed to be a promising option since WEE kinases bind Cdk1, altering equilibria and thus affecting G2/M transition.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (165 words)

In the cell cycle, there are two checkpoint arrests that allow cells to repair damaged DNA in order to maintain genomic integrity. Many cancer cells have defective G1 checkpoint mechanisms, thus depending on the G2 checkpoint far more than normal cells. G2 checkpoint abrogation is therefore a promising concept to preferably damage cancerous cells over normal cells. The main factor influencing the decision to enter mitosis is a complex composed of Cdk1 and cyclin B. Cdk1/CycB is regulated by various feedback mechanisms, in particular inhibitory phosphorylations at Thr14 and Tyr15 of Cdk1. In fact, Cdk1/CycB activity is restricted by the balance between WEE family kinases and Cdc25 phosphatases. The WEE kinase family consists of three proteins: WEE1, PKMYT1, and the less important WEE1B. WEE1 exclusively mediates phosphorylation at Tyr15, whereas PKMYT1 is dual-specific for Tyr15 as well as Thr14. Inhibition by a small molecule inhibitor is therefore proposed to be a promising option since WEE kinases bind Cdk1, altering equilibria and thus affecting G2/M transition.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29168755 · DOI · PMC6149964

Withaferin A triggers G2/M arrest and intrinsic apoptosis in glioblastoma cells via ATF4-ATF3-CHOP axis [2]

Research article Tang Q, Ren L, Liu J, Li W, Zheng X, Wang J, et al. · · 2020 · cited 90 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectiveWithaferin A (WA) is a bioactive compound with a remarkable anti-cancer effect derived from Withania somnifera, commonly known as ashwagandha.
Closing excerpt
This discovery is important for optimization of WA-based regimens for prevention and/or treatment of GBM.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (208 words)

ObjectiveWithaferin A (WA) is a bioactive compound with a remarkable anti-cancer effect derived from Withania somnifera, commonly known as ashwagandha. However, the anti-cancer mechanisms of WA in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are still unclear.Materials and methodsCell viability assays and xenografted nude mice were used to evaluate the effects of WA, along with flow cytometry to detect apoptosis and cell cycle of GBM. RNA-seq analysis, Western blotting, immunofluorescence staining, qRT-PCR and siRNA gene silencing were carried out to determine the signalling pathways affected by WA.ResultsWithaferin A significantly inhibited the growth of GBM in vitro and in vivo and triggered the intrinsic apoptosis of GBM cells by up-regulating expression of Bim and Bad. WA arrested GBM cells at the G2/M phase of the cell cycle through dephosphorylating Thr161 of CDK1 by activating p53-independent p21 up-regulation. Knockdown of p21 restored cell cycle progression and cell viability by down-regulating the expression of Bad rather than Bim. We demonstrated that endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress induced by WA through the ATF4-ATF3-CHOP axis, initiated apoptosis and G2/M arrest in GBM cells.ConclusionWe revealed a novel pathway that elucidated WA activation of apoptosis and G2/M arrest in GBM cells through the ATF4-ATF3-CHOP axis. This discovery is important for optimization of WA-based regimens for prevention and/or treatment of GBM.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31642559 · DOI · PMC6985693

Histone deacetylase inhibitors promote glioma cell death by G2 checkpoint abrogation leading to mitotic catastrophe [3]

Research article Cornago M, Garcia-Alberich C, Blasco-Angulo N, Vall-Llaura N, Nager M, Herreros J, et al. · · 2014 · cited 87 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Glioblastoma multiforme is resistant to conventional anti-tumoral treatments due to its infiltrative nature and capability of relapse; therefore, research efforts focus on characterizing gliomagenesis and identifying molecular targets useful on therapy.
Closing excerpt
Therefore, HDACi treatment causes glioma cell entry into mitosis before DNA damage could be repaired and to the formation of an aberrant mitotic spindle that results in glioma cell death through mitotic catastrophe-induced apoptosis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (222 words)

Glioblastoma multiforme is resistant to conventional anti-tumoral treatments due to its infiltrative nature and capability of relapse; therefore, research efforts focus on characterizing gliomagenesis and identifying molecular targets useful on therapy. New therapeutic strategies are being tested in patients, such as Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) either alone or in combination with other therapies. Here two HDACi included in clinical trials have been tested, suberanilohydroxamic acid (SAHA) and valproic acid (VPA), to characterize their effects on glioma cell growth in vitro and to determine the molecular changes that promote cancer cell death. We found that both HDACi reduce glioma cell viability, proliferation and clonogenicity. They have multiple effects, such as inducing the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and activating the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway, nevertheless cell death is not prevented by the pan-caspase inhibitor Q-VD-OPh. Importantly, we found that HDACi alter cell cycle progression by decreasing the expression of G2 checkpoint kinases Wee1 and checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1). In addition, HDACi reduce the expression of proteins involved in DNA repair (Rad51), mitotic spindle formation (TPX2) and chromosome segregation (Survivin) in glioma cells and in human glioblastoma multiforme primary cultures. Therefore, HDACi treatment causes glioma cell entry into mitosis before DNA damage could be repaired and to the formation of an aberrant mitotic spindle that results in glioma cell death through mitotic catastrophe-induced apoptosis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25275596 · DOI · PMC4237242

Changes in nuclear and actin mechanics from G1 to G2 affect nuclear integrity [4]

Research article Bunner S, Huang K, Shah A, Figueroa S, Lang N, Chu C, et al. · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The structural integrity of the nucleus is dependent on nuclear mechanical elements of chromatin and lamins resisting antagonistic actin cytoskeleton forces.
Closing excerpt
Cell cycle-based changes in nuclear and actin mechanics impact nuclear integrity and shape.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (184 words)

The structural integrity of the nucleus is dependent on nuclear mechanical elements of chromatin and lamins resisting antagonistic actin cytoskeleton forces. Force imbalance results in nuclear blebbing, rupture and cellular dysfunction found in many human diseases. Here, we used the fluorescent ubiquitin cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) cells to determine how cell cycle changes affect the nucleus and actin force balance. Whereas nuclear blebs were present equally throughout interphase, nuclear blebs formed predominantly in G1 and then persisted into G2. Actin-based nuclear confinement and focal adhesion density was greater in G1 versus G2 cells. Removal of focal adhesions through treatment with an inhibitor resulted in decreased nuclear confinement and blebbing, supporting this as the underlying mechanism. Upon artificial confinement, G2 nuclei ruptured more than G1 nuclei. Single nucleus micromanipulation force measurements confirmed that G1 nuclei were stiffer than G2 nuclei in both the chromatin-based and lamin-based nuclear stiffness regimes. Decreased nuclear stiffness can be explained by loss of peripheral H3K9me3 from G1 to G2, recapitulated by H3K9me3 inhibition through treatment with chaetocin. Cell cycle-based changes in nuclear and actin mechanics impact nuclear integrity and shape.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41549998 · DOI · PMC12989073

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Regulation of the G2/M transition by p53 [5]
    Taylor WR, Stark GR · Oncogene · 2001 · cited 1,163 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The impact of a negligent G2/M checkpoint on genomic instability and cancer induction [6]
    Löbrich M, Jeggo PA · Nat Rev Cancer · 2007 · cited 480 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The G2-phase DNA-damage checkpoint [7]
    O'Connell MJ, Walworth NC, Carr AM · Trends Cell Biol · 2000 · cited 276 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article G2 checkpoint abrogators as anticancer drugs [8]
    Kawabe T · Mol Cancer Ther · 2004 · cited 275 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article G2 checkpoint abrogation and checkpoint kinase-1 targeting in the treatment of cancer [9]
    Bucher N, Britten CD · Br J Cancer · 2008 · cited 268 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Checking out the G(2)/M transition [10]
    Smits VA, Medema RH · Biochim Biophys Acta · 2001 · cited 260 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Schmidt M, Rohe A, Platzer C, Najjar A, Erdmann F, Sippl W. Regulation of G2/M Transition by Inhibition of WEE1 and PKMYT1 Kinases. . 2017. PMID 29168755 · DOI · PMC6149964
  2. Tang Q, Ren L, Liu J, Li W, Zheng X, Wang J, et al.. Withaferin A triggers G2/M arrest and intrinsic apoptosis in glioblastoma cells via ATF4-ATF3-CHOP axis. . 2020. PMID 31642559 · DOI · PMC6985693
  3. Cornago M, Garcia-Alberich C, Blasco-Angulo N, Vall-Llaura N, Nager M, Herreros J, et al.. Histone deacetylase inhibitors promote glioma cell death by G2 checkpoint abrogation leading to mitotic catastrophe. . 2014. PMID 25275596 · DOI · PMC4237242
  4. Bunner S, Huang K, Shah A, Figueroa S, Lang N, Chu C, et al.. Changes in nuclear and actin mechanics from G1 to G2 affect nuclear integrity. . 2026. PMID 41549998 · DOI · PMC12989073
  5. Taylor WR, Stark GR. Regulation of the G2/M transition by p53. Oncogene. 2001. PMID 11313928 · DOI
  6. Löbrich M, Jeggo PA. The impact of a negligent G2/M checkpoint on genomic instability and cancer induction. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007. PMID 17943134 · DOI
  7. O'Connell MJ, Walworth NC, Carr AM. The G2-phase DNA-damage checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol. 2000. PMID 10856933 · DOI
  8. Kawabe T. G2 checkpoint abrogators as anticancer drugs. Mol Cancer Ther. 2004. PMID 15078995 · DOI
  9. Bucher N, Britten CD. G2 checkpoint abrogation and checkpoint kinase-1 targeting in the treatment of cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008. PMID 18231106 · DOI · PMC2243162
  10. Smits VA, Medema RH. Checking out the G(2)/M transition. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001. PMID 11406266 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • G1 PhaseMolecular Biology
  • S PhaseMolecular Biology
  • InterphaseMolecular Biology
  • MitosisMolecular Biology
  • MeiosisMolecular Biology
  • Cell CycleMolecular Biology

All 100 articles in Molecular Biology →

At a glance

8,518
PubMed records on this heading
11%
published since 2020
256
review articles
0
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • G1 PhaseMolecular Biology
  • S PhaseMolecular Biology
  • InterphaseMolecular Biology
  • MitosisMolecular Biology
  • MeiosisMolecular Biology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support