Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Digestive System and Liver›Mucositis

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Mucositis

Digestive System and Liver · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

An inflammation of the mucosa with burning or tingling sensation.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (837 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

An inflammation of the mucosa with burning or tingling sensation. It is characterized by atrophy of the squamous epithelium, vascular damage, inflammatory infiltration, and ulceration. It usually occurs at the mucous lining of the mouth, the gastrointestinal tract or the airway due to chemical irritations, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy (radiotherapy).

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Mucositides.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Gastroenteritis; Mouth Diseases

Related concepts

  • Inflammation
  • Mucous Membrane
  • Epithelium
  • Mouth
  • Gastrointestinal Tract
  • Drug Therapy
  • Radiotherapy

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 2,323 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Mucositis” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 834 of them (35.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 1,081 records.

Reviews account for 426 records (18.3%) and meta-analyses for 55. Randomized controlled trials number 169 (7.3%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 422 records; 2010-2019: 1,081 records; 2020 onward: 834 records0through 19994222000-20091,0812010-20198342020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-2009422
2010-20191,081
2020 onward834
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 18.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 2.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 7.3 percentReviews18.3% (426)Meta-analyses2.4% (55)Randomized controlled trials7.3% (169)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 2,323 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews42618.3%
Meta-analyses552.4%
Randomized controlled trials1697.3%

Method: PubMed query "Mucositis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.

Reading the evidence in digestive system and liver

Gut and liver research ranges from laboratory studies of the microbiome to large trials of drugs and surgery. Symptoms such as pain, reflux or bowel change are reported by patients and overlap between conditions, and diet and microbiome studies are mostly observational. Check whether the study measured symptoms, tissue findings or long-term outcomes, how the diagnosis was made and how long people were followed. Nothing here replaces advice from a qualified clinician.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Glutamine for Amelioration of Radiation and Chemotherapy Associated Mucositis during Cancer Therapy
Anderson PM, Lalla RV
2020Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
102cc by
PMID 32512833 · DOI · PMC7352314
Microbiota from alginate oligosaccharide-dosed mice successfully mitigated small intestinal mucositis
Zhang P, Liu J, Xiong B, Zhang C, Kang B, Gao Y, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
80cc by
PMID 32711581 · DOI · PMC7382812
Interventions for the Prevention of Oral Mucositis in Patients Receiving Cancer Treatment: Evidence from Randomised Controlled Trials
Colella G, Boschetti CE, Vitagliano R, Colella C, Jiao L, King-Smith N, et al.
2023Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
71cc by
PMID 36661723 · DOI · PMC9858113
Mucositis Pain and Its Temporal Relationship to White Cell Count
Douglas C, Morse JD, Anderson BJ
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 39757886 · DOI · PMC11883507

Glutamine for Amelioration of Radiation and Chemotherapy Associated Mucositis during Cancer Therapy [1]

Review article Anderson PM, Lalla RV · · 2020 · cited 102 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Glutamine is a major dietary amino acid that is both a fuel and nitrogen donor for healing tissues damaged by chemotherapy and radiation.
Closing excerpt
Topical and oral glutamine seem to be the preferred routes for this amino acid to promote mucosal healing during and after cancer treatment.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (137 words)

Glutamine is a major dietary amino acid that is both a fuel and nitrogen donor for healing tissues damaged by chemotherapy and radiation. Evidence supports the benefit of oral (enteral) glutamine to reduce symptoms and improve and/or maintain quality of life of cancer patients. Benefits include not only better nutrition, but also decreased mucosal damage (mucositis, stomatitis, pharyngitis, esophagitis, and enteritis). Glutamine supplementation in a high protein diet (10 grams/day) + disaccharides, such as sucrose and/or trehalose, is a combination that increases glutamine uptake by mucosal cells. This increased topical effect can reduce painful mucosal symptoms and ulceration associated with chemotherapy and radiation in the head and neck region, esophagus, stomach and small intestine. Topical and oral glutamine seem to be the preferred routes for this amino acid to promote mucosal healing during and after cancer treatment.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32512833 · DOI · PMC7352314

Microbiota from alginate oligosaccharide-dosed mice successfully mitigated small intestinal mucositis [2]

Research article Zhang P, Liu J, Xiong B, Zhang C, Kang B, Gao Y, et al. · · 2020 · cited 80 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundThe increasing incidence of cancer and intestinal mucositis induced by chemotherapeutics are causing worldwide concern.
Closing excerpt
Video Abstract.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (213 words)

BackgroundThe increasing incidence of cancer and intestinal mucositis induced by chemotherapeutics are causing worldwide concern. Many approaches such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) have been used to minimize mucositis. However, it is still unknown whether FMT from a donor with beneficial gut microbiota results in more effective intestinal function in the recipient. Recently, we found that alginate oligosaccharides (AOS) benefit murine gut microbiota through increasing "beneficial" microbes to rescue busulfan induced mucositis.ResultsIn the current investigation, FMT from AOS-dosed mice improved small intestine function over FMT from control mice through the recovery of gene expression and an increase in the levels of cell junction proteins. FMT from AOS-dosed mice showed superior benefits over FMT from control mice on recipient gut microbiotas through an increase in "beneficial" microbes such as Leuconostocaceae and recovery in blood metabolome. Furthermore, the correlation of gut microbiota and blood metabolites suggested that the "beneficial" microbe Lactobacillales helped with the recovery of blood metabolites, while the "harmful" microbe Mycoplasmatales did not.ConclusionThe data confirm our hypothesis that FMT from a donor with superior microbes leads to a more profound recovery of small intestinal function. We propose that gut microbiota from naturally produced AOS-treated donor may be used to prevent small intestinal mucositis induced by chemotherapeutics or other factors in recipients. Video Abstract.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32711581 · DOI · PMC7382812

Interventions for the Prevention of Oral Mucositis in Patients Receiving Cancer Treatment: Evidence from Randomised Controlled Trials [3]

Review article Colella G, Boschetti CE, Vitagliano R, Colella C, Jiao L, King-Smith N, et al. · · 2023 · cited 71 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Oral mucositis is a common and most debilitating complication associated with cancer therapy.
Closing excerpt
The results of our review may assist in highlighting the efficacy and testing the effectiveness of low-cost, safe preventative measures for oral mucositis in cancer patients.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (197 words)

Oral mucositis is a common and most debilitating complication associated with cancer therapy. Despite the significant clinical and economic impact of this condition, there is little to offer to patients with oral mucositis, and the medications used in its management are generally only palliative. Given that mucositis is ultimately a predictable and, therefore, potentially preventable condition, in this study we appraised the scientific literature to evaluate effective methods of prevention that have been tested in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Published high-level evidence shows that multiple preventative methods are potentially effective in the prevention of oral mucositis induced by radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or both. Anti-inflammatory medications (including benzydamine), growth factors and cytokines (including palifermin), cryotherapy, laser-and-light therapy, herbal medicines and supplements, and mucoprotective agents (including oral pilocarpine) showed some degree of efficacy in preventing/reducing the severity of mucositis with most anticancer treatments. Allopurinol was potentially effective in the prevention of radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis; antimicrobial mouthwash and erythropoietin mouthwash were associated with a lower risk of development of severe oral mucositis induced by chemotherapy. The results of our review may assist in highlighting the efficacy and testing the effectiveness of low-cost, safe preventative measures for oral mucositis in cancer patients.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36661723 · DOI · PMC9858113

Mucositis Pain and Its Temporal Relationship to White Cell Count [4]

Research article Douglas C, Morse JD, Anderson BJ · · 2025

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundChildren who have received chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy treatment resulting in neutropenia can suffer painful mucositis.
Closing excerpt
This analgesic response to increasing white cell count had greater dominance than analgesia achieved using either opioids or ketamine.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (290 words)

BackgroundChildren who have received chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy treatment resulting in neutropenia can suffer painful mucositis. We explored the relationship between pain score and white cell count in children with mucositis due to immunosuppression and assessed the influence of opioid and ketamine analgesia.MethodsChildren with mucositis nursed in the pediatric oncology and hematology ward were invited to partake in this observational study following referral to the pediatric pain service for intravenous analgesia. Pain scores, white cell count, neutrophil count, and analgesia requirements were recorded daily until intravenous analgesia was either stopped or transitioned to oral analgesia. Data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed effects models that sought a relationship between white cell count and pain score using a sigmoid maximal effect (EMAX) model. The impact of analgesic use on pain score was determined. The temporal relationship between white cell count and pain score was characterized by using a delayed effect model with an equilibration half-time.ResultsFifty children were enrolled in the study from January 2022 to December 2023. The equilibration half-time relating the rise in white cell count and pain response was 0.29 days. The initial pain score (estimated in those children already started on treatment with paracetamol and tramadol) was 6.3 (maximum pain 10). The maximum pain reduction was 59% of that initial pain score. Morphine and ketamine further reduced pain; the maximum response for opioids was 38% reduction and that for ketamine was 11%.ConclusionPain relief from mucositis is related to an increase in white cell count after a period of severe neutropenia, where white cell count is a surrogate for neutrophil count. There is a delay in analgesic response of approximately 1 day. This analgesic response to increasing white cell count had greater dominance than analgesia achieved using either opioids or ketamine.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39757886 · DOI · PMC11883507

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy [5]
    Lalla RV, Bowen J, Barasch A, Elting L, Epstein J, Keefe DM, et al. · Cancer · 2014 · cited 733 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy [6]
    Elad S, Cheng KKF, Lalla RV, Yarom N, Hong C, Logan RM, et al. · Cancer · 2020 · cited 537 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Prevention and treatment of peri-implant diseases-The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline [7]
    Herrera D, Berglundh T, Schwarz F, Schwarz F, Chapple I, Jepsen S, et al. · J Clin Periodontol · 2023 · cited 406 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Prevalences of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis: systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
    Lee CT, Huang YW, Zhu L, Weltman R · J Dent · 2017 · cited 365 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Systematic review: the role of the gut microbiota in chemotherapy- or radiation-induced gastrointestinal mucositis - current evidence and potential clinical applications [9]
    Touchefeu Y, Montassier E, Nieman K, Gastinne T, Potel G, Bruley des Varannes S, et al. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther · 2014 · cited 325 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: Case definitions and diagnostic considerations [10]
    Renvert S, Persson GR, Pirih FQ, Camargo PM · J Periodontol · 2018 · cited 267 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Anderson PM, Lalla RV. Glutamine for Amelioration of Radiation and Chemotherapy Associated Mucositis during Cancer Therapy. . 2020. PMID 32512833 · DOI · PMC7352314
  2. Zhang P, Liu J, Xiong B, Zhang C, Kang B, Gao Y, et al.. Microbiota from alginate oligosaccharide-dosed mice successfully mitigated small intestinal mucositis. . 2020. PMID 32711581 · DOI · PMC7382812
  3. Colella G, Boschetti CE, Vitagliano R, Colella C, Jiao L, King-Smith N, et al.. Interventions for the Prevention of Oral Mucositis in Patients Receiving Cancer Treatment: Evidence from Randomised Controlled Trials. . 2023. PMID 36661723 · DOI · PMC9858113
  4. Douglas C, Morse JD, Anderson BJ. Mucositis Pain and Its Temporal Relationship to White Cell Count. . 2025. PMID 39757886 · DOI · PMC11883507
  5. Lalla RV, Bowen J, Barasch A, Elting L, Epstein J, Keefe DM, et al.. MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy. Cancer. 2014. PMID 24615748 · DOI · PMC4164022
  6. Elad S, Cheng KKF, Lalla RV, Yarom N, Hong C, Logan RM, et al.. MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy. Cancer. 2020. PMID 32786044 · DOI · PMC7540329
  7. Herrera D, Berglundh T, Schwarz F, Schwarz F, Chapple I, Jepsen S, et al.. Prevention and treatment of peri-implant diseases-The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline. J Clin Periodontol. 2023. PMID 37271498 · DOI
  8. Lee CT, Huang YW, Zhu L, Weltman R. Prevalences of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2017. PMID 28478213 · DOI
  9. Touchefeu Y, Montassier E, Nieman K, Gastinne T, Potel G, Bruley des Varannes S, et al.. Systematic review: the role of the gut microbiota in chemotherapy- or radiation-induced gastrointestinal mucositis - current evidence and potential clinical applications. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014. PMID 25040088 · DOI
  10. Renvert S, Persson GR, Pirih FQ, Camargo PM. Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: Case definitions and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018. PMID 29926953 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • GastroenteritisDigestive System and Liver
  • DiverticulumDigestive System and Liver
  • Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesDigestive System and Liver
  • Crohn DiseaseDigestive System and Liver
  • PouchitisDigestive System and Liver
  • EnterocolitisDigestive System and Liver

All 66 articles in Digestive System and Liver →

At a glance

2,323
PubMed records on this heading
36%
published since 2020
426
review articles
169
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-11-04; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • GastroenteritisDigestive System and Liver
  • DiverticulumDigestive System and Liver
  • Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesDigestive System and Liver
  • Crohn DiseaseDigestive System and Liver
  • PouchitisDigestive System and Liver

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support