Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Diagnostics and Medical Technology›Microscopy

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Microscopy

Diagnostics and Medical Technology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 3 min read

The use of instrumentation and techniques for visualizing material and details that cannot be seen by the unaided eye.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. Full-text reviews7. References8. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (423 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The use of instrumentation and techniques for visualizing material and details that cannot be seen by the unaided eye. It is usually done by enlarging images, transmitted by light or electron beams, with optical or magnetic lenses that magnify the entire image field. With scanning microscopy, images are generated by collecting output from the specimen in a point-by-point fashion, on a magnified scale, as it is scanned by a narrow beam of light or electrons, a laser, a conductive probe, or a topographical probe.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Optical Microscopy; Microscopy, Optical; Compound Microscopy; Microscopy, Compound; Hand-Held Microscopy; Hand Held Microscopy; Microscopy, Hand-Held; Light Microscopy.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Diagnostic Imaging; Investigative Techniques; Optics and Photonics
Narrower topics
Intravital Microscopy; Microscopy, Acoustic; Microscopy, Confocal; Microscopy, Electron; Microscopy, Fluorescence; Microscopy, Interference; Microscopy, Polarization; Microscopy, Scanning Probe; Microscopy, Ultraviolet; Microscopy, Video; Nonlinear Optical Microscopy; Nuclear Microscopy; Photomicrography; Single Molecule Imaging

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 598,933 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Microscopy” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 49,410 of them (8.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 257,298 records.

Reviews account for 22,867 records (3.8%) and meta-analyses for 167. Randomized controlled trials number 1,811 (0.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 257,298 records; 2000-2009: 133,482 records; 2010-2019: 158,743 records; 2020 onward: 49,410 records257,298through 1999133,4822000-2009158,7432010-201949,4102020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999257,298
2000-2009133,482
2010-2019158,743
2020 onward49,410
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 3.8 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.3 percentReviews3.8% (22,867)Meta-analyses0.0% (167)Randomized controlled trials0.3% (1,811)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 598,933 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews22,8673.8%
Meta-analyses1670.0%
Randomized controlled trials1,8110.3%

Method: PubMed query "Microscopy"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.

Reading the evidence in diagnostics and medical technology

A test or device is judged by how well it detects a condition, how often it gives false alarms or misses cases, and whether using it improves outcomes for people. Accuracy depends on who is tested and how common the condition is, so a test that performs well in a specialist hospital can perform differently in the community. Check the reference standard, the population studied, the sensitivity and specificity and whether results were confirmed in a separate group.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
AreTomoLive: automated reconstruction of comprehensively corrected and denoised cryo-electron tomograms in real time and at high throughput
Peck A, Yu Y, Paraan M, Kimanius D, Ermel UH, Hutchings J, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
17cc by
PMID 42185541 · DOI · PMC13259924
A multimodal adaptive optical microscope for in vivo imaging from molecules to organisms
Fu TM, Liu G, Milkie DE, Ruan X, Görlitz F, Shi Y, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
10cc by
PMID 42174242 · DOI · PMC13310421
In situ cryo-ET defines the ultrastructure of ER exit sites in human cells
Downes KW, Flood JR, Nans A, Van der Verren SE, Audhya A, Zanetti G
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
8cc by
PMID 42162283 · DOI · PMC13279273

AreTomoLive: automated reconstruction of comprehensively corrected and denoised cryo-electron tomograms in real time and at high throughput [1]

Research article Peck A, Yu Y, Paraan M, Kimanius D, Ermel UH, Hutchings J, et al. · · 2026 · cited 17 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
High-throughput data processing is necessary to realize the full potential of cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging.
Closing excerpt
Collectively, this pipeline prioritizes automation to support data preprocessing concurrent with data collection at scale.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (97 words)

High-throughput data processing is necessary to realize the full potential of cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging. The field's fragmented software landscape remains a considerable hurdle to this end. Here we present AreTomoLive, an automated preprocessing pipeline composed of two GPU-accelerated packages. The first, AreTomo3, streamlines tomographic alignment and reconstruction, with new features to fully account for sample geometry and locally correct the contrast transfer function. The second package, DenoisET, leverages AreTomo3's comprehensively corrected tomograms to retain more intermediate-resolution features during contrast enhancement. Collectively, this pipeline prioritizes automation to support data preprocessing concurrent with data collection at scale.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42185541 · DOI · PMC13259924

A multimodal adaptive optical microscope for in vivo imaging from molecules to organisms [2]

Research article Fu TM, Liu G, Milkie DE, Ruan X, Görlitz F, Shi Y, et al. · · 2026 · cited 10 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Understanding biological systems requires observing features and processes across vast spatial and temporal scales, spanning nanometers to centimeters and milliseconds to days, often using multiple imaging modalities within complex native microenvironments.
Closing excerpt
MOSAIC facilitates correlative studies across biological scales within the same specimen, providing an integrated platform for broad biological investigation.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (148 words)

Understanding biological systems requires observing features and processes across vast spatial and temporal scales, spanning nanometers to centimeters and milliseconds to days, often using multiple imaging modalities within complex native microenvironments. Yet, achieving this comprehensive view is challenging because microscopes optimized for specific tasks typically lack versatility due to inherent optical and sample handling tradeoffs, and frequently suffer performance degradation from sample-induced optical aberrations in multicellular contexts. Here, we present Multimodal Optical Scope with Adaptive Imaging Correction (MOSAIC), a reconfigurable microscope that integrates multiple advanced imaging techniques including light-sheet, label-free, super-resolution and multiphoton, all equipped with adaptive optics. MOSAIC enables noninvasive imaging of subcellular dynamics in both cultured cells and live multicellular organisms, nanoscale mapping of molecular architectures across millimeter-scale expanded tissues and structural/functional neural imaging within live mice. MOSAIC facilitates correlative studies across biological scales within the same specimen, providing an integrated platform for broad biological investigation.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42174242 · DOI · PMC13310421

In situ cryo-ET defines the ultrastructure of ER exit sites in human cells [3]

Research article Downes KW, Flood JR, Nans A, Van der Verren SE, Audhya A, Zanetti G · · 2026 · cited 8 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Trafficking of secretory proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi apparatus comprises the first, essential steps towards the appropriate localization of 30% of eukaryotic proteins.
Closing excerpt
We quantify coated vesicle morphology and positioning with respect to other ER exit site components, providing a molecular description of the organization of the mammalian early secretory pathway.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (178 words)

Trafficking of secretory proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi apparatus comprises the first, essential steps towards the appropriate localization of 30% of eukaryotic proteins. Coat protein complexes COPII and COPI are involved in the forward and retrograde transport of cargo and cargo receptors between the ER and the Golgi, respectively. Although COPII forms coated vesicles in vitro, the biogenesis, morphology and organization of transport carriers in mammalian cells is subject to debate. Here we use in situ cryo-electron tomography and super-resolution fluorescence microscopy to reveal the molecular architecture of ER exit sites in human cells that were not perturbed with drugs, temperature blocks or overexpression systems. We visualize ribosome-exclusion zones enriched with COPII- and COPI-coated vesicles and thus resolve the debate regarding the existence of COPII-coated vesicles. COPII vesicles derive from ER membranes, whereas COPI vesicles originate from vesicular-tubular clusters that constitute the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC). We quantify coated vesicle morphology and positioning with respect to other ER exit site components, providing a molecular description of the organization of the mammalian early secretory pathway.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42162283 · DOI · PMC13279273

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting [4]
    Vestergaard ME, Macaskill P, Holt PE, Menzies SW · Br J Dermatol · 2008 · cited 498 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for basal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis [5]
    Reiter O, Mimouni I, Gdalevich M, Marghoob AA, Levi A, Hodak E, et al. · J Am Acad Dermatol · 2019 · cited 109 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Meta-analysis of digital dermoscopy follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions: a study on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society [6]
    Salerni G, Terán T, Puig S, Malvehy J, Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, et al. · J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol · 2013 · cited 101 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Diagnostic accuracy of same-day microscopy versus standard microscopy for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
    Davis JL, Cattamanchi A, Cuevas LE, Hopewell PC, Steingart KR · Lancet Infect Dis · 2013 · cited 86 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
    Gad H, Petropoulos IN, Khan A, Ponirakis G, MacDonald R, Alam U, et al. · J Diabetes Investig · 2022 · cited 76 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Corneal confocal microscopy for assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a meta-analysis [9]
    Jiang MS, Yuan Y, Gu ZX, Zhuang SL · Br J Ophthalmol · 2016 · cited 75 times (Europe PMC)

Full-text reviews on EvidenceLib

Open-access review articles about this topic, reproduced in full with authors, licence and references.

  • Cryogenic Electron Microscopy Methodologies as Analytical Tools for the Study of Self-Assembled Pharmaceutics

    Na’ama Koifman, Yeshayahu Talmon, Sandra Ristori et al. · Pharmaceutics 2021 · CC BY 4.0

  • Optical Methods for Non-Invasive Determination of Skin Penetration: Current Trends, Advances, Possibilities, Prospects, and Translation into In Vivo Human Studies

    Maxim E. Darvin · Pharmaceutics 2023 · CC BY 4.0

References

  1. Peck A, Yu Y, Paraan M, Kimanius D, Ermel UH, Hutchings J, et al.. AreTomoLive: automated reconstruction of comprehensively corrected and denoised cryo-electron tomograms in real time and at high throughput. . 2026. PMID 42185541 · DOI · PMC13259924
  2. Fu TM, Liu G, Milkie DE, Ruan X, Görlitz F, Shi Y, et al.. A multimodal adaptive optical microscope for in vivo imaging from molecules to organisms. . 2026. PMID 42174242 · DOI · PMC13310421
  3. Downes KW, Flood JR, Nans A, Van der Verren SE, Audhya A, Zanetti G. In situ cryo-ET defines the ultrastructure of ER exit sites in human cells. . 2026. PMID 42162283 · DOI · PMC13279273
  4. Vestergaard ME, Macaskill P, Holt PE, Menzies SW. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol. 2008. PMID 18616769 · DOI
  5. Reiter O, Mimouni I, Gdalevich M, Marghoob AA, Levi A, Hodak E, et al.. The diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for basal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019. PMID 30582991 · DOI
  6. Salerni G, Terán T, Puig S, Malvehy J, Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, et al.. Meta-analysis of digital dermoscopy follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions: a study on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013. PMID 23181611 · DOI
  7. Davis JL, Cattamanchi A, Cuevas LE, Hopewell PC, Steingart KR. Diagnostic accuracy of same-day microscopy versus standard microscopy for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013. PMID 23099183 · DOI · PMC3836432
  8. Gad H, Petropoulos IN, Khan A, Ponirakis G, MacDonald R, Alam U, et al.. Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Investig. 2022. PMID 34351711 · DOI · PMC8756328
  9. Jiang MS, Yuan Y, Gu ZX, Zhuang SL. Corneal confocal microscopy for assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID 25677672 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Molecular ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • DermoscopyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Optical ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • AortographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Brain MappingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • CholangiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology

All 110 articles in Diagnostics and Medical Technology →

At a glance

598,933
PubMed records on this heading
8%
published since 2020
22,867
review articles
1,811
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-11-04; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Molecular ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • DermoscopyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Optical ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • AortographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Brain MappingDiagnostics and Medical Technology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support