Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (940 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The period in the menstrual cycle that follows ovulation, characterized by the development of corpus luteum, increase in progesterone production by the ovary and secretion by the glandular epithelium of the endometrium. The luteal phase begins with ovulation and ends with the onset of menstruation.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Phase, Luteal; Menstrual Cycle, Luteal Phase; Postovulatory Phase; Phase, Postovulatory; Menstrual Secretory Phase; Secretory Phase, Menstrual; Menstrual Cycle, Secretory Phase.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Menstrual Cycle
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 5,673 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Luteal Phase” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 552 of them (9.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,774 records.
Reviews account for 435 records (7.7%) and meta-analyses for 76. Randomized controlled trials number 518 (9.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 2,774 |
| 2000-2009 | 1,286 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,061 |
| 2020 onward | 552 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 435 | 7.7% |
| Meta-analyses | 76 | 1.3% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 518 | 9.1% |
Method: PubMed query "Luteal Phase"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Higher Circulating Cortisol in the Follicular vs. Luteal Phase of the Menstrual Cycle: A Meta-Analysis [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Although results of animal research show that interactions between stress and sex hormones are implicated in the development of affective disorders in women, translation of these findings to patients has been scarce.
- Closing excerpt
- As cortisol regulation is a delicate process, we review some of the basic mechanisms by which progesterone, its potent metabolites, and estradiol regulate cortisol output and circulation to contribute to the net effect of higher cortisol in the follicular phase.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (277 words)
Although results of animal research show that interactions between stress and sex hormones are implicated in the development of affective disorders in women, translation of these findings to patients has been scarce. As a basic step toward advancing this field of research, we analyzed findings of studies which reported circulating cortisol levels in healthy women in the follicular vs. luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. We deemed this analysis critical not only to advance our understanding of basic physiology, but also as an important contrast to the findings of future studies evaluating stress and sex hormones in women with affective disorders. We hypothesized that cortisol levels would be lower in the follicular phase based on the proposition that changes in levels of potent GABAergic neurosteroids, including allopregnanolone, during the menstrual cycle dynamically change in the opposite direction relative to cortisol levels. Implementing strict inclusion criteria, we compiled results of high-quality studies involving 778 study participants to derive a standardized mean difference between circulating cortisol levels in the follicular vs. luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. In line with our hypothesis, our meta-analysis found that women in the follicular phase had higher cortisol levels than women in the luteal phase, with an overall Hedges' g of 0.13 (p < 0.01) for the random effects model. No significant between-study difference was detected, with the level of heterogeneity in the small range. Furthermore, there was no evidence of publication bias. As cortisol regulation is a delicate process, we review some of the basic mechanisms by which progesterone, its potent metabolites, and estradiol regulate cortisol output and circulation to contribute to the net effect of higher cortisol in the follicular phase.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32582024 · DOI · PMC7280552
Optimising Follicular Development, Pituitary Suppression, Triggering and Luteal Phase Support During Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Delphi Consensus [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundA Delphi consensus was conducted to evaluate global expert opinions on key aspects of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment.
- Closing excerpt
- Additional guidance from clinicians on ART strategies could complement guidelines and policies, and may help to further improve treatment outcomes.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (284 words)
BackgroundA Delphi consensus was conducted to evaluate global expert opinions on key aspects of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment.MethodsTen experts plus the Scientific Coordinator discussed and amended statements plus supporting references proposed by the Scientific Coordinator. The statements were distributed via an online survey to 35 experts, who voted on their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement. Consensus was reached if the proportion of participants agreeing or disagreeing with a statement was >66%.ResultsEighteen statements were developed. All statements reached consensus and the most relevant are summarised here. (1) Follicular development and stimulation with gonadotropins (n = 9 statements): Recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) alone is sufficient for follicular development in normogonadotropic patients aged (2) Pituitary suppression (n = 2 statements): Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists are associated with lower rates of any grade ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and cycle cancellation versus GnRH agonists. (3) Final oocyte maturation triggering (n=4 statements): Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) represents the gold standard in fresh cycles. The efficacy of hCG triggering for frozen transfers in modified natural cycles is controversial compared with LH peak monitoring. Current evidence supports significantly higher pregnancy rates with hCG + GnRH agonist versus hCG alone, but further evidence is needed. GnRH agonist trigger, in GnRH antagonist protocol, is recommended for final oocyte maturation in women at risk of OHSS. (4) Luteal-phase support (n = 3 statements): Vaginal progesterone therapy represents the gold standard for luteal-phase support.ConclusionsThis Delphi consensus provides a real-world clinical perspective on the specific approaches during the key steps of ART treatment from a diverse group of international experts. Additional guidance from clinicians on ART strategies could complement guidelines and policies, and may help to further improve treatment outcomes.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34040586 · DOI · PMC8142593
Peak visual gamma frequency is modified across the healthy menstrual cycle [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Fluctuations in gonadal hormones over the course of the menstrual cycle are known to cause functional brain changes and are thought to modulate changes in the balance of cortical excitation and inhibition.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings show that complex functional changes in synaptic microcircuitry occur across the menstrual cycle and that menstrual cycle phase should be taken into consideration when including female participants in research into gamma-band oscillations.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (201 words)
Fluctuations in gonadal hormones over the course of the menstrual cycle are known to cause functional brain changes and are thought to modulate changes in the balance of cortical excitation and inhibition. Animal research has shown this occurs primarily via the major metabolite of progesterone, allopregnanolone, and its action as a positive allosteric modulator of the GABAA receptor. Our study used EEG to record gamma oscillations induced in the visual cortex using stationary and moving gratings. Recordings took place during twenty females' mid-luteal phase when progesterone and estradiol are highest, and early follicular phase when progesterone and estradiol are lowest. Significantly higher (∼5 Hz) gamma frequency was recorded during the luteal compared to the follicular phase for both stimuli types. Using dynamic causal modeling, these changes were linked to stronger self-inhibition of superficial pyramidal cells in the luteal compared to the follicular phase. In addition, the connection from inhibitory interneurons to deep pyramidal cells was found to be stronger in the follicular compared to the luteal phase. These findings show that complex functional changes in synaptic microcircuitry occur across the menstrual cycle and that menstrual cycle phase should be taken into consideration when including female participants in research into gamma-band oscillations.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29665216 · DOI · PMC6055613
Urine Progesterone Level as a Diagnostics Tool to Evaluate the Need for Luteal Phase Rescue in Hormone Replacement Therapy Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Additional progesterone administration during the luteal phase enhances reproductive outcomes in Hormone Replacement Therapy Frozen Embryo Transfer (HRT-FET) cycles in patients with low serum progesterone (P4).
- Closing excerpt
- The findings of the present study suggest that urine progesterone could be a valuable diagnostic tool to evaluate the need for additional progesterone in HRT-FET cycles.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (178 words)
Additional progesterone administration during the luteal phase enhances reproductive outcomes in Hormone Replacement Therapy Frozen Embryo Transfer (HRT-FET) cycles in patients with low serum progesterone (P4). In this study we wanted to explore the use of urine P4 as a diagnostic tool during the luteal phase. This prospective observational cohort included a total of 464 HRT-FET cycles. The protocol entailed oral oestradiol (6 mg/24 h), followed by vaginal micronised progesterone (400 mg/12 h). On the day of blastocyst transfer, urine and serum samples were collected. Urine samples were analysed using an ARCHITECT automated immunoassay. A significant difference was found in median urine P4 between patients with serum P4 higher or lower than 11 ng/mL: 6400 ng/mL IQR [2528; 11,930] vs. 3408 ng/mL IQR [592; 6688], p p = 0.013). The odds ratio for live birth was 1.8 in patients with urine P4 ≥ 4000 ng/mL, 95% CI [1.067; 3.018], p = 0.028. The findings of the present study suggest that urine progesterone could be a valuable diagnostic tool to evaluate the need for additional progesterone in HRT-FET cycles.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41226830 · DOI · PMC12610767
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Oxidative stress and ageing of the post-ovulatory oocyte [5]
- Research article Luteal phase support in infertility treatment: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials [6]
- Research article Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles [7]
- Research article Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and luteal phase consequences [8]
- Research article An update of luteal phase support in stimulated IVF cycles [9]
- Research article Luteolysis induced by a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is the key to prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome [10]
References
- Hamidovic A, Karapetyan K, Serdarevic F, Choi SH, Eisenlohr-Moul T, Pinna G. Higher Circulating Cortisol in the Follicular vs. Luteal Phase of the Menstrual Cycle: A Meta-Analysis. . 2020. PMID 32582024 · DOI · PMC7280552
- Orvieto R, Venetis CA, Fatemi HM, D'Hooghe T, Fischer R, Koloda Y, et al.. Optimising Follicular Development, Pituitary Suppression, Triggering and Luteal Phase Support During Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Delphi Consensus. . 2021. PMID 34040586 · DOI · PMC8142593
- Sumner RL, McMillan RL, Shaw AD, Singh KD, Sundram F, Muthukumaraswamy SD. Peak visual gamma frequency is modified across the healthy menstrual cycle. . 2018. PMID 29665216 · DOI · PMC6055613
- Hansen LY, Fujisawa T, Povlsen BB, Laursen RJ, Jensen MB, Humaidan P, et al.. Urine Progesterone Level as a Diagnostics Tool to Evaluate the Need for Luteal Phase Rescue in Hormone Replacement Therapy Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles. . 2025. PMID 41226830 · DOI · PMC12610767
- Lord T, Aitken RJ. Oxidative stress and ageing of the post-ovulatory oocyte. Reproduction. 2013. PMID 23950493 · DOI
- Pritts EA, Atwood AK. Luteal phase support in infertility treatment: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Hum Reprod. 2002. PMID 12202415 · DOI
- van der Linden M, Buckingham K, Farquhar C, Kremer JA, Metwally M. Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID 26148507 · DOI · PMC6461197
- Fauser BC, Devroey P. Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and luteal phase consequences. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003. PMID 12826330 · DOI
- Fatemi HM, Popovic-Todorovic B, Papanikolaou E, Donoso P, Devroey P. An update of luteal phase support in stimulated IVF cycles. Hum Reprod Update. 2007. PMID 17626114 · DOI
- Kol S. Luteolysis induced by a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is the key to prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004. PMID 14711532 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.